ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06579274PARISAHUpdated Aug 21, 2026

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Parecoxib in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

A Phase 2 interventional study of Parecoxib and Placebo in Neurological Complication, sponsored by St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic. Recruiting at 4 sites in Czechia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
112
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Because of the important role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of SAH, it was hypothesized that its pharmacological manipulation might improve the prognosis of patients. In recent years, the effects of several groups of anti-inflammatory drugs on the development of complications after SAH have been described. Initially promising, glucocorticoids, thought to reduce cerebrovascular inflammation, brain swelling, and headache, failed in clinical trials. Studies have not provided clear evidence of the beneficial effects of these drugs in patients after SAH. Therefore, the administration of glucocorticoids is not currently part of the recommended practice. In addition, glucocorticoid treatment is associated with adverse effects that worsen outcomes, including hyperglycemia, infection, and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Read the detailed description

Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a specific type of hemorrhagic stroke with a worldwide incidence ranging from 0.5 to 28 per 100,000 population, with large regional variations. Despite improvements in diagnosis, treatment and care, SAH remains a disease with high mortality and morbidity. According to the literature, one third of patients die within the first few days after SAH, and most survivors have cognitive impairment or long-term disability. The overall clinical outcome depends on the severity of early brain injury (EBI), cerebral edema, hydrocephalus, development of delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND), epileptic seizures, and other complications. The pathophysiological cascades responsible for the development of these complications remain poorly understood. However, numerous studies support the important role of aseptic cerebrovascular inflammation induced by blood and blood breakdown products in the subarachnoid space after SAH. The increased interest in the development of cerebrovascular inflammation after SAH is confirmed by the increasing number of clinical and experimental studies devoted to this topic. Cerebrovascular aseptic inflammation as a potential treatment target is also mentioned in current guidelines for the management of patients after SAH.

The results of experimental studies formed the basis for the clinical evaluation of the effects of NSAIDs after SAH. The effects of several commonly used NSAIDs, particularly dexketoprofen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, indomethacin, or dipyrone, have been evaluated in prospective and retrospective clinical trials over the past decade. In addition to reducing pro-inflammatory markers such as IL6, lowering body temperature and platelet aggregation, the administration of NSAIDs has been associated with reduced mortality and improved clinical outcomes. Despite the beneficial effects of some NSAIDs, more robust studies are still lacking, except for one study that evaluated the effect of meloxicam in patients after SAH. This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. It showed a trend towards a better outcome with a lower incidence of vasospasm or mortality in patients after SAH.

Despite encouraging experimental results, no clinical trials have yet evaluated the anti-inflammatory and other potentially beneficial effects of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. COX-2 inhibitors, or coxibs, belong to the group of NSAIDs that selectively inhibit the COX-2 enzyme, which is responsible for developing inflammation and pain. A planned clinical study will evaluate the effects of parecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor in the NSAIDs group, on overall clinical outcome and development of complications in patients following spontaneous SAH.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurological Complication

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • subarachnoidal hemorrhage
  • inflammation
  • NSAIDs
03

In context

Inflammation

3,536 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammation; 642 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 112 is above the median of 50 across 2,577 interventional studies indexed under Inflammation.

Browse Inflammation studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed
  • Age: 18-85 years
  • Weight> 50 kg
  • Spontaneous SAH diagnosed on a native CT brain max. 48 hours after the first symptoms
  • Spontaneous SAH caused by rupture of the cerebral aneurysm confirmed on DSA or CT angiography (Fisher grade 1 to 4) OR Spontaneous SAH without a source on CT AG, DSA or MRI with Fisher grade 3 and 4
  • For women capable of becoming pregnant (see definitions from the CTFG guideline for ): use of the following highly reliable contraceptive method within 3 months after the end of the study: adherence to sexual abstinence or contraception containing progesterone with inhibition of ovulation (oral administration, injection) or non-hormonal intrauterine device or hormonal or bilateral tubal occlusion or partner vasectomy. Males: adherence to sexual abstinence or use of an adequate contraceptive method (i.e. condom) in case of sexual intercourse within 3 months after the end of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms of SAH without the finding of blood on the initial native CT scan of the brain
  • SAH from a cause other than a ruptured aneurysm, e.g. A-V malformation, traumatic SAH
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding (pregnancy test)
  • Known to the components of the product
  • Allergic reaction to the active substance or sulfonamides in the anamnesis
  • Concomitant treatment with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin or (at least five half-lives before administration of the medicinal product under investigation)
  • Severe hepatic insufficiency (serum albumin level \<25 g/l or score less than 10).
  • Active peptic ulcer or bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract in the anamnesis
  • Inflammatory bowel disease in the anamnesis
  • Congestive heart failure ( II-IV) in history.
  • Proven ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial insufficiency.
  • Participation in another clinical study (a gap of at least five half-lives before administration of the medicinal product under investigation).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
112 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active - Parecoxib

    Parecoxib 40 mg/100 ml will be injected into a peripheral or central venous catheter within 12 hours of the patient's inclusion in the study (from when informed consent is signed). Parecoxib 40 mg/100 ml is administered every 12 hours for 5 days. The maximum daily dose is 80 mg. In patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 7-9), parecoxib is started at 20 mg/50 mL and continued at this dose every 12 hours. The maximum daily dose is 40 mg. Participants will be monitored for six months for adverse events and changes in subjective status. In the event of adverse events, patients will be followed until resolution. After that, their participation in this clinical trial will be terminated. The total duration of the patient's participation in the clinical trial will be six months.

    Drug: Parecoxib

  • Placebo comparator
    Control - Placebo

    A placebo is a substance administered to a participant as a comparison without any pharmacological effect. However, unlike conventional medicines, it does not contain any active ingredients. In this clinical trial, the placebo is an isotonic sodium chloride solution. The placebo is injected into a peripheral or central venous catheter within 12 hours of the patient's enrollment in the study (from when informed consent is signed). Placebo 100 mL per dose will continue to be administered every 12 hours for five days. Participants will be followed for six months for any adverse events and changes in subjective status. In the event of adverse effects, patients will be followed until resolution. After that, their participation in this clinical trial will be terminated. The total duration of the patient's participation in the clinical trial will be six months.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Parecoxib (Dynastat) 40 mg solution for injection is for intravenous administration. Parecoxib may be given as an intravenous injection for 30 minutes directly into a vein or through an intravenous infusion set.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo intravenous injection can be administered quickly and directly into a vein or through an intravenous infusion set.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Influence of parecoxib on outcome of patients with SAH

    The primary outcome measure is the percentage of patients in the active and control groups whose outcome is categorized as favorable (mRS 0-3) or unfavorable (mRS 4-6) according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).

    Time frame: 180 days ± 14 days after first dose of parecoxib/placebo

Secondary outcomes

  1. Influence of parecoxib on outcome of patients with SAH

    The secondary monitored parameter is the percentage of patients in the active and control groups whose outcome, according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS), is divided into favourable (mRS 0-3) or unfavourable (mRS 4-6).

    Time frame: Discharge from hospital and 90 days ± 7 days after first dose of parecoxib/placebo

  2. Occurrence of symptomatic vasospasms (vasospasms confirmed on TCD / CT AG / MR AG / DSA

    Number of patients with vasospasms confirmed on TCD / CT AG / MR AG / DSA

    Time frame: Six, eight and ten days after the application of the first dose of the evaluated medicinal product /placebo.

  3. Incidence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND)

    Number of patients with delayed ischemic neurological deficit

    Time frame: Six, eight and ten days, three and six months after the application of the first dose of the evaluated medicinal product /placebo.

  4. Mortality

    Number of deaths

    Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization, 90 days ± 7 days and 180 days ± 14 days

  5. Length of hospitalization in ICU

    Length of hospitalization in ICU

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Total length of hospitalization

    Total length of hospitalization

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Occurrence of acute hydrocephalus

    Number of patients with acute hydrocephalus

    Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization

  8. Occurrence of chronic hydrocephalus

    Number of patients with chronic hydrocephalus with V-P shunt implantation

    Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization, 90 days ± 7 days, 180 days ± 14 days

  9. Occurrence of fevers

    Number of patients with fever above 38 degrees Celsius

    Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization

  10. Occurrence of inflammation

    Evaluation of the systemic inflammatory response (assessed daily during hospitalization) meeting at least 2 parameters: * heart rate \> 90/min. * leukocytosis \> 12x109/l) or leukopenia \< 9x109 * respiratory rate \> 20/min. or PaCO2 \< 32 mm Hg (4.3 kPa) * body temperature \< 36.0 °C or \> 38.0 °C

    Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization

  11. Evaluation of pain according to Visual Analogue Scale

    The comparison of the patients in the treatment and placebo arm with pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale, a numerical scale from 0 to 10 points, where increasing pain is indicated by a higher score.

    Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization, discharge from hospital, 90 days ± 7 days and 180 days ± 14 days after first dose of parecoxib/placebo

  12. Evaluation of prostaglandins and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the cerebrospinal fluid in the case of the below-mentioned external ventricular drainage after 2 days and in the serum

    Evaluation of prostaglandins (COX-2, PGH2, PGI2, PGE2, PGD2, PF2a, TXA2) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12) in the cerebrospinal fluid in the case of the below-mentioned external ventricular drainage after 2 days and in the serum regardless of the established cerebrospinal fluid drainage after two days to day 10 from initial symptoms

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 days after implantation of drainage

  13. Evaluatioon of laboratory markers of inflammatory response in peripheral blood

    C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and white blood cell count

    Time frame: Two, four, six, eight and ten days after the application of the first dose parecoxib/placebo

  14. Evaluation of the functionality of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier every 2 days if cerebrospinal fluid drainage is necessary.

    This evaluation will compare the number of patients in the treatment and placebo arms who undergo cerebrospinal fluid drainage.

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 days after implantation of drainage

  15. Quality of life measured through questionnaires

    Evaluation of quality of life (SF-36 score)

    Time frame: Discharge from hospital, 90 days ± 7 days and 180 days ± 14 days after the application of the first dose parecoxib/placebo

  16. Evaluation of the difference in efficacy parameters between subgroups according to the source of bleeding

    Number of patients with inflamation based on source of bleeding

    Time frame: After discharge from hospital, six days after administration of the 1st dose of parecoxib/placebo

  17. Serious adverse events

    Percentage of patients in the experimental and placebo groups with the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE) (assessed during hospitalization, at discharge, 3 and 6 months after the first dose) supplemented by evaluation in individual subgroups according to the source of bleeding.

    Time frame: During hospitalization, at discharge, 90 days ± 7 days, 180 days ± 14 days after the first dose of parecoxib/placebo

  18. Hepatotoxicity

    Percentage of patients in the experimental and placebo groups with an increase in blood creatine phosphokinase (CPK), an increase in blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), an increase in alanine transaminase (ALT), an increase in aspartate transaminase (AST), and an increase in blood urea level \> 5x ULN; separate analysis for subgroups by source of bleeding.

    Time frame: Before the 1st dose of parecoxib/placebo, 1., 3. and 5. day of treatment and 10. day of hospitalization

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • St. Anne's University Hospital Brno
    Brno, Czech Republic 602 00, Czechia
    Recruiting
    • Peter Solar, MD · Contactpeter.solar@fnusa.cz · + 420 543 182 703
    • Klara Kostelanska, PhD · Contactklara.kostelanska@fnusa.cz · +420 543 185 526
    • Peter Solar, M.D., Ph.D. · Principal investigator
    • Radim Jancalek, M.D., Ph.D. · Sub investigator
  • University Hospital Olomouc
    Olomouc, 779 00, Czechia
    Recruiting
    • David Krahulík, prof. MD · Contactdavid.krahulik@fnol.cz · +420 588 443 451
    • David Krieg, MD · Sub investigator
    • Stanislav Šoustal, MD · Sub investigator
  • University Hospital Ostrava
    Ostrava, 708 52, Czechia
    Recruiting
    • Tomáš Hrbáč, associate professor · Contacttomas.hrbac@fno.cz · +420 597 375 470
    • Jan Krahulik, MD · Sub investigator
  • Masarykovy nemocnice v Ústí nad Labem, o.z.
    Ústí nad Labem, 401 13, Czechia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 113 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Inflammation, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 64. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 149 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 19, 2024
First posted
Aug 30, 2024
StartActual
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
Last update
Aug 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06579274
Lead sponsor
St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
Collaborators
Masaryk University, CZECRIN - Czech Clinical Research Infrastructure Network
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Study contacts

Lucie Tesárková
Contact
lucie.tesarkova@fnusa.cz
+420 543 185 174
Klara Kostelanska, PhD
Contact
klara.kostelanska@fnusa.cz
+420 543 185 526
Peter Solar
principal investigator · St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Parecoxib

Start the discussion