CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07849400Updated Sep 30, 2026

Video-guided Versus Conventional Right-sided Double-lumen Tube Placement for Thoracoscopic Surgery

An interventional study of Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube and Conventional right-sided double-lumen tube in Right-sided Double-lumen Tube Positioning, Lung Isolation During Thoracoscopic Surgery and One-lung Ventilation, sponsored by Diansan Su. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by Diansan Su · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
566
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Right-sided double-lumen tubes are used for lung isolation during thoracoscopic surgery but can be difficult to position because of right bronchial anatomy. This multicenter randomized controlled trial will compare a continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube with a conventional right-sided double-lumen tube in adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery requiring right-sided lung isolation. The primary objective is to determine whether continuous video guidance increases the rate of successful initial right-sided double-lumen tube positioning. Secondary outcomes include positioning time, clinically relevant intraoperative tube displacement, rescue fiberoptic bronchoscopy, lung collapse quality, hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation, and airway-related complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Right-sided Double-lumen Tube Positioning
  • Lung Isolation During Thoracoscopic Surgery
  • One-lung Ventilation
  • Lung Cancer
  • Pulmonary Nodules
  • Mediastinal Tumors
  • Thoracoscopic Surgery Requiring One-lung Ventilation
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
  • Patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic surgery requiring lung isolation with a right-sided double-lumen tube.
  • Patients who provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to placement of a right-sided double-lumen tube, including right main bronchial lesions that preclude its use.
  • Known tracheobronchial anatomical abnormalities.
  • Known or anticipated difficult airway.
  • Requirement for rapid sequence induction.
  • Emergency surgery.
  • Thoracic surgery within 4 weeks before enrollment, recent respiratory infection, or known or suspected pulmonary tuberculosis.
  • Severe respiratory instability.
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial that may affect the study outcomes.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
566 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube

    Device: Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube

  • Active comparator
    Conventional right-sided double-lumen tube

    Device: Conventional right-sided double-lumen tube

Interventions

  • DeviceContinuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube

    Participants will receive a continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube for lung isolation during thoracoscopic surgery. The device incorporates an integrated visualization system that provides continuous real-time airway visualization during tube positioning and intraoperative management.

  • DeviceConventional right-sided double-lumen tube

    Participants will receive a conventional right-sided double-lumen tube for lung isolation during thoracoscopic surgery according to standard clinical practice.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with successful initial right-sided double-lumen tube positioning assessed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy

    Successful initial positioning is defined as Grade 1 (optimal) or Grade 2 (acceptable) tube position at the first protocol-mandated fiberoptic bronchoscopic assessment before any bronchoscopic adjustment. Grade 3 (malposition) is considered unsuccessful. Successful positioning requires an acceptable bronchial cuff position, adequate alignment of the right upper-lobe ventilation slot with the right upper-lobe bronchial orifice, absence of clinically relevant right upper-lobe obstruction, and a patent bronchus intermedius without the need for further advancement, withdrawal, or rotation of the tube. Each participant will be classified as successful or unsuccessful.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively, immediately after initial tube positioning and before initiation of one-lung ventilation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to initial right-sided double-lumen tube positioning

    Time in seconds from passage of the double-lumen tube through the vocal cords into the trachea until the anesthesiologist completes the initial right-sided bronchial positioning and no further tube advancement, withdrawal, or rotation is performed before the protocol-mandated fiberoptic bronchoscopic assessment.

    Time frame: Periprocedural, during initial right-sided double-lumen tube positioning.

  2. Number of unplanned intraoperative right-sided double-lumen tube repositioning events per participant

    An event is defined as any unplanned advancement, withdrawal, rotation, or other repositioning of the right-sided double-lumen tube after satisfactory initial positioning has been confirmed. Minor positional changes not requiring intervention are not counted. For each repositioning event, the use of unplanned fiberoptic bronchoscopy for guidance or confirmation will be recorded as an event characteristic. The total number of repositioning events will be recorded for each participant.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively, from confirmation of satisfactory initial tube position until completion of one-lung ventilation.

  3. Quality of surgical lung collapse assessed by a 3-point surgeon-rated scale

    The operating surgeon will assess the quality of surgical lung collapse using a predefined 3-point ordinal scale: 1 = poor, lung collapse is insufficient and interferes with surgical exposure or requires additional intervention; 2 = moderate, lung collapse is partially adequate with some interference with surgical exposure but without the need for additional intervention; and 3 = good, lung collapse is adequate and does not interfere with surgical exposure. Higher scores indicate better lung collapse.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively, approximately 20 minutes after initiation of one-lung ventilation.

  4. Number of hypoxemic episodes during one-lung ventilation per participant

    A hypoxemic episode is defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) below 90% for at least 1 minute during one-lung ventilation, measured continuously by pulse oximetry. A new hypoxemic episode will be counted only after SpO₂ has recovered to 90% or above for at least 1 minute following the previous episode. The total number of hypoxemic episodes will be recorded for each participant.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively, during one-lung ventilation.

  5. Airway-related complications

    Time frame: From airway instrumentation until 24 hours after surgery.

06

Study locations

3 sites
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine,
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China
  • Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University(The First Hospital of Jiaxing)
    Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314000, China
  • The Second Hospital of Jiaxing
    Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314000, China
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The plan for sharing de-identified individual participant data has not yet been finalized. Any future data sharing will be considered in accordance with participant privacy, institutional data governance, applicable ethics requirements, and relevant study policies.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07849400
Lead sponsor
Diansan Su
Responsible party
Diansan Su (Chief Investigator, Department of Anesthesiology, Zhejiang University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Study contacts

Heng Wen
Contact
wen_heng@yeah.net
+86057187236169

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion