ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07741435METHYLSCAPE-COUpdated Aug 3, 2026

Methylation Profile Test (Methylscape) in Body Fluids for Multi-Cancer Detection and Monitoring in Colombia

An observational study in Neoplasms, Solid Tumor and Breast Neoplasms, sponsored by Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo. Recruiting at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,250
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

DNA methylation changes occur early and broadly during carcinogenesis. Methylscape is a rapid assay that detects global DNA methylation patterns in body fluids (blood, urine, and saliva) and may detect a cancer signal and predict the cancer signal origin (CSO) from a single fluid sample, using the differential interaction between methylated and unmethylated DNA and gold nanoparticles.

This prospective observational study evaluates the diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the Methylscape test in Colombian patients with various biopsy-confirmed solid tumors compared with age- and sex-matched cancer-free (healthy) volunteers. The study is conducted in three parts: Phase 1 validates the assay in 250 patients with cancer; Sub-study 2a compares 1,500 patients with cancer against 1,500 matched cancer-free volunteers; and Sub-study 2b uses serial blood and urine sampling in 300 patients with early-stage disease to assess detection of disease relapse during follow-up, in parallel with standard imaging.

The study also estimates positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) and projects the budget impact and cost-effectiveness of Methylscape as a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tool in an upper-middle-income Latin American setting.

Read the detailed description

Background. Most cancers lack reliable screening methods, often leading to advanced-stage diagnosis. Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests based on body fluids can screen for several cancer types from a single sample. DNA methylation, which occurs early in carcinogenesis and is tissue-specific, is the most commonly used marker in MCED assays. Methylscape leverages global differences in the genomic distribution of methylation between cancerous and normal tissues, detected electrochemically through differential adsorption of DNA on gold electrodes.

Objective. To determine whether Methylscape can detect the methylation landscape across multiple cancer types with sufficiently high specificity to predict the cancer signal origin (CSO), and to assess its potential application as a population-scale MCED test among Colombians.

Design. Single-center prospective observational study conducted at CTIC (Bogotá, Colombia), with sample processing at CTIC and Columbia University. Phase 1 (N=250 patients with cancer) provides initial validation across solid tumor types selected by local incidence. Sub-study 2a (1,500 patients with cancer and 1,500 matched cancer-free volunteers) provides large-scale clinical validation. Sub-study 2b (N=300 early-stage patients) evaluates serial blood/urine Methylscape testing for relapse detection during follow-up every 6 months. Phase 1 participants may enter Sub-studies 2a/2b only if they meet the corresponding criteria and provide new informed consent; cross-phase participation is flagged in the database to adjust statistical estimates.

Biospecimens \& reference standards. Blood/plasma (K2EDTA), urine, saliva, and FFPE tumor tissue are collected and stored at -80 °C in the CTIC biobank. Cancers are coded with WHO ICD-O-3; stage per AJCC 8th edition. Reference standards: histopathology (MCED), RECIST 1.1 or biopsy (relapse), and absence of cancer by record review plus 12-month follow-up (cancer-free).

Statistical analysis. Sensitivity and specificity are estimated overall and by stage/type (expected sensitivity 85-90%, specificity 98%; 95% confidence, 80% power). PPV/NPV are derived via Bayes' theorem with prevalence from GLOBOCAN 2022; 95% CIs by stratified bootstrap (1,000 resamples). Budget impact and cost-effectiveness (QALYs) are projected via microsimulation and Markov models.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasms
  • Solid Tumor
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Stomach Neoplasms
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Urologic Neoplasms
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local

Keywords

  • DNA methylation
  • Liquid biopsy
  • Cell-free DNA (cfDNA)
  • Multi-cancer early detection (MCED)
  • Methylscape
  • Cancer signal origin
  • Minimal residual disease
  • Methylation biomarker
  • Cancer screening
  • Colombia
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,250 is above the median of 200 across 2,638 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Colombian adults (≥18 years) with biopsy-confirmed solid tumors selected by local incidence (emphasis on breast, lung, and gastric cancer) and age- and sex-matched cancer-free volunteers, recruited at a single cancer center (CTIC) in Bogotá, Colombia.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Willing and able to participate and to provide the required samples (blood, urine, saliva) and demographic information (age, sex, race/ethnicity, ).
  • Able to provide written for participation and for use of biological samples. For CTIC Biobank samples, prior research-use consent is verified.
  • Demographic/anthropometric comparability (race, ethnicity, BMI) with other participants; race/ethnicity by self-identification (WHO and national census categories); BMI per WHO categories.

Inclusion - Cancer cohort:

  • Cancer diagnosis confirmed within 90 days prior to sample collection.
  • -proven with radiological staging.
  • No anticancer treatment at the time of collection or within the previous 3 years.
  • Inclusion - Cancer-free (healthy) cohort:
  • No cancer diagnosis or treatment in the previous 3 years (ICD-O-3 behavior code 2 or 3).
  • Not under evaluation for suspected cancer (verified by medical record review or additional medical evaluation).
  • Subjects with benign tumors (code 0) or tumors of uncertain behavior (code 1) may be included if there is no clinical evidence of progression or malignancy.

Additional criteria - tumor-burden monitoring (Sub-study 2b):

  • Biopsy-confirmed cancer.
  • performance status ≤ 2.

Exclusion Criteria (both cohorts):

  • Failure to meet the general or cohort-specific inclusion criteria.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Organ transplant recipients.
  • Use of demethylating agents (azacitidine, decitabine) or cytotoxic agents (including for /inflammatory conditions).
  • Prior or ongoing anticancer therapy: cancer surgery beyond that needed for diagnosis; local, regional, or systemic chemotherapy (including chemoembolization); targeted therapy; immunotherapy (including cancer vaccines); hormonal therapy; or radiotherapy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,250 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with cancer

    Colombian adults (≥18 y) with biopsy-confirmed solid tumors (behavior code 3, ICD-O-3) diagnosed within 90 days and untreated. Provide blood, urine, saliva, and FFPE tumor tissue for Methylscape testing. An early-stage subset is followed with serial blood/urine sampling for relapse detection (Sub-study 2b).

    Diagnostic Test: Methylscape DNA methylation assay

  • Cancer-free (healthy) volunteers

    Colombian adults (≥18 y) without cancer diagnosis or treatment in the prior 3 years, matched to cancer patients by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and BMI. Provide blood, urine, and saliva for Methylscape testing (Sub-study 2a).

    Diagnostic Test: Methylscape DNA methylation assay

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMethylscape DNA methylation assay

    Rapid assay measuring global DNA methylation patterns in body fluids (blood/plasma, urine, saliva) and FFPE tumor tissue via differential adsorption of methylated vs. unmethylated DNA on gold electrodes (differential pulse voltammetry), to detect a cancer signal and predict the cancer signal origin (CSO). Applied to both groups; no therapeutic intervention is administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of the Methylscape test for cancer-signal detection, as assessed against histopathological confirmation as the reference standard

    Percentage of participants with biopsy-confirmed cancer who have a positive Methylscape result (cancer signal detected). Reported overall and by subgroup (cancer stage per AJCC 8th ed. and cancer type per ICD-O); all subgroups use the same unit. Adjusted by GLOBOCAN 2022 incidence.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Specificity of the Methylscape test for cancer-signal detection, as assessed against absence of cancer confirmed by medical-record review and 12-month follow-up

    Percentage of confirmed cancer-free volunteers who have a negative Methylscape result (no cancer signal detected).

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of Methylscape cancer-signal-origin (CSO) prediction, measured as the percentage of cases in which the predicted tissue of origin matches the histopathologically confirmed primary tumor site

    Among participants with a positive Methylscape cancer signal, the percentage in which the Methylscape-predicted tissue of origin agrees with the confirmed primary site (ICD-O morphology code).

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Sensitivity and specificity of serial Methylscape testing for detection of disease relapse, as assessed against imaging response (RECIST 1.1) or biopsy of local recurrence

    In early-stage participants under follow-up (Sub-study 2b), sensitivity and specificity of serial blood/urine Methylscape testing for detecting disease relapse. Sensitivity and specificity are both reported as percentages (same unit of measure); the reference standard is radiological progression per RECIST 1.1 or biopsy-confirmed local recurrence.

    Time frame: At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of Methylscape for cancer-signal detection

    Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Methylscape cancer-signal result, both reported as percentages. Values are computed via Bayes' theorem using cancer prevalence estimated from GLOBOCAN 2022, with 95% confidence intervals obtained by stratified bootstrap (1,000 resamples). Reference standard: histopathological confirmation for cancer status and absence of cancer by medical-record review and 12-month follow-up for cancer-free status.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  2. Diagnostic performance of Methylscape in cancers with versus without established screening programs

    Sensitivity and specificity of Methylscape, both reported as percentages, compared between cancers with established screening options (e.g., breast, cervical, lung) and cancers without standard screening. Reference standard: histopathological confirmation (sensitivity) and absence of cancer by medical-record review and 12-month follow-up (specificity).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  3. Budget impact of implementing Methylscape as a multi-cancer early detection strategy

    Estimated incremental budget impact of introducing Methylscape as a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) and relapse-detection tool versus current screening and follow-up practice in the Colombian health system, reported in Colombian pesos (COP). Estimated using microsimulation and Markov models populated with study-derived diagnostic performance.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 24 months

  4. Cost-effectiveness of Methylscape (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio)

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Methylscape versus current practice, reported as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, in Colombian pesos per QALY (COP/QALY). Estimated using microsimulation and Markov models populated with study-derived diagnostic performance.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Fundación CTIC Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo
    Bogotá, Bogota D.C. 110131, Colombia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sina AA, Carrascosa LG, Liang Z, Grewal YS, Wardiana A, Shiddiky MJA, Gardiner RA, Samaratunga H, Gandhi MK, Scott RJ, Korbie D, Trau M. Epigenetically reprogrammed methylation landscape drives the DNA self-assembly and serves as a universal cancer biomarker. Nat Commun. 2018 Dec 4;9(1):4915. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07214-w. PubMed 30514834 ↗
  • Bretthauer M, Wieszczy P, Loberg M, Kaminski MF, Werner TF, Helsingen LM, Mori Y, Holme O, Adami HO, Kalager M. Estimated Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Nov 1;183(11):1196-1203. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3798. PubMed 37639247 ↗
  • Welch HG, Bergmark R. Cancer Screening, Incidental Detection, and Overdiagnosis. Clin Chem. 2024 Jan 4;70(1):179-189. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad127. PubMed 37757858 ↗
  • Tafazzoli A, Ramsey SD, Shaul A, Chavan A, Ye W, Kansal AR, Ofman J, Fendrick AM. The Potential Value-Based Price of a Multi-Cancer Early Detection Genomic Blood Test to Complement Current Single Cancer Screening in the USA. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Nov;40(11):1107-1117. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01181-3. Epub 2022 Aug 30. PubMed 36038710 ↗
  • Nicholson BD, Oke J, Virdee PS, Harris DA, O'Doherty C, Park JE, Hamady Z, Sehgal V, Millar A, Medley L, Tonner S, Vargova M, Engonidou L, Riahi K, Luan Y, Hiom S, Kumar H, Nandani H, Kurtzman KN, Yu LM, Freestone C, Pearson S, Hobbs FR, Perera R, Middleton MR. Multi-cancer early detection test in symptomatic patients referred for cancer investigation in England and Wales (SYMPLIFY): a large-scale, observational cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jul;24(7):733-743. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00277-2. Epub 2023 Jun 20. PubMed 37352875 ↗
  • Minasian LM, Pinsky P, Katki HA, Dickherber T, Han PKJ, Harris L, Patriotis C, Srivastava S, Weil CJ, Prorok PC, Castle PE. Study design considerations for trials to evaluate multicancer early detection assays for clinical utility. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Mar 9;115(3):250-257. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac218. PubMed 36458902 ↗
  • Klein EA, Richards D, Cohn A, Tummala M, Lapham R, Cosgrove D, Chung G, Clement J, Gao J, Hunkapiller N, Jamshidi A, Kurtzman KN, Seiden MV, Swanton C, Liu MC. Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set. Ann Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1167-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.806. Epub 2021 Jun 24. PubMed 34176681 ↗
  • LeeVan E, Pinsky P. Predictive Performance of Cell-Free Nucleic Acid-Based Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tests: A Systematic Review. Clin Chem. 2024 Jan 4;70(1):90-101. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad134. PubMed 37791504 ↗
  • Cohen JD, Li L, Wang Y, Thoburn C, Afsari B, Danilova L, Douville C, Javed AA, Wong F, Mattox A, Hruban RH, Wolfgang CL, Goggins MG, Dal Molin M, Wang TL, Roden R, Klein AP, Ptak J, Dobbyn L, Schaefer J, Silliman N, Popoli M, Vogelstein JT, Browne JD, Schoen RE, Brand RE, Tie J, Gibbs P, Wong HL, Mansfield AS, Jen J, Hanash SM, Falconi M, Allen PJ, Zhou S, Bettegowda C, Diaz LA Jr, Tomasetti C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lennon AM, Papadopoulos N. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science. 2018 Feb 23;359(6378):926-930. doi: 10.1126/science.aar3247. Epub 2018 Jan 18. PubMed 29348365 ↗
  • Hackshaw A, Clarke CA, Hartman AR. New genomic technologies for multi-cancer early detection: Rethinking the scope of cancer screening. Cancer Cell. 2022 Feb 14;40(2):109-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Feb 3. PubMed 35120599 ↗
  • Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, Wender RC. Cancer screening in the United States, 2019: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 May;69(3):184-210. doi: 10.3322/caac.21557. Epub 2019 Mar 15. PubMed 30875085 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in study publications will be made available, together with the corresponding data dictionary. Data will be shared in fully anonymized form, with direct and indirect identifiers removed in accordance with Colombian Law 1581 of 2012 on personal data protection. Sharing is subject to the approvals and conditions described under Access Criteria and to any constraints arising from the sponsor's intellectual-property rights in the Methylscape assay

Supporting information: Clinical study report

Time frame: Data will become available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and will remain available until 5 years after the study completion date, consistent with the institutional data-retention period.

Access criteria: Access will be granted to qualified researchers whose proposed use has been approved by the study sponsor and the Comité de Ética en Investigación. Requestors must submit a methodologically sound research proposal and execute a data access/use agreement. Requests should be directed to the principal investigator. Data will be shared through a secure, controlled-access mechanism, and no personally identifiable information will be released.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07741435
Lead sponsor
Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 3, 2026
Start date
Jun 5, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 4, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Study contacts

Andrés Cardona, MD, MSc, PhD, MBA
Contact
acardona@fctic.org
+573016348173

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion