ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07488026Updated Mar 23, 2026

Effects of the Stimulation Site of tsMS With TMS on Functional Mobility in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

An interventional study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Cervical Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease (PD), Gait Disorders and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, sponsored by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-23.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of two different trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (tsMS) application sites, cervical versus thoracic, when combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), on functional mobility in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). Participants diagnosed with PD will be randomized into two intervention groups (rTMS + cervical tsMS or rTMS + thoracic tsMS) and will undergo 10 treatment sessions. Outcomes will include functional mobility, gait speed, motor function, freeing of gait, balance, quality of life, global perceived improvement and adverse events. The study is expected to identify the most effective tsMS application site to enhance mobility and motor outcomes in PD, contributing to the optimization and standardization of tsMS protocols as an adjunct therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson's Disease (PD)
  • Gait Disorders
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Spinal Cord Stimulation

Keywords

  • gait disorders
  • spinal cord stimulation
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • parkinson's disease
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 40 across 3,353 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco is the lead sponsor of 166 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: (i) a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease confirmed by a neurologist; (ii) stable dopaminergic pharmacological treatment for at least three months; (iii) age 40 years or older; (iv) disease stage between 2.5 and 3 on the modified Hoehn and Yahr scale; (v) (v) gait impairment, defined as the occurrence of at least one freezing of gait episode per week.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

(i) other neurological disorders, orthostatic hypotension, vestibular, musculoskeletal, or visual impairments that could compromise performance on the proposed assessments; (ii) other osteomuscular conditions affecting the lower limbs that interfere with mobility and functional performance; (iii) a (MoCA) score lower than 21 points; (iv) prior surgical procedures for Parkinson's disease; or (v) to magnetic stimulation techniques, including a history of seizures or the presence of metallic implants in the neck or spinal region.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rTMS + Cervical tsMS

    Participants will receive a combined neuromodulation protocol consisting of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the primary motor cortex, followed by trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (tsMS) at the cervical level.

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation · Device: Cervical Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation

  • Experimental
    rTMS + Thoracic tsMS

    Participants will receive a combined neuromodulation protocol consisting of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the primary motor cortex, followed by trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (tsMS) at the thoracic level.

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation · Device: Thoracic Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the primary motor cortex using standardized stimulation parameters.

    Also known as: rTMS

  • DeviceCervical Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation

    Trans-spinal magnetic stimulation applied at the cervical level using standardized stimulation parameters.

    Also known as: tsMS

  • DeviceThoracic Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation

    Trans-spinal magnetic stimulation applied at the thoracic level using standardized stimulation parameters.

    Also known as: tsMS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Mobility (Timed Up and Go Test)

    Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Participants are instructed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters at a fast but safe speed, turn around, return, and sit down. The outcome is the time to complete the task (in seconds), with lower values indicating better functional mobility.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Day 10 (end of intervention), and at 15 and 30 days post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Statatic and Dynamic Balance (Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test - MiniBESTest)

    Balance will be evaluated using the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), a validated tool for individuals with Parkinson's disease. The test includes 14 items covering anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, and dynamic gait. Each item is scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate better balance.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Day 10 (end of intervention), and at 15 and 30 days post-intervention

  2. Motor function (Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - MDS-UPDRS)

    Motor function will be assessed using Sections II (Activities of Daily Living) and III (Motor Examination) of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Items are scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe), with lower scores indicating better motor function.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Day 10 (end of intervention), and at 15 and 30 days post-intervention

  3. Freezing of gait (Freezing of gait Questionnaire - FOG-Q)

    Freezing of gait will be assessed using the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q), a patient-reported measure that evaluates the severity and functional impact of freezing episodes during walking. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Day 10 (end of intervention), and at 15 and 30 days post-intervention

  4. Gait speed (10 meter-walk test)

    Gait speed will be measured using the 10-Meter Walk Test. Participants will walk at usual and fastest safe speeds. Time will be recorded and converted to meters per second (m/s).

    Time frame: Baseline, at Day 10 (end of intervention), and at 15 and 30 days post-intervention

  5. Lower limb stength (Five times sit-to-stand test)

    Lower limb strength will be assessed using the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5xSTS). The time to complete five repetitions will be recorded in seconds, with longer times indicating poorer performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Day 10 (end of intervention), and at 15 and 30 days post-intervention

  6. Quality of Life Measured by the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39): Total Score and Domain Scores

    Quality of life will be evaluated using the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. Both total and domain scores will be analyzed.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Day 10 (end of intervention), and at 15 and 30 days post-intervention

  7. Global Perceived Improvement (Global perceived change scale)

    Global perceived improvement will be assessed using the Global Perceived Change scale, a 7-point patient-reported measure ranging from "no change" to "much better."

    Time frame: At Day 10 (end of intervention)

  8. Adverse events

    Adverse events will be monitored using a standardized questionnaire for magnetic stimulation-related side effects, including headache, scalp discomfort, tingling, fatigue, nausea, and drowsiness, rated from 0 (none) to 4 (severe).

    Time frame: Throughout the intervention period (10 days)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy and ethical considerations, as well as restrictions imposed by the ethics committee.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07488026
Responsible party
Kátia Monte-Silva (Professor, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
Start date
Jan 5, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 23, 2026

Study contacts

Ana Cecília Ribeiro Nascimento, Msc. student
Contact
anaceciliaribeiro.n@gmail.com
(81) 99893-6664 ext. +55
Kátia Monte-Silva, PhD in Neurosciences
study director · Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion