ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07641790WEVIB-HEMIUpdated Jun 11, 2026

Effects of Wearable Vibratory Devices on Arm Function in Subacute Stroke Patients

An interventional study of Wearable Focal Muscle Vibrator in Hemiplegia and Stroke, sponsored by University of Faisalabad. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by University of Faisalabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2026, registered Jun 2026).
  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hemiplegia, or paralysis of one side of the body, often results from stroke and severely limits arm function. Standard physiotherapy helps, but recovery is often slow. This study tests if adding a wearable vibratory device to standard therapy improves arm movement better than standard therapy alone. Thirty patients with subacute stroke (3-6 months) will be split into two groups. One group will receive usual physiotherapy, while the other will receive usual physiotherapy plus the vibratory device for 8 weeks. Doctors will measure changes in spasticity (muscle stiffness), motor function, and daily independence before and after treatment.

Read the detailed description

This single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial aims to investigate the neurophysiological effects of focal muscle vibration (FMV) delivered via a wearable device. The study will enroll 28 participants (14 per arm, accounting for 20% attrition) diagnosed with unilateral hemiplegia in the subacute stage (3 to 6 months post-stroke). Inclusion requires a Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score between 20 and 50 and a Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score indicating mild to moderate spasticity. Exclusion criteria include fixed contractures, severe sensory loss, or other neurological diseases.

Intervention Protocol: Both groups will receive a 45-minute conventional physiotherapy session focusing on range of motion, strengthening, and functional task training, three times per week for 8 weeks. The experimental group (Group A) will additionally wear a portable vibratory device (frequency: 100-120 Hz) on the belly of the affected biceps and forearm extensors for 30 minutes during the therapy session. The device will be applied by a trained physiotherapist. The control group (Group B) receives the same conventional therapy without the vibratory device. Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) will be used as a baseline warm-up for both groups.

Outcomes: The primary outcomes are changes in spasticity (MAS) and motor function (FMA-UE). The secondary outcome is functional independence measured by the Barthel Index. Assessments occur at baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8). Data will be analyzed using an intention-to-treat analysis in SPSS v20.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemiplegia
  • Stroke

Keywords

  • Vibration
  • Upper Extremity
  • Physical Therapy
  • Subacute Stroke
03

In context

Hemiplegia

446 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemiplegia; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 34 across 370 interventional studies indexed under Hemiplegia.

Browse Hemiplegia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Faisalabad is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Unilateral hemiplegia secondary to stroke
  • Age between 30 and 60 years
  • Subacute stage (3 to 6 months post-stroke)
  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score between 20 and 50
  • Able to follow simple verbal commands

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous peripheral nerve injury or surgery affecting the upper limb
  • Fixed contractures or bony fractures in the affected limb
  • Complete sensory loss of the upper limb
  • Co-existing neurological conditions (e.g., Parkinson's, MS, Dementia)
  • Unstable cardiovascular conditions
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Wearable Vibration + Physiotherapy

    Participants receive conventional physiotherapy (45 min) plus a wearable vibratory device applied to the affected upper limb for 30 minutes during the session. Sessions occur 3 times/week for 8 weeks.

    Device: Wearable Focal Muscle Vibrator

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Physiotherapy Only

    Participants receive conventional physiotherapy (45 min) without the vibratory device. Sessions occur 3 times/week for 8 weeks.

    Device: Wearable Focal Muscle Vibrator

Interventions

  • DeviceWearable Focal Muscle Vibrator

    A portable, battery-operated device worn on the forearm. It delivers high-frequency focal vibration (100-120 Hz) to the muscle belly (biceps/forearm extensors) to reduce spasticity and facilitate motor recruitment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Upper Limb Spasticity

    Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Scale ranges from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigidity). A lower score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8)

  2. Change in Upper Limb Motor Function

    Measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Total score ranges from 0 to 66. A higher score indicates better motor recovery.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Functional Independence

    Measured by the Barthel Index (BI). Total score ranges from 0 (totally dependent) to 100 (completely independent). A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 4 months after the start.

Of 223 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hemiplegia, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27. This study's planned 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 228 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 6, 2026
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
StartActual
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 15, 2026
Last update
Jun 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07641790
Lead sponsor
University of Faisalabad
Responsible party
Anbreena Rasool (Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Faisalabad) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Study contacts

Dr. Anbreena Rasool, Doctor of Physical Therapy
Contact
anbreenarasool.DPT@tuf.edu.pk
+92 345 79368
Dr Muhammad Ateeb, PhD Public Health
Contact
mateeb.oric@tuf.edu.pk
+923357333383

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion