ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07613892Updated May 29, 2026

Post Operative Skin Approximation With Cyanoacrylate Based Wound Closure Adhesives

An interventional study of Evaluating wound closure products to close larger surgical site incisions and Evaluating wound closure products to close smaller surgical site incisions in Wound Closure and Dehisced Surgical Wounds, sponsored by Medline Industries. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-29.

Sponsored by Medline Industries · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2025, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

surgical adhesive systems are used to close surgical cuts and simple skin wounds. This system is a non-invasive option, meaning it can be used instead of stitches or staples. Because these products do not require stitching deep into the skin, they can reduce the time it takes to close a wound and may reduce stress or damage to the skin edges.

Read the detailed description

The OptiClose surgical adhesive system combines a liquid adhesive with a self-adhering mesh for the closure of surgical incisions and simple lacerations. It acts as a demonstrated noninvasive alternative to skin sutures and staples.

The OptiClose and Dermabond topical skin adhesives combine a self-adhering, pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA), polyester-based mesh (for incisions requiring a mesh), as well as a simple non mesh application system (for incisions that do not require a mesh) for temporarily adjoining the approximated skin edges of an incision, and a 2-octyl cyanoacrylate liquid adhesive formulation for final skin closure. By sparing long intracutaneous sutures, wound closure time is significantly reduced and wound edge ischemia potentially diminished. The purpose of this study is to conduct a two arm, prospective, randomized control trial by which participants will be randomly assigned to either receive the Dermabond wound closure adhesive or the OptiClose wound closure adhesive in participants undergoing the closure of any subcutaneous tissue following surgical site incisions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wound Closure
  • Dehisced Surgical Wounds

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • surgical site closure
  • Wound Closure
  • wound dehiscence
  • adhesive performance
03

In context

Surgical Wound

315 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 66 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound.

Browse Surgical Wound studies →

Lead sponsor

Medline Industries is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (93%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Are able to understand and willing to carry out instructions for this study.
  • Full thickness surgical incision requiring subcutaneous closure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known sensitivities/allergies to the ingredients contained in the products. Individuals with a self-reported Type IV reaction to cyanoacrylates (namely acrylates).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    larger incisions requiring mesh are randomized to two a Medline product and the other a comparator

    In the first arm, larger incisions (greater than 20cm) requiring mesh are randomized to either OptiClose Secure or Dermabond Prineo. Participants are assessed at three post procedure time points: immediately after skin closure and at two subsequent follow up visits. Study endpoints include cosmetic outcome (cosmesis score), incidence of wound dehiscence or allergic reactions, dry time, and ease of application. Participants complete the study following the final assessment visit, though withdrawal is permitted at any time, and investigators may discontinue participation if clinical concerns arise. The study involved an overall duration of approximately 4-6 months\[SR1\] \[NS2\] , with participant follow up lasting about 4-6 weeks, including a 2 week post operative visit, placing all follow up activities within the referenced 8-12 week completion window.\[

    Device: Evaluating wound closure products to close larger surgical site incisions

  • Experimental
    smaller incisions not requiring mesh are closed using adhesive only with participants randomized

    In the second arm, smaller incisions (19 cm or smaller) not requiring mesh are closed using cyanoacrylate-based adhesive ("glue") only, with participants randomized to OptiClose Rapid or Dermabond Advanced. Participants are assessed at three post procedure time points: immediately after skin closure and at two subsequent follow up visits. Study endpoints include cosmetic outcome (cosmesis score), incidence of wound dehiscence or allergic reactions, dry time, and ease of application. Participants complete the study following the final assessment visit, though withdrawal is permitted at any time, and investigators may discontinue participation if clinical concerns arise. The study involved an overall duration of approximately 4-6 months. , with participant follow up lasting about 4-6 weeks, including a 2 week post operative visit, placing all follow up activities within the referenced 8-12 week completion window

    Device: Evaluating wound closure products to close smaller surgical site incisions

Interventions

  • DeviceEvaluating wound closure products to close larger surgical site incisions

    Participants receive surgical incision closure using either OptiClose or Dermabond, selected through randomization based on incision characteristics. Incisions requiring mesh support (\>20 cm) are closed with adhesive plus mesh using one of the assigned products.

    Also known as: OptiClose, Dermabond

  • DeviceEvaluating wound closure products to close smaller surgical site incisions

    Participants receive surgical incision closure using either OptiClose or Dermabond, selected through randomization based on incision characteristics. Incisions not requiring mesh (≤19 cm) are closed using cyanoacrylate-based adhesive alone. Product assignment is randomized within each incision category.

    Also known as: Opticlose, Dermabond

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound Adhesion Scoring

    Incidence of wound edge apposition without dehiscence or need of reapproximation following wound closure.

    Time frame: 8-12 weeks post-operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dry Time

    Timing in seconds to start once the applicator has contacted the skin and ends when the application of the liquid adhesive is complete and is no longer wet to the touch.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  2. Modified Hollander Cosmesis Score (Total Score)

    Cosmetic appearance of the wound as identified by the Modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale. The Modified Hollander Cosmesis Scale consists of multiple components assessed as binary outcomes (1 = absence, 0 = presence). Individual item scores are summed to generate a total score per participant (overall cosmesis score) The total score ranges from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating better cosmetic outcome.

    Time frame: 8-12 weeks post-operation

  3. Participant Satisfaction With Cosmetic Outcome

    Participant satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome was assessed using a numeric rating scale ranging from 1 to 10, where lower scores indicate greater satisfaction. This assessment was collected alongside the Modified Hollander cosmesis evaluation.

    Time frame: 8-12 weeks post-operation

  4. Operator Satisfaction Score (1-10 Scale)

    Operator satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome was assessed using a numeric rating scale ranging from 1 to 10, where lower scores indicate greater satisfaction. This assessment was collected alongside the Modified Hollander cosmesis evaluation.

    Time frame: 8-12 weeks post-operation

  5. Counts of Surgical Site Infections

    The counts will be collected of participants experiencing surgical site infections (SSIs) and recorded for each subject (as occurring within 30 days of treatment) as per the CDC guidelines.

    Time frame: 8-12 weeks post-operation

  6. Counts of Inflammatory reactions

    The counts will be collected of participants experiencing Inflammatory reactions and recorded for each subject as per the ICDRG guidelines.

    Time frame: 8-12 weeks post-operation

Other outcomes

  1. Mesh application time

    Time to apply Mesh in seconds

    Time frame: During the procedure

  2. Glue Application Time

    Time to apply glue

    Time frame: During the procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nadora Healthcare
    Johnstown, Colorado 80534, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2025 to primary completion in Mar 2026, 11 months.

Of 27 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Surgical Wound, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23. This study's 11 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 126 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 7, 2026
First posted
May 29, 2026
StartActual
Apr 2, 2025
Primary completionActual
Mar 18, 2026
CompletionActual
Mar 18, 2026
Last update
May 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07613892
Lead sponsor
Medline Industries
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 29, 2026
Start date
Apr 2, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 18, 2026
Completion
Mar 18, 2026
Last update
May 29, 2026

Study contacts

Scott Dupar, Physician - Doctor of Medicine
principal investigator · Nadora Healthcare

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion