ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07573371PATO-LARSUpdated May 7, 2026

Understanding and Tailored Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

An observational study in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, Faecal Incontinence With Faecal Urgency and Faecal Incontinence, sponsored by Aalborg University Hospital. Recruiting at 3 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by Aalborg University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
145
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn why some patients develop low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after colorectal cancer treatment. The study also aims to identify different subtypes of LARS and understand which patients may respond to specific treatments.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What physiological and imaging changes are associated with LARS?
  • How do patients with LARS differ from patients without LARS after colorectal cancer surgery?
  • Are there measurable differences between LARS, patients treated with organ-preserving chemoradiotherapy, and patients with fecal incontinence?

Participants will:

  • Complete advanced physiological and imaging assessments related to bowel function
  • Be compared with four control groups:

    • patients without LARS after colorectal cancer surgery
    • patients treated with organ-preserving chemoradiotherapy
    • patients with fecal incontinence and urge fecal incontinence
  • Take part in a single study visit where all measurements are performed
Read the detailed description

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a common long-term complication after colorectal cancer surgery. Up to 80% of patients experience symptoms such as urgency, frequent bowel movements, clustering, and fecal incontinence. These symptoms can severely affect quality of life, and the underlying causes are not fully understood. LARS appears to result from several interacting mechanisms, including sensory changes, altered motility, reduced reservoir function, sphincter dysfunction, and effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Because different patients may have different dominant mechanisms, treatment responses vary widely.

This observational study aims to investigate the physiological and imaging characteristics of LARS using advanced assessment methods. The goal is to better understand the mechanisms behind LARS, identify distinct patient subtypes, and support development of more targeted treatment strategies.

The study will include 50 patients with minor or major LARS after rectal cancer surgery. Their results will be compared with four control groups:

  • patients who had rectal cancer surgery but did not develop LARS,
  • patients with fecal incontinence (before/after sacral nerve stimulation),
  • patients with urge fecal incontinence (before/after dorsal genital nerve stimulation), and
  • patients treated with organ-preserving chemoradiotherapy ("watch-and-wait"), whose rectum has not been surgically removed.

All participants will attend a single study visit that includes advanced physiological measurements, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based assessments, and standardized questionnaires. These methods are not part of routine clinical care but are used to explore mechanisms such as motility, sensory function, sphincter activity, and rectal reservoir function.

Patients with LARS will also be followed during their standard stepwise treatment pathway. They will complete questionnaires before and during each treatment step, which may include dietary advice, medication, pelvic floor training (biofeedback), and rectal emptying techniques such as mini-enemas or transanal irrigation. This follow-up will help determine how different physiological patterns relate to treatment response.

The study is conducted in collaboration between Aarhus University Hospital and Aalborg University Hospital, with expert input from The Royal London Hospital (UK) and Motilis SA (Switzerland).

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
  • Faecal Incontinence With Faecal Urgency
  • Faecal Incontinence
  • Colorectal (Colon or Rectal) Cancer Survivors

Keywords

  • LARS
03

In context

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Anterior Resection Syndrome; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 145 is above the median of 125 across 25 observational studies indexed under Low Anterior Resection Syndrome.

Browse Low Anterior Resection Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Aalborg University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

During outpatient visits, the treatment responsible doctor will identify eligible patients. Patients will be recruited at the following departments:

  1. LARS patients - patient operated for rectal cancer at Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, with rectal resection with sphincter preservation and primary anastomosis.
  2. Watch and wait patients - patient treated for rectal cancer with organ preservation at Aalborg University Hospital or Vejle Hospital.
  3. Patients with Faecal Incontinence planned for neuromodulation at Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery, AUH.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

General:

  • Must be able to read and understand Danish.
  • All participants must be adults and >18 years and have full legal capacity.
  • Assessed by study personnel to have understood the research protocol, being able to comply with investigation procedures as well as ability to come to the hospital at the agreed timepoints, and to complete the trial.

Specific inclusion criteria for LARS patients:

  • Patients operated for rectal cancer with a rectal resection and sphincter preserving surgery at a minimum of three months postop.
  • If patients have received a temporary protective ileostomy, this should have been reversed for a minimum of three months postop.

Specific inclusion criteria for fecal incontinence patients and urge fecal incontinence patients

  • Patients planned for neuromodulation.
  • Satisfactory interoperative test results leading to permanent implantation of a pacemaker for sacral nerve modulation.

Specific inclusion criteria for "watch and wait" patients:

  • Rectum/colon cancer patients treated with organ-preserving treatment, i.e., chemotherapy and radiotherapy with a complete clinical and radiological response at a minimum of 12 months posttreatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

General exclusion criteria

  • Persons that are not able to understand information
  • Connective tissue disorders
  • Parkinson's disease
  • Non-MRI compatible pacemaker, clips or other metal objects in the body. Patients implanted with a pacemaker for sacral nerve modulation will not undergo MRI postoperatively.
  • Piercings that cannot be removed before MRI
  • Claustrophobia
  • Allergic to latex
  • Abdominal diameter equal or more than 140 cm
  • Have other individual factors, in the opinion of the physician/healthcare professional, in which participating is
  • Participation in concomitant clinical trial
  • Known intestinal obstruction, significant intestinal strictures or perforation. If in doubt about intestinal stricture, the patient will be examined with MRI of the small intestine, colonoscopy or other supplementing examination
  • Disorders of swallowing
  • Pregnant women

Specific exclusion criterias for LARS patients

  • History of anastomotic leakage following rectal resection and sphincter preserving therapy
  • Evidens of local recurrence or dessimination of the cancer
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
145 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • LARS, minor or major symptoms

    LARS score ≥ 20; Patients operated for rectal cancer with a rectal resection and sphincter preserving surgery at a minimum of three months postoperative. If patients have received a temporary protective ileostomy, this should have been reversed for a minimum of three months postoperative.

  • LARS, no symptoms

    LARS score \< 20; Patients operated for rectal cancer with a rectal resection and sphincter preserving surgery at a minimum of three months postoperative. If patients have received a temporary protective ileostomy, this should have been reversed for a minimum of three months postoperative.

  • Faecal Incontinence

    * Patients planned for neuromodulation * Satisfactory interoperative test results leading to permanent implantation of a pacemaker for sacral nerve modulation

  • Faecal Incontinence, urge

    * Patients planned for neuromodulation * Satisfactory interoperative test results leading to permanent implantation of a pacemaker for sacral nerve modulation * Faecal urgency occurring ≥3 episodes per week, with or without associated Faecal incontinence (≥1 episode per week), and a St. Mark's Incontinence Score of ≥9

  • Watch and wait

    Rectum/colon cancer patients treated with organ-preserving treatment, i.e., chemotherapy and radiotherapy with a complete clinical and radiological response at a minimum of 12 months posttreatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level quality-of-life questionnaire

    The EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level questionnaire assesses generic health-related quality of life across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain has five response levels ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems." Score range and direction: Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. Includes a visual analogue scale (0-100) where higher scores indicate better self-rated health.

    Time frame: From baseline visit to the end of each standardized treatments at 4 weeks

  2. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score

    The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Score is a disease-specific symptom questionnaire assessing bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection. It includes five items covering incontinence, frequency, clustering, urgency, and impact on daily life. Score range and direction: Total score ranges from 0 to 42. Higher scores indicate more severe bowel dysfunction. Severity categories: 0-20: No LARS 21-29: Minor LARS 30-42: Major LARS

    Time frame: From baseline visit to the end of each standardized treatments at 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. St Mark's Incontinence score

    Description: The St. Mark's Incontinence Score assesses the severity of fecal incontinence across multiple domains, including incontinence to gas, liquid, and solid stool, urgency, use of pads, and lifestyle impact. Score range and direction: Total score ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate more severe fecal incontinence.

    Time frame: • Applied at baseline and four weeks into all treatment periods

  2. Colostomy Impact Score

    The Colostomy Impact Score is a disease-specific questionnaire evaluating the impact of living with a colostomy on daily functioning, social participation, body image, and emotional well-being. Score range and direction: Total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater negative impact of the colostomy on quality of life.

    Time frame: From baseline visit to the end of each standardized treatments at 4 weeks

  3. Bristol Stool Form Scale

    The Bristol Stool Form Scale classifies stool consistency into seven categories ranging from hard, lumpy stools to entirely liquid stools. It is used as an indicator of bowel transit and stool form. Score range and direction: Scale ranges from Type 1 to Type 7. Lower types (1-2) indicate harder stools and slower transit. Middle types (3-4) indicate normal stool form. Higher types (6-7) indicate loose or watery stools and faster transit.

    Time frame: From baseline visit to the end of each standardized treatments at 4 weeks

  4. Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM)

    The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnaire measures symptom severity in constipation across three domains: abdominal symptoms, stool symptoms, and rectal symptoms. Score range and direction: Each item is scored 0-4; total score ranges from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate more severe constipation symptoms.

    Time frame: From baseline visit to the end of each standardized treatments at 4 weeks

  5. Wexner Incontinence Score

    The Wexner Incontinence Score evaluates the severity of fecal incontinence based on frequency of incontinence to gas, liquid, and solid stool, need for pads, and lifestyle alteration. Score range and direction: Total score ranges from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate more severe fecal incontinence.

    Time frame: From baseline visit to the end of each standardized treatments at 4 weeks

  6. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale assesses symptoms of anxiety and depression in medical populations. It consists of two subscales: HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression. Score range and direction: Each subscale ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of anxiety or depression. Total score (0-42) may be reported but is less commonly used.

    Time frame: From baseline visit to the end of each standardized treatments at 4 weeks

  7. Whole gut and segmental transit times as measured with 3D-Transit

    Whole-gut and segmental gastrointestinal transit times are measured using the Motilis 3D-Transit system. The system tracks the movement of an electromagnetic capsule through the gastrointestinal tract, allowing calculation of segmental transit times (stomach, small intestine, colon) and total whole-gut transit time. This measure evaluates gastrointestinal motility patterns at baseline. Score range and direction: Transit times are continuous measures reported in minutes or hours. There is no fixed upper or lower limit, as transit times vary physiologically between individuals. Longer transit times indicate slower gastrointestinal motility. Shorter transit times indicate faster gastrointestinal motility.

    Time frame: At baseline

  8. Colonic and segmental colonic volumes

    Magnetic resonance imaging is used at baseline to quantify total colonic volume and segmental colonic volumes (ascending, transverse, descending, sigmoid/rectum colon). Volumes are derived from semi-automated segmentation of the colon on T2-weighted images. This measure evaluates baseline colonic morphology and storage capacity. Score range and direction: Colonic volumes are continuous measures reported in milliliters (mL). There is no fixed upper or lower limit, as volumes vary physiologically between individuals. Higher values indicate larger colonic or segmental volume. Lower values indicate smaller colonic or segmental volume.

    Time frame: At baseline

  9. Resting Anal Pressure Measured by High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry

    Resting anal pressure will be measured using high-resolution anorectal manometry according to standard manometric protocols. Resting anal pressure reflects basal anal sphincter tone, primarily related to internal anal sphincter function. The outcome will be reported as a continuous physiological measure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). There are no fixed minimum or maximum values because pressures vary physiologically between individuals. Higher values indicate higher resting anal sphincter tone, while lower values indicate reduced resting sphincter tone.

    Time frame: At baseline

  10. Maximal Voluntary Anal Squeeze Pressure Measured by High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry

    Maximal voluntary anal squeeze pressure will be measured using high-resolution anorectal manometry according to standard manometric protocols. Squeeze pressure reflects voluntary external anal sphincter contractile strength. The outcome will be reported as a continuous physiological measure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). There are no fixed minimum or maximum values because pressures vary physiologically between individuals. Higher values indicate stronger voluntary anal sphincter contraction, while lower values indicate reduced voluntary sphincter contractile function.

    Time frame: At baseline

  11. Rear-Front Pressure Gradient Measured by the Fecobionics Device

    The rear-front pressure gradient will be measured using the Fecobionics device during simulated stool evacuation. The Fecobionics device records axial pressure patterns during defecation. The rear-front pressure gradient reflects the pressure difference between the rear and front sensors of the device during evacuation and provides a measure of propulsive force relative to outlet resistance. The outcome will be reported as a continuous physiological measure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). There are no fixed minimum or maximum values because values vary physiologically between individuals. Higher values indicate stronger propulsive pressure relative to outlet resistance, whereas lower values may indicate impaired propulsion or increased outlet resistance.

    Time frame: At baseline

  12. Compare the physiological findings in LARS patients with controls

    Compare the physioligal findings in LARS patients with a) no-LARS patients, b) organ-preservation patients and c) patient with fecal incontinence

    Time frame: At baseline

  13. Investigate the physiological changes in anorectal function associated with neuromodulation in patients with urge fecal incontinence

    Changes in anorectal function measured by the Fecobionics Device

    Time frame: From baseline to after 30 minutes of active neuromodulation

  14. Investigate the physiological changes in anorectal function associated with neuromodulation in patients with urge fecal incontinence

    Changes in anorectal function measured by high-resolution anorectal manometry

    Time frame: From baseline to after 30 minutes of active neuromodulation

  15. Investigate the physiological changes in anorectal function associated with neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence

    Changes in anorectal function measured by the Fecobionics Device

    Time frame: From baseline to after active neuromodulation at Visit 2

  16. Investigate the physiological changes in anorectal function associated with neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence

    Changes in anorectal function measured by high-resolution anorectal manometry

    Time frame: From baseline to after active neuromodulation at Visit 2

  17. Change in VAS Urgency Score From Before to During Stimulation at the Baseline Visit

    The participant's perceived urgency to defecate during the examination will be assessed using a visual analogue scale. Participants with fecal incontinence will rate their urgency to defecate on a numeric scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no desire to defecate and 10 indicates maximal urgency. The outcome will be reported as the change in VAS urgency score from the pre-stimulation assessment to the stimulation assessment at the baseline visit. Higher scores indicate stronger urgency to defecate.

    Time frame: Baseline visit: immediately before stimulation and during active stimulation

  18. Resting-State Electroencephalography

    Resting-state electroencephalography is recorded with the participant at rest to assess baseline cortical activity patterns. Measures include spectral power across standard frequency bands (theta, alpha, beta). Score range and direction: Spectral power values are continuous and do not have fixed upper limits. Higher or lower values reflect differences in cortical activity depending on frequency band.

    Time frame: At baseline

  19. Evoked Potential Amplitude During Rectal Balloon Distension

    Electroencephalography is recorded during rapid rectal balloon distension to elicit cortical evoked potentials. The primary measure is the amplitude of the evoked response to visceral stimulation. Score range and direction: Amplitude is measured in microvolts (µV). Higher amplitudes indicate stronger cortical responses to visceral stimulation.

    Time frame: At baseline

  20. Evoked Potential Latency During Rectal Balloon Distension

    Electroencephalography is recorded during rectal balloon distension to measure the latency of cortical evoked potentials, reflecting the timing of sensory pathway activation. Score range and direction: Latency is measured in milliseconds (ms). Longer latencies indicate slower or delayed cortical processing. Shorter latencies indicate faster neural conduction.

    Time frame: At baseline

  21. Defecation Index Measured by the Fecobionics Device

    The defecation index will be derived from Fecobionics measurements obtained during simulated stool evacuation. The index summarizes expulsion performance and anorectal function based on prespecified Fecobionics-derived variables. The outcome will be reported as a continuous index value. There are no fixed minimum or maximum values. Higher values indicate more efficient expulsion and better defecatory performance, whereas lower values indicate reduced defecatory performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

2 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves sensitive health information and data protection regulations (GDPR) prevent public sharing of identifiable or de-identified participant-level data.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 27 months after the start.

Of 18 observational studies under Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 27 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 20, 2026
First posted
May 7, 2026
StartActual
Sep 17, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
May 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07573371
Collaborators
Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Cancer Society, Vejle Hospital
Responsible party
Esben Bolvig Mark (Associate Professor, Aalborg University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2026
Start date
Sep 17, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2026

Study contacts

Esben B Mark, PhD
Contact
e.mark@rn.dk
97663523 ext. +45
Peter Christensen, MD, Professor
principal investigator · Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion