ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05250102Updated Oct 30, 2024Results posted

Neonatal Pulse Oximetry Sensor Study

An interventional study of Pulse oximeter sensors in Premature Birth, sponsored by Medline Industries. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-30.

Sponsored by Medline Industries · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
1 Day to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To validate the SpO2 accuracy, bias, and precision of Medline's reprocessed pulse oximetry sensors as compared to SaO2 in arterial blood samples as assessed by CO-oximetry in neonates.

Read the detailed description

Pulse oximetry helps in measuring peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) continuously and non-invasively, and provides an indirect measurement of arterial oxygenation (SaO2) based on the red and infrared light-absorption characteristics of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. Uses of pulse oximetry include detection of hypoxia, avoidance of hyperoxia, titration of fractional inspired oxygen, and enabling weaning from mechanical ventilation. Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis, such as by the use of CO-oximeter, provides a direct measurement of SaO2. However, ABG analysis requires time, expense, and arterial access. Therefore, this study aims to validate the SpO2 accuracy of pulse oximetry sensors (manufactured by Nellcor and Masimo, and reprocessed by Medline Industries, LP) in neonates as compared to ABG measurements as part of their clinical standard of care (SOC), as assessed by CO-oximetry.

02

Conditions studied

  • Premature Birth

Browse trials for

03

In context

Premature Birth

2,550 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 84 across 1,666 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Medline Industries is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (93%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who are postnatal 28 days or younger (neonates)
  • Subjects who are likely to receive one or more ABG measurements as part of their clinical SOC
  • Subjects who weigh less than 5 Kg (weight range for thesensors)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with current signs and symptoms of a Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) combined with a current or planned arterial line placement which will affect the validity of the co-oximetry measurement
  • Subjects with physical malformation of hands, fingers, feet, or toes that would limit the ability to place sensors for this study
  • Subjects judged by the Principal Investigator (PI) to be inappropriate for participation in this study
  • Subjects for whom placing a pulse oximeter will cause dermatological issues (e.g. allergic to foam rubber or adhesive tape)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Pulse oximeter sensor readings

    Subjects who satisfy all of the inclusion criteria will be eligible to participate in the study, will receive intervention (the Masimo and Nellcor sensors, and their arterial blood sample will be taken in the normal course of care). This is a single arm study. Those who don't meet the inclusion/ exclusion criteria won't be eligible to participate.

    Device: Pulse oximeter sensors

Interventions

  • DevicePulse oximeter sensors

    Pulse oximeter reading will be compared to CO-oximeter reading.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bland-Altman Analysis for Nellcor Pulse Oximeter

    BIAS Measurement and 95% confidence interval calculated using a Bland-Altman plot (mean vs. difference of SaO2 and SpO2) and an error plot (SaO2 vs. difference of SaO2 and SpO2) were generated. The B\&A plot analysis is a simple way to evaluate a bias between the mean differences, and to estimate an agreement interval, within which 95% of the differences of the second method, compared to the first one, fall. Data can be analyzed both as unit differences plot and as percentage differences plot. We ran a percentage mean difference plot.

    Time frame: 15 episodic minutes

07

Results

Posted Oct 30, 2024

Participant flow

a total of 23 neonates were recruited for the study, with 1-3 measurement pairs taken for each subject and each pulse oximetry sensor, for a total of 2, 4, or 6 measurement pairs per subject.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePulse Oximeter Sensor Readings
Started23
Completed23
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryBland-Altman Analysis for Nellcor Pulse Oximeter

BIAS Measurement and 95% confidence interval calculated using a Bland-Altman plot (mean vs. difference of SaO2 and SpO2) and an error plot (SaO2 vs. difference of SaO2 and SpO2) were generated. The B\&A plot analysis is a simple way to evaluate a bias between the mean differences, and to estimate an agreement interval, within which 95% of the differences of the second method, compared to the first one, fall. Data can be analyzed both as unit differences plot and as percentage differences plot. We ran a percentage mean difference plot.

Time frame:
15 episodic minutes
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of difference in mean
Bland-Altman Analysis for Nellcor Pulse Oximeter
percentage of difference in meanSensor Massimo or Nellcor
Bias Massimo.151 (-.361 to .662)
Bias Nellcor.434 (-.149 to 1.017)

Adverse events

Collected over Neonates enrolled in the study were monitored until discharge from the hospital, on average for 2 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0.0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pulse Oximeter Sensor Readings0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

23 to 29 weeks

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Pulse Oximeter Sensor Readings
<=18 years23
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Weeks)Pulse Oximeter Sensor Readings
Mean23.6 ± 1.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pulse Oximeter Sensor Readings
Female17
Male6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Pulse Oximeter Sensor Readings
Black or African American14
White - Non Hispanic or Latino8
Hispanic or Latino1
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Eastern Carolina University
    Greenville, North Carolina 27858, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ascha M, Bhattacharyya A, Ramos JA, Tonelli AR. Pulse Oximetry and Arterial Oxygen Saturation during Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Oct;50(10):1992-1997. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001658. PubMed 29771822 ↗
  • Dawson JA, Davis PG, O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Morley CJ. Pulse oximetry for monitoring infants in the delivery room: a review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Jan;92(1):F4-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.102749. No abstract available. PubMed 17185428 ↗
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(4):571-82. doi: 10.1080/10543400701329422. PubMed 17613642 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05250102
Lead sponsor
Medline Industries
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 22, 2022
Start date
Jun 13, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 10, 2023
Completion
Oct 10, 2023
Results posted
Oct 30, 2024
Last update
Oct 30, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion