CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07636200EASEUpdated Jun 9, 2026

The EASE Study: Randomized Trial of a Novel Approach to Addressing Fear of Progression in Advanced Cancer

An interventional study of Written Exposure-Based Coping Intervention (EASE) and Usual Care Control Condition in Advanced Solid Tumor Cancer, Stage IV Cancer (Solid Tumors Only) and Glioblastoma, sponsored by University of Colorado, Boulder. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-09.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Boulder · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Precision oncology has led to a growing population of adults with advanced cancer living increasingly longer lives in the face of profound uncertainty about the future, with over half reporting moderate to high fear of cancer progression (FoP). These fears are associated with anxiety and depression, over-use of healthcare, physical symptom burden, higher treatment regret, fatigue, and, in many studies, poorer quality of life. Moreover, FoP is strongly correlated with cancer-related trauma symptoms-physical hyperarousal, intrusiveness of cancer thoughts/images, and avoidance of cancer-related thoughts and feelings, suggesting overlapping symptoms. While behavioral interventions exist to target fear of recurrence in early-stage cancer survivors, there is a dearth of behavioral interventions to address FoP or cancer-related trauma symptoms in adults with advanced cancer, and no known published randomized trials of such interventions in the United States. In addition, cutting-edge developments for the treatment of trauma in general populations have not been adapted to cancer populations. To address these critical gaps, we adapted a cutting-edge behavioral treatment for trauma to reduce FoP and cancer-related trauma symptoms among adults with advanced cancer. The intervention, titled EASE, is based on written exposure therapy, an efficacious approach for reducing trauma symptoms in general populations that is better accepted and far briefer than other gold-standard approaches. EASE adapts this approach to help advanced cancer patients with elevated FoP and cancer-related trauma symptoms reduce their fear of the future by using written exposure focused on their future worst-case scenario with cancer. Informed by the NIH stage model, we evaluated EASE delivered by telehealth in an open pilot trial for 29 adults with late-stage cancer and elevated FoP and cancer-related trauma symptoms. Pilot findings show strong acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy potential. We now propose to conduct the first randomized trial of EASE, and, thus, first known randomized trial in the United States of a behavioral intervention for FoP and cancer-related trauma symptoms among adults with advanced cancer. This 2-arm trial (N=250) will compare EASE delivered by telehealth with Usual Care (UC). We aim to compare EASE to UC on FoP and cancer-related trauma symptoms (primary outcomes) and anxiety, depression, hopelessness, and quality of life, at post-intervention (Aim 1) and follow-up (Aim 2). We will evaluate mechanisms for EASE relative to UC (Aim 3). Offering EASE in both English and Spanish, and by telehealth, increases access. Simple content increases scalability. Rigorous evaluation of EASE has the potential to provide a paradigm-shifting intervention ready for dissemination and to inform evidence-based care guidelines for distressed adults with advanced cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Solid Tumor Cancer
  • Stage IV Cancer (Solid Tumors Only)
  • Glioblastoma
  • Stage III Ovarian Cancer
  • Small Cell Lung Cancer Extensive Stage

Keywords

  • Fear of cancer progression
  • Cancer-related trauma symptoms
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Boulder is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults, age 18 or older
  • Have been diagnosed with either (a) Stage IV metastatic cancer of any solid tumor type, (b) Stage III ovarian cancer that has recurred, (c) 'extensive stage' small cell lung cancer, or (d) glioblastomas of any staging
  • Are capable at time of consent of understanding and voluntarily consenting themselves to the study, attending intervention sessions, and writing for 30 minutes, confirmed by an Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status Scale of ≤2
  • Report elevated FoP and cancer-related trauma symptoms on the screening measures: FoP-Q 12-item short version: mean score of 2.5 (or total score of 30), IES-R: mean of 1.5 (or total score of 33)
  • Are fluent in English or Spanish and can read English proficiently (for the surveys, which are in English)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a history of chronic untreated trauma unrelated to their cancer, psychiatric hospitalization or suicide attempt(s) in the past 2 years, or current high suicide risk, as identified in the screening.
  • EMR-noted cognitive impairment (such as dementia) is an exclusion due to potential impairments in neural learning mechanisms that may affect the efficacy of exposure therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EASE (Written Exposure-Based Coping Intervention)

    EASE intervention over 6 individual sessions.

    Behavioral: Written Exposure-Based Coping Intervention (EASE)

  • Other
    Control: Usual Care

    Usual Care (UC) consists of access to supportive care providers available at treatment sites.

    Behavioral: Usual Care Control Condition

Interventions

  • BehavioralWritten Exposure-Based Coping Intervention (EASE)

    The EASE intervention includes 6-sessions of structured writing designed to reduce fear of progression (FoP) and cancer-related trauma symptoms in adults with advanced cancer. Adapted from Written Exposure Therapy (WET), EASE will be delivered via telehealth by trained interventionists through 1:1 sessions. Each session will last approximately 60 minutes. The first session begins with an assessment, where participants identify their worst-case scenario related to their cancer. In the next three sessions, participants engage in structured exposure writing about this imagined scenario, focusing on vivid, sensory-rich descriptions and thoughts and feelings. The final two sessions involve coping writing, where participants re-evaluate the realism of their scenario. If deemed unlikely, they write about a more realistic outcome and how to cope with it; if likely, they focus on coping strategies for the original scenario

  • BehavioralUsual Care Control Condition

    Usual Care (UC) consists of access to a clinical social worker and nurse practitioners for supportive visits at patient request. To account for individual and site differences in use/availability of UC resources, patients in both arms will report use of non-study cancer supportive care using piloted trackers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fear of Progression Questionnaire, Short Form (with cancer as the disease)

    Assesses fear of cancer progression. Higher scores = higher fear of progression.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  2. Impact of Events Scale-Revised (with cancer as the event)

    Cancer-related trauma symptoms. Higher scores = higher symptom levels.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Concerns About Recurrence Scale (CARS overall fear scale)

    Fear of cancer recurrence/progression. Higher scores = higher fear of recurrence/progression.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

    Anxiety symptoms. Higher scores = higher anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire-8

    Depression symptoms. Higher scores = higher depression symptoms.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  4. Hopelessness Assessment in Illness Questionnaire

    Hopelessness regarding one's illness. Higher scores = higher hopelessness.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  5. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General-7 item version (FACT-G7)

    Quality of life with cancer. Higher scores = higher quality of life.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

Other outcomes

  1. Valuing Questionnaire, Obstruction and Progress Scales

    Measures movement towards values and goals. Higher scores = greater movement towards values and goals. Theorized process variable.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  2. Death Attitude Profile Revised (DAP-R), Death Avoidance and Fear of Death Scales

    Measures rigidly avoidance of all thinking about dying; fear of dying. Higher scores = higher avoidance and fear. Theorized process variable.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  3. Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (COPE) - Behavioral and Emotional Disengagement Scale and Emotion Approach Coping Scale

    Measures use of avoidance-based coping strategies. Higher scores = higher use of coping strategies. Theorized process variable.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  4. Intolerance of Uncertainty (IUS-4)

    Measures behavioral reactions to ambiguous or uncertain situations. Higher scores = greater levels of intolerance of uncertainty.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  5. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)

    Measures emotional state. Higher scores = higher intensity of affect.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  6. Positive and Negative Valence Systems Scale (PVSS)

    Measures reward sensitivity. Higher scores = higher reward sensitivity.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  7. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale - Short Form Version 1.0

    Measures fatigue and lack of vitality. Higher scores = higher levels of fatigue and higher lack of vitality.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  8. RAND Short Form Health Survey (RAND-SF 36), 2-items

    Measures perceived health. Higher scores = lower perceived health.

    Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  9. Adverse Childhood Experience Questionnaire for Adults

    Measures childhood exposure to trauma. Higher scores = higher levels of exposure to trauma. Theorized moderator/predictor.

    Time frame: Assessed once with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre).

  10. Demographics, Short Cancer History Questionnaire, History of journaling/creative writing

    Demographics and cancer treatment history - Relevant cancer diagnostic and treatment history items will be confirmed via medical chart review, Single item about history of journaling or use of writing to process emotion

    Time frame: Assessed once with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre).

  11. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8

    Measures client satisfaction with the intervention. Higher scores = higher satisfaction.

    Time frame: Assessed twice in intervention group only: within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), and at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  12. Sharing of Scenario

    Item assessing whether participant has discussed their scenario with anyone else.

    Time frame: Assessed three times with parallel timing in the control group: following session 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 3-month follow-up (FU).

  13. Reflection Questions

    Description of experience of writing.

    Time frame: Assessed pre and post- each 30-minute writing block in EASE Sessions 1-5, in the intervention group only.

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Colorado Boulder
    Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arch JJ, Kirk MH, Finkelstein LB. Patient-Reported Worst-Case Scenarios in Advanced Cancer: Presence, Contents, and Predictors. Psychooncology. 2024 Dec;33(12):e70039. doi: 10.1002/pon.70039. PubMed 39710501 ↗
  • Finkelstein LB, Wojdak CP, Studts JL, Arch JJ. Writing Content Predicts Outcomes in Written Exposure to Worst-Case Scenarios for Advanced Cancer. J Palliat Med. 2025 Dec;28(12):1648-1653. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0463. Epub 2025 Jun 12. PubMed 40510017 ↗
  • Arch JJ, Slivjak ET, Finkelstein LB. A Novel Intervention to Reduce Fear of Progression and Trauma Symptoms in Advanced Cancer Using Written Exposure to Worst-Case Scenarios. J Palliat Med. 2024 Aug;27(8):1009-1017. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0658. Epub 2024 Apr 5. PubMed 38579139 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified study survey data and associated documentation will be made available to the research community free of charge through the Cancer Data Service (CDS), maintained by the National Cancer Institute under the Cancer Research Data Commons (CRDC) infrastructure for storing cancer research data generated by NCI funded programs.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07636200
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Boulder
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI), University of Colorado, Denver
Responsible party
Joanna Arch (Professor, University of Colorado, Boulder) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
Start date
May 4, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2030 (estimated)
Completion
May 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion