ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07633626Updated Jun 8, 2026

Vortioxetine for Cognitive Function in ALK-positive NSCLC Treated With Lorlatinib

An observational study in Advanced ALK/ROS1-positive NSCLC, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung (NSCLC) and Lung Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo. Recruiting at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Primary conditionAdenocarcinoma of LungRegistry: CarcinomaReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Carcinoma — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Adenocarcinoma of Lung
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Adenocarcinoma of Lung, a narrower term within Carcinoma.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
24
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study evaluates whether vortioxetine - an antidepressant medication with cognitive-enhancing properties - can reduce the neurological and cognitive side effects associated with lorlatinib treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ALK or ROS1 gene rearrangements.

Lorlatinib is a highly effective third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, but it causes neuropsychological adverse events (NAEs) in approximately 42% of patients, including cognitive impairment, mood changes, and speech disturbances. Vortioxetine has demonstrated cognitive improvement in depressed patients and in preclinical models of androgen deprivation therapy-induced cognitive impairment.

Twenty-four adult patients with ALK/ROS1-positive NSCLC receiving lorlatinib as standard care and prescribed vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day) for NAE management will be enrolled. Comprehensive neuropsychological assessments and quality-of-life questionnaires will be conducted at baseline, week 6, week 12, and month 6 to document changes in cognitive function, depressive symptoms, and quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced ALK/ROS1-positive NSCLC
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung (NSCLC)
  • Lung Adenocarcinoma
  • ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
  • Cognitive Dysfunction
  • Depression
03

In context

Adenocarcinoma of Lung Reclassified

418 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenocarcinoma of Lung; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 211 across 90 observational studies indexed under Adenocarcinoma of Lung.

Browse Adenocarcinoma of Lung studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Compared within Adenocarcinoma of Lung, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Carcinoma. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults (>= 18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced (stage IIIB/IV) lung adenocarcinoma harboring ALK or ROS1 fusions, currently receiving lorlatinib as standard care, and initiating vortioxetine for NAE management.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • confirmed diagnosis of ALK/ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stage IIIB/IV.
  • Currently receiving lorlatinib as part of the standard therapeutic regimen.
  • Documented neurocognitive adverse events (NAEs) attributable to lorlatinib.
  • Age >= 18 years.
  • performance status 0-2.
  • Ability to understand and sign .
  • Expected survival >= 6 months.
  • Planned initiation of vortioxetine as part of standard care.
  • Ability to complete neuropsychological tests and questionnaires in Spanish.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior diagnosis of major cognitive impairment unrelated to cancer treatment.
  • Current use of another antidepressant that cannot be discontinued.
  • Uncontrolled major psychiatric disorder.
  • History of uncontrolled epilepsy or recent seizures.
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment.
  • Known to vortioxetine.
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days.
  • Inability to provide .
  • \< 3 months.
  • to vortioxetine (e.g., concomitant MAOI use).
  • Prior vortioxetine use.
  • Severe psychiatric disorders or significant cognitive impairment unrelated to lorlatinib.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Psychomotor Speed

    Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). The DSST measures psychomotor speed and sustained attention. Participants match symbols to digits within a fixed time limit. Score range: 0 to 90 (number of correct substitutions in 90 seconds); higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. Within-subject change from baseline analyzed using ANCOVA.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  2. Processing Speed and Visual Attention

    Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A). The TMT-A measures processing speed and visual scanning. The outcome is time to completion in seconds; lower scores indicate better performance. Clinically meaningful change assessed using the Reliable Change Index (RCI).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  3. Executive Function and Cognitive Flexibility

    Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B). The TMT-B measures executive function and set-shifting ability. The outcome is time to completion in seconds; lower scores indicate better performance. Clinically meaningful change assessed using the Reliable Change Index (RCI).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  4. Selective and Sustained Attention

    D2-R Test of Attention. The D2-R Test of Attention measures selective and sustained visual attention. The primary metric is the Total Concentration Performance score (TN-E), calculated as total items processed minus errors. Score range: 0 to 299; higher scores indicate better attentional performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  5. Working Memory

    Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS-IV), Working Memory Index. The WAIS-IV Working Memory Index is a standardized composite score derived from Digit Span and Arithmetic subtests. Score range: 45 to 155 (mean 100, SD 15); higher scores indicate better working memory capacity. Change from baseline analyzed using linear mixed-effects models (LMM).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  6. Processing Speed

    Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS-IV), Processing Speed Index. The WAIS-IV Processing Speed Index is a standardized composite score derived from Coding and Symbol Search subtests. Score range: 45 to 155 (mean 100, SD 15); higher scores indicate better processing speed. Change from baseline analyzed using LMM.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  7. Verbal Learning and Memory

    California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). The California Verbal Learning Test measures verbal learning and episodic memory across five immediate recall trials plus short- and long-delay recall. Primary metric: Total Learning Trials 1-5 (score range: 0 to 80); higher scores indicate better verbal memory performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  8. Language

    Phonemic Verbal Fluency Task. Phonemic verbal fluency is measured by the total number of words beginning with a specified letter generated in 60 seconds. There is no fixed maximum; higher scores indicate better phonemic language production and frontal-executive function. The average of three letter trials (F, A, S) will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  9. Language

    Semantic Verbal Fluency Task. Semantic verbal fluency is measured by the total number of words from a specified semantic category generated in 60 seconds. There is no fixed maximum; higher scores indicate better semantic retrieval and language functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  10. Frontal Lobe and Executive Function

    INECO Frontal Screening (IFS). The INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) evaluates frontal lobe functions including motor programming, verbal fluency inhibitory control, working memory, abstraction capacity, and reflex suppression. Score range: 0 to 30; higher scores indicate better executive and frontal lobe functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  11. Subjective Cognitive Complaints

    Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ), Attention/Concentration Subscore. The PDQ Attention/Concentration subscore measures self-reported cognitive difficulties in attention and concentration. Subscore range: 0 to 20; higher scores indicate greater perceived cognitive impairment. Analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  12. Subjective Cognitive Complaints

    Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ), Planning/Organization Subscore. The PDQ Planning/Organization subscore measures self-reported difficulties in planning and organizational ability. Subscore range: 0 to 20; higher scores indicate greater perceived impairment. Analyzed using MMRM.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  13. Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I)

    The Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I) is a clinician-rated measure of overall clinical improvement relative to baseline. Score range: 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse); lower scores indicate greater improvement. Response is defined as a score of 1 or 2. Analyzed using MMRM.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depressive Symptoms

    Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The MADRS is a clinician-administered scale measuring severity of depressive symptoms across 10 items. Score range: 0 to 60; higher scores indicate greater depression severity. Response defined as \>= 50% reduction from baseline; remission defined as score \< 10. MCID: \>= 50% reduction.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Month 6

  2. Depressive Symptoms

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a 9-item self-report scale for depression screening and severity assessment. Score range: 0 to 27; higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom burden. Severity categories: minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), severe (20-27). MCID: \>= 5-point reduction.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  3. Health-Related Quality of Life

    36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Physical Component Summary (PCS). The SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) is a norm-based composite score derived from four SF-36 subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health). Score range: 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better physical health status. MCID: \>= 4 points.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 12

  4. Health-Related Quality of Life

    36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Mental Component Summary (MCS). The SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) is a norm-based composite score derived from four SF-36 subscales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health). Score range: 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better mental health status. MCID: \>= 4 points.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 12

  5. Life Satisfaction

    Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). The Q-LES-Q-SF measures overall enjoyment and satisfaction with daily life across 14 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very poor to 5 = very good). Total score range: 14 to 70; higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction. Items 15 and 16 are scored separately and not included in the total. MCID: \>= 9 points.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 12

  6. Health Utility

    EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D), Utility Index. The EQ-5D utility index is derived from five health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) using the Spanish value set. Score range: -0.654 to 1.0; higher scores indicate better health utility (1.0 = full health, 0 = death). MCID: \>= 0.1.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

  7. Self-Rated Health

    EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). The EQ-VAS is a vertical visual analogue scale for overall self-rated health. Score range: 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better self-rated health (100 = best imaginable health state). MCID: \>= 7 points.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

  8. Functional Capacity

    University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA), Composite Score. The UPSA composite score combines the UPSA-VIM and UPSA-Brief to measure real-world functional capacity across domains including finance and communication. Score range: 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better functional performance. Analyzed using ANCOVA.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  9. Work Limitations

    Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ). The WLQ measures the degree to which health problems interfere with job performance across four scales: time management, physical demands, mental-interpersonal demands, and output demands. Each scale is scored 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater work limitation. An overall WLQ productivity loss score will also be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Month 6

  10. Cognitive and Physical Functioning

    Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ). The CPFQ is a 7-item self-report instrument measuring cognitive and physical energy symptoms relevant to depression and related conditions. Score range: 7 to 42; higher scores indicate greater cognitive and physical impairment. Analyzed only in participants with a baseline score \> 25.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12

  11. Tumor Response to Lorlatinib

    Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). Tumor response is assessed by contrast-enhanced CT scan per RECIST version 1.1 criteria. Response is classified as: Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD). Best overall response will be documented for each participant.

    Time frame: Month 2, Month 6, Month 12

  12. Adverse Events

    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 5.0. All adverse events (AEs) will be graded by type, severity (Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening; Grade 5: death), and causality attribution (unrelated / unlikely / possible / probable / definitely related to vortioxetine). Predefined study suspension thresholds: \> 25% Grade 3, \> 10% Grade 4, or \> 3% Grade 5 AEs attributable to vortioxetine.

    Time frame: All scheduled visits, from baseline through 30 days post-last visit

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sharp AM, Lertphinyowong S, Yee SS, Paredes D, Gelfond J, Johnson-Pais TL, Leach RJ, Liss M, Risinger AL, Sullivan AC, Thompson IM, Morilak DA. Vortioxetine reverses medial prefrontal cortex-mediated cognitive deficits in male rats induced by castration as a model of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Nov;236(11):3183-3195. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05274-4. Epub 2019 May 28. PubMed 31139875 ↗
  • Vaiana AM, Chen Y, Gelfond J, Johnson-Pais TL, Leach RJ, Ramamurthy C, Thompson IM, Morilak DA. Effects of vortioxetine on hippocampal-related cognitive impairment induced in rats by androgen deprivation as a model of prostate cancer treatment. Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 3;13(1):307. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02600-5. PubMed 37788996 ↗
  • Chen G, Hojer AM, Areberg J, Nomikos G. Vortioxetine: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Jun;57(6):673-686. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0612-7. PubMed 29189941 ↗
  • Mork A, Pehrson A, Brennum LT, Nielsen SM, Zhong H, Lassen AB, Miller S, Westrich L, Boyle NJ, Sanchez C, Fischer CW, Liebenberg N, Wegener G, Bundgaard C, Hogg S, Bang-Andersen B, Stensbol TB. Pharmacological effects of Lu AA21004: a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012 Mar;340(3):666-75. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.189068. Epub 2011 Dec 9. PubMed 22171087 ↗
  • Bang-Andersen B, Ruhland T, Jorgensen M, Smith G, Frederiksen K, Jensen KG, Zhong H, Nielsen SM, Hogg S, Mork A, Stensbol TB. Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder. J Med Chem. 2011 May 12;54(9):3206-21. doi: 10.1021/jm101459g. Epub 2011 Apr 12. PubMed 21486038 ↗
  • Kugathasan P, Waller J, Westrich L, Abdourahman A, Tamm JA, Pehrson AL, Dale E, Gulinello M, Sanchez C, Li Y. In vivo and in vitro effects of vortioxetine on molecules associated with neuroplasticity. J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Mar;31(3):365-376. doi: 10.1177/0269881116667710. Epub 2016 Sep 28. PubMed 27678087 ↗
  • He D, Lasek AW. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Regulates Internalization of the Dopamine D2 Receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2020 Feb;97(2):123-131. doi: 10.1124/mol.119.117473. Epub 2019 Nov 16. PubMed 31734646 ↗
  • Dutton JW 3rd, Chen H, You C, Brodie MS, Lasek AW. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase regulates binge-like drinking and dopamine receptor sensitivity in the ventral tegmental area. Addict Biol. 2017 May;22(3):665-678. doi: 10.1111/adb.12358. Epub 2016 Jan 11. PubMed 26752591 ↗
  • Sisi M, Fusaroli M, De Giglio A, Facchinetti F, Ardizzoni A, Raschi E, Gelsomino F. Psychiatric Adverse Reactions to Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of Spontaneous Reports Submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Target Oncol. 2022 Jan;17(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s11523-021-00865-8. Epub 2022 Jan 13. PubMed 35025076 ↗
  • Dagogo-Jack I, Oxnard GR, Evangelist M, Digumarthy SR, Lin JJ, Gainor JF, Murphy JF, Rabin MS, Heist RS, Muzikansky A, Shaw AT. Phase II Study of Lorlatinib in Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Lung Cancer and CNS-Specific Relapse. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 May;6:e2100522. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00522. PubMed 35584349 ↗
  • Jia K, Ren S. Neurocognitive Adverse Events of Lorlatinib: On the Way to Precise Prediction? J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Jan;18(1):26-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.003. No abstract available. PubMed 36543433 ↗
  • Bauer TM, Felip E, Solomon BJ, Thurm H, Peltz G, Chioda MD, Shaw AT. Clinical Management of Adverse Events Associated with Lorlatinib. Oncologist. 2019 Aug;24(8):1103-1110. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0380. Epub 2019 Mar 19. PubMed 30890623 ↗
  • Priantti JN, Vilbert M, de Moraes FCA, Madeira T, de Lima Santiago EM, Leighl NB, Cavalcante L, Karim NFA. Neurocognitive Adverse Events Related to Lorlatinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;16(14):2611. doi: 10.3390/cancers16142611. PubMed 39061249 ↗
  • Jiang J, Zhao C, Zhang F, Liu Z, Zhou K, Ren X, Wan Y. ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with and without brain metastases: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e060782. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060782. PubMed 36123063 ↗
  • Shaw AT, Felip E, Bauer TM, Besse B, Navarro A, Postel-Vinay S, Gainor JF, Johnson M, Dietrich J, James LP, Clancy JS, Chen J, Martini JF, Abbattista A, Solomon BJ. Lorlatinib in non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK or ROS1 rearrangement: an international, multicentre, open-label, single-arm first-in-man phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1590-1599. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30680-0. Epub 2017 Oct 23. PubMed 29074098 ↗
  • Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Gadgeel S, Ahn JS, Kim DW, Ou SI, Perol M, Dziadziuszko R, Rosell R, Zeaiter A, Mitry E, Golding S, Balas B, Noe J, Morcos PN, Mok T; ALEX Trial Investigators. Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 31;377(9):829-838. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704795. Epub 2017 Jun 6. PubMed 28586279 ↗
  • Petrelli F, Lazzari C, Ardito R, Borgonovo K, Bulotta A, Conti B, Cabiddu M, Capitanio JF, Brighenti M, Ghilardi M, Gianni L, Barni S, Gregorc V. Efficacy of ALK inhibitors on NSCLC brain metastases: A systematic review and pooled analysis of 21 studies. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 27;13(7):e0201425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201425. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30052658 ↗
  • Rangachari D, Yamaguchi N, VanderLaan PA, Folch E, Mahadevan A, Floyd SR, Uhlmann EJ, Wong ET, Dahlberg SE, Huberman MS, Costa DB. Brain metastases in patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancers. Lung Cancer. 2015 Apr;88(1):108-11. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.01.020. Epub 2015 Feb 4. PubMed 25682925 ↗
  • 18. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare . Report on the Deliberation Results. www.pmda.go.jp/files/000228981.pdf
  • 17. European Medicines Agency. Lorviqua. www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/lorviqua
  • 16. US FDA . FDA approves Lorlatinib for metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC. www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-Lorlatinib-metastatic-alk-positive-nsclc
  • Syed YY. Lorlatinib: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2019 Jan;79(1):93-98. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1041-0. PubMed 30604291 ↗
  • Solomon BJ, Besse B, Bauer TM, Felip E, Soo RA, Camidge DR, Chiari R, Bearz A, Lin CC, Gadgeel SM, Riely GJ, Tan EH, Seto T, James LP, Clancy JS, Abbattista A, Martini JF, Chen J, Peltz G, Thurm H, Ou SI, Shaw AT. Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1654-1667. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30649-1. Epub 2018 Nov 6. PubMed 30413378 ↗
  • Pacheco JM, Gao D, Smith D, Purcell T, Hancock M, Bunn P, Robin T, Liu A, Karam S, Gaspar L, Kavanagh B, Rusthoven C, Aisner D, Doebele R, Camidge DR. Natural History and Factors Associated with Overall Survival in Stage IV ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Apr;14(4):691-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.12.014. Epub 2018 Dec 30. PubMed 30599201 ↗
  • Sellmann L, Fenchel K, Dempke WC. Improved overall survival following tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer-the Holy Grail in cancer treatment? Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015 Jun;4(3):223-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2015.03.01. PubMed 26207209 ↗
  • Morgensztern D, Ng SH, Gao F, Govindan R. Trends in stage distribution for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a National Cancer Database survey. J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Jan;5(1):29-33. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181c5920c. PubMed 19952801 ↗
  • 10. American Cancer Society . Lung cancer survival rates. www.cancer.org/cancer/lung-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html
  • Barrios CH, Werutsky G, Martinez-Mesa J. The global conduct of cancer clinical trials: challenges and opportunities. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015:e132-9. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e132. PubMed 25993164 ↗
  • Parra-Medina R, Castaneda-Gonzalez JP, Montoya L, Paula Gomez-Gomez M, Clavijo Cabezas D, Plazas Vargas M. Prevalence of oncogenic driver mutations in Hispanics/Latin patients with lung cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 2023 Nov;185:107378. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107378. Epub 2023 Sep 15. PubMed 37729688 ↗
  • Arrieta O, Cardona AF, Bramuglia G, Cruz-Rico G, Corrales L, Martin C, Imaz-Olguin V, Castillo O, Cuello M, Rojas-Bilbao E, Casas G, Fernandez C, Aren Frontera O, Denninghoff V, Recondo G, Aviles-Salas A, Mas-Lopez LA, Oblitas G, Rojas L, Piottante A, Jimenez-Garcia E, Sanchez-Sosa S, Saenz-Frias J, Lupera H, Ramirez-Tirado LA, Vargas C, Carranza H, Astudillo H, Wills LB, Pichelbaur E, Raez LE; on behalf of the CLICaP. Molecular Epidemiology of ALK Rearrangements in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma in Latin America. Oncology. 2019;96(4):207-216. doi: 10.1159/000493733. Epub 2018 Nov 26. PubMed 30476928 ↗
  • Mazieres J, Iadeluca L, Shaw AT, Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, Felip E, Goto Y, Kim DW, Mok T, Reisman A, Thurm H, Polli AM, Liu G. Patient-reported outcomes from the randomized phase 3 CROWN study of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2022 Dec;174:146-156. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 7. PubMed 36410210 ↗
  • Solomon BJ, Liu G, Felip E, Mok TSK, Soo RA, Mazieres J, Shaw AT, de Marinis F, Goto Y, Wu YL, Kim DW, Martini JF, Messina R, Paolini J, Polli A, Thomaidou D, Toffalorio F, Bauer TM. Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 10;42(29):3400-3409. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00581. Epub 2024 May 31. PubMed 38819031 ↗
  • Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, Mok TSK, Liu G, Mazieres J, de Marinis F, Goto Y, Kim DW, Wu YL, Jassem J, Lopez FL, Soo RA, Shaw AT, Polli A, Messina R, Iadeluca L, Toffalorio F, Felip E. Efficacy and safety of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of data from the phase 3, randomised, open-label CROWN study. Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Apr;11(4):354-366. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00437-4. Epub 2022 Dec 16. PubMed 36535300 ↗
  • Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, Felip E, Goto Y, Liu G, Mazieres J, Kim DW, Mok T, Polli A, Thurm H, Calella AM, Peltz G, Solomon BJ; CROWN Trial Investigators. First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 19;383(21):2018-2029. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027187. PubMed 33207094 ↗
  • Zia V, Lengyel CG, Tajima CC, de Mello RA. Advancements of ALK inhibition of non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Jul 31;12(7):1563-1574. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-619. Epub 2023 Jul 4. PubMed 37577315 ↗
  • Barta JA, Powell CA, Wisnivesky JP. Global Epidemiology of Lung Cancer. Ann Glob Health. 2019 Jan 22;85(1):8. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2419. PubMed 30741509 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07633626
Lead sponsor
Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 8, 2026
Start date
Mar 10, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 10, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 10, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Study contacts

Felipe Canro, MD
Contact
felipe.canro@gmail.com
+57 310 8593083

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion