ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07548879KAPSSUpdated Apr 23, 2026

Quantitative Analysis of Cardiac Muscle Perfusion

An interventional study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Contrast in Myocardial Ischemia, sponsored by St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-23.

Sponsored by St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Full quantitative perfusion of the myocardial wall using MRI is a difficult method for several reasons. First the perfusion algorithm is mostly only relatively available, usually available algorithms /e.g. ISP/ shows not precise results according to our measurements, secondly based on signal physics and nature of MRI scans is not easy to get absolute numbers and specific new algorithms must be developed and tested. Such a tool is not only needed for some special cohort of patients, like 3-vessel disease, coronary artery disease or diffuse coronary artery involvement in coronary vasculopathy in patients after heart transplantation. Fully quantitative perfusion analysis is highly needed for nearly all cardiac patients to better characterise the health and status of the myocardium.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is to optimise the scanning and evaluation of stress perfusion with respect to the quantification of measurement results.

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death among patients in developed countries. One of the most significant conditions within this group is ischemic heart disease (IHD), a state in which restricted blood flow through the coronary arteries results in myocardial ischemia.

At present, emphasis is placed on non-invasive diagnostic approaches to detect this condition. One such method is stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Currently, this examination using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is mainly limited to qualitative assessment, in which the examiner evaluates perfusion defects based on a subjective visual assessment of myocardial blood flow, or semi-quantitative assessment, in which blood flow in individual myocardial segments is evaluated from the slope of signal-time curves. In this study, perfusion defects in individual segments will be assessed using quantitative analysis, i.e., direct calculation of blood flow in millilitres per gram of myocardial tissue, and the results will be compared with the aforementioned qualitative and semi-quantitative methods currently used in clinical practice.

In contrast, quantitative assessment of stress perfusion offers significant advantages, particularly the ability to provide an objective evaluation independent of the interpreting physician, improved diagnostic accuracy, and, importantly, the potential to diagnose patients with diffuse perfusion impairment across all vascular territories - for example, in those with three-vessel disease. However, fully quantified myocardial perfusion assessment is technically demanding and faces several limitations. The examination will be performed using a CE-marked Philips MRI system, with various frequencies and acquisition modules being evaluated.

The following quantitative CMR perfusion parameters will be analyzed:

Parameter Description Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF) Blood flow through the myocardium, expressed in ml/min/g of tissue. Measured for individual myocardial segments.

Myocardial Perfusion Reserve (MPR) Ratio of MBF during stress to MBF at rest: MPR = MBF_stress / MBF_rest, indicating the perfusion reserve.

Arterial Input Function (AIF) Contrast concentration in the left ventricle or aorta, serving as the reference input signal for MBF calculation.

Time to Peak (TTP) Time required for the myocardial signal to reach its maximum after bolus administration (indicator of delayed flow).

Upslope Slope of the rising phase of the perfusion curve - a relative measure of perfusion (often used in semi-quantitative analysis).

Peak Signal Intensity (PSI) Maximum signal value following contrast arrival (less commonly used as a standalone parameter).

Myocardial perfusion will be conducted according to the standard ESC perfusion protocol, using Gadolinium-based contrast agent (Gadovist) at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg (0.1 ml/kg) administered at 3-5 ml/s, followed by 20 ml of saline flush. The contrast agent will be divided into two equal doses for stress and rest perfusion (0.05 ml/kg per perfusion). The stress agents used will be Adenosine (short-term infusion at 140 µg/kg/min using an infusion pump) or Regadenoson (400 µg intravenous bolus).

Patients with relative or absolute contraindications to stress testing will be excluded from the study, including those with acute coronary syndrome, life-threatening arrhythmias, severe COPD, second- or third-degree AV block, and patients with contraindications to MRI (ferromagnetic implants, severe renal failure, pregnancy).

The MRI protocol monitors contrast agent passage through the myocardium and subsequent washout for at least one minute in selected cardiac slices (typically three parallel short-axis slices from the apex to the base of the left ventricle). During the examination, basic physiological parameters are continuously monitored, including ECG, blood pressure, oxygen saturation (pO₂), and respiration. If necessary, the stress effect of the administered agent can be immediately reversed by administration of, for example, aminophylline. During scanning, changes in contrast concentration (signal intensity) are tracked over time. A targeted perfusion sequence (Philips DYNs_BTFE_3sl) will be used. For quantification purposes, this sequence will be complemented by a very short labeling sequence, which enables quantitative calculations while leaving the dynamic and pharmacological characteristics of the main perfusion sequence unaffected. After the examination, quantitative parameters from the perfusion sequence will be calculated to obtain the required perfusion metrics.

Analysis of the main perfusion parameters and other common cardiovascular metrics will be performed using Philips IntelliSpace Portal and CVI42 software.

The objective of the project is to optimize the scanning and evaluation process of stress perfusion MRI towards full quantification of measurement results, through collaboration between the clinical site and the MRI system manufacturer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myocardial Ischemia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Fully quantitative stress perfusion
  • CMR
03

In context

Myocardial Ischemia

1,123 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Ischemia; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 35 is below the median of 116 across 622 interventional studies indexed under Myocardial Ischemia.

Browse Myocardial Ischemia studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed
  • Patients indicated for a non-invasive test for ischemic heart disease/chronic coronary syndrome
  • Patients with intermittent chest pain and low to moderate probability of chronic coronary syndrome

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of relative or absolute to stress testing, including acute coronary syndrome, life-threatening arrhythmias, severe (COPD), or second- or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block.
  • Contraindications to MRI, such as severe claustrophobia, presence of ferromagnetic material or implants, or severe renal impairment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
35 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Arm

    Patients clinically indicated for non-invasive exclusion of ischemic heart disease (IHD) will be enrolled in the study. All participants will undergo stress myocardial perfusion MRI in accordance with ESC (European Society of Cardiology) guidelines. The examination will form part of a standard cardiac MRI protocol. During the procedure, a vasoactive agent will be administered as part of routine clinical care, in accord current standards and recommendations. A quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis of myocardial blood flow will be performed from the acquired data, and the results of both analyses will be compared. In patients with documented perfusion abnormalities, selective coronary angiography will be performed in accordance with standard clinical practice. In cases of inconclusive test results, an additional stress test (e.g., myocardial scintigraphy) or CT coronary angiography will be performed.

    Diagnostic Test: Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Contrast

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMagnetic Resonance Imaging with Contrast

    Myocardial perfusion will be conducted according to the standard ESC perfusion protocol, using Gadolinium-based contrast agent (Gadovist) at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg (0.1 ml/kg) administered at 3-5 ml/s, followed by 20 ml of saline flush. The contrast agent will be divided into two equal doses for stress and rest perfusion (0.05 ml/kg per perfusion). The stress agents used will be Adenosine (short-term infusion at 140 µg/kg/min using an infusion pump) or Regadenoson (400 µg intravenous bolus). Patients with relative or absolute contraindications to stress testing will be excluded from the study, including those with acute coronary syndrome, life-threatening arrhythmias, severe COPD, second- or third-degree AV block, and patients with contraindications to MRI (ferromagnetic implants, severe renal failure, pregnancy).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The correlation between quantitative and semi-quantitative analyses

    The primary outcome measure is the degree of correlation between quantitative and semi-quantitative analyses of rest and stress myocardial perfusion assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), evaluated both globally and in individual myocardial segments.

    Time frame: 1 day + up to 7 days after the examination

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ratio between MBF during stress and rest

    Degree of correlation between quantitative analysis parameters: Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF) in ml/min/g for each myocardial segment and Myocardial Perfusion Reserve (MPR) as ratio between MBF during stress and rest - MPR = MBF\_stress / MBF\_rest with already established semiquantitive parameters: Time to Peak (TTP) as time for the myocardial signal to reach peak after contrast bolus (indicator of low blood flow), Upslope as the slope of signal intensity increase in signal intensity to time curve of the myocardium and Peak Signal Intensity (PSI) as the maximal signal intensity reached after contrast agent bolus

    Time frame: 1 day + up to 7 days after the indicated examination

  2. The predictive value of quantitative and semi-quantitative MRI perfusion

    The secondary outcome measure is the predictive value of quantitative and semi-quantitative MRI perfusion results relative to findings from invasive coronary angiography and other functional stress tests.

    Time frame: 1 day + up to 7 days after the indicated examination

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Dec 2029, 42 months later.

Of 155 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Myocardial Ischemia, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 42 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 192 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 58.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 16, 2026
First posted
Apr 23, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2029
Last update
Apr 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07548879
Lead sponsor
St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
Collaborators
Philips Medical Systems
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 23, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 23, 2026

Study contacts

Roman Panovský, MD
Contact
panovsky@fnusa.cz
+420 543 18 2409
Roman Panovský, MD
principal investigator · St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion