ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07516860Updated Apr 14, 2026

Effect of SCS Technique on Oromotor Skills in Children With CP

An interventional study of Strain Counter-Strain (SCS) and Designed Oral Motor Program in Sialorrhea, Spastic Cerebral Palsy (sCP) and Strain Counterstrain Technique, sponsored by Cairo University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 8 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of the Strain Counter-Strain (SCS) technique on improving oromotor functions in children with spastic cerebral palsy. The intervention specifically targets the masseter, SCM, upper trapezius, scalenes, and suprahyoid muscles to release myofascial tension. The study aims to determine if modulating muscle tone through SCS can provide a stable postural foundation to enhance functional oral motor skills. Outcomes are measured after 4 weeks (one month) of intervention, focusing on mouth opening range, drooling frequency and severity, and overall oral motor functions

Read the detailed description

This study follows a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design. Children with spastic cerebral palsy are screened for inclusion based on impaired oromotor control and persistent neck muscle tension.

The Control Group receives a designed oral motor program aimed at improving oral motor functions, mouth opening, and drooling severity, conducted over 4 weeks (one month).

The Study Group receives the same designed oral motor program, preceded by the Strain Counter-Strain (SCS) technique applied to the masseter, sternocleidomastoid (SCM), scalenes, upper trapezius, and suprahyoid muscles. The SCS technique aims to normalize cervical alignment and release restrictive tension in the orofacial region.

Outcome Measures: Functional and physical changes are assessed at baseline and after the 4-week period. The primary outcomes include:

Mouth opening range (measured in centimeters). Drooling frequency and severity (using standardized scales). Oral motor functions (evaluated through standardized scales). The comparison seeks to demonstrate how stabilizing the proximal postural base through SCS facilitates refined distal oromotor performance

02

Conditions studied

  • Sialorrhea
  • Spastic Cerebral Palsy (sCP)
  • Strain Counterstrain Technique
  • Oral Motor Functions
  • Mouth Opening

Keywords

  • Strain Counter-Strain
  • SCS technique
  • Oromotor Functions
  • Mouth Opening
  • Drooling Severity
  • Masseter Muscle
  • Pediatric Physical Therapy
  • Spastic cerebral palsy
03

In context

Sialorrhea

60 studies on the registry are indexed under Sialorrhea; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is close to the median of 31 across 44 interventional studies indexed under Sialorrhea.

Browse Sialorrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,941 studies on the registry; 1,458 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronological age was 4 - 8 years from gender was selected
  • Their degrees of spasticity were 1, 1+ according to modified Ashworth scale.
  • They had moderate drooling according to modified drooling questionnaire.
  • Mouth opening limitation was less than 3 cm.
  • Their levels of motor function were II - III- IV according to gross motor function classification system.
  • Their levels of feeding abilities were III on Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System.
  • Children were able to follow instruction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any history of jaw, head, and face trauma.
  • Facial or dental developmental abnormalities.
  • Any history of head and neck surgical intervention.
  • Congenital abnormalities of head and neck
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Strain counter-strain plus oral motor program

    This group receives the Strain Counter-Strain (SCS) technique followed by a designed oral motor program. The intervention targets the masseter, SCM, upper trapezius, scalenes, and suprahyoid muscles to release myofascial tension and normalize cervical alignment, conducted 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks

    Procedure: Strain Counter-Strain (SCS) · Procedure: Designed Oral Motor Program

  • Active comparator
    Oral motor program only

    This group receives only the designed oral motor program aimed at improving the strength, range of motion, and coordination of the masticatory and suprahyoid muscles. The program is conducted 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks

    Procedure: Designed Oral Motor Program

Interventions

  • ProcedureStrain Counter-Strain (SCS)

    A manual therapy technique used to release myofascial tightness and muscle tension in the head and neck region to provide a stable postural foundation for oromotor skills

  • ProcedureDesigned Oral Motor Program

    A structured exercise program designed to enhance oral motor functions, including feeding efficiency, mouth opening range, and drooling

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oral motor functions

    Assessment of oral motor skills including feeding, swallowing, and coordination using the Oral Motor Assessment Scale (OMAS). The scale scores range from 0 to 2, where higher scores indicate better function

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mouth Opening Range

    Measurement of the maximum inter-incisal distance using tape measurement (measured in centimeters)

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention

  2. Drooling Frequency and Severity

    Evaluation of drooling patterns using the Modified Drooling Questionnaire (MDQ). Higher scores indicate more frequent and severe drooling.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be available to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the participants. The study results will be disseminated through the final thesis and potential peer-reviewed publications as aggregate data only

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07516860
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Alshimaa Mohamed Mahmoud Hassan (Physical Therapist and Master Degree Candidate, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 8, 2026
Start date
Jan 20, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 14, 2026

Study contacts

Kamal Shoukry, PhD
study director · Professor of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion