ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07114783Updated Jun 22, 2026

Dual-function Semirigid Thoracoscopy Versus Rigid Thoracoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pleural Disease

An interventional study of Dual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy and Rigid thoracoscopy in Pleural Effusion Disorder, sponsored by China-Japan Friendship Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-22.

Sponsored by China-Japan Friendship Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Medical thoracoscopy (rigid and semirigid) is an effective, safe method for diagnosing and managing pleural diseases. Rigid thoracoscopy demonstrates superior overall diagnostic yield compared to semirigid techniques (flexible forceps/cryobiopsy) due to its ability to obtain larger, deeper biopsies with rigid forceps. However, diagnostic rates become similar when biopsies are successfully obtained.

Limitations of rigid thoracoscopy include restricted maneuverability (especially in posterior/mediastinal areas), increased procedural pain from leveraging against ribs and larger trocars, higher sedation requirements, and a steep learning curve for pulmonologists.

To address these issues, a novel dual-function semirigid thoracoscope (UE FET-680, China) was developed. Its straight working channel accommodates standard rigid biopsy forceps, potentially matching rigid thoracoscopy's diagnostic yield while improving usability. This randomized trial will compare the efficacy and safety of this new device versus conventional rigid thoracoscopy in undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pleural Effusion Disorder

Keywords

  • Medical Thoracoscopy
  • Pleural Disease
03

In context

Pleural Effusion

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 92 is above the median of 80 across 142 interventional studies indexed under Pleural Effusion.

Browse Pleural Effusion studies →

Lead sponsor

China-Japan Friendship Hospital is the lead sponsor of 178 studies on the registry; 111 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years;
  2. Patients with unilateral pleural effusion of unclear aetiology after less invasive means of diagnosis;
  3. Fully informed of the purpose and method of the study, agreed to participate in the study, and signed the form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with PaO2/FiO2 \<300;
  2. Patients with a tendency for uncontrolled bleeding, unstable cardiovascular status or severe heart failure;
  3. Patients with complete pleural symphysis, where it was not possible to create a pneumothorax, were excluded subsequently;
  4. Patients with cough;
  5. Patients with performance status 4;
  6. Patients did not agree to participate in this study;
  7. Participation in other studies within three months without withdrawal or termination will affect the observation of this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
92 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dual-function Semi-rigid Thoracoscopy

    Device: Dual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy

  • Other
    Rigid Thoracoscopy

    Device: Rigid thoracoscopy

Interventions

  • DeviceDual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy

    Patients received pleural biopsy via dual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy.

  • DeviceRigid thoracoscopy

    Patients received pleural biopsy via rigid thoracoscopy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic yield

    Diagnostic yield is defined as the percentage of participants for whom the allocated thoracoscopic pleural biopsy provides a specific histopathological diagnosis. Malignant pleural disease and other defined histopathological diagnoses will be classified as diagnostic results. Non-specific pleuritis, fibrinous pleuritis, non-interpretable specimens, and cases in which no biopsy is obtained will be classified as non-diagnostic results.

    Time frame: 7 days after the procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedural Sedative and Analgesic Requirements

    Procedural sedative and analgesic requirements will be assessed by recording the total dose of each sedative or analgesic agent administered during thoracoscopy, including midazolam, pentazocine, and tramadol. The dose of each agent will be recorded separately in milligrams and summarised by treatment group

    Time frame: The day of thoracoscopy.

  2. Disease-specific Diagnostic Sensitivity

    Disease-specific diagnostic sensitivity is defined as the percentage of participants with a specific final diagnosis according to the reference standard whose allocated thoracoscopic pleural biopsy provides a specific histopathological diagnosis supporting the same disease. Participants with non-specific biopsy findings who are subsequently diagnosed with malignant pleural disease or tuberculous pleuritis during follow-up will be classified as false-negative biopsy results for the corresponding disease.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after thoracoscopy.

  3. Sampling Quality of Pleural Biopsy Specimens

    Sampling quality will be assessed using specimen size, specimen depth, and specimen interpretability. Specimen size will be measured as the largest cross-sectional area of the processed biopsy specimens on microscopic glass slides using ImageJ software and reported in square millimetres. Specimen depth will be assessed according to the presence of thoracic wall fatty tissue. Specimen interpretability will be classified as easily interpretable, interpretable with some difficulty, interpretable with great difficulty, or non-interpretable.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks after thoracoscopy.

  4. Procedure Duration

    Procedure duration will be measured in minutes from skin incision to completion of chest tube placement and wound closure.

    Time frame: The day of thoracoscopy.

  5. Operator-assessed Device Performance

    Operator-assessed device performance will include image quality, ease of manoeuvring, ease of obtaining a biopsy sample, and the operator's expectation that the biopsy sample will provide a definitive histological diagnosis. Each domain will be assessed immediately after the procedure using a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better operator-assessed performance.

    Time frame: Immediately after the thoracoscopic procedure

  6. Post-thoracoscopy Pain Score

    Patient-reported post-thoracoscopy pain will be assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale while at rest and while coughing. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.

    Time frame: At 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after thoracoscopy

  7. Procedure-related Complications

    Procedure-related complications will be classified as major or minor complications. Major complications include empyema, major haemorrhage defined as a drop in haemoglobin of at least 1 g/dL or requiring blood transfusion, persistent air leak for more than 3 days, and re-expansion pulmonary oedema. Minor complications include subcutaneous emphysema, operative site infection, non-infective fever, and minor haemorrhage.

    Time frame: At discharge from the index hospitalization, up to 30 days after thoracoscopy.

Other outcomes

  1. Postprocedural Length of Hospital Stay

    Postprocedural length of hospital stay is defined as the number of days from the date of thoracoscopy to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: At discharge from the index hospitalization, up to 30 days after thoracoscopy.

  2. Direct Medical Costs During the Index Hospitalization

    Direct medical costs during the index hospitalization will be extracted from hospital billing records. These costs include procedure-related costs, anaesthetic and analgesic medication costs, chest tube and drainage-related costs, postprocedural imaging and management costs, and postprocedural hospitalization costs. Costs will be reported in Chinese Yuan.

    Time frame: At discharge from the index hospitalization, up to 30 days after thoracoscopy.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Xu L, Liu X, Wu H, Xie Z, Wang K, Deng M, Zheng Z, Hou G. Diagnostic yield and safety of Dual-functIon Semi-rigid thoraCoscOpy Versus rigid thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of plEuRal disease (DISCOVER-2): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Jul 8;16(7):e118022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118022. PubMed 42419899 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the main publication will be made available upon reasonable request. The shared data will include baseline characteristics, allocated intervention, primary and secondary outcome data, and procedure-related complication data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning 6 months after publication of the main trial results and ending 5 years after publication.

Access criteria: Researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal. Access will be subject to approval by the study investigators and execution of a formal data-sharing agreement.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07114783
Responsible party
Gang Hou (Principal Investigator, China-Japan Friendship Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 11, 2025
Start date
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2026

Study contacts

Mingming Deng, MD.,PhD.
Contact
isdeng1017@163.com
+86 18801336854

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion