ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07596355H&NANCEUpdated May 19, 2026

AI-Assisted Endoscopy for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions

An observational study in Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasms, Upper AerodigestiveTract Cancer and Upper Aero-digestive Tract (UADT) Neoplasm, sponsored by Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-19.

Sponsored by Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
283
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective observational clinical study designed to evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms applied to upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) video-endoscopy. The study assesses three main tasks: lesion detection (localization), classification (benign vs malignant), and segmentation of tumor margins.

AI algorithms will be applied to endoscopic video data acquired during routine clinical practice without influencing clinical decision-making. The system will process images in real time and store data for subsequent analysis. AI outputs will be compared with physician assessment and reference standard histopathology to evaluate diagnostic performance.

Read the detailed description

The artificial intelligence algorithms developed will be employed in the analysis of laryngeal lesions for 3 tasks:

  • Task 1: Computer aided diagnosis (CADx): the algorithm provides a differential diagnosis between benign and malignant neoplasms (binary classification) and the exact histology (multiclass classification). During the UADT video-endoscopy in the outpatient clinic, the physician performs the video-endoscopy and selects and captures n.3 WL and n.3 NBI significant frames of the lesion. The AI model records the classification output of the algorithm that the physician cannot access. The predicted pathologic results will be finally displayed as two different classifications along with the probability of each prediction (0% to 100%) as estimated by the AI algorithm: a first binary classification "neoplastic" or "non-neoplastic," and a second multiclass classification with the exact histology. The physician subsequently, based on the endoscopic examination, will write the suspected diagnosis (benign vs. malignant lesion and the actual histology) in the appropriate patient chart. Next, the physician reviews the screenshot taken and makes sure the lesion is visible in every one of them. Retrospectively, an investigator (blinded to the physician's assessment) will review the AI processed frames with the resulting CADx classifications and mark the AI-processed diagnosis in the patient chart. Once biopsied, the final histology of the lesion analyzed by definitive histopathological examination is recorded in the patient chart by the investigator. The investigators will finally compare the two recorded diagnoses (CADx and physician) with the definitive histology.
  • Task 2: Computer aided detection (CADe): the algorithm, through the representation of a rectangle (bounding box), localizes the lesion during the video-endoscopy in the outpatient clinic in real-time. During the UADT video-endoscopy, the physician performs the video-endoscopy as for standard-of-care procedure. In parallel, the AI model processes in real-time the endoscopic video and records the output of the algorithm (which the physician cannot access). The physician captures n.3 WL and n.3 NBI significant frames of the lesion. Moreover, n.3 frames where no lesions are visible are captured as negative controls. Later, the physician reviews the screenshot taken and makes sure to label the frames where the lesion is visible as "positive cases" and the frame where the lesion is not visible as "negative cases". The investigators will finally assess if the lesion was detected by the CADe system to define a "true positive". Similarly, to define a true negative, the CADe system should have not output a bounding box in the majority of the "negative cases" frames.
  • Task 3: Computer aided segmentation (CASe): the algorithm analyzes the neoplasm margins and provides a delineation mask. In the operating room setting, once the lesion to be resected is identified with a 0° telescope, the surgeon captures n.1 WL and n.1 NBI close-up photographs that exemplify the superficial lesion margins. The same procedure is repeated with a 70° optics and other two photographs are acquired. The frames taken are then saved and analyzed by the AI algorithm, which will perform the segmentation task. The surgeon will be blinded to the AI prediction. Later, the surgeon will draw the margins of the lesion according to her/his evaluation of each captured frame. The annotated frame will be saved so that it can be analyzed at a later time. Afterwards, in cases where positive superficial margins are identified by histopathologic examination, the surgeon-designed margins and the AI model ones will be compared to see if there was any difference in the suggested margin.
02

Conditions studied

  • Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasms
  • Upper AerodigestiveTract Cancer
  • Upper Aero-digestive Tract (UADT) Neoplasm
  • Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Leukoplakia
  • Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
  • Vocal Cord Disease
  • Vocal Fold Polyp
  • Vocal Fold Nodules
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,710 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 594 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 283 is above the median of 100 across 502 observational studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The sample size for a single-arm, prospective cohort study, where the same group of patients undergoes testing with an AI model and a human physician and then they are compared with the gold standard reference test (biopsy) was calculated based on information from previous studies

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Injury originating from the upper aero-digestive tract
  • Recording of the video-endoscopic examination
  • Patient known to undergo a of the lesion or clinical follow-up for lesion with known biopsy (e.g. laryngeal papillomatosis) or suffering from Reinke's edema (in this pathology, in fact, biopsy is not necessary since the diagnosis is clinical)
  • Or patients undergoing transoral lesion excision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Submucosal lesion
  • Patients with previous operations on the upper aero-digestive tract
  • Patients with previous radiotherapy of the head and neck district
  • Poor compliance on endoscopic examination
  • Unavailability of CADe/CADx or CASe data logging note
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
283 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Negative Predictive Value of the CADx Algorithm for Malignant or Premalignant Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions

    Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of the computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) algorithm for classifying UADT lesions as malignant/premalignant versus benign/non-neoplastic, using definitive histopathology as the reference standard. The CADx final classification will be based on the majority rule across selected white-light and narrow-band imaging frames. NPV = true negatives / (true negatives + false negatives). The pre-specified performance target is NPV ≥ 90%.

    Time frame: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.

  2. Sensitivity of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions

    Sensitivity of the computer-aided detection (CADe) algorithm for localizing UADT lesions with a bounding box. A true positive is defined as localization of the lesion area by a bounding box in the majority of physician-labeled lesion-positive captured frames. Sensitivity = true positives / (true positives + false negatives).

    Time frame: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.

  3. Median Intersection Over Union Between CASe Segmentation and Surgeon-Drawn Lesion Margins

    Median overlap between the AI-generated segmentation mask and the lesion margin area drawn by the surgeon on intraoperative endoscopic images. Intersection over Union (IoU) = area of overlap / area of union. Values range from 0 to 1; higher values indicate greater agreement.

    Time frame: At intraoperative pre-resection endoscopy, with assessment performed after image annotation up to 30 days after surgery.

  4. Median Dice Similarity Coefficient Between CASe Segmentation and Surgeon-Drawn Lesion Margins

    Median Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) between the AI-generated segmentation mask and the lesion margin area drawn by the surgeon on intraoperative endoscopic images. Dice Similarity Coefficient = 2 × area of overlap / (AI segmented area + surgeon-drawn area). Values range from 0 to 1; higher values indicate greater agreement.

    Time frame: At intraoperative pre-resection endoscopy, with assessment performed after image annotation up to 30 days after surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. WL-NPV vs. NBI-NPV of CADx classification

    Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of CADx classification calculated using only the three selected white-light frames, compared with definitive histopathology, vs. NPV of CADx classification calculated using only the three selected narrow-band imaging frames, compared with definitive histopathology. The final AI-result will be calculated based on the majority rule of the 3 WL and 3 NBI frames computed separately.

    Time frame: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.

  2. Clinician-Reported Usability Score for the AI Endoscopy System

    Usability of the AI endoscopy system assessed using standardized usability questionnaires administered to clinicians after use of the AI system. Questionnaire scoring will be interpreted according to the selected questionnaire manual, with higher scores indicating greater usability.

    Time frame: Assessed after clinician use of the AI system during study procedures, up to 20 months after study initiation.

  3. Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of CADx histology prediction

    Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of the CADx algorithm for histology prediction, compared with definitive histopathology.

    Time frame: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.

  4. F1 Score of CADx Classification

    F1 score of the CADx classification output compared with definitive histopathology.

    Time frame: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.

  5. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of CADx Classification

    AUC of the ROC curve for CADx classification of UADT lesions compared with definitive histopathology.

    Time frame: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.

  6. Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of human physician histology prediction

    Sensitivity, Specificity an Accuracy of the treating physician's suspected diagnosis compared with definitive histopathology.

    Time frame: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.

  7. Specificity of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions

    Proportion of physician-labeled lesion-negative frames/cases in which the CADe algorithm does not output a bounding box in the majority of negative-control frames.

    Time frame: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.

  8. Accuracy of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions

    Overall proportion of correctly classified lesion-positive and lesion-negative cases/frames by the CADe algorithm.

    Time frame: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.

  9. Positive Predictive Value of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions

    Positive predictive value of CADe bounding-box output for lesion localization. PPV = true positives / (true positives + false positives).

    Time frame: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.

  10. Negative Predictive Value of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions

    Negative predictive value of CADe absence of bounding-box output for lesion localization. NPV = true negatives / (true negatives + false negatives).

    Time frame: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.

  11. Percentage of Positive Superficial Margin Cases in Which the AI-Predicted Tumor Area Is Wider Than the Surgeon-Drawn Area

    Among cases with positive superficial margins on final histopathology, percentage of cases in which the AI-predicted tumor area extends beyond the surgeon-drawn margin at the affected margin.

    Time frame: At intraoperative pre-resection endoscopy, with assessment performed after image annotation up to 30 days after surgery.

07

Study locations

3 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dunham ME, Kong KA, McWhorter AJ, Adkins LK. Optical Biopsy: Automated Classification of Airway Endoscopic Findings Using a Convolutional Neural Network. Laryngoscope. 2022 Feb;132 Suppl 4:S1-S8. doi: 10.1002/lary.28708. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PubMed 32343434 ↗
  • Piazza C, Peretti G, Vander Poorten V. Editorial: Advances in Transoral Approaches for Laryngeal Cancer. Front Oncol. 2018 Oct 17;8:455. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00455. eCollection 2018. No abstract available. PubMed 30386742 ↗
  • Paderno A, Piazza C, Del Bon F, Lancini D, Tanagli S, Deganello A, Peretti G, De Momi E, Patrini I, Ruperti M, Mattos LS, Moccia S. Deep Learning for Automatic Segmentation of Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer Using Narrow Band Imaging: Preliminary Experience in a Clinical Perspective. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 24;11:626602. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.626602. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33842330 ↗
  • Azam MA, Sampieri C, Ioppi A, Africano S, Vallin A, Mocellin D, Fragale M, Guastini L, Moccia S, Piazza C, Mattos LS, Peretti G. Deep Learning Applied to White Light and Narrow Band Imaging Videolaryngoscopy: Toward Real-Time Laryngeal Cancer Detection. Laryngoscope. 2022 Sep;132(9):1798-1806. doi: 10.1002/lary.29960. Epub 2021 Nov 25. PubMed 34821396 ↗
  • Ren J, Jing X, Wang J, Ren X, Xu Y, Yang Q, Ma L, Sun Y, Xu W, Yang N, Zou J, Zheng Y, Chen M, Gan W, Xiang T, An J, Liu R, Lv C, Lin K, Zheng X, Lou F, Rao Y, Yang H, Liu K, Liu G, Lu T, Zheng X, Zhao Y. Automatic Recognition of Laryngoscopic Images Using a Deep-Learning Technique. Laryngoscope. 2020 Nov;130(11):E686-E693. doi: 10.1002/lary.28539. Epub 2020 Feb 18. PubMed 32068890 ↗
  • Kim DH, Kim Y, Kim SW, Hwang SH. Use of narrowband imaging for the diagnosis and screening of laryngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2020 Sep;42(9):2635-2643. doi: 10.1002/hed.26186. Epub 2020 May 4. PubMed 32364313 ↗
  • Rex DK, Kahi C, O'Brien M, Levin TR, Pohl H, Rastogi A, Burgart L, Imperiale T, Ladabaum U, Cohen J, Lieberman DA. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):419-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.023. PubMed 21353837 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 19 months later.

Of 215 non-industry observational studies under Head and Neck Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 71 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 144. This study's planned 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 237 studies reached it within 71 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 142.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 5, 2026
First posted
May 19, 2026
StartEst.
May 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 2028
Last update
May 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07596355
Lead sponsor
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
Collaborators
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, CRO "Centro Clinical Trials" IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven, Università degli Studi 'G. d'Annunzio' Chieti e Pescara, Universita degli Studi di Genova, Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 19, 2026
Start date
May 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 19, 2026

Study contacts

Leonardo De Mattos, PhD
Contact
leonardo.demattos@iit.it
+39 010 2898 270

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion