CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07637084PBM-SEDh-01Updated Jun 15, 2026

Photobiomodulation for Chronic Pain and Fatigue in Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (PBM-SEDh-01)

An observational study in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Hypermobile, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, sponsored by Centre Medical ISM (Integrative Systemic Medicine). Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-15.

Sponsored by Centre Medical ISM (Integrative Systemic Medicine) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
25
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy using a MLS® class IV laser on chronic pain and fatigue in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS). hEDS is a hereditary connective tissue disorder characterized by joint hypermobility, chronic pain, and debilitating fatigue, for which therapeutic options remain limited.

Participants will receive 10 PBM sessions over 5 weeks (2 sessions per week), using red and near-infrared light (808 nm continuous + 905 nm pulsed) applied to painful areas identified at baseline. Pain (Visual Analogue Scale), multidimensional fatigue (MFI-20), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) will be assessed at baseline (T0), end of treatment (week 5), and follow-up (week 10).

This is a pilot observational study - the first to document the effect of MLS® laser PBM in hEDS. No additional procedures beyond routine care are required.

Read the detailed description

Background: Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) is the most common form of EDS (80-90% of cases), diagnosed according to the 2017 International Consortium criteria. Chronic pain and fatigue are the two most disabling symptoms. No randomized controlled trial has evaluated the effect of MLS® class IV laser photobiomodulation in hEDS to date.

Intervention: Photobiomodulation using ASAlaser M-Hi device (MLS® technology: synchronized 808nm continuous + 905nm pulsed emissions, CE MDR class IV). Progressive fluence: 4 J/cm² (sessions 1-2), 6 J/cm² (sessions 3-6), 8 J/cm² (sessions 7-10). Maximum 3-4 zones per session. Treatment areas individualized based on pain mapping at baseline.

Design: Single-center prospective observational pilot study in private practice. No randomization, no control group, no modification of ongoing treatment.

Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (paired, non-parametric), descriptive statistics. Exploratory pilot - no formal power calculation. Target sample size: 20-25 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Hypermobile
  • Chronic Pain
  • Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

Keywords

  • photobiomodulation; laser therapy; MLS laser; Ehlers-Danlos syndrome; chronic pain; fatigue; quality of life; observational study; pilot study
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with confirmed hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS), diagnosed according to the 2017 International Consortium criteria, presenting with chronic pain (≥ 3 months, VAS ≥ 4/10) and/or fatigue, followed in private outpatient practice at Centre Médical ISM, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. Patients are recruited consecutively among those already receiving photobiomodulation therapy as part of their routine care. No healthy volunteers are included.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Confirmed diagnosis of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) according to 2017 International Consortium criteria
  • Chronic pain ≥ 3 months, average VAS score ≥ 4/10 over the preceding week
  • Stable analgesic treatment for ≥ 4 weeks (if any)
  • Follow-up at Centre Médical ISM, Boulogne-Billancourt
  • Informed and non-opposition signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspicious or malignant skin lesion on areas to be treated
  • Non-modifiable photosensitizing treatment
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Photosensitive epilepsy
  • Acute articular inflammatory flare at inclusion date
  • Analgesic treatment modification within 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Simultaneous participation in another research protocol
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
10 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in chronic pain intensity

    Change in pain intensity measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10), representing average pain over the preceding week. A decrease of ≥ 1.5 points is considered clinically meaningful.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0) to Week 5 (end of PBM treatment cycle)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Durability of pain relief

    Change in pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable; lower scores indicate less pain), between end of treatment (Week 5) and follow-up (Week 10), to assess persistence of the analgesic effect after PBM cessation

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 10 (5 weeks post-treatment follow-up)

  2. Change in multidimensional fatigue

    Change in fatigue assessed by the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), comprising 20 items across 5 subscales: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Reduced Activity, Reduced Motivation, and Mental Fatigue. Total score ranges from 20 to 100.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), Week 5 (T5), and Week 10 (T10)

  3. Change in health-related quality of life

    Change in quality of life assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS, 0-100).

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), Week 5 (T5), and Week 10 (T10)

Other outcomes

  1. Tolerability of PBM therapy

    Frequency and nature of local adverse events (redness, discomfort, transient pain aggravation) recorded at each session by the investigator.

    Time frame: Each session, from Week 1 to Week 5 (sessions 1 to 10)

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centre Médical ISM
    Boulogne-Billancourt, Île-de-France Region 92100, France
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Castori M, Camerota F, Celletti C, Danese C, Santilli V, Saraceni VM, Grammatico P. Natural history and manifestations of the hypermobility type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a pilot study on 21 patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Mar;152A(3):556-64. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33231. PubMed 20140961 ↗
  • Malfait F, Francomano C, Byers P, Belmont J, Berglund B, Black J, Bloom L, Bowen JM, Brady AF, Burrows NP, Castori M, Cohen H, Colombi M, Demirdas S, De Backer J, De Paepe A, Fournel-Gigleux S, Frank M, Ghali N, Giunta C, Grahame R, Hakim A, Jeunemaitre X, Johnson D, Juul-Kristensen B, Kapferer-Seebacher I, Kazkaz H, Kosho T, Lavallee ME, Levy H, Mendoza-Londono R, Pepin M, Pope FM, Reinstein E, Robert L, Rohrbach M, Sanders L, Sobey GJ, Van Damme T, Vandersteen A, van Mourik C, Voermans N, Wheeldon N, Zschocke J, Tinkle B. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017 Mar;175(1):8-26. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31552. PubMed 28306229 ↗
  • Robijns J, Nair RG, Lodewijckx J, Arany P, Barasch A, Bjordal JM, Bossi P, Chilles A, Corby PM, Epstein JB, Elad S, Fekrazad R, Fregnani ER, Genot MT, Ibarra AMC, Hamblin MR, Heiskanen V, Hu K, Klastersky J, Lalla R, Latifian S, Maiya A, Mebis J, Migliorati CA, Milstein DMJ, Murphy B, Raber-Durlacher JE, Roseboom HJ, Sonis S, Treister N, Zadik Y, Bensadoun RJ. Photobiomodulation therapy in management of cancer therapy-induced side effects: WALT position paper 2022. Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 30;12:927685. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.927685. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36110957 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07637084
Lead sponsor
Centre Medical ISM (Integrative Systemic Medicine)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
Start date
May 26, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 15, 2026

Study contacts

Lilian Lessedjina, M.D.
Contact
dr.llessedjina@gmail.com
+337-82-83-40-83

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion