ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07878936QIPB-LIHRUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Quadro-Iliac Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

An interventional study of Quadro-iliac plane block in Inguinal Hernia Unilateral, Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use, sponsored by Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 16, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to learn whether an ultrasound-guided quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) reduces opioid use and pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in adults aged 18-65 years. The main question it aims to answer is: does QIPB reduce total tramadol consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours? Researchers will compare patients who receive QIPB under general anesthesia with patients who receive no block. All participants will receive the same general anesthesia, multimodal analgesia and intravenous tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Pain scores, PCA use, quality of recovery (QoR-15), nausea and vomiting, and time to discharge will be recorded during the first 24 hours.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP or TEP) causes less pain than open repair, but many patients still report moderate to severe pain in the early postoperative period, with both somatic and visceral components. The quadro-iliac plane block is a recently described fascial plane block in which local anesthetic is injected between the inner surface of the iliac crest and the posterior surface of the quadratus lumborum muscle. Cadaveric data show spread to the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, subcostal and genitofemoral nerves and the lumbar plexus, and case series suggest effective analgesia after inguinal hernia surgery.

This single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, outcome-assessor-blinded trial will be conducted at Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital. Sixty-four patients will be randomized 1:1 by computer-generated random numbers to Group QIPB or Group C (control). The anesthesia team will know the group allocation; the investigator assessing outcomes will be blinded.

All patients will receive standard monitoring (ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, SpO2, EtCO2, bispectral index) and IV midazolam 0.02 mg/kg premedication. Anesthesia will be induced with remifentanil 2 µg/kg, propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, and maintained with desflurane and remifentanil infusion, targeting BIS 40-60. In Group QIPB, after induction and in the lateral position, a unilateral QIPB will be performed on the surgical side with a low-frequency convex probe placed parasagittally at the attachment of the quadratus lumborum to the iliac crest. Using an in-plane approach with a 100-mm block needle, needle position will be confirmed with 5 mL saline, followed by 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with intermittent aspiration. Group C will receive no block.

Fifteen minutes before the end of surgery, all patients will receive IV paracetamol 1 g, tramadol 1.5 mg/kg and ondansetron 8 mg. After surgery, all patients will receive IV tramadol PCA (10 mg/mL; 1 mL bolus; 10-minute lockout). Patients with NRS > 4 will receive rescue IV morphine 4 mg. Pain scores at rest and on coughing and cumulative tramadol consumption will be recorded at 0, 6, 12 and 24 hours. The QoR-15 questionnaire will be administered preoperatively (baseline) and at 24 hours.

The sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1. Assuming a mean 24-hour tramadol consumption of 85 mg in the control group, a minimum clinically relevant reduction of 25 mg (approx. 30%) and an SD of 30 mg (Cohen's d = 0.83), with α = 0.05 and power = 0.80, 24 patients per group are required. To allow for dropouts and protocol violations, 32 patients per group (64 in total) will be enrolled. Data will be analyzed using the independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, repeated-measures ANOVA or linear mixed-effects models for pain scores over time, Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test for time to first PCA demand, chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical outcomes, and ANCOVA adjusted for baseline QoR-15. A two-sided p \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inguinal Hernia Unilateral
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Opioid Use

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • quadro-iliac plane block
  • fascial plane block
  • regional anesthesia
  • laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
  • TAPP
  • TEPP
  • patient-controlled analgesia
  • tramadol
  • quality of recovery
  • QoR-15
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,224 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,154 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is below the median of 75 across 4,457 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Scheduled for elective unilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP or TEP) under general anesthesia
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Bilateral hernia repair or conversion to open surgery
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics or study drugs
  • Coagulopathy or ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Infection at the block site
  • Chronic pain or regular opioid use before surgery
  • Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to understand the NRS or use the PCA device
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group QIPB

    Unilateral ultrasound-guided quadro-iliac plane block on the surgical side after induction of general anesthesia (40 mL 0.25% bupivacaine), plus standard multimodal analgesia and IV tramadol PCA.

    Procedure: Quadro-iliac plane block

  • No intervention
    Group C (Control)

    No block. Standard general anesthesia, multimodal analgesia and IV tramadol PCA only.

Interventions

  • ProcedureQuadro-iliac plane block

    With the patient in the lateral position, a low-frequency convex probe is placed parasagittally at the attachment of the quadratus lumborum to the iliac crest. Using an in-plane approach with a 100-mm block needle, position is confirmed with 5 mL saline, followed by 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total tramadol consumption

    Cumulative tramadol (mg) delivered by the IV PCA device during the first 24 postoperative hours

    Time frame: 0-24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain score at rest

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain

    Time frame: 0, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery

  2. Pain score on coughing

    NRS (0-10) during coughing

    Time frame: 0, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery

  3. Time to first PCA demand

    Time (minutes) from arrival in the PACU to the first patient-activated PCA bolus

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

  4. Quality of recovery

    QoR-15 total score (0-150; higher = better recovery), adjusted for preoperative baseline QoR-15

    Time frame: Preoperatively (baseline) and 24 hours after surgery

  5. Postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Incidence and severity (0 = none, 1 = mild nausea, 2 = severe nausea, 3 = vomiting); need for additional antiemetics

    Time frame: 0, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery

  6. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption

    Total remifentanil dose (µg) during anesthesia

    Time frame: Intraoperative

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tulgar S, Ciftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Bilal B, Sakul BU, Girit M, Akin T, Narayanan M, Alici HA. Ultrasound guided quadro-iliac plane block: another novel fascial plane block. Pain Med. 2024 May 3;25(6):370-373. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae018. PubMed 38459608 ↗
  • Sorrentino T, Pullano C, Marrone F. A novel and feasible option for postoperative analgesia in hernia repair surgery: quadro-iliac plane block. Minerva Anestesiol. 2025 Sep;91(9):857-858. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19017-2. Epub 2025 May 7. No abstract available. PubMed 40332067 ↗
  • Satici MH, Altay N. Quadro-iliac plane block in inguinal hernia surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2025 May;91(5):475-476. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18739-7. Epub 2025 Feb 18. No abstract available. PubMed 39964109 ↗
  • Tolver MA, Strandfelt P, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Pain characteristics after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3859-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1810-2. Epub 2011 Jun 18. PubMed 21688078 ↗
  • Hubbard G, Hubert C, Vudayagiri L, Tullington J, Merino K, Vaidya A, Gemma R. Transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a review. Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1059-1065. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02831-x. Epub 2023 Jul 3. PubMed 37395916 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Aug 2027, 10 months later.

Of 1,888 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 10 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,901 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 10, 2026
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 15, 2027
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07878936
Lead sponsor
Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
dilara gocmen (Dilara Göçmen, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Dilara Göçmen, Asist Prof
Contact
dilara.gocmen@marmara.edu.tr
+902166254545

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion