ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07793682Updated Sep 3, 2026

Early Neuropsychological Rehabilitation and Family Psychoeducation After Ischemic Stroke

An interventional study of Computerized neuropsychological rehabilitation and Family psychoeducational program in Ischemic Stroke, Cognitive Impairment and Quality of Life, sponsored by Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2025, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
81
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life are frequent consequences of ischemic stroke and can also affect family caregivers, who often assume caregiving responsibilities with limited preparation. Evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions initiated during the early poststroke period remains limited.

This randomized clinical trial evaluates two independent interventions initiated after baseline assessment and randomization, approximately 20 days after the index stroke: a structured computerized neuropsychological rehabilitation program for the patient and a structured psychoeducational program for the primary family caregiver. A 2×2 factorial design allows the main effect of each intervention to be estimated within a single sample and permits an exploratory assessment of their interaction.

The primary outcome is quality of life at 3 months after stroke, measured using the CAVIDACE total direct score and completed by a family informant. Secondary outcomes include cognitive performance, functional status, mood, and caregiver burden. Molecular biomarkers and acute structural neuroimaging variables are examined as exploratory outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Background and rationale

Cognitive deficits are frequent after ischemic stroke and may adversely affect functional recovery, quality of life, emotional well-being, and participation in rehabilitation. Although recovery trajectories vary considerably between individuals, the early poststroke period represents an important phase of cognitive, functional, and psychosocial adaptation. Evidence regarding structured cognitive rehabilitation initiated during this early period remains limited.

Stroke also has important consequences for family members and informal caregivers. Caregivers may experience substantial burden associated with functional dependence, cognitive and behavioral changes, emotional difficulties, and the demands of providing ongoing support. Structured psychoeducational interventions may help caregivers understand the consequences of stroke and develop appropriate strategies for supporting recovery and adaptation.

This trial evaluates both dimensions simultaneously by examining computerized neuropsychological rehabilitation directed at the patient and structured family psychoeducation directed at the primary family caregiver.

Procedures

Participants are recruited during the acute phase of ischemic stroke, within 96 hours of symptom onset. Baseline assessment of the primary outcome is performed approximately 20 days after the index stroke, before randomization and before either intervention begins. Randomization is performed after completion of this baseline assessment.

Allocation is stratified according to receipt of acute reperfusion therapy, defined as intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy versus no reperfusion treatment. Reperfusion status is used as a prespecified prognostic stratification factor. Randomization is implemented through the REDCap electronic data capture system using randomly permuted blocks of variable size. The allocation sequence is inaccessible to personnel responsible for recruitment and eligibility assessment, and the next treatment assignment cannot be anticipated.

Both intervention factors begin after randomization, approximately 20 days after the index stroke, and continue for approximately 12 weeks. The primary outcome assessment is scheduled at 3 months after stroke, corresponding to 90 days ±14 days. An optional 12-month follow-up constitutes an observational extension and is not part of the primary randomized trial analysis.

Participants allocated to computerized neuropsychological rehabilitation receive 24 sessions of structured computerized cognitive training using the Guttmann NeuroPersonalTrainer platform. Sessions last 45 minutes and are delivered twice weekly over approximately 12 weeks. The sequence and duration of the cognitive exercises are standardized, while task difficulty is individually adjusted by the platform according to previous performance. The intervention targets attention, processing speed, memory, executive functions, language, visuospatial abilities, and functional transfer of trained strategies.

Participants not allocated to computerized neuropsychological rehabilitation receive an active digital control condition consisting of simple recreational digital activities matched in duration and frequency. These activities do not incorporate adaptive difficulty, structured therapeutic progression, or cognitive performance feedback.

Primary family caregivers allocated to structured family psychoeducation receive six individual 45-minute sessions delivered by videoconference approximately every 2 weeks over 12 weeks. The program includes stroke education, the role of the family in recovery, emotional management, behavioral difficulties, cognitive restructuring, relaxation, self-compassion, mindfulness-based coping strategies, and behavioral activation. Caregivers are not trained in cognitive rehabilitation techniques in order to preserve the conceptual independence of the two factorial intervention components.

Primary family caregivers not allocated to structured psychoeducation receive a brief informational leaflet at the approximately 20-day visit after randomization. The leaflet provides general information about stroke and its physical, communicative, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral consequences, together with recommended educational resources. It does not include behavioral management strategies, structured psychoeducational techniques, or cognitive rehabilitation training.

All participants continue to receive usual poststroke clinical care. Physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, convalescence care, and other rehabilitation services may be prescribed according to clinical indication and are recorded as co-interventions.

Outcomes and analysis

The primary outcome is the CAVIDACE total direct score at 3 months after stroke, completed by a family informant. The total direct score ranges from 0 to 192, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. The corresponding CAVIDACE score obtained approximately 20 days after stroke is used as the baseline covariate in the primary analysis.

Secondary outcomes are organized into two independent prespecified families. The family associated with computerized neuropsychological rehabilitation includes the global neuropsychological composite score, Modified Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, and Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale. The family associated with structured family psychoeducation includes the Zarit Burden Interview, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety subscale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale, and Beck Depression Inventory-II.

The primary analysis follows the intention-to-treat principle and uses an analysis of covariance model including the main effects of both intervention factors, baseline CAVIDACE, and the randomization stratum. The F1×F2 interaction is examined in a separate exploratory model.

Exploratory biological outcomes include brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial fibrillary acidic protein, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and S100 calcium-binding protein B. Acute structural magnetic resonance imaging variables include lesion volume, lesion location, vascular territory, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification, and apparent diffusion coefficient. These analyses are considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

A prespecified Statistical Analysis Plan defining the estimands, analysis models, handling of missing data, multiplicity, and sensitivity analyses was finalized and signed before database lock and before any comparative analysis of study outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ischemic Stroke
  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Quality of Life
  • Caregiver Burden

Keywords

  • stroke rehabilitation
  • neuropsychological rehabilitation
  • psychoeducation
  • caregiver
  • factorial design
  • acute phase
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 81 is below the median of 120 across 1,776 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First-ever ischemic stroke, excluding
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Inclusion within 96 hours of symptom onset
  • Functional independence before the index stroke, defined as a prestroke Modified Rankin Scale score ≤1
  • Diagnosis of ischemic stroke classified according to the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project as total anterior circulation infarction, partial anterior circulation infarction, posterior circulation infarction, or lacunar infarction
  • Capacity to provide written at enrollment or, in cases of temporary incapacity, availability of a legally authorized representative to provide consent on the participant's behalf, followed by participant re-consent if decision-making capacity is regained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous neurological or psychiatric disease associated with cognitive impairment
  • Severe systemic disease
  • of less than 1 year
  • Severe stroke, defined as a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >19 at admission
  • Alcohol or other substance abuse, excluding tobacco use
  • aphasia preventing comprehension of neuropsychological test instructions, operationalized as a score \<5 on the fluency subscale of the Western Aphasia Battery
  • Sensory impairment preventing valid neuropsychological assessment or use of the intervention materials, such as severe visual or hearing impairment
  • Functional illiteracy, defined as inability to read and understand simple written instructions
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
81 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1: Control

    Other: Non-specific recreational cognitive activities / active digital control · Other: Written information leaflet

  • Experimental
    Group 2: Neuropsychological rehabilitation

    Behavioral: Computerized neuropsychological rehabilitation · Other: Written information leaflet

  • Experimental
    Group 3: Family psychoeducation

    Behavioral: Family psychoeducational program · Other: Non-specific recreational cognitive activities / active digital control

  • Experimental
    Group 4: Combined intervention

    Behavioral: Computerized neuropsychological rehabilitation · Behavioral: Family psychoeducational program

Interventions

  • BehavioralComputerized neuropsychological rehabilitation

    Structured computerized cognitive training using the Guttmann NeuroPersonalTrainer platform. The intervention comprises 24 sessions of 45 minutes, delivered twice weekly over approximately 12 weeks, starting after randomization approximately 20 days after the index stroke. The sequence and duration of cognitive exercises are standardized, while task difficulty is individually adjusted by the platform according to previous performance.

  • BehavioralFamily psychoeducational program

    Six individual 45-minute sessions delivered by videoconference to the primary family caregiver approximately every 2 weeks over 12 weeks. The program covers stroke education, the role of the family in recovery, emotional management, behavioral difficulties, cognitive restructuring, relaxation, self-compassion, mindfulness-based coping strategies, and behavioral activation. Caregivers are not trained in cognitive rehabilitation techniques.

  • OtherNon-specific recreational cognitive activities / active digital control

    Simple recreational digital activities matched to the computerized neuropsychological rehabilitation condition in session duration and frequency. The activities do not incorporate adaptive difficulty, structured therapeutic progression, or cognitive performance feedback.

  • OtherWritten information leaflet

    A brief informational leaflet provided at the approximately 20-day visit after randomization. The leaflet includes general information about stroke and its physical, communicative, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral consequences, together with recommended educational resources. It does not include behavioral management strategies, structured psychoeducational techniques, or cognitive rehabilitation training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of life (CAVIDACE total direct score)

    The CAVIDACE scale (Quality of Life in Acquired Brain Injury) is completed by a family informant. The total direct score ranges from 0 to 192, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. The corresponding CAVIDACE score obtained approximately 20 days after stroke is used as the baseline covariate in the primary analysis.

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke (day 90 ± 14 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global neuropsychological composite score

    The global neuropsychological composite score is calculated as the unweighted mean of standardized z scores across five cognitive domains: attention and processing speed, memory and learning, language, executive functioning, and visuospatial functioning. Individual neuropsychological test scores are standardized using the corresponding normative data. At least three valid cognitive-domain scores are required to calculate the composite. Because the composite consists of standardized z scores, it has no fixed theoretical minimum or maximum. Higher scores indicate better global cognitive performance.

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke (90 days ±14 days)

  2. Modified Rankin Scale

    The Modified Rankin Scale assesses global disability after stroke on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6. A score of 0 indicates no symptoms, whereas a score of 6 indicates death. Higher scores indicate greater disability and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke (90 days ±14 days)

  3. Barthel Index

    The Barthel Index assesses independence in basic activities of daily living. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence and a better outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke (90 days ±14 days)

  4. Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale

    The Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale assesses independence in instrumental activities of daily living. The 8-item version used in this study ranges from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater independence and a better functional outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke (90 days ±14 days)

  5. Zarit Burden Interview, 22-item version

    The 22-item Zarit Burden Interview assesses perceived caregiver burden. Each item is rated from 0 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 88. Higher scores indicate greater perceived caregiver burden and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke (90 days ±14 days)

  6. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A)

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety subscale consists of 7 items and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety symptoms and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke (90 days ±14 days)

  7. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression Subscale (HADS-D)

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale consists of 7 items and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke (90 days ±14 days)

  8. Beck Depression Inventory-II

    The Beck Depression Inventory-II consists of 21 items and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post-stroke (90 days ±14 days)

Other outcomes

  1. Biomarker concentrations (BDNF, GFAP, IL-6, CRP, and S100B)

    Exploratory longitudinal biomarker outcomes including brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial fibrillary acidic protein, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and S100 calcium-binding protein B. Biomarker concentrations are examined in relation to clinical and cognitive recovery.

    Time frame: Acute hospitalization (≤96 hours after stroke), approximately 20 days after stroke, and 3 months after stroke (90 days ±14 days); optional observational assessment at 12 months

  2. Acute structural MRI lesion characteristics

    Exploratory variables derived from acute structural magnetic resonance imaging include lesion volume, lesion location, vascular territory, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification, and apparent diffusion coefficient.

    Time frame: Acute hospitalization (≤96 hours after stroke)

  3. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment evaluates global cognitive performance. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better global cognitive performance.

    Time frame: Acute hospitalization (≤96 hours), approximately 20 days after stroke, 3 months after stroke, and optional observational follow-up at 12 months.

  4. Functional Ambulation Category (FAC)

    The Functional Ambulation Category assesses functional walking ability. Scores range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater independence in ambulation.

    Time frame: Acute hospitalization (≤96 hours), approximately 20 days after stroke, 3 months after stroke, and optional observational follow-up at 12 months.

  5. Hessisch Oldendorf Risk of Falling Scale (HOSS)

    The Hessisch Oldendorf Risk of Falling Scale assesses risk of falling. Total scores range from 0 to 22, with higher scores indicating greater risk of falling.

    Time frame: Acute hospitalization (≤96 hours), approximately 20 days after stroke, 3 months after stroke, and optional observational follow-up at 12 months.

  6. Depression Signs Scale (ESD)

    The Depression Signs Scale (Escala de Signes de Depressió), developed by the Catalan Agency for Health Quality and Assessment, comprises 6 dichotomously scored items and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate a greater number of observed signs suggestive of mood disturbance.

    Time frame: Acute hospitalization (≤96 hours), approximately 20 days after stroke, 3 months after stroke, and optional observational follow-up at 12 months.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Déu de Manresa, Fundació Althaia
    Manresa, Barcelona 08243, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Following publication of the primary trial results, deidentified individual participant data underlying the published analyses, together with the corresponding data dictionary where applicable, may be made available upon reasonable request. Access will be subject to approval by Fundació Althaia and compliance with applicable ethical, institutional, informed-consent, and data-protection requirements.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning after publication of the primary trial results.

Access criteria: Access may be granted following a reasonable scientific request, review and approval by Fundació Althaia, and compliance with applicable ethical, institutional, informed-consent, and data-protection requirements.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 12 months after the start.

Of 572 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ischemic Stroke, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 653 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 26, 2026
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
StartActual
Nov 19, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 25, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 27, 2027
Last update
Sep 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07793682
Lead sponsor
Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa
Collaborators
University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia
Responsible party
Jordi Sanchez Monteagudo (Clinical Neuropsychologist, Principal Investigator, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
Start date
Nov 19, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 25, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 27, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Study contacts

Jordi Sanchez Monteagudo
principal investigator · Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Déu de Manresa, Fundació Althaia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion