ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07561411Updated Jun 2, 2026

Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Block on Chronic Pain After Mastectomy

An interventional study of Paravertebral block and Erector Spinae block in Mastectomy; Lymphedema, Chronic Pain and Regional Anesthesia Morbidity, sponsored by American University of Beirut Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Lebanon. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by American University of Beirut Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
132
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the erector spinae block can reduce the incidence of chronic pain compared to the paravertebral block in adult patients undergoing total mastectomy. The study includes patients aged 18 to 80 years scheduled for mastectomy, with or without axillary dissection. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does erector spinae block reduce the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months after mastectomy compared to paravertebral block?
  • Does erector spinae block affect postoperative outcomes such as opioid consumption at 48 hours, pain scores (in PACU, 24 and 48 hours), block performance time, and the incidence of complications, anxiety or depression, and pain intensity at 3 months?

Researchers will compare patients receiving erector spinae block to those receiving paravertebral block to determine if erector spinae block provides equivalent or improved outcomes in terms of chronic pain and perioperative measures.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to receive either erector spinae block or paravertebral block prior to surgery
  • Undergo total mastectomy (with or without axillary dissection)
  • Have their pain assessed in the PACU and at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively
  • Have opioid consumption measured during the first 48 hours after surgery
  • Be followed up at 3 months to assess chronic pain, pain intensity, and psychological outcomes (anxiety or depression)
Read the detailed description

Background: Acute post mastectomy pain is a strong predictor of the development of chronic pain. Paravertebral block (PVB) has been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of acute and chronic pain post mastectomy. Despite the use of ultrasound, the performance of this advanced block requires special skills and training due to the proximity of the injection site to the pleura and the spinal cord. Erector spinae block (ESB), a novel regional anesthesia technique, has been shown to be equivalent to PVB in reducing the incidence and severity of acute post-surgical pain.

Specific aims: The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of ESB and PVB on the incidence of chronic pain measured 3 months after mastectomy. Secondary objectives include assessment of cumulative opioid consumption at 48 hours post operatively, pain scores in the PACU as well as at 24 and 48 hours, time needed for performing the block, as well as complications, anxiety or depression at 3 months, pain intensity at 3 months. Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial will be conducted in the operating rooms at AUBMC. 132 (66 in each group) adult patients scheduled to total mastectomy, with or without axillary dissection, and aging between 18 and 80 will be randomly allocated to 2 groups: The erector spinae group or the paravertebral group. Significance: It has not been demonstrated yet that the ESB is equivalent to the more conventional PVB in reducing the incidence of chronic post mastectomy pain. This study will compare the effect of ESB to PVB in reducing the incidence of chronic pain, which will improve the quality of life of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy

02

Conditions studied

  • Mastectomy; Lymphedema
  • Chronic Pain
  • Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
  • Opioid Use
03

In context

Lymphedema

529 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphedema; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 132 is above the median of 50 across 369 interventional studies indexed under Lymphedema.

Browse Lymphedema studies →

Lead sponsor

American University of Beirut Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 158 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients between 18 and 80 years old.
  • Scheduled to total mastectomy with or without axillary dissection
  • Willing to receive regional anesthesia in addition to GA
  • 1-3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous thoracic surgery with an incision of >2 cm
  • Patient's refusal
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Pregnant women
  • Any to thoracic PVB, including intrathoracic infection, infection at the puncture site, cancer invasion of the puncture site, severe spinal deformity, history of spinal surgery, and severe coagulopathy; anticoagulants intake.
  • (ASA) classification of 4 or higher,
  • History of chronic pain or untreated clinical severe depression
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
132 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Paravertebral block

    Thoracic paravertebral block is performed at the level of T4 or T5 if no axillary procedure is to be performed, and additionally at the level of T2 if axillary procedure is planned. A high-frequency transducer probe connected to an ultrasound (US) machine is positioned in a para-median sagittal plane, approximately 2-2.5 cm lateral to the spinous process at the ipsilateral side of surgery location to localize the transverse process and the paravertebral space. The skin is sterilized and the US probe covered with a sterile cap. A 22-gauge, 100 mm stimuplex nerve block needle is introduced in an in-plane direction. After perforating the costotransverse ligament and confirming negative aspiration of blood, 20ml of a mixture of ropivacaine 0.5% is injected. Anterior displacement of the pleura indicates appropriate spread of local anaesthesia (LA) in the paravertebral space.

    Drug: Paravertebral block

  • Experimental
    Erector Spinae block

    The ESB is performed at the level of T4-T5 if no axillary procedure is to be performed, and additionally at the level of T2 (5ml) if axillary procedure is planned. A transducer probe is positioned in a para-median sagittal plane approximately 3 cm lateral to the spinous process at the ipsilateral side of surgery. Following the same sterilization procedure, the 10 cm stimuplex needle is introduced in an in-plane direction. The transverse process of the vertebrae, trapezius muscle, rhomboid major and erector spinae muscle are visualized, and 25 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% mixture is injected after confirming negative aspiration of blood (lower the concentration not to exceed 2 mg/kg ideal body weight). The LA spread lifts the erector spinae muscle off the bony shadow of the transverse process

    Drug: Erector Spinae block

Interventions

  • DrugParavertebral block

    Thoracic paravertebral block is performed at the level of T4 or T5 if no axillary procedure is to be performed, and additionally at the level of T2 if axillary procedure is planned. A high-frequency transducer probe connected to an ultrasound (US) machine is positioned in a para-median sagittal plane, approximately 2-2.5 cm lateral to the spinous process at the ipsilateral side of surgery location to localize the transverse process and the paravertebral space. The skin is sterilized and the US probe covered with a sterile cap. A 22-gauge, 100 mm stimuplex nerve block needle is introduced in an in-plane direction. After perforating the costotransverse ligament and confirming negative aspiration of blood, 20ml of a mixture of ropivacaine 0.5% is injected. Anterior displacement of the pleura indicates appropriate spread of local anaesthesia (LA) in the paravertebral space.

    Also known as: TPVB

  • DrugErector Spinae block

    The ESB is performed at the level of T4-T5 if no axillary procedure is to be performed, and additionally at the level of T2 (5ml) if axillary procedure is planned. A transducer probe is positioned in a para-median sagittal plane approximately 3 cm lateral to the spinous process at the ipsilateral side of surgery. Following the same sterilization procedure, the 10 cm stimuplex needle is introduced in an in-plane direction. The transverse process of the vertebrae, trapezius muscle, rhomboid major and erector spinae muscle are visualized, and 25 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% mixture is injected after confirming negative aspiration of blood (lower the concentration not to exceed 2 mg/kg ideal body weight). The LA spread lifts the erector spinae muscle off the bony shadow of the transverse process.

    Also known as: ESPB

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Chronic pain

    Chronic pain measured using NRS scale (0-10) 3 months after mastectomy

    Time frame: 3 months after mastectomy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cumulative opioid consumption

    Cumulative opioid consumption

    Time frame: Amount of opioids used by the patient 48 hours after the procedure

  2. Pain score

    Pain score measured using NRS scale (0-10)

    Time frame: Pain score measured using NRS scale (0-10) on arrival to the PACU,12 hour, 24 hour,and 48 hour after the procedure

  3. Time needed for performing the block

    Time needed for performing the block in minutes

    Time frame: Time needed for performing the block (Perioperative)

  4. Complications

    Incidence of complications (Yes/No)

    Time frame: Incidence of complications (Yes/No) (Perioperative)

  5. Anxiety or depression

    Anxiety or depression measured using HADS

    Time frame: Anxiety or depression measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; range 0-42, with subscales 0-21 each), where higher scores indicate worse anxiety and depression, assessed 3 months after the procedure.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07561411
Responsible party
Nancy Abou Nafeh (Principal Investigator, American University of Beirut Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 1, 2026
Start date
May 19, 2026
Primary completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Nancy Abou Nafeh, MD
Contact
na181@aub.edu.lb
01350000 ext. 6820
Thouraya HajAli
Contact
th64@aub.edu.lb
Nancy Abou Nafeh, MD
principal investigator · American University of Beirut Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion