ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07615504Better TestsUpdated May 29, 2026

Better Tests- Improving Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostication in Interstitial Lung Diseases

An observational study in Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), sponsored by University of Dundee. Recruiting at 3 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-29.

Sponsored by University of Dundee · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
750
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) suffer significant delays in obtaining a diagnosis, and objective evidence of support for immunosuppressive therapies, due to weaknesses in the diagnostic tests available in ILD clinics.

This project will assess several non-invasive assessments, focusing on blood and breath based sampling, to identify candidate tests that may translate through to routine clinical use. The tests being assessed will be initially employed in Pigeon Fanciers, a group recognised to be at high risk of developing ILD compared to age matched controls, due to their regular exposure to a known cause of ILD. Candidate tests will also be assessed for change over time in this group. Tests which show promise will then be utilised in patients with ILD diagnoses, including those with severe respiratory failure, to assess their acceptability to patients and their ability to provide useful prognostic information, to allow powering of future definitive clinical trials.

Read the detailed description

Pigeon Fanciers attending a recruitment event at one of the large national meetings for the sport will undergo assessments after completion of informed consent. The basic assessments include collection of height, weight and lung function (e.g. spirometry). In addition we will collect basic information about current health, past medical history and current pigeon keeping habits (number kept, time spent with birds etc). Participants will then have a blood sample taken for collection of antibody level against Pigeons, and for storage for subsequent processing of relevant candidate objective tests. Participants will also perform an additional breathing test to allow collection of exhaled air, which will be analysed on site or via subsequent testing (dependent on test required). Results will be linked to symptoms on exposure to their pigeons and any subsequent diagnoses obtained.

Subsequent follow up of the Pigeon Fancier cohort, again via the participants attendance at large national meetings, will allow repeat of the candidate tests, enabling determination of natural variation and the effect of change in exposure or development of new medical conditions. We will also examine the dynamic change in candidate tests following natural exposures to causes of ILD, by performing the tests with a subset of Pigeon Fanciers before, during and after exposure to their birds.

Patients attending Interstitial Lung Disease clinics in NHS Tayside, and when admitted with their Interstitial Lung Disease, will be offered the opportunity to perform the non-invasive assessments available to Pigeon Fanciers, with their results being linked to subsequent clinical outcomes (progression of disease, response to treatment and time to death).

02

Conditions studied

  • Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)

Keywords

  • Interstitial Lung Disease
  • Lung fibrosis
  • Non-invasive assessment
  • Pigeon fanciers
  • Prognostication
  • Diagnosis
03

In context

Lung Diseases, Interstitial

680 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases, Interstitial; 246 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 750 is above the median of 157 across 278 observational studies indexed under Lung Diseases, Interstitial.

Browse Lung Diseases, Interstitial studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Dundee is the lead sponsor of 113 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Active Pigeon Fanciers, or patients with ILD presenting to clinics or hospital services with severe respiratory failure due to ILD

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

To participate subjects will either have to be active Pigeon Fanciers, or will be either attending ILD clinics for management of their interstitial lung disease or will present acutely to hospital services with severe respiratory failure due to ILD.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Unable to provide

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
750 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Pigeon Fanciers

    Active Pigeon Fanciers

  • Clinic patients with ILD

    Patients with established Interstitial Lung Disease attending clinic

  • Hospital patients with ILD

    Patients with established Interstitial Lung Disease admitted due to their condition

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prediction of subsequent clinical outcomes

    The utilised tests will be examined for their ability to accurately predict the subsequent diagnostic label for ILD and clinical behaviour

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Acceptability to participants

    The tests employed will be assessed for their ease of performance and acceptability from a participant perspective

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Winter Gardens
    Blackpool, FY1 1HU, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Mark Spears, PhD FRCP · Contactmspears001@dundee.ac.uk · 44 1253 629600
    • Mark Spears, PhD FRCP · Principal investigator
  • Ninewells Hospital
    Dundee, DD21UB, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Mark Spears, PhD FRCP · Contactmspears001@dundee.ac.uk · 44 1382 660111
    • Mark Spears, PhD FRCP · Principal investigator
  • Perth Royal Infirmary
    Perth, PH1 1NX, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Mar Spears, PhD FRCP · Contactmspears001@dundee.ac.uk · 44 1738 473861
    • Mark Spears, PhD FRCP · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Likely we will, but I need to clarify how best to do this. Data will not be available for sharing for several years, allowing time to discuss with sponsor on how to approach (mapping to recognised best practice at that time as likely to evolve)

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2036, 119 months after the start.

Of 111 non-industry observational studies under Lung Diseases, Interstitial, half reached primary completion within 72 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 274. This study's planned 119 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 132 studies reached it within 55 months; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 83.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 22, 2026
First posted
May 29, 2026
StartActual
Jan 17, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 15, 2036
CompletionEst.
Jan 15, 2036
Last update
May 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07615504
Collaborators
British Pigeon Fanciers Medical Research, NHS Tayside
Responsible party
Mark Spears (Consultant Respiratory Physician, University of Dundee) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 29, 2026
Start date
Jan 17, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2036 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2036 (estimated)
Last update
May 29, 2026

Study contacts

Mark Spears, PhD FRCP
Contact
mspears001@dundee.ac.uk
+44 1738 473861
Mark Spears, PhD FRCP
principal investigator · NHS Tayside and University of Dundee

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion