ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07632196Updated Jun 8, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation on Fecal Continence in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Neoplasia

An interventional study of Posterior tibial nerve stimulation intervention group and Control group in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), Rectal Neoplasm Malignant and Quality of Life (QOL), sponsored by Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa. Recruiting at 2 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Sponsored by Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rectal neoplasia is one of the most prevalent cancers in Spain, and the treatment of choice is total mesorectal excision (TME), as it has demonstrated significant oncological improvements. However, mesorectal excision is not without complications, and patients often experience altered bowel function in the form of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), as well as erectile dysfunction. However, few studies evaluate faecal incontinence, as most focus on oncological outcomes.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on fecal incontinence, sexual dysfunction, and quality of life in patients who underwent to rectal surgery for rectal neoplasia.

It will be conducted a randomized clinical trial (1:1) with two arms: half of the patients will receive posterior tibial nerve stimulation, while the other half will undergo stimulation with subtherapeutic doses. Faecal incontinence will be assessed using the LARS and Wexner questionnaires, and quality of life and sexual function will be assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQLS) and the Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR38), at one month, six months and one year after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS)
  • Rectal Neoplasm Malignant
  • Quality of Life (QOL)
  • Fecal Incontinence (FI)
  • Disorder of Ejaculation

Keywords

  • total mesorectum excision
  • rectal neoplasm
  • randomised clinical trial
  • posterior tibial nerve stimulation
  • low anterior resection syndrome (LARS)
  • life quality
  • Fecal Incontinence (FI)
03

In context

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Anterior Resection Syndrome; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is above the median of 72 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Low Anterior Resection Syndrome.

Browse Low Anterior Resection Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Adult patients diagnosed with rectal neoplasia and who have undergone a high anterior rectal resection regardless of the surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, laparoscopic+TaTME or robotic+TaTME).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not operated or within active surveillance strategy programs (watch \& wait)
  • Patients with ostomy
  • Patients with to the use of the neurostimulator:

    • Pacemaker / Defibrillator / Other electronic devices
    • History of heart problems
    • Propensity to excessive bleeding (coagulopathies)
    • Damage to the nervous system (epilepsy)
    • Current pregnancy
    • Infections or skin lesions
    • Severe vascular disorders
    • Active neoplasms.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Posterior tibial nerve stimulation with Beurer EM-49 digital neuroestimulator at complete doses

    Device: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation intervention group

  • Sham comparator
    Control group

    Posterior tibial nerve stimulation with Beurer EM-49 digital neuroestimulator at subtherapeutic doses

    Device: Control group

Interventions

  • DevicePosterior tibial nerve stimulation intervention group

    In the intervention group, Beurer EM-49 digital neurostimulator will be used, with CE marking, and a dose of 20 Hertz (Hz) - 200 microseconds (μs) will be applied. As the control group and the intervention group, the pelvic floor rehabilitator will program the neurostimulator for each case and then they will be trained on how to perform the neurostimulation. The first session will be carried out with the rehabilitator to learn how it works and resolve doubts about its use, and later the sessions will be carried out at home. In both groups, a program for carrying out sessions will be indicated according to the following scheme: * From the 1st month to the 3rd month post-surgery: stimulation 3 times a week * From the 4th month to the 6th month post-surgery: stimulation 2 times a week * From the 7th to the 12th month post-surgery: 1 time a week

  • DeviceControl group

    In the intervention group, Beurer EM-49 digital neurostimulator will be used, with CE marking; and a dose of 80 Hertz (Hz) - 150 microseconds (μs) will be applied. As the control group and the intervention group, the pelvic floor rehabilitator will program the neurostimulator for each case and then they will be trained on how to perform the neurostimulation. In order to apply the therapy, the patient must sit down for the placement of the electrodes. It will be performed on 2 feet at the same time. The first session will be carried out with the rehabilitator to learn how it works and resolve doubts about its use, and later the sessions will be carried out at home. In both groups, a program for carrying out sessions will be indicated according to the following scheme: * From the 1st month to the 3rd month post-surgery: stimulation 3 times a week * From the 4th month to the 6th month post-surgery: stimulation 2 times a week * From the 7th to the 12th month post-surgery: 1 time a week

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Faecal incontinence (FI) - LARS 1st month

    Assessed by LARS questionnaire Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): LARS scale consists of 5 questions: gas incontinence (0,4,7 points), liquid incontinence (0,3,3 points), stool frequency (4,2,0,5 points), defecation fractionation (0,9,11 points) and defecatory urgency (0, 11,16 points). The score range is between 0 and 42 points. Patients are categorized into three groups: no LARS (0 to 20 points), mild LARS (21 to 29 points) and severe LARS (30 to 42 points).

    Time frame: 1st month post-surgery

  2. Faecal incontinence (FI) - LARS 6th month

    Assessed by LARS questionnaire Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): LARS scale consists of 5 questions: gas incontinence (0,4,7 points), liquid incontinence (0,3,3 points), stool frequency (4,2,0,5 points), defecation fractionation (0,9,11 points) and defecatory urgency (0, 11,16 points). The score range is between 0 and 42 points. Patients are categorized into three groups: no LARS (0 to 20 points), mild LARS (21 to 29 points) and severe LARS (30 to 42 points).

    Time frame: 6th month post-surgery

  3. Faecal incontinence (FI) - LARS 12th month

    Assessed by LARS questionnaire Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): LARS scale consists of 5 questions: gas incontinence (0,4,7 points), liquid incontinence (0,3,3 points), stool frequency (4,2,0,5 points), defecation fractionation (0,9,11 points) and defecatory urgency (0, 11,16 points). The score range is between 0 and 42 points. Patients are categorized into three groups: no LARS (0 to 20 points), mild LARS (21 to 29 points) and severe LARS (30 to 42 points).

    Time frame: 12th month post-surgery

  4. Feacal incontinence (FI) - Wexner 1st month

    Assessed by Wexner questionnaire. Wexner scale consists of 5 questions (range 0-4): incontinence of solid stools, incontinence of liquid stools, incontinence of gases, use of pads or diapers and alteration of social life. Depending on the frequency, a score of 0 to 4 is assigned. The score can range from 0 to 20 points, considering no incontinence as 0 to 2 points, mild incontinence as a result of 3 to 6 points, moderate incontinence as 7 to 11 points and severe incontinence as a result greater than or equal to 12 points.

    Time frame: 1st month post-surgery

  5. Faecal incontinence (FI) - Wexner 6th month

    Assessed by Wexner questionnaire. Wexner scale consists of 5 questions (range 0-4): incontinence of solid stools, incontinence of liquid stools, incontinence of gases, use of pads or diapers and alteration of social life. Depending on the frequency, a score of 0 to 4 is assigned. The score can range from 0 to 20 points, considering no incontinence as 0 to 2 points, mild incontinence as a result of 3 to 6 points, moderate incontinence as 7 to 11 points and severe incontinence as a result greater than or equal to 12 points.

    Time frame: 6th month post-surgery

  6. Faecal incontinece (FI) - Wexner 12th month

    Assessed by Wexner questionnaire. Wexner scale consists of 5 questions (range 0-4): incontinence of solid stools, incontinence of liquid stools, incontinence of gases, use of pads or diapers and alteration of social life. Depending on the frequency, a score of 0 to 4 is assigned. The score can range from 0 to 20 points, considering no incontinence as 0 to 2 points, mild incontinence as a result of 3 to 6 points, moderate incontinence as 7 to 11 points and severe incontinence as a result greater than or equal to 12 points.

    Time frame: 12th month post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sexual impairment 1st month

    Assessed by QLQ-CR38 questionnaire (question 17-18 for both sexes, 20-21 for men and 22-23 for women). Each question can be answered from 1 to 4 points. And then is it calculated in the sexual impairment analysis (symptoms area)

    Time frame: 1st month post-surgery

  2. Sexual impairment - 6th month

    Assessed by QLQ-CR38 questionnaire (question 17-18 for both sexes, 20-21 for men and 22-23 for women). Each question can be answered from 1 to 4 points. And then is it calculated in the sexual impairment analysis (symptoms area)

    Time frame: 6th month post-surgery

  3. Sexual impairment - 12th month

    Assessed by QLQ-CR38 questionnaire (question 17-18 for both sexes, 20-21 for men and 22-23 for women). Each question can be answered from 1 to 4 points. And then is it calculated in the sexual impairment analysis (symptoms area)

    Time frame: 12th month post-surgery

  4. Quality of life (QoL) - FIQLS 1st month

    Assessed by: -Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale(FIQLS):composed of 29 items that evaluate 4 health dimensions:lifestyle(10 items),behavior(9 items),depression/self-esteem(7 items) and shame(3 items).Each item has a range from 1 to 5,with 1 being the minimum value for the quality of life state.

    Time frame: 1st month post-surgery

  5. Quality of life (QoL) - FIQLS 6th month

    Assessed by: -Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale(FIQLS):composed of 29 items that evaluate 4 health dimensions:lifestyle(10 items),behavior(9 items),depression/self-esteem(7 items) and shame(3 items).Each item has a range from 1 to 5,with 1 being the minimum value for the quality of life state

    Time frame: 6th month post-surgery

  6. Quality of life (QoL) - FIQLS 12th month

    Assessed by: -Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale(FIQLS):composed of 29 items that evaluate 4 health dimensions:lifestyle(10 items),behavior(9 items),depression/self-esteem(7 items) and shame(3 items).Each item has a range from 1 to 5,with 1 being the minimum value for the quality of life state

    Time frame: 12th month post-surgery

  7. Quality of life (QoL) - QLQ-CR 38 1st month

    Assessed by: -Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire(QLQ-CR38):organized into 2 areas: 1.Functioning area,which includes the body image and sexual functioning scales and the items on enjoying sex and worrying about the future.2.Symptom area with scales for problems with urination,gastrointestinal symptoms,chemotherapy side effects,problems with defecation,problems with the stoma,sexual problems in men and women,and the weight loss item. All scores ranged 1 to 4, and then are lineal transformation is done (0 to 100). In the functioning area,a higher score indicates a better quality of life,while in the symptom area, a higher score indicates a worse quality

    Time frame: 1st month

  8. Quality of life (QoL) - QLQ-CR38 6th month

    Assessed by: -Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire(QLQ-CR38):organized into 2 areas: 1.Functioning area,which includes the body image and sexual functioning scales and the items on enjoying sex and worrying about the future.2.Symptom area with scales for problems with urination,gastrointestinal symptoms,chemotherapy side effects,problems with defecation,problems with the stoma,sexual problems in men and women,and the weight loss item. All scores ranged 1 to 4, and then are lineal transformation is done (0 to 100). In the functioning area,a higher score indicates a better quality of life,while in the symptom area, a higher score indicates a worse quality

    Time frame: 6th month post-surgery

  9. Quality of life (QoL) - QLQ-CR38 12th month

    Assessed by: -Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire(QLQ-CR38):organized into 2 areas: 1.Functioning area,which includes the body image and sexual functioning scales and the items on enjoying sex and worrying about the future.2.Symptom area with scales for problems with urination,gastrointestinal symptoms,chemotherapy side effects,problems with defecation,problems with the stoma,sexual problems in men and women,and the weight loss item. All scores ranged 1 to 4, and then are lineal transformation is done (0 to 100). In the functioning area,a higher score indicates a better quality of life,while in the symptom area, a higher score indicates a worse quality

    Time frame: 12th month post-surgery

  10. Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I)

    Assessed by PGI-I questionnaire. The Patient Global Improvement Visual Analogue Scale (PGI-I) will be used to allow patients to comparatively assess their degree of global improvement after undergoing posterior tibial nerve stimulation therapy. The scale in question has only one question that asks the patient to classify the degree of symptom relief obtained with the treatment according to the 7-point Likert scale. The higher the score, the better the perception of quality of life.

    Time frame: 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Patient's characteristics

    Age at diagnosis (years), sex (man/woman), height (m), weight (kg), BMI (kg/m2), prior anorectal disease (yes and not, if yes should specify)

    Time frame: At the enrollment

  2. Concomitant medication for stool

    methylcellulose, loperamide, ... (yes or no, if yes should specify)

    Time frame: At the enrollment

  3. Tumor characteristics

    Date of diagnosis (exact day), clinical TNM stage (TNM), tumour height from the anal verge by colonoscopy (cm) and proctoscopy (cm) magnetic resonance imaging findings (TNM, cm to anal verge), neadjuvant treatment (yes or no, which type), CEA values (ng/mL), neutrophil and lymphocyte values pre and post-chemotherapy (absolut value x10e9)

    Time frame: At the enrollment

  4. Surgical details

    Date of surgery, surgical approach (laparoscopic (LAP), robotic (ROB), LAP + transanal (TaTME), ROB + TaTME), transanal extraction of the specimen (yes or no), intraoperative complications (specify), type of anastomosis (mechanic, manual), height of anastomosis (cm), protective ileostomy (yes or no)

    Time frame: At the enrollment

  5. Follow-up

    Days of hospital stay (days), days until intake (days), postoperative complications (yes or no, if yes specify and complete Clavien-Dindo clasification), treatment of postoperative complication (need of new surgery, yes or no, if yes specify surgical procedure), readmission (yes or no, specify why)

    Time frame: From the surgical day (day 1) to the end of the study (day 360)

  6. Esphinteric funcionality

    Rectal examination with basal tone and transperineal ultrasound (normal, insufficient expulsive maneuver, sphincter defect, anism, rectal hypersensitivity, rectal hyposensitivity, not performed), Oxford classification of esphinteric muscular strenght (0 to 5, being 5 good function).

    Time frame: At 1st month and 12th month from day 1 (surgery day)

  7. Compliance diary

    Registration of the sessions done and observations

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa
    Manresa, Barcelona 08243, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Anna Arnau, PhD · Contactaarnau@althaia.cat · +34 93 875 93 00
    • Meritxell Font Prat, MD · Principal investigator
  • Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Althaia
    Manresa, Barcelona 08243, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Meritxell Font, Medical doctor · Contactmeritxell.fontprat@gmail.com · +34 676131774
    • Ignasi Puig, Medical doctor · Principal investigator
    • Meritxell Font, Medical doctor · Sub investigator
    • Sheila Serra, Medical doctor · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — It is planned to publish the complete result data without providing specific participant data.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 22 months after the start.

Of 29 interventional studies with no phase under Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 22 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2026
First posted
Jun 8, 2026
StartActual
Feb 6, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Jun 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07632196
Lead sponsor
Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa
Responsible party
Meritxell Font Prat (Medical doctor, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 8, 2026
Start date
Feb 6, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Study contacts

Meritxell Font
Contact
meritxell.fontprat@gmail.com
+34 676131774

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion