ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07604844Updated May 28, 2026

Comparative Efficacy of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid Versus Mandelic Acid Peel in the Treatment of Melasma

An interventional study of Mandelic Acid Peel and Intralesional Tranexamic Acid in Melasma, sponsored by Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-28.

Sponsored by Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Melasma is a chronic acquired disorder of facial hyperpigmentation that significantly affects quality of life. Both intralesional tranexamic acid and mandelic acid chemical peels are effective treatment options with favorable safety profiles in darker skin types. However, comparative evidence in South Asian populations is limited. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, quality of life outcomes, and patient satisfaction of intralesional tranexamic acid versus mandelic acid peel in patients with facial melasma treated at Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad.

Read the detailed description

This quasi-experimental, non-randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad. A total of 120 patients aged 18-45 years with clinically diagnosed facial melasma will be enrolled and allocated alternately into two groups. Group A will receive mandelic acid chemical peels every two weeks for six sessions. Group B will receive intradermal tranexamic acid injections every two weeks for six sessions. All participants will receive sunscreen and photoprotection counseling. Outcomes will be assessed using Physician Global Assessment, modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI), MELASQoL questionnaire, adverse event monitoring, and patient satisfaction over a 12-week period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Melasma

Keywords

  • Melasma
  • Tranexamic Acid
  • Mandelic Acid
  • Chemical Peel
  • Hyperpigmentation
  • MELASQoL
  • Pakistan
03

In context

Melanosis

170 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanosis; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 40 across 157 interventional studies indexed under Melanosis.

Browse Melanosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age 18-45 years. Clinical diagnosis of facial melasma. Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III-V. Disease duration of at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancy or lactation. Known to tranexamic acid or mandelic acid. Active facial dermatoses or infection. Personal or family history of thromboembolic disease. Coagulation disorders. Systemic retinoid use within 6 months. Oral or hormone replacement therapy within 6 months. Use of topical or systemic depigmenting agents within 4 weeks. History of keloid tendency.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Mandelic Acid Peel

    Participants will receive mandelic acid chemical peels every two weeks for six sessions over 12 weeks.

    Procedure: Mandelic Acid Peel

  • Active comparator
    Intralesional Tranexamic Acid

    Participants will receive intradermal tranexamic acid injections every two weeks for six sessions over 12 weeks.

    Procedure: Intralesional Tranexamic Acid

Interventions

  • ProcedureMandelic Acid Peel

    After degreasing the face, mandelic acid solution will be applied for 5-7 minutes and then neutralized. Sessions will be repeated every two weeks for six sessions.

  • ProcedureIntralesional Tranexamic Acid

    Tranexamic acid will be injected intradermally at 1-cm intervals over melasma patches using a 30-gauge insulin syringe every two weeks for six sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants achieving a Physician Global Assessment rating of good or excellent.

    Good response is defined as ≥51% improvement and excellent response as ≥76% improvement in pigmentation.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in modified Melasma Area and Severity Index(0-24), 0-clear, 24-severe

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

  2. Change in Melasma Quality of Life Scale MELASQoL score(7-70) 10 - 39: Mild quality of life impairment, 40 - 54: Moderate quality of life impairment, 55 - 70: Severe quality of life impairment .

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

  3. Patient satisfaction score (Likert Scale 1-5, 1:Very Dissatisfied, 5: Satisfied)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Frequency of treatment-related adverse events

    Time frame: Throughout the 12-week treatment period

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Xu L, Ding X, Ying L, Zhang X, Lu N. Follicular Lymphoma Presenting With Monoclonal IgM And MYD88 Mutation: A Case Report And Review Of The Literature. Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Sep 23;12:7833-7842. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S211436. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31576141 ↗
  • Tong M, Kotur T, Liang W, Vogelmann K, Kleine T, Leister D, Brieske C, Yang S, Ludke D, Wiermer M, Zhang Y, Li X, Hoth S. E3 ligase SAUL1 serves as a positive regulator of PAMP-triggered immunity and its homeostasis is monitored by immune receptor SOC3. New Phytol. 2017 Sep;215(4):1516-1532. doi: 10.1111/nph.14678. Epub 2017 Jul 10. PubMed 28691210 ↗
  • Ikino JK, Nunes DH, Silva VP, Frode TS, Sens MM. Melasma and assessment of the quality of life in Brazilian women. An Bras Dermatol. 2015 Mar-Apr;90(2):196-200. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20152771. PubMed 25830989 ↗
  • Slovacek L, Slovackova B, Slanska I, Hrstka Z, Priester P. Incidence and relevance of depression among palliative care female inpatients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Sep;19(5):e8-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01030.x. Epub 2009 Aug 25. No abstract available. PubMed 19708933 ↗
  • Sedighi M, Haghnegahdar A. Lumbar disk herniation surgery: outcome and predictors. Global Spine J. 2014 Dec;4(4):233-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390010. Epub 2014 Sep 26. PubMed 25396104 ↗
  • Marsidi N, Beijnen JH, van Zuuren EJ. Palladium-induced granulomas analysed with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Jul;79(1):41-42. doi: 10.1111/cod.12979. Epub 2018 Mar 1. No abstract available. PubMed 29492982 ↗
  • Nagalakshmi S, Sriram G, Balachandar K, Dhayanithi D. A comparative evaluation of mandibular incisor decrowding with coaxial and optiflex arch wires and their load-deflection rates. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014 Jul;6(Suppl 1):S118-21. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.137412. PubMed 25210351 ↗
  • Ogbechie-Godec OA, Elbuluk N. Melasma: an Up-to-Date Comprehensive Review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017 Sep;7(3):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s13555-017-0194-1. Epub 2017 Jul 19. PubMed 28726212 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be made publicly available.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07604844
Lead sponsor
Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
Responsible party
Dr Shapara Shakeel (Resident Dermatologist, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 22, 2026
Start date
May 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 28, 2026

Study contacts

Shapara Shakeel, MBBS, FCPS-resident derm
Contact
shaparashakil@gmail.com
+923489081830
Ovais Faizi, MBBS, FCPS(Internal Medicine)
Contact
ovaisfaizi@yahoo.com
+923134422922
Ali Amar, MBBS, FCPS(dermatology), CHPE
study chair · Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion