ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03791086BRIDGEUpdated Mar 22, 2023

The BRIDGE Study - Bronchiectasis Research Involving Databases, Genomics and Endotyping

An observational study in Bronchiectasis Adult, sponsored by University of Dundee. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-22.

Sponsored by University of Dundee · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2019; still recruiting 7 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bronchiectasis is a complex heterogeneous disorder. Treatment is challenging and many recent randomized controlled trials have been negative. It is believed that bronchiectasis as a broad diagnosis incorporates multiple different patient subgroups (also known as phenotypes) and molecular entities (referred to as endotypes). This study aims to phenotype and endotype bronchiectasis during stable disease and exacerbations, to develop strategies for personalised medicine.

Primary Objective To determine molecular endotypes of bronchiectasis which can guide response to treatment.

Secondary Objectives

  1. To determine molecular endotypes of stable bronchiectasis
  2. To determine the causes and inflammatory profiles of bronchiectasis exacerbations
  3. To validate candidate biomarkers of stable and exacerbation endotypes to use in stratified medicine
  4. To perform in-vivo or in-vitro proof of concept studies using phenotypic data to identify patient populations likely to benefit in future randomized controlled trials

This is an observational cohort study that will aim to identify patient subgroups and link these with meaningful clinical outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Background: Bronchiectasis is a common disabling and heterogeneous disease that has been neglected in terms of basic and clinical research. Recent controlled trials have failed to achieve their primary end-points, likely because the optimal patient population to benefit from antibiotic, mucoactive and anti-inflammatory drugs has not been identified. This study aims to explore the clinical, microbiological, inflammatory and functional heterogeneity of the disease with the aim of identifying patient endotypes for stratified medicine.

Study aims and objectives

  1. To determine the molecular endotypes of bronchiectasis during stable disease
  2. To determine the causes and inflammatory profiles of bronchiectasis exacerbations
  3. To validate candidate biomarkers of stable and exacerbation endotypes to use in stratified medicine
  4. To perform in-vivo or in-vitro proof of concept studies using phenotypic data to identify patient populations likely to benefit in future randomized controlled trials Study Design: Observational Cohort study

Study methods:

Patients with bronchiectasis will be recruited into an observational study, the objectives of which will be to:

Aim 1 will define and validate endotypes of stable bronchiectasis by studying up to 1000 patients with bronchiectasis. Clinical data, sputum microbiome, sputum proteomics, and systemic and sputum inflammatory marker measurement will be incorporated for analysis. A sub-study (n=200) will be performed using air liquid interface culture of primary airway epithelial cells. Patients will have brushings of the inferior nasal turbinate with assessment of % ciliation, ciliary beat frequency and pattern by high speed video microscopy before and after culture.

Aim 2 will replicate the phenotyping approach to stable patients with 160 patients during exacerbation. This will identify changes from baseline in microbiota, proteomic and other markers associated with onset of exacerbation and allow classification of clusters of exacerbation.

Aim 3, we will externally validate candidate phenotype/endotypes in registered ethically approved external biobanks and aim to demonstrate that validated markers to be linked to potential treatment responses for use in stratified medicine trials.

In total we will recruit 1000 patients for study. These patients will attend the Clinical Research Centre at one of the participating study centres at least once and undergo sampling along with collecting of clinical data. Patients will be asked to consent for their samples to be linked to data held on the EMBARC registry.

Nature of outputs and outcomes/results expected:

This study will aim to establish detailed endotypes in bronchiectasis which can guide response to treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bronchiectasis Adult

Browse trials for

03

In context

Bronchiectasis

404 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiectasis; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 160 across 137 observational studies indexed under Bronchiectasis.

Browse Bronchiectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Dundee is the lead sponsor of 113 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with bronchiectasis

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A previous CT scan showing bronchiectasis along with compatible clinical syndrome of cough, sputum production and/or recurrent respiratory tract infections.
  • A primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis made by a respiratory physician
  • At the screening visit the individual will have been clinically stable for 4 weeks indicated by the lack of any treatment with antibiotics or for a pulmonary exacerbation in the previous 4 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give
  • \<18years of age
  • Patients with active tuberculosis
  • Treatment with antibiotics or for a pulmonary exacerbation in the previous 4 weeks
  • Bronchiectasis due to cystic fibrosis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with bronchiectasis

    Adult patients with bronchiectasis meeting the inclusion criteria.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency of exacerbations

    Worsening of respiratory symptoms as defined by the EMBARC/BRR definition- Eur Respir J. 2017 Jun 8;49(6). pii: 1700051.

    Time frame: up to 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first exacerbation

    Time to first event after enrolment as defined by the EMBARC/BRR definition- Eur Respir J. 2017 Jun 8;49(6). pii: 1700051.

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Quality of life- the quality of life bronchiectasis questionnaire (QOL-B)

    Validated questionnaire

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Quality of life- the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)

    Validated questionnaire

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Quality of life- The Bronchiectasis impact measure (BIM)

    Questionnaire undergoing validation

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Quality of life- The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ)

    Validated questionnaire

    Time frame: 3 years

  6. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)

    Spirometry

    Time frame: 3 years

  7. Severity of disease (the bronchiectasis severity index)

    Validated severity assessment tool

    Time frame: 3 years

  8. Hospitalisation for severe exacerbations

    Admission to hospital for an exacerbation meeting the EMBARC/BRR exacerbation definition

    Time frame: 3 years

  9. All cause mortality

    Survival during the study

    Time frame: 3 years

  10. Infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Defined as isolation in sputum culture or bronchoalveolar lavage meeting the criteria for chronic infection- Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Nov;12(11):1602-11.

    Time frame: 3 years

  11. Sputum volume

    Measured in millilitres per day

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data from EMBARC supported studies will be made available to researchers. Application for EMBARC data can be made on our website. Further information is available at www.bronchiectasis.eu/dataaccess

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Available following the study subject to approval by the scientific committee as detailed at www.bronchiectasis.eu/dataaccess

Access criteria: Approval of an analysis protocol by an independent scientific committee

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 87 months after the start.

Of 62 observational studies under Bronchiectasis, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12. This study's planned 87 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 29, 2018
First posted
Jan 2, 2019
StartActual
Nov 1, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2027
Last update
Mar 22, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03791086
Responsible party
James Chalmers (Professor, University of Dundee) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 2, 2019
Start date
Nov 1, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 22, 2023

Study contacts

James D Chalmers, MD, PhD
Contact
james.chalmers@nhs.scot
01382660111
Amelia Shoemark, PhD
Contact
a.shoemark@dundee.ac.uk
01382660111
James D Chalmers, MD, PhD
principal investigator · GSK/British Lung Foundation Chair of Respiratory Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion