ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07592793Updated Jul 6, 2026

Community Gateway to Health Study

An interventional study of Tools and Training for Cancer Control and Enhancing Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Breast Cancer Screening, Cervical Cancer Screening and Colon Cancer Screening, sponsored by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH). Enrolling by invitation at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-06.

Sponsored by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of a multi-level intervention on cancer prevention and social determinants of health outcomes. This partnership between academic and community-based researchers aims to link community health centers and communities in ways that maximize both civic engagement and participation in cancer control care. The system-level intervention consists of two components: (1) provision of community health center systems-level tools for cancer screening (breast, cervical, colorectal) and tobacco cessation treatment gaps; and (2) digital access screening and navigation. These interventions will be delivered via usual care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Screening
  • Cervical Cancer Screening
  • Colon Cancer Screening
  • Tobacco Cessation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tobacco Use Cessation

276 studies on the registry are indexed under Tobacco Use Cessation; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 226 across 256 interventional studies indexed under Tobacco Use Cessation.

Browse Tobacco Use Cessation studies →

Lead sponsor

Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) is the lead sponsor of 154 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Study participants include community health center and community partner staff participating in surveys and interviews about the implementation of the intervention.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community health center staff or community partners
  • Age 18 or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18

Patients will not be individually recruited for the study because the intervention is being offered as part of routine care.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Multilevel Intervention

    Behavioral: Tools and Training for Cancer Control · Behavioral: Enhancing Social Capital and Civic Engagement

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    In this stepped wedge design, all sites have a period of being in usual care. Six sites then have periods of providing the intervention and six sites remain comparison sites (i.e. usual care).

Interventions

  • BehavioralTools and Training for Cancer Control

    This system level intervention consists of two components: (1) provision of community health center systems-level tools for cancer screening (breast, cervical, colorectal) and tobacco cessation treatment gaps; and (2) digital access screening and navigation.

  • BehavioralEnhancing Social Capital and Civic Engagement

    This community level intervention consists of a patient referral from a community health center to a community organization focused on building social capital and civic engagement to test the impact of connecting clinical and community resources explicitly for patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients Screened for Colorectal Cancer

    % patients who are up to date on colorectal cancer screening from EMR

    Time frame: change from baseline to end of intervention period, an average of 1 year

  2. Patients Screened for Breast Cancer

    % patients who are up to date on breast cancer screening from EMR

    Time frame: change from baseline to end of intervention period, an average of 1 year

  3. Patients Screened for Cervical Cancer

    % patients who are up to date on cervical cancer screening from EMR

    Time frame: change from baseline to end of intervention period, an average of 1 year

  4. Patients Offered Pharmacotherapy for Smoking Cessation

    % patients offered pharmacotherapy from EMR

    Time frame: change from baseline to end of intervention period, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of the intervention

    Self reported via staff survey

    Time frame: Post intervention, 1 year follow up

  2. Feasibility of the intervention

    Self-reported via staff survey

    Time frame: Post intervention, 1 year follow up

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Caring Health Center
    Springfield, Massachusetts 01103, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data that underlie the results reported here, after de-identification. Individual staff/partner data on implementation will be made publicly available. Patient data can be made available upon request and appropriate approvals (see below).

Time frame: Data will be stored for 7 years.

Access criteria: Outside investigators will need an approved concept proposal to analyze study data and spend the requisite time with study staff to learn about the data elements needed to conduct the proposed analysis. With the assistance from the study's analytic team, s/he will draft a detailed analysis plan and present to the core group of co-investigators. The discussion at this meeting ensures adequate knowledge of the data, and the presenter gains much insight into how the analysis can be most useful and how it relates to previous analyses. Once the plan is approved by this group, it must also be approved by the CHCs that provide the de-identified data. Following approval by the appropriate IRBs and confirmation that it meets HIPAA requirements, s/he may sign a DUA to use a secure, de-identified dataset to complete only the approved analyses and write the manuscript(s) offsite. A formal data analysis plan application and DUA are available. Requests should be directed to jdaly@hsph.harvard.edu.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2028, 24 months after the start.

Of 115 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tobacco Use Cessation, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 24 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 116 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 4, 2026
First posted
May 18, 2026
StartActual
Jun 2, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 2029
Last update
Jul 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07592793
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI), Caring Health Center, Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers
Responsible party
Rebekka Lee (Lecturer on Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 18, 2026
Start date
Jun 2, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 6, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion