ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06741839Updated Apr 15, 2026

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Guided Medical Thoracoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pleural Disease

An interventional study of Confocal laser endomicroscopy guided pleural biopsy using medical thoracoscopy and Plerual biopsy using medical thoracoscopy in Pleural Diseases and Pleural Effusion, sponsored by China-Japan Friendship Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-15.

Primary conditionPleural EffusionRegistry: Pleural DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pleural Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Pleural Effusion
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Pleural Effusion, a narrower term within Pleural Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by China-Japan Friendship Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
158
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic biopsy guided by confocal optical real-time microscopic imaging (nCLE) in the diagnosis of fibrinal pleurisy of unknown etiology. Patients with fibrinous pleurisy of unknown etiology who were to undergo thoracoscopic pleural biopsy were enrolled and informed consent was signed. Subjects were randomized to either the nCLE guided biopsy Group (Group A) or the visual biopsy group (Group B) according to the randomization table (1:1 ratio). nCLE was used to probe the benign and malignant status of pleural lesions, compare the consistency of random pathological biopsy or nCLE guided biopsy with histopathological results, compare whether nCLE guided biopsy can reduce the number of thoracoscopic biopsies, and follow up short-term postoperative complications to evaluate its safety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pleural Diseases
  • Pleural Effusion

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pleural Effusion Reclassified

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 158 is above the median of 80 across 142 interventional studies indexed under Pleural Effusion.

Browse Pleural Effusion studies →

Lead sponsor

China-Japan Friendship Hospital is the lead sponsor of 178 studies on the registry; 111 are open to participants now.

Compared within Pleural Effusion, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pleural Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Evidence of exudative pleural effusion in which a specific diagnosis could not be determined using clinical, radiological, laboratory, or cytological examinations
  • Willingness to participate in the study and undergo an invasive procedure.;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pleural thickening or pleural-based mass without pleural effusion on radiologic examination;
  • Hemodynamic instability;
  • Presence of parapneumonic effusion;
  • Any to pleural or semirigid thoracoscopy;
  • Participation in other studies within three months without withdrawal or termination.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
158 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    pCLE guided pleural biopsy via semi-rigid thoracoscopy

    pCLE will be introduced to detect suspected areas of the parietal pleura. The pCLE inspection will follow a standardized protocol with two main steps. First, any visible abnormalities under white light, such as nodules or thickening, will be examined with pCLE to evaluate intralesional heterogeneity and determine the best biopsy site. Second, the basal pleura will be systematically swept, covering at least two intercostal spaces above the costophrenic recess, including the diaphragmatic pleura and lower posterior chest wall, which are common sites for malignant involvement. After confirming the targeted area of the parietal pleura for pleural biopsy, the pCLE probe will be withdrawn, and a flexible forceps biopsy will be performed. This process will be repeated eight times, and eight samples will be obtained. All specimens will be transported in separate formalin containers with biopsy sequences for histopathological analysis.

    Procedure: Confocal laser endomicroscopy guided pleural biopsy using medical thoracoscopy

  • Placebo comparator
    Conventional Pleural biopsy via semi-rigid thoracoscopy

    For patients assigned to receive pleural biopsy via semi-rigid thoracoscopy alone, the parietal, visceral, and diaphragmatic pleura will be inspected, and eight biopsies will be obtained under direct vision in all suspected areas of the parietal pleura.

    Procedure: Plerual biopsy using medical thoracoscopy

Interventions

  • ProcedureConfocal laser endomicroscopy guided pleural biopsy using medical thoracoscopy

    After the completion of the routine thoracoscopic examination, the biopsy location was determined based on the results of chest CT/ ultrasound. The benign and malignant states of pleural lesions were explored by nCLE and image records were collected. Then, the biopsy tissues were collected under the guidance of nCLE.

  • ProcedurePlerual biopsy using medical thoracoscopy

    After the completion of the routine thoracoscopic examination, the biopsy location was determined according to the results of chest CT/ ultrasound, and random pathological biopsy was performed, and biopsy tissues were collected by biopsy forceps.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic yield

    The proportion of participants in whom a specific diagnosis is established following pleural biopsy via semirigid thoracoscopy, based on histopathological analysis and final reference diagnosis (including 12-month follow-up for initially benign or nonspecific results).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Negative likelihood ratio

    The negative likelihood ratio is defined as the probability of a negative biopsy result (i.e., no specific malignant or tuberculous diagnosis) in a patient who truly has the target disease (malignant pleural mesothelioma, metastatic cancer, or tuberculous pleurisy), divided by the probability of a negative biopsy result in a patient who does not have the disease. Because pleural biopsy results have no false positives in this study (specificity = 1, false-positive rate = 0), the NLR simplifies to 1 - sensitivity. It will be calculated using the final reference diagnosis at 12 months as the gold standard.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after the procedure

  2. Diagnostic sensitivity for specific diseases

    Sensitivity of the procedure for diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma, metastatic cancer, and tuberculous pleurisy, as determined by the reference standard.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after the procedure

  3. Procedural time

    Total duration of the thoracoscopic procedure from insertion to removal of the thoracoscope.

    Time frame: Day of procedure

  4. Rate of adequate specimens for achieving molecular diagnosis

    Proportion of biopsy specimens that are sufficient for predictive molecular marker analysis according to tumor type (e.g., PD-L1, EGFR, ALK, ROS-1, HER2, ER, PR, BRCA, RAS, BRAF, etc.). Specimens are categorized as: (a) successful molecular marker analysis, (b) unsuccessful molecular marker analysis (explicit test failure), (c) not sent despite relevance.

    Time frame: Within 2 weeks after the procedure (upon pathological reporting)

  5. Incidence of procedure-related complications

    Occurrence of any adverse events related to the procedure, including but not limited to: prolonged air leak, hemorrhage (graded as nil/slight self-limiting, mild requiring local vasoactive medication, moderate-to-severe requiring electrocautery or argon plasma coagulation), subcutaneous emphysema, postoperative fever, empyema, wound infection, cardiac arrhythmias, hypotension, and chest wall seeding from mesothelioma.

    Time frame: From start of procedure up to 30 days post-procedure (or until chest tube removal and hospital discharge, whichever is longer)

  6. Sampling quality (tissue depth and interpretability)

    Tissue depth: Biopsy quality determined based on tissue depth (e.g., deep biopsy including fatty tissue from the thoracic wall is considered high quality). Interpretability: Assessed as (a) easily interpretable (sufficient tissue with all diagnostic elements), (b) interpretable with some difficulty, (c) interpretable with great difficulty, (d) non-interpretable.

    Time frame: Within 2 weeks after the procedure (upon pathological assessment)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Deng MM, Hu Y, Liu X, Feng Y, Zheng Z, Tong R, Porcel J, Hou G. Diagnostic yield and safety of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy-guided pleural biopsy via semirigid thoracoscope in diagnosing patients with unknown pleural effusion: a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (COLLABORATION-I). BMJ Open. 2026 Jun 4;16(6):e117208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117208. PubMed 42242740 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 26 months after the start.

Of 61 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pleural Effusion, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 26 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 63 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 16, 2024
First posted
Dec 19, 2024
StartActual
Mar 11, 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 2027
CompletionEst.
May 2027
Last update
Apr 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06741839
Collaborators
Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Anhui Chest Hospital, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center, The Second People's Hospital of Gansu Province
Responsible party
Gang Hou (Chief physician, China-Japan Friendship Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 19, 2024
Start date
Mar 11, 2025
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2026

Study contacts

Gang Hou
Contact
hougangcmu@163.com
13840065481

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion