ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07604584Updated May 22, 2026

Effects of Platelet-Rich Fibrin After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery in Smokers and Nonsmokers

An interventional study of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar, Postoperative Pain and Trismus, sponsored by Ankara University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-22.

Sponsored by Ankara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 years after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2017, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mandibular third molar surgery is commonly associated with postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been proposed as a biological adjunct to improve postoperative healing; however, its effectiveness in smokers remains unclear. This prospective randomized split-mouth clinical study aimed to evaluate the effects of PRF on postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, and analgesic consumption after impacted mandibular third molar surgery in smokers and nonsmokers. Thirty patients with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were included. PRF was placed in one extraction socket, while the contralateral socket served as the control site. Postoperative clinical outcomes were assessed during the first postoperative week and compared between smoking and nonsmoking patients.

Read the detailed description

This prospective randomized split-mouth clinical trial was conducted between 2017 and 2019 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, and analgesic consumption after impacted mandibular third molar surgery in smoking and nonsmoking patients.

A total of 30 systemically healthy patients aged 18-35 years with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were included. Patients were divided into smoking and nonsmoking groups. In each patient, PRF was randomly applied to one extraction socket, while the contralateral socket served as the control site without PRF application. All surgical procedures were performed by the same oral and maxillofacial surgeon using a standardized surgical protocol. Outcome assessments were performed by a different clinician blinded to the intervention side.

Postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Facial swelling was assessed using linear facial measurements between anatomical landmarks, and trismus was evaluated by measuring maximum interincisal distance. Clinical evaluations were performed preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7.

The primary outcome of the study was postoperative pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included postoperative swelling, trismus, and analgesic consumption. The study also aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of PRF between smokers and nonsmokers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Trismus
  • Facial Swelling

Keywords

  • Platelet-Rich Fibrin
  • Mandibular Third Molar
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Smoking
  • Swelling
  • Trismus
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara University is the lead sponsor of 320 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Systemically healthy patients aged between 18 and 35 years
  • Bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars
  • Mandibular third molars classified as Pell and Gregory Class I, Position C
  • Mandibular third molars classified as Parant Class II difficulty
  • Smoking and nonsmoking patients
  • Patients willing to participate and provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of acute infection or pericoronitis
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Alcohol or substance abuse
  • Use of oral
  • Menstrual period during surgery
  • Antibiotic use within the previous month
  • Smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day
  • Agitation or inability to cooperate
  • Incomplete follow-up data
  • Systemic disease contraindicating oral surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PRF-treated socket

    Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) was placed into the extraction socket following impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

    Biological: Platelet-Rich Fibrin

  • No intervention
    Control socket

    The contralateral extraction socket was primarily closed without PRF application after mandibular third molar surgery.

Interventions

  • Autologous platelet-rich fibrin prepared from venous blood by centrifugation and placed into the extraction socket after mandibular third molar extraction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) after impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Facial Swelling

    Postoperative facial swelling assessed using linear facial measurements between anatomical landmarks.

    Time frame: Preoperative period and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

  2. Postoperative Trismus

    Trismus assessed by measuring maximum interincisal mouth opening distance.

    Time frame: Preoperative period and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

  3. Postoperative Analgesic Consumption

    Number of analgesic tablets used during the postoperative follow-up period.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry
    Ankara, 06560, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 19 months.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's 19 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 17, 2026
First posted
May 22, 2026
StartActual
May 15, 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 21, 2018
CompletionActual
Dec 21, 2018
Last update
May 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07604584
Lead sponsor
Ankara University
Responsible party
Mehmet Alp Eriş (Research Assistant, Ankara University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 22, 2026
Start date
May 15, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2018
Completion
Dec 21, 2018
Last update
May 22, 2026

Study contacts

Mehmet Emre Yurttutan, PhD, DDS
principal investigator · Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: P-prf

Start the discussion