ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07696728Updated Jul 10, 2026

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Sensation

An interventional study of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy and Ankle Range of Motion and Ankle Range of Motion (Levangie and Norkin, 2011) in Diabetes Mellitus (DM), sponsored by University of Faisalabad. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by University of Faisalabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 77 studies in Diabetes Mellitus with a site in Pakistan — 22 open to participants now, 27 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Diabetes Mellitus · Pakistan.

Planned enrollment
49th of 63
42 · median 100
Started
2026
with 7 others
No phase
52 of 77
15 open now
Primary completion
2026-08
later than 21 of 26 live
Registered
72nd of 77
by date

Among the 77 studies in Diabetes Mellitus with a site in Pakistan, this one is the 49th largest by planned enrollment of the 63 interventional ones, is one of 8 that started in 2026, is one of 52 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 21 of the 26 other live ones, and was the 72nd registered.

By phase

77 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study52 · 15 open
Observational13 · 3 open
Phase 14 · 2 open
Phase 33 · 1 open
Phase 43 · 1 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2004; this study’s year is marked. 8 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 100 across the 63 interventional studies, 300 across the 13 observational. Of the 41 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 77 studies in Diabetes Mellitus with a site in Pakistan, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycaemia for extended periods of time, which causes damage to peripheral nerves, resulting in sensory, motor and autonomic dysfunction. The study will aim to assess the effect of the Low pulse electromagnetic field therapy in VPT and protective sensation in the diabetic foot ulcer. The total number of participants will be 42 (calculated by epi tool) and the participants are to be divided among two groups. Non Probability Consecutive sampling technique will be used for this study.

The data collection tools will be Wagner Classification System for Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Goniometry, 10 g monofilament, Tuning Fork 128 Hz will be used. After meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria and taking the written and verbal informed consent participants in one group will receive (low frequency pulsed electromagnatic field therapy and ankle Range of Motion) and other group will be receive (Sham PEMF and ankle Range of motion). Both interventions will be given three times weekly (or every other day) for 6 weeks. Vibrations perception, protective sensation, pain, ankle ROM and will be the outcome measures of the study. The data will be collected at baseline and 6 weeks. The data will be analyzed by using SPSS 23 and interpreted by using MS Word.

03

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus (DM)

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must have a clinical diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes ( ≥ 6.5) (Bolen et al., 2016).
  • Patients with Wagner grade 1 diabetic foot ulcers was selected.
  • Michigan Neuropathic Screening Instrument history score ≤7 (Viswanathan et al., 2025).
  • Participants showing reduced vibration perception threshold on 128Hz Tunning fork was included to confirm the presence of sensory neuropathy Associated with diabetic ulcers (Viswanathan et al., 2025).
  • Sensation on 10g monofilament less then 8 point out of 10 indicate reduces Sensation.
  • Participants having diabetes for more than 10 years (Grewal et al., 2015).
  • Pariticipants aged between 40 to 60 years.
  • Both gender were included.
  • Participants who was willing to give consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have significant cognitive impairment (e.g Dementia, Alzheimer) that would prevent them from understanding and adhering to Study instructions.
  • Participants with active infections requiring systemic antibiotic therapy (Kwan et al., 2015).
  • Patients with comorbidities such as , severe renal disease, or Other systemic condition.
  • Participants who was not taking any medicine
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy and Ankle Range of Motion

    Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (Tassone et al., 2025) Parameters Description PEMF Low frequency (15 Hz) Very low intensity (20 Gauss) Time duration (20 minutes) Duration 3 days a week (alternate days) Total Treatment Duration 6 weeks Table 2 Ankle Range of Motion (Levangie and Norkin, 2011) Parameters Description Ankle Range of Motion Active ROM * Dorsiflexion * Plantarflexion * Inversion * Eversion Set 2 sets Repetition 15-20 repetition Workload 3 days/week (on alternate days) Total Treatment Period 6 weeks

    Procedure: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy and Ankle Range of Motion

  • Experimental
    Group B Ankle Range of Motion

    Ankle Range of Motion (Levangie and Norkin, 2011) Parameters Description Ankle Range of Motion Active ROM * Dorsiflexion * Plantarflexion * Inversion * Eversion (Levangie and Norkin, 2011) Set 2 sets Repetition 15-20 repetition Days/Week 3 days per week (on alternative days) Total Treatment Duration 6 weeks

    Procedure: Ankle Range of Motion (Levangie and Norkin, 2011)

Interventions

  • ProcedurePulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy and Ankle Range of Motion

    Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (Tassone et al., 2025) Parameters Description PEMF Low frequency (15 Hz) Very low intensity (20 Gauss) Time duration (20 minutes) Duration 3 days a week (alternate days) Total Treatment Duration 6 weeks Ankle Range of Motion (Levangie and Norkin, 2011) Parameters Description Ankle Range of Motion Active ROM * Dorsiflexion * Plantarflexion * Inversion * Eversion Set 2 sets Repetition 15-20 repetition Workload 3 days/week (on alternate days) Total Treatment Period 6 weeks

  • ProcedureAnkle Range of Motion (Levangie and Norkin, 2011)

    Parameters Description Ankle Range of Motion Active ROM * Dorsiflexion * Plantarflexion * Inversion * Eversion (Levangie and Norkin, 2011) Set 2 sets Repetition 15-20 repetition Days/Week 3 days per week (on alternative days) Total Treatment Duration 6 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vibration Perception Threshold

    Vibration perception threshold will be measured by using Tuning Fork 128 Hz. that check either the patient sense the vibration or not. if person feel sensation grater than 10 second indicate decrease vibration perception.

    Time frame: 6 week

  2. Protective Sensation Score as Assessed by the 10-g Monofilament Test (0-10 Total Score).

    Protective sensation will be assessed using the 10-g monofilament at 10 standardized plantar sites. One point is awarded for each site where the participant correctly perceives the monofilament, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate better protective sensation.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy

    Diabetic peripheral neuropathy will be measured by using Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) Physical Assessment, the decrease in score showed improvement the total score consisting of 5 per foot overall 10, 0 indicate foot is healthy and 10 indicate worse condition.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Range of Motion

    Range of Motion will be measured by using Goniometory the increase in range shows improvement and decrease showed adverse effect.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity will be measured by using Numerical Pain Rating Scale, the scale consisting of 0 to 10 number 0 means no pain 10 mean worse pain the decrease in NPRS scores reflecting decreased pain intensity and increased comfort.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Aug 2026, 0 months later.

Of 1,583 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 0 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,743 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 8, 2026
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
StartEst.
Jul 7, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 5, 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 5, 2026
Last update
Jul 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07696728
Lead sponsor
University of Faisalabad
Responsible party
Rubina Zulfqar (Assistant Professor, University of Faisalabad) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
Start date
Jul 7, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 5, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 5, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Dr. Rubina Zulfqar
Contact
drrubinazulfqar355@gmail.com
+923414291664

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion