ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07755007PTS-HEMO-EDUpdated Sep 23, 2026

Pneumatic Tube System Versus Personnel Transport and the Hemolysis Index of Emergency Department Blood Samples: A Randomized, Split-Sample, Single-Blind Trial

An interventional study of Pneumatic Tube System Transport and Manual Personnel Transport in Hemolysis, Diagnostic Errors and Blood Specimen Collection, sponsored by Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
166
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hemolysis is the most common pre-analytical error in emergency department (ED) laboratory specimens and can lead to false elevation of intracellular analytes (potassium, LDH, AST, hemoglobin), resulting in misdiagnosis and unnecessary testing. Blood samples in the ED are transported to the laboratory either by pneumatic tube systems (PTS) or manually by personnel. Although PTS shortens turnaround time, the forces generated during transport may damage erythrocyte membranes and promote hemolysis. Evidence on whether PTS increases hemolysis compared with personnel transport is inconsistent, partly because existing studies use parallel-group designs that cannot control for between-subject biological variability, and partly because findings differ across PTS brands and configurations. The Sumetzberger Power Control PTS installed at Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital (speed 4-5 m/s, 120 m, cushioned capsule) has not been prospectively validated for hemolysis risk. This study uses a randomized, split-sample (within-patient matched), single-blind design in which two simultaneously drawn yellow-cap tubes from the same patient are randomly allocated, one to PTS and one to personnel transport, thereby eliminating between-patient variability. The primary outcome is the Hemolysis Index (HI) category (ordinal scale 0-5 corresponding to free hemoglobin thresholds of \<50, 50-99, 100-199, 200-299, 300-500, and >500 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes include the rate of clinically significant hemolysis (HI >= 1 / free Hb >= 50 mg/dL) and the correlation between transport time and HI.

Read the detailed description

PNEUMATIC TUBE SYSTEM TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

The installed pneumatic tube system is a Sumetzberger Power Control system (Sumetzberger, Austria). The transit line length between the Emergency Department phlebotomy station and the central clinical laboratory is approximately 120 meters. System operating speed is set at 4-5 m/s. Transport capsules are cushioned with internal foam padding to minimize mechanical impact forces. Average transit duration ranges between 50 and 90 seconds.

BLOOD COLLECTION PROTOCOL

Blood collection is performed by trained emergency department phlebotomists using standard venipuncture technique. Tubes are drawn from a single venipuncture in the standard order of draw: (1) blue-cap coagulation tube, not used in the study; (2) yellow-cap serum separator tube #1; (3) yellow-cap serum separator tube #2; (4-5) any additional clinically indicated tubes, not used in the study. The two yellow-cap serum separator tubes are dispatched simultaneously by the two transport routes and are analysed simultaneously on arrival at the laboratory, so that waiting time does not act as a pre-analytical variable.

RANDOMIZATION AND ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT (CONSORT 2025 Items 15-17)

Allocation is by computer-generated block randomization with a block size of four. The allocation sequence assigns each participant to Sequence A (tube #1 to the pneumatic tube system, tube #2 to personnel transport) or Sequence B (tube #1 to personnel transport, tube #2 to the pneumatic tube system). The sequence is held in sealed, opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes that are opened in order at the time of enrolment. This scheme balances any effect of tube draw order across the two transport routes.

BLINDING (CONSORT 2025 Item 12b)

Tubes are labeled with standardized participant study identifiers and tube sequence numbers (Tube #1 and Tube #2) without indicating transport allocation. Laboratory technicians operating the automated analyzer and assessing the Hemolysis Index remain fully blinded to transport allocation. Clinicians and investigators are not blinded.

WITHDRAWAL CRITERIA

A participant's tube pair is withdrawn from analysis if pneumatic transport cannot be completed because of system failure, if a tube is broken or otherwise cannot be analyzed, or if the participant withdraws consent.

HARMS (CONSORT 2025 Item 27)

No intervention is applied to the participant. Both tubes are drawn from the venipuncture already required for routine clinical care, and no additional venipuncture or other invasive procedure is performed. No participant-level adverse events are therefore anticipated and no harms outcome measure is specified.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (PPI) STATEMENT (CONSORT 2025 Item 8)

Patients or members of the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. PPI was deemed non-applicable given the technical, pre-analytical nature of this laboratory quality evaluation study.

DATA SHARING STATEMENT (CONSORT 2025 Item 4)

De-identified individual participant data collected during the trial will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding investigator following publication.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemolysis
  • Diagnostic Errors
  • Blood Specimen Collection

Keywords

  • Pneumatic Tube System
  • Blood Specimen Transport
  • Hemolysis Index
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Pre-Analytical Variability
  • Sumetzberger
03

In context

Hemolysis

120 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemolysis; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 166 is above the median of 49 across 78 interventional studies indexed under Hemolysis.

Browse Hemolysis studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Presenting to the emergency department of Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
  • Venous blood draw required for routine clinical care, allowing two yellow-cap (serum separator) tubes to be drawn from the same venipuncture
  • Written provided by the participant or, where the acute clinical condition of the participant prevents this, by a legal representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known underlying hemolytic disorder (e.g., hemolytic anemia, sickle cell disease, G6PD deficiency, hemolytic anemia, or TTP/HUS)
  • Macroscopic hemolysis visible in the sample tube immediately after phlebotomy
  • Age younger than 18 years
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
166 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    PTS-First Sequence

    Participants from whom two yellow-cap serum separator blood tubes are drawn simultaneously. Tube #1 (first drawn) is transported via the pneumatic tube system (PTS), and Tube #2 (second drawn) is transported by manual personnel. Both tubes are dispatched simultaneously.

    Procedure: Pneumatic Tube System Transport · Procedure: Manual Personnel Transport

  • Other
    Personnel-First Sequence

    Participants from whom two yellow-cap serum separator blood tubes are drawn simultaneously. Tube #1 (first drawn) is transported by manual personnel, and Tube #2 (second drawn) is transported via the pneumatic tube system (PTS). Both tubes are dispatched simultaneously.

    Procedure: Pneumatic Tube System Transport · Procedure: Manual Personnel Transport

Interventions

  • ProcedurePneumatic Tube System Transport

    Blood sample transport using the Sumetzberger Power Control pneumatic tube system (Sumetzberger, Austria). The system operates at a speed of 4-5 m/s over a distance of approximately 120 meters using cushioned capsules. Transport duration ranges between 50 and 90 seconds.

  • ProcedureManual Personnel Transport

    Blood sample transport performed manually by emergency department staff carrying the tube on foot from the phlebotomy area to the central clinical laboratory. Transport is dispatched simultaneously with the paired pneumatic tube sample.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemolysis Index (HI) Category in PTS-Transported vs. Personnel-Transported Tubes

    Ordinal 6-category HI scale (0=\<50, 1=50-99, 2=100-199, 3=200-299, 4=300-500, 5=\>500 mg/dL free hemoglobin) as reported by the automated analyser. Higher category indicates more hemolysis. Compared between PTS and personnel tube from the same patient (paired).

    Time frame: At laboratory analysis (within 30 minutes of blood draw)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Clinically Significant Hemolysis (HI ≥ 1) in PTS-Transported vs. Personnel-Transported Tubes

    Proportion of tubes with HI category ≥ 1 (free haemoglobin ≥ 50 mg/dL), the threshold at which samples are typically flagged for rejection by the laboratory. Dichotomous outcome (0 vs ≥1) compared between matched tube pairs.

    Time frame: At laboratory analysis (within 30 minutes of blood draw)

Other outcomes

  1. Spearman Correlation Between Tube Transport Time and HI Category

    Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ) between recorded PTS transport time (seconds, 50-90 s range) and the HI category of the PTS tube. Exploratory analysis.

    Time frame: At laboratory analysis (within 30 minutes of blood draw)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mullins GR, Bruns DE. Air bubbles and hemolysis of blood samples during transport by pneumatic tube systems. Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Oct;473:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 10. PubMed 28803746 ↗
  • Kara H, Bayir A, Ak A, Degirmenci S, Akinci M, Agacayak A, Marcil E, Azap M. Hemolysis associated with pneumatic tube system transport for blood samples. Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Jan;30(1):50-8. doi: 10.12669/pjms.301.4228. PubMed 24639830 ↗
  • Cakirca G, Erdal H. The Effect of Pneumatic Tube Systems on the Hemolysis of Biochemistry Blood Samples. J Emerg Nurs. 2017 May;43(3):255-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2016.09.007. Epub 2017 Mar 28. PubMed 28359708 ↗
  • Phelan MP, Reineks EZ, Hustey FM, Berriochoa JP, Podolsky SR, Meldon S, Schold JD, Chamberlin J, Procop GW. Does Pneumatic Tube System Transport Contribute to Hemolysis in ED Blood Samples? West J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;17(5):557-60. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.6.29948. Epub 2016 Jul 26. PubMed 27625719 ↗
  • Ding X, Wen X, Wang L, Chen T, Zhou G, He H, Xin X. Effects of a pneumatic tube system on the hemolysis of blood samples: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2021 Sep;81(5):343-352. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2021.1930140. Epub 2021 Jun 10. PubMed 34109899 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data collected during the trial that underlie the published results will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified scientific researchers.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will become available beginning 3 months following publication and ending 36 months following article publication.

Access criteria: Proposals should be submitted to the corresponding investigator via email (emirunal@gmail.com). Requestors must provide a methodologically sound research proposal and sign a data use agreement.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07755007
Lead sponsor
Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Emir Ünal (Assistant Professor, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Emir Ünal, Assistant Professor
Contact
emirunal@gmail.com
+905327766010
Emir Ünal, Assistant Professor
Contact
emirunal@gmail.com
Emir Ünal
principal investigator · Marmara University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion