ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07625176APPLAUSUpdated Jun 4, 2026

Evaluating the Use of an App in Pleural Disease: Algorithm-supported Clinical Decision Making Versus Usual Care

An interventional study of Clinical decision-making support tool and Usual care in Pleural Diseases, Pneumothorax Spontaneous Primary and Pneumothorax Spontaneous Secondary, sponsored by Zealand University Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 10 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Sponsored by Zealand University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
828
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pleural disease is a group of conditions that affect the membrane around the lungs. These conditions-fluid around the lungs, infections, cancer, and collapsed lung-are common and can cause serious illness. They often lead to long hospital stays, emergency admissions, and reduced quality of life. In Denmark and worldwide, the number of patients with pleural disease is rising, and the treatment is costly for the healthcare system.

How long patients stay in the hospital depends on the type of pleural disease. Some stay less than a week, while others remain for several weeks, especially if complications occur. Research shows that early diagnosis and treatment based on clinical guidelines can shorten hospital stays and improve outcomes.

In the UK, many hospitals have created dedicated pleural clinics run by specialists. These clinics help ensure that patients receive fast, consistent, and evidence based care, and they have reduced the number of days patients spend in hospital. In Denmark, however, such clinics are rare. A recent national survey showed that many Danish hospitals do not follow current pleural disease guidelines, and many lack clear pathways for diagnosing and treating these patients. As a result, patients may receive suboptimal care.

This project aims to close that gap. The goal is to develop an easy to use, guideline based decision tool that supports doctors in emergency, medical, and surgical departments. The tool will guide clinicians from the moment a patient arrives until discharge, helping them choose the right tests and treatments at the right time. By making expert knowledge accessible to non specialists, the project hopes to improve patient care, reduce complications, and shorten hospital stays.

Ultimately, the project seeks to ensure that all patients with pleural disease in Denmark receive fast, safe, and evidence based treatment-no matter where they are admitted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pleural Diseases
  • Pneumothorax Spontaneous Primary
  • Pneumothorax Spontaneous Secondary
  • Pleural Effusion
  • Pleural Infection
03

In context

Pleural Diseases

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Diseases; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 828 is above the median of 77 across 32 interventional studies indexed under Pleural Diseases.

Browse Pleural Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Zealand University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 236 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

One or more of the following, relevante ICD-10 codes for either spontaneous pneumothorax, pleural effusion or pleural infection.

Spontaneous pneumothorax:

  • DJ93
  • DJ930
  • DJ931
  • DJ938
  • DJ939

Pleural effusion:

  • DJ90
  • DJ909
  • DJ919
  • DJ91
  • DJ940
  • DJ948
  • DJ948A
  • DJ949
  • DC782

Pleural infection:

  • DJ86
  • DJ860
  • DJ860

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic pneumothorax (including iatrogenic pneumothorax)
  • Hemothorax
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
828 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Usual care

    Usual provided care for patients with spontaneous pneumothorax, pleural effusion or pleural infection. All clusters begin in this condition before transitioning to the intervention as part of the stepped-wedge schedule.

    Other: Usual care

  • Experimental
    Clinical decision-making support tool

    Care supported by the clinical decision-making app. Clusters transition to this condition at predefined time points according to the stepped-wedge design.

    Behavioral: Clinical decision-making support tool

Interventions

  • BehavioralClinical decision-making support tool

    Care for patients with spontaneous pneumothorax, pleural effusion or pleural infection when supported by a clinical decision-support tool, in the form of a smartphone app.

  • OtherUsual care

    Care supported by a clinical decision-support tool delivered via a smartphone app.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay (days)

    Number of days from hospital admission to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From hospital admission through hospital discharge (up to 90 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correct pneumothorax subtype classification

    Whether the pneumothorax subtype was correctly classified during the index hospital admission according to predefined diagnostic criteria (yes/no).

    Time frame: During index hospital admission (up to 90 days after admission)

  2. Number of participants receiving each initial pneumothorax management strategy

    Number of participants managed with either conservative care, needle aspiration, chest tube insertion, or ambulatory device insertion

    Time frame: Within 24 hours from hospital admission

  3. Chest tube size

    Diameter of chest tube used for treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax, reported in French units (Fr).

    Time frame: Periprocedural.

  4. Number of participants with persistent air leak (>7 days)

    Number of participants with ongoing air leak through the chest drainage system for more than 7 days after chest tube insertion (yes/no)

    Time frame: From chest tube insertion until resolution of air leak or up to 90 days

  5. Number of participants undergoing high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)

    Number of participants who underwent high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) during hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge, recorded as yes/no

    Time frame: During index hospital admission

  6. Number of participants receiving complete recommended diagnostic work-up for unilateral pleural effusion

    Assessment of whether recommended blood tests (full blood count, C-reactive protein, renal function tests, liver function tests, and albumin) and pleural fluid analyses (pH or glucose, LDH, leukocyte differential count, microbiology culture and sensitivity analysis, and cytology) were performed in participants with unilateral pleural effusion.

    Time frame: At end of index hospital admission (up to 90 days).

  7. Chest tube size

    Chest tube size (French gauge, Fr) used for pleural effusion drainage

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  8. Definitive cause for pleural effusion

    Was a definitive cause for the cause of pleural effusion established.

    Time frame: During hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge.

  9. Definitive pleural procedure

    Definitive pleural procedure within 90 days of admission due to pleural effusion.

    Time frame: During hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge.

  10. Number of participants receiving complete recommended diagnostic work-up for suspected pleural infection

    Assessment of whether recommended blood tests (full blood count, C-reactive protein, renal function tests, liver function tests, and albumin) and pleural fluid analyses (pH or glucose, LDH, leukocyte differential count, microbiology culture and sensitivity analysis, and cytology) were performed in participants with suspected pleural infection.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days

  11. Chest tube diameter of chest tubes used for pleural infection.

    Diameter of chest tube used for drainage of pleural infection, reported in French units (Fr).

    Time frame: Periprocedural.

  12. Number of participants receiving intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) for pleural infection.

    Assessment of whether intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) was administered in participants with pleural infection despite chest tube drainage.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days.

  13. Length of antibiotic treatment

    Total length of antibiotic treatment (both intravenously and orally) for pleural infection.

    Time frame: During hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge.

07

Study locations

10 sites
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 6 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 20, 2026
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
StartActual
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 15, 2026
Last update
Jun 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07625176
Responsible party
Uffe Bodtger (Professor, Zealand University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

Casper Jensen, MD
principal investigator · Lungemedicinsk Forskningsenhed (PLUZ), Institut for Regional Sundhedsforskning, Syddansk Universitet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion