ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07734727Text2QuitUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Adaptation and Testing of a Novel Text-based Tobacco Cessation and Education Intervention in Kenyan Emergency Department Patients

An interventional study of Text2Quit-Kenya in Tobacco Use and Tobacco Use Cessation, sponsored by Yale University. Recruiting at 1 site in Kenya. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 27, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
285
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, investigators will adapt and implement Text2Quit in a Kenyan ED population will increase knowledge and cessation. Investigators will use a mixed-methods, hybrid implementation-effectiveness approach to assess these outcomes. Results will inform a randomized, controlled trial in a nationally representative sample of EDs in future. This study will be the first to target tobacco use in this population, the first to use mobile cessation, and will contribute to advancing implementation science on tobacco cessation globally. It will also provide a novel approach to implementation for mHealth interventions, with findings that can be generalized to other Non-Communicable Diseases and risk factors, such as alcohol use, hypertension and diabetes.

Read the detailed description

Aim 1. To assess tobacco use and willingness to engage with mHealth for tobacco cessation targeting Kenyan ED patients.

Aim 2. To adapt the Text2Quit mHealth tool for use in the Kenya context using a participatory approach.

Aim 3. To pilot test Text2Quit-Kenya and assess its acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy.

The focus of this registration is Aim 3.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tobacco Use
  • Tobacco Use Cessation

Keywords

  • Kenya
  • Africa
  • Noncommunicable disease
  • global health
03

In context

Tobacco Use

420 studies on the registry are indexed under Tobacco Use; 82 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 285 is above the median of 124 across 351 interventional studies indexed under Tobacco Use.

Browse Tobacco Use studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,770 studies on the registry; 294 are open to participants now.

Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 129 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Current tobacco users (self-identified smokers).
  • Presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH).
  • Own a mobile phone capable of receiving text messages.
  • Willing to quit tobacco use.
  • Able and willing to provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals unwilling or unable to provide consent.
  • Non-tobacco users.
  • Those without access to a mobile phone.
  • Patients who are critically ill or otherwise unable to participate (practically excluded at triage).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
285 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Text2Quit Kenya

    Participants will receive the Text2Quit intervention

    Other: Text2Quit-Kenya

  • No intervention
    Control

    Standard of care

Interventions

  • OtherText2Quit-Kenya

    A text message-based mHealth tool addressing tobacco cessation. The program is organized around automated, bidirectional text messages timed for a user's quit date. Messages based on social cognitive theory prompt users to track smoking, report on cravings and on smoking status.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Text2Quit Survey to assess efficacy

    Efficacy will be assessed by self-report binary quantitative outcome of tobacco use in past 7 days

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Month post intervention

  2. Exhaled Carbon Monoxide testing to assess efficacy

    Efficacy will be assessed by repeat exhaled Carbon Monoxide testing. Will be assessed using both a binary assessment with a cutoff of 10% and a continuous assessment of percent point prevalence

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1 and Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent enrollment

    Percent enrollment per arm using Reach RE-AIM Framework

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Adoption assessed using Adoption RE-AIM Framework

    This is a qualitative outcome. The measure will be assessed using a semi-structured interview guide informed by the RE-AIM Adoption framework. Interview transcripts will undergo thematic analysis to identify themes related to intervention adoption, future use, and perceived fit within the target community.

    Time frame: up to Month 6

  3. Facililtators -Implementation

    Facililtators assessed using semi-structured qualitative interviews guided by the RE-AIM Implementation framework, with thematic analysis used to identify themes.

    Time frame: up to Month 6

  4. Barriers-Implementation

    Barriers assessed using semi-structured qualitative interviews guided by the RE-AIM Implementation framework, with thematic analysis used to identify themes.

    Time frame: up to Month 6

  5. Frequency of message delivery

    Frequency of message delivery using Implementation RE-AIM Framework

    Time frame: up to Month 6

  6. Frequency of message read

    Frequency of message read using Implementation RE-AIM Framework

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1 and Month 6

  7. Frequency of response

    Absolute and proportion of response to interactive messages using Implementation RE-AIM Framework

    Time frame: up to Month 6

  8. Maintenance assessed using RE-AIM Framework

    Assesses the long-term sustainability of an intervention by measuring two key levels: individual long-term effects and setting-level institutionalization.

    Time frame: Month 6

  9. Cost

    Number of texts sent x cost per text to obtain individual user cost using Implementation RE-AIM Framework

    Time frame: Month 6

  10. Tobacco Policies Knowledge

    Change in knowledge on tobacco policies using qualitative measure based on Efficacy RE-AIM Framework

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 1

  11. Tobacco Harms Knowledge

    Change in knowledge on tobacco harms of use using qualitative measure based on Efficacy RE-AIM Framework. Mean count of correct responses to the tobacco harms knowledge items, with scores ranging from 0 to 5 (higher scores indicate greater knowledge).

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 1

  12. Tobacco Use Frequency

    Frequency of tobacco use using Efficacy RE-AIM Framework

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 1

  13. Mean Tobacco Cessation Attempts

    Mean number of tobacco cessation attempts using Efficacy RE-AIM Framework

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 1

  14. Absolute Number Tobacco Cessation Attempts

    Absolute number of tobacco cessation attempts using Efficacy RE-AIM Framework

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 1

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 27, 2026
Sites
Kenyatta National Hospital is now Recruiting
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026→Nov 2026
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Kenyatta National Hospital is now Recruiting
    Start date Aug 2026→Nov 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07734727
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Christine Ngaruiya, MD MSC DTMH
Contact
cngaruiya@stanford.edu
650-723-6576
Jessica Rayo, MS
Contact
jrayo@stanford.edu
559-759-4266
Christine Ngaruiya, MD MSC DTMH
principal investigator · Stanford School of Medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion