ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07376226FRUIT2Updated Jul 7, 2026

Effects of Whole Fruit on Blood Sugar in People With Type 2 Diabetes

An interventional study of Whole Fruit in Type 2 Diabetes, sponsored by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH). Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will determine the effects of consuming whole fruit on blood sugar control, liver fat, and cardiovascular health in adults with type 2 diabetes who are not treated with insulin.

Read the detailed description

Diabetes is one of the top three drivers of healthcare costs in the U.S., and nearly half of Americans will develop either diabetes or prediabetes in their lifetime. It is therefore critical to find new strategies to treat or reverse diabetes.

One such approach is adopting a healthy diet, which can dramatically improve blood sugar levels in adults with type 2 diabetes and even induce diabetes remission in some patients. Despite this, not much is known about which food groups are most effective at improving blood sugar levels in patients with diabetes.

Although individuals with type 2 diabetes are often advised to reduce carbohydrate intake, current dietary guidelines also recommend consuming fruit and other carbohydrate-rich foods. This has led to confusion among patients and clinicians about whether eating fruit, particularly in larger amounts, is beneficial or harmful for blood sugar and overall health. Whole fruit differs from many other carbohydrate sources in that whole fruit is rich in fiber, vitamins, minerals, and bioactive plant compounds, while being relatively low in energy density.

Most prior research examining the effects of whole fruit in people with type 2 diabetes has been epidemiologic, focused on individual fruits, or combined whole fruit with fruit juice and/or vegetables into a single food category. As a result, it is unknown how whole fruit, as a food category, affects glycemic control and cardiovascular health.

The investigators previously found that a whole-fruit-rich, Mediterranean-style diet improved blood sugar control and blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and even allowed some patients to wean off all anti-hyperglycemic medications. The investigators will conduct a follow-up study to determine the effects of whole fruit alone on glycemic control, liver fat, and cardiovascular risk factors. The study will be a single-arm controlled feeding study to determine the effects of eating a large amount of whole fruit for 17 weeks on glycemic control (Aim 1), liver fat (Aim 2a), and cardiovascular disease risk factors (Aim 2b) in patients with insulin-independent type 2 diabetes. The primary measures of glycemic control will be mean 24-hour glucose levels (as measured by continuous glucose monitoring) and mean 3-hour glucose levels (as measured during a 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test). These assessments will be supplemented by, and interpreted in light of, other glycemic outcomes, which are listed as outcomes #3-9 below.

By providing controlled, high-quality evidence, this study will determine whether whole fruit is good or bad for patients with type 2 diabetes and will improve dietary guidelines for the hundreds of millions of individuals with type 2 diabetes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

  • type 2 diabetes
  • whole fruit
  • dietary intervention
  • glycemic control
  • liver fat
  • continuous glucose monitoring
  • blood sugar
  • nutrition
  • fruit
  • glucose
  • insulin
  • blood pressure
  • carbohydrates
  • high-carbohydrate diet
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

10,371 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,406 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 25 is below the median of 80 across 8,350 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) is the lead sponsor of 154 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes
  • between 6.5-12.0%
  • Fasting C-peptide level ≥0.5 ng/ml, indicating the patient does not have beta-cell failure, as measured at screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On insulin
  • Evidence of latent diabetes (LADA) or maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)
  • Estimated (eGFR) \<45 ml/min per 1.73 m²
  • Heart attack in the past 6 months or severe/unstable heart failure
  • On weight loss medication, including GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide, dulaglutide)
  • Change in the dosage of a chronic medication that may affect study endpoints within the past 3 months
  • laboratory abnormality (e.g., abnormal levels)
  • Significant gastrointestinal disease, major gastrointestinal surgery, or gallstones
  • Significant cardiovascular, renal, cardiac, liver, lung, adrenal, or nervous system disease that might compromise participant safety or data validity
  • Evidence of cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer) within the last 5 years
  • Lost or gained more than 5 lbs (or more than 2% of body weight if the patient weighs >250 lbs) of weight in the past 2 months
  • Pregnant, planning to become pregnant in the next 6 months, or breastfeeding
  • Major psychiatric condition that would affect the ability to participate in the study
  • Not able to eat the provided study meals (e.g., food allergies)
  • Behavioral factors or circumstances that may impede adherence to the dietary intervention
  • Not able to undergo the MRI scan (e.g., due to claustrophobia, implanted metal objects, or body girth ≥60 cm)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Whole Fruit

    Participants will consume a large amount of whole fruit, constituting 50% of total calories.

    Other: Whole Fruit

Interventions

  • OtherWhole Fruit

    Participants will consume a large amount of whole fruit for 17 weeks. During the first 6.5 weeks, participants will gradually increase the amount of whole fruit they eat by 5% every 5 days. Once they reach 50% of their calories as whole fruit, they will continue to eat 50% fruit for the remaining 10.5 weeks of the study. This is a controlled feeding study, so participants will consume fruit prepared in a metabolic kitchen. The fruit will consist of fresh fruit, dried fruit, and frozen fruit blended into smoothies. To demonstrate compliance, participants will video-record themselves eating the provided fruit. All participants will receive the same dietary intervention. Participants will otherwise continue their usual diet and lifestyle habits.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean 24-hour Glucose Levels

    Average 24-hour interstitial glucose levels (mg/dl), as measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). If needed, data will be adjusted for any changes in antihyperglycemic medication use, using the medication effect score (MES).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  2. Mean 3-hour Glucose Levels

    Mean glucose (mg/dl) during a 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  3. Mean 3-hour Insulin

    Mean insulin (mU/l) during a 3-hour OGTT

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  4. Mean 3-hour C-Peptide

    Mean C-Peptide (ng/ml) during a 3-hour OGTT

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  5. Insulin Sensitivity

    Insulin sensitivity (dl/kg/min/μU/ml) during a 3-hour OGTT, as measured by the Oral C-Peptide Minimal Model

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  6. Dynamic Beta-Cell Responsivity

    Phi\_dynamic during a 3-hour OGTT, as measured by the Oral C-Peptide Minimal Model (which is a set of 5 coupled differential equations; see reference under Citations). Phi\_dynamic is a measure of beta-cell responsiveness during first-phase insulin secretion. It is a dimensionless index (arbitrary units), where higher values denote greater insulin secretion

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  7. Static Beta-Cell Responsivity

    Phi\_static during a 3-hour OGTT, as measured by the Oral C-Peptide Minimal Model (which is a set of 5 coupled differential equations; see reference under Citations). Phi\_static is a measure of beta-cell responsiveness during second-phase insulin secretion. The units of measure are min\^-1, and higher values denote greater insulin secretion.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  8. Glycemic Variability

    Measures of glucose variability derived from continuous glucose monitoring, including mean amplitude of glycemic excursions and standard deviation (mg/dl).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  9. Time-in-range Metrics from CGM

    Standard time-in-range metrics, including time-below-range (TBR), time-in-range (TIR), and time-above-range (TAR), as standardized by the International Consensus on Time in Range. Values will be reported as percentages of the 24-hour day.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intrahepatic Lipid (Liver Fat)

    Percentage as measured using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and 3-point M-Dixon Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  2. Body Weight

    kg

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  3. Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    mm Hg

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  4. Heart Rate

    beats per minute

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

  5. Lipids

    Fasting total cholesterol (mg/dl), LDL cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL cholesterol (mg/dl), and triglycerides (mg/dl).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 17

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cobelli C, Dalla Man C, Toffolo G, Basu R, Vella A, Rizza R. The oral minimal model method. Diabetes. 2014 Apr;63(4):1203-13. doi: 10.2337/db13-1198. PubMed 24651807 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07376226
Responsible party
Courtney Peterson (Associate Professor, Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Kathleen Johnson Research Project Manager, MPH, RD
Contact
fruit2@hsph.harvard.edu
617-998-6333
Courtney M Peterson
principal investigator · Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion