ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07595120Updated May 19, 2026

Application of Electromagnetic Navigation System in Pulmonary Nodule Localization

An interventional study of Electromagnetic Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Localization of Pulmonary Nodules and CT-Guided Percutaneous Localization of Pulmonary Nodules in Pulmonary Nodules and Early-Stage Lung Cancer, sponsored by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-19.

Sponsored by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to design and conduct a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled post-market clinical trial to validate the clinical efficacy of high-precision electromagnetic navigation technology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Nodules
  • Early-Stage Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • ENB
  • CT-guided Percutaneous
  • pulmonary nodules
  • localization
03

In context

Multiple Pulmonary Nodules

99 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Pulmonary Nodules; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 97 across 46 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Pulmonary Nodules.

Browse Multiple Pulmonary Nodules studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China is the lead sponsor of 160 studies on the registry; 95 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18-80 years, regardless of gender;
  2. Solitary single nodule, scheduled for lung nodule puncture and localization;
  3. Chest CT (lung window mode) showing a maximum nodule diameter ≤ 2 cm;
  4. (ECOG) performance status score 0-2;
  5. Voluntary participation, with signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Not suitable for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery;
  2. The distance between the center of the lesion and the dome of the diaphragm is \< 3 cm;
  3. History of thoracic adhesion due to previous thoracotomy or pleural infection;
  4. Patients judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for preoperative transthoracic or transbronchial localization;
  5. Inability to complete follow-up or poor compliance.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Electromagnetic Navigation Localization Group

    Procedure: Electromagnetic Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Localization of Pulmonary Nodules

  • Active comparator
    CT-Guided Localization Group

    Procedure: CT-Guided Percutaneous Localization of Pulmonary Nodules

Interventions

  • ProcedureElectromagnetic Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Localization of Pulmonary Nodules

    Performed by an experienced thoracic surgeon or interventional radiologist under general or local anesthesia, the procedure is guided by an electromagnetic navigation system. The procedural steps include: 1) preoperative import of the patient's CT data into the navigation system for path planning; 2) intraoperative coupling of the positioning sensor with the puncture instrument; 3) under real-time three-dimensional imaging guidance of the electromagnetic navigation system, performing percutaneous puncture to accurately place a positioning guidewire / microcoil / dye near the target pulmonary nodule; 4) postoperative CT scan to confirm the localization. This is a single-session procedure.

  • ProcedureCT-Guided Percutaneous Localization of Pulmonary Nodules

    Performed by an experienced thoracic surgeon or interventional radiologist under local anesthesia, the procedure is guided using a CT scanner. The steps include: 1) positioning the patient appropriately and performing a CT scan to determine the puncture site and path; 2) employing CT fluoroscopy or intermittent CT scanning for real-time guidance; 3) under CT image guidance, performing a percutaneous puncture to place a localization guidewire / microcoil / dye near the target pulmonary nodule; 4) performing a repeat CT scan post-procedure to confirm the localization position. This is a single-session procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate of intraoperative localization of lung nodules

    Thoracoscopic exploration enables accurate identification and localization of markers (e.g., contrast dye, microcoils, etc.), with the distance between the center of the marker or the main imaging area and the center of the target nodule being ≤20 mm, and ultimately successfully guides the resection of the target lesion.

    Time frame: Day 0 (Intraoperative)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Localization Accuracy

    The shortest physical distance (unit: mm) between the actual localization marker point (e.g., the center of the dye) and the outer edge of the nodular lesion in the resected specimen.

    Time frame: Day 0 (Intraoperative)

  2. Location Procedure Time

    CT-guided group: Time from the start of the initial localization planning CT scan to the completion of marker/needle deployment and withdrawal of instruments from the body surface. Electromagnetic navigation group: Time from when the bronchoscope passes the vocal cords to the completion of marker deployment and withdrawal of the guiding instrument (unit: min).

    Time frame: Day 0 (Intraoperative)

  3. Conversion Rate

    The proportion of subjects in whom conversion from complete thoracoscopy to thoracotomy, or from the planned sublobar resection (wedge/segment) to an extended resection (e.g., lobectomy), was necessitated due to failure to locate the lesion, insufficient surgical margin resulting from excessive localization error, or severe complications related to localization (such as major hemorrhage).

    Time frame: Day 0 (Intraoperative)

  4. Complication Rate

    Record the incidence of all complications related to the localization procedure. In addition to complications common to percutaneous approaches, such as pneumothorax and intrathoracic hemorrhage, airway-related complications, including airway mucosal injury/bleeding, bronchospasm, and severe hypoxemia, should be systematically documented. Assessment should be performed based on the adverse event grading criteria.

    Time frame: Day 0 through hospital discharge or Day 7 postoperatively, whichever comes first

  5. Radiation Exposure

    Dose-length product (DLP) value of radiation received by the patient, as recorded by the CT scanner (unit: mGy·cm).

    Time frame: Day 0 (Intraoperative)

  6. Operative Time

    Time from the initiation of the skin incision for thoracoscopy to the completion of wound closure (unit: min).

    Time frame: Day 0 (Intraoperative)

  7. Early Postoperative Pain Score

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) or Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), scored from 0 to 10 points (with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the most severe pain).

    Time frame: Day 0 (immediately after localization); 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07595120
Responsible party
Haifeng Wang (Prof., Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 19, 2026
Start date
May 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 19, 2026

Study contacts

Shenghao Huang
Contact
huangshplus5@163.com
+86 153 5656 1656
Haifeng Wang
principal investigator · Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion