ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07586072Updated Jul 30, 2026Results posted

Short-Term Symptom Changes in Adults With Teeth Clenching or Grinding and Jaw Symptoms Receiving Splint, Botulinum Toxin, or Medication Plus Splint Care

An observational study in Bruxism, Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) and Myofascial Pain, sponsored by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective observational study evaluated short-term patient-reported symptom changes in adults with bruxism-related and temporomandibular disorder symptoms who received one of three clinically selected management approaches: occlusal splint therapy, botulinum toxin type A injection, or short-term pharmacotherapy combined with splint therapy. Management selection reflected routine clinical decision-making based on clinical indication, symptom profile, shared decision-making, and patient preference and was not determined by random allocation. Symptom severity was assessed at baseline and after 3 months using the Fonseca Anamnestic Index. The primary objective was to describe the 3-month change in total Fonseca Anamnestic Index scores within the clinically selected cohorts and to explore whether longitudinal change patterns differed among them. Selected Fonseca Anamnestic Index items, severity-category changes, and clinically recorded treatment-related adverse events were also evaluated as secondary outcomes.

Read the detailed description

This was a 3-month prospective, non-randomized observational cohort study of adults with bruxism-related and temporomandibular disorder symptoms managed according to routine clinical practice. A total of 60 participants were included in three clinically selected management cohorts: occlusal splint therapy, botulinum toxin type A injection, and short-term pharmacotherapy combined with splint therapy.

Management selection was based on routine clinical decision-making according to clinical indication, predominant symptom profile, shared decision-making, and patient preference rather than random allocation. The study protocol was designed to observe indication-based clinical management and did not require participants to be allocated randomly to interchangeable treatment options. Because the clinical characteristics influencing management selection could also influence subsequent symptom changes, the cohorts were not assumed to be clinically equivalent or exchangeable at baseline. Between-cohort analyses were therefore considered exploratory rather than estimates of comparative treatment effectiveness.

Participants in the occlusal splint cohort received custom-made maxillary stabilization splints and were instructed to wear the splints during sleep. Participants in the botulinum toxin type A cohort received a single session of bilateral intramuscular Dysport® injections into the masseter and temporalis muscles. Participants in the short-term pharmacotherapy plus splint cohort received the same maxillary stabilization splint protocol together with short-term oral thiocolchicoside and tenoxicam for symptom control.

The Turkish version of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index was administered at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up as a patient-reported measure of temporomandibular disorder-related symptom severity. The primary outcome was the change in total Fonseca Anamnestic Index score from baseline to 3 months. The study primarily aimed to describe within-cohort changes and to explore whether longitudinal change patterns differed among the three clinically selected cohorts. Secondary exploratory assessments included changes in selected Fonseca Anamnestic Index sub-item scores, shifts in Fonseca Anamnestic Index severity categories, and clinically recorded treatment-related adverse events during follow-up.

Because the management approaches were clinically distinct, participants and treating clinicians were not blinded. The study was not designed to establish causal comparative effectiveness or superiority among the three management approaches.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bruxism
  • Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD)
  • Myofascial Pain

Keywords

  • Occlusal splint
  • Botulinum toxin type A
  • Medical-splint therapy
  • Fonseca Anamnestic Index
  • Masticatory muscle pain
  • Bruxism-related TMD symptoms
  • Temporomandibular disorder symptoms
03

In context

Bruxism

151 studies on the registry are indexed under Bruxism; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 89 across 55 observational studies indexed under Bruxism.

Browse Bruxism studies →

Lead sponsor

Recep Tayyip Erdogan University is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consisted of adults presenting to the Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, with reported clenching or grinding and temporomandibular disorder related symptoms. Eligible participants who met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included during the study period and were managed according to routine clinical indication, symptom profile, shared decision making, and patient preference.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Presence of bruxism-related temporomandibular disorder symptoms.
  • Self-reported sleep or awake bruxism based on clenching or grinding awareness.
  • Clinical signs compatible with bruxism, including dental attrition, cupped-out wear facets, or shiny occlusal surfaces.
  • Absence of known systemic conditions that could interfere with treatment or outcome assessment.
  • Ability to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age younger than 18 years.
  • Presence of systemic or neurological disorders.
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric conditions.
  • Infection or inflammatory lesions at the planned injection sites.
  • History of maxillofacial surgery or severe trauma in the relevant orofacial region.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide written .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Occlusal Splint Therapy

    Participants in this arm received custom-made maxillary stabilization splints. The splints were adjusted to obtain simultaneous bilateral posterior contacts in centric relation and canine guidance during eccentric movements. Participants were instructed to wear the splints during sleep for at least eight hours per night for 3 months.

    Device: Occlusal splint

  • Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection

    Participants in this arm received a single session of intramuscular botulinum toxin type A injections. Dysport was reconstituted with 2 mL sterile 0.9% saline. A total dose of 160 U Dysport was administered per participant, consisting of 60 U into each masseter muscle and 20 U into each temporalis muscle.

    Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport®)

  • Combined Medical-Splint Therapy

    Participants in this arm received a custom-made maxillary stabilization splint using the same design and adjustment protocol as the splint arm. In addition, a short-term pharmacological regimen consisting of thiocolchicoside 8 mg/day and tenoxicam 20 mg/day was prescribed for 7 to 10 days for acute symptom control. Participants continued nocturnal splint use during the follow-up period.

    Device: Occlusal splint · Drug: Thiocolchicoside · Drug: tenoxicam

Interventions

  • DeviceOcclusal splint

    Custom-made maxillary stabilization splints were fabricated from hard acrylic resin and adjusted to obtain simultaneous bilateral posterior contacts in centric relation and canine guidance during eccentric movements. Participants were instructed to wear the splints during sleep for at least eight hours per night.

    Also known as: Maxillary stabilization splint, Hard acrylic stabilization splint

  • Botulinum toxin type A was administered as a single intramuscular injection session. Dysport was reconstituted with 2 mL sterile 0.9% saline. A total dose of 160 U Dysport was administered per participant, consisting of 60 U into each masseter muscle and 20 U into each temporalis muscle.

  • Thiocolchicoside 8 mg/day was prescribed as part of a short-term pharmacological regimen for acute symptom control in the combined medical-splint therapy arm. The medication was used for 7 to 10 days.

  • Tenoxicam 20 mg/day was prescribed as part of a short-term pharmacological regimen for acute symptom control in the combined medical-splint therapy arm. The medication was used for 7 to 10 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Total Fonseca Anamnestic Index Score

    Change in total Fonseca Anamnestic Index score from baseline to the 3-month follow-up. The Fonseca Anamnestic Index is a 10-item symptom-based questionnaire used to assess temporomandibular disorder-related symptom severity. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The change score was calculated as pre-treatment total score minus post-treatment total score; therefore, higher positive change values indicate greater symptom improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Selected Fonseca Anamnestic Index Sub-Item Scores at Baseline and 3 Months

    Selected Fonseca Anamnestic Index sub-item scores were assessed at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up. Each selected item is scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The selected items assessed mouth opening difficulty, masticatory muscle fatigue or pain during chewing, temporomandibular joint clicking, and teeth clenching or grinding habit.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

  2. Fonseca Anamnestic Index Severity Categories at Baseline and 3 Months

    Fonseca Anamnestic Index severity categories were assessed at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up. Total Fonseca Anamnestic Index scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe temporomandibular disorder-related symptoms. Severity categories were defined as absence of symptoms (0-15), mild symptoms (20-40), moderate symptoms (45-65), and severe symptoms (70-100).

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  3. Treatment-Related Adverse Events

    Treatment-related adverse events were monitored during the 3-month follow-up period. Participants were questioned about injection-related, medication-related, and splint-related adverse effects. Serious adverse events were defined as events requiring urgent medical care, hospitalization, treatment discontinuation, or resulting in persistent functional impairment.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 30, 2026
Limitations and caveats
This study has several limitations. Treatment allocation was non-randomized and open-label; therefore, selection bias and residual confounding cannot be excluded. The sample size was limited to 20 participants per arm and follow-up was restricted to 3 months. Outcomes were mainly based on the Fonseca Anamnestic Index, without objective measures such as EMG, polysomnography, or imaging. The absence of a medical-only arm limits interpretation of the combined therapy effect.

Participant flow

A total of 60 adult patients with bruxism-related temporomandibular disorder symptoms were enrolled at the Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye. Participants were assigned to one of three treatment arms.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOcclusal Splint TherapyBotulinum Toxin Type A InjectionCombined Medical-Splint Therapy
Started202020
Completed202020
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Total Fonseca Anamnestic Index Score

Change in total Fonseca Anamnestic Index score from baseline to the 3-month follow-up. The Fonseca Anamnestic Index is a 10-item symptom-based questionnaire used to assess temporomandibular disorder-related symptom severity. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The change score was calculated as pre-treatment total score minus post-treatment total score; therefore, higher positive change values indicate greater symptom improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline to 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · points on a scale
Change in Total Fonseca Anamnestic Index Score
points on a scaleOcclusal Splint TherapyBotulinum Toxin Type A InjectionCombined Medical-Splint Therapy
Change in Total Fonseca Anamnestic Index Score33.75 ± 13.8527.25 ± 12.6239.25 ± 11.04
Statistical analysis
  • Occlusal Splint Therapy vs Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection vs Combined Medical-Splint Therapy · ANOVA · p = 0.014 · Eta-squared: 0.139Eta-squared was reported as the effect size for the one-way ANOVA.
  • Occlusal Splint Therapy vs Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.387 · Mean difference (net): 6.50 · 95% CI -1.71 to 14.71Mean difference was calculated as Occlusal Splint Therapy minus Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection.
  • Occlusal Splint Therapy vs Combined Medical-Splint Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.519 · Mean difference (net): -5.50 · 95% CI -13.26 to 2.26Mean difference was calculated as Occlusal Splint Therapy minus Combined Medical-Splint Therapy.
  • Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection vs Combined Medical-Splint Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.008 · Mean difference (net): -12.00 · 95% CI -19.35 to -4.65Mean difference was calculated as Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection minus Combined Medical-Splint Therapy.
SecondarySelected Fonseca Anamnestic Index Sub-Item Scores at Baseline and 3 Months

Selected Fonseca Anamnestic Index sub-item scores were assessed at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up. Each selected item is scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The selected items assessed mouth opening difficulty, masticatory muscle fatigue or pain during chewing, temporomandibular joint clicking, and teeth clenching or grinding habit.

Time frame:
Baseline to 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · points on a scale
Selected Fonseca Anamnestic Index Sub-Item Scores at Baseline and 3 Months
points on a scaleOcclusal Splint TherapyBotulinum Toxin Type A InjectionCombined Medical-Splint Therapy
Q1 - Difficulty Opening the Mouth Wide, Baseline6.50 ± 2.865.25 ± 2.556.75 ± 2.94
Q1 - Difficulty Opening the Mouth Wide, 3 Months2.50 ± 2.564.25 ± 2.452.50 ± 2.56
Q3 - Fatigue or Muscle Pain During Chewing, Baseline5.75 ± 3.356.25 ± 3.197.50 ± 3.44
Q3 - Fatigue or Muscle Pain During Chewing, 3 Months2.75 ± 3.022.75 ± 3.021.75 ± 2.45
Q7 - Temporomandibular Joint Noise During Chewing or Mouth Opening, Baseline5.50 ± 3.205 ± 3.246 ± 3.08
Q7 - Temporomandibular Joint Noise During Chewing or Mouth Opening, 3 Months2.50 ± 3.034.50 ± 3.592.75 ± 3.02
Q8 - Clenching or Grinding Habit, Baseline7.50 ± 2.568.00 ± 2.517.00 ± 2.51
Q8 - Clenching or Grinding Habit, 3 Months5.25 ± 4.723.25 ± 2.942.75 ± 3.02
SecondaryFonseca Anamnestic Index Severity Categories at Baseline and 3 Months

Fonseca Anamnestic Index severity categories were assessed at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up. Total Fonseca Anamnestic Index scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe temporomandibular disorder-related symptoms. Severity categories were defined as absence of symptoms (0-15), mild symptoms (20-40), moderate symptoms (45-65), and severe symptoms (70-100).

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Fonseca Anamnestic Index Severity Categories at Baseline and 3 Months
ParticipantsOcclusal Splint TherapyBotulinum Toxin Type A InjectionCombined Medical-Splint Therapy
Baseline — Absence of symptoms000
Baseline — Mild symptoms441
Baseline — Moderate symptoms at baseline8106
Baseline — Severe symptoms at baseline8613
3 Months — Absence of symptoms224
3 Months — Mild symptoms161312
3 Months — Moderate symptoms at baseline254
3 Months — Severe symptoms at baseline000
SecondaryTreatment-Related Adverse Events

Treatment-related adverse events were monitored during the 3-month follow-up period. Participants were questioned about injection-related, medication-related, and splint-related adverse effects. Serious adverse events were defined as events requiring urgent medical care, hospitalization, treatment discontinuation, or resulting in persistent functional impairment.

Time frame:
Up to 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Treatment-Related Adverse Events
ParticipantsOcclusal Splint TherapyBotulinum Toxin Type A InjectionCombined Medical-Splint Therapy
Participants with treatment-related adverse events000
Participants without treatment-related adverse events202020

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Occlusal Splint Therapy0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Combined Medical-Splint Therapy0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

All participants assigned to the treatment arms were included in the baseline analysis population.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Occlusal Splint TherapyBotulinum Toxin Type A InjectionCombined Medical-Splint TherapyTotal
Mean25.10 ± 6.0925.25 ± 6.7229.00 ± 7.3626.45 ± 6.87
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Occlusal Splint TherapyBotulinum Toxin Type A InjectionCombined Medical-Splint TherapyTotal
Female18161751
Male2439
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Occlusal Splint TherapyBotulinum Toxin Type A InjectionCombined Medical-Splint TherapyTotal
Count of participants———0
Baseline Total Fonseca Anamnestic Index Score
Baseline Total Fonseca Anamnestic Index Score(points on a scale)Occlusal Splint TherapyBotulinum Toxin Type A InjectionCombined Medical-Splint TherapyTotal
Mean62.75 ± 18.3959.25 ± 18.7370.00 ± 16.8664.00 ± 18.39
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Faculty of Dentistry
    Rize, Rize Province 53020, Turkey (Türkiye)
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data will be shared only after review of the scientific purpose of the request and, where appropriate, completion of a data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: De-identified individual participant data and available supporting information will be made available beginning 6 months after publication and will be available for 5 years.

Access criteria: De-identified individual participant data may be shared with qualified researchers for scientifically valid purposes upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Requests will be reviewed by the study investigators, and data will be shared only after approval of the request and, where appropriate, completion of a data sharing agreement. Shared data will not include information that could directly identify participants.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07586072
Lead sponsor
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
Responsible party
Emre Can ÇIRALIK (Research Assistant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 14, 2026
Start date
Aug 5, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2025
Completion
Aug 1, 2025
Results posted
Jul 30, 2026
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Sedef KURT CIRALIK
principal investigator · Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Faculty of Dentistry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion