A Phase 2 interventional study of Active taVNS and Sham taVNS in PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), sponsored by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-26.
Sponsored by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by motor impairments such as bradykinesia accompanied by resting tremor and/or rigidity. As PD progresses due to its neurodegenerative nature, complementary strategies must be developed to optimize its effects. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has emerged as a strategy for controlling the symptoms of the disease. Nevertheless, the efficacy of this approach in managing PD remains to be elucidated. The objective of the present study is to investigate and compare the effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and sham taVNS on functional mobility, which is the primary outcome and will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go test. The following tests will be used to evaluate the secondary outcomes: the miniBESTest and the Biodex Balance System (balance), the MDS-UPDRS and the Five-Time Sit-to-Stand Test (motor function), the FOG-Q (freezing of gait), the 10-Meter Walk Test (gait speed), the PGIC (perception of change), and the recording of adverse events. The volunteers will be divided into two groups: one group will receive taVNS in conjunction with physical therapy, while the other group will receive a sham taVNS in conjunction with physical therapy. To assess the effect of therapy, the efficacy of taVNS in enhancing the effects of physical therapy on the functional mobility of people with PD will be evaluated.
4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 40 across 3,353 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.
Browse Parkinson Disease studies →Universidade Federal de Pernambuco is the lead sponsor of 166 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Device: Active taVNS
Device: Sham taVNS
taVNS will be applied to the concha in the left auricle of volunteers with the following parameters: 8 trains of 120 seconds of stimulation each at 25 Hz, 300 μs, and 60 seconds of interstimulus interval, with intensity below the pain threshold, totaling 24 minutes of stimulation. The stimulation is combined with physical therapy focused on functional mobility.
Physical therapy focusing on functional mobility with sham transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation.
Functional mobility
Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. In the TUG, the time taken by the volunteer to perform the activity of getting up from a chair, walking, and sitting back down is timed. The test begins with the volunteer sitting in a chair with their back against the backrest; when asked, they stand up, walk three meters at their fastest speed, but safely, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down. Shorter times in performing this test translate into greater functional mobility. Three repetitions of the test will be scored, and for analysis purposes, the average of the repetitions will be used.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (Day 5), post-intervention (Day 10), 1 month post-intervention (Day 30)
Balance
Static and dynamic balance will be assessed using the reduced version of the Balance Evaluation System Test (miniBESTest), which aims to evaluate six different balance control mechanisms based on 14 specific activities of daily living. Each activity is scored from 0 (worst performance) to 2 (best performance). Thus, lower scores indicate poorer balance.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (Day 5), post-intervention (Day 10), 1 month post-intervention (Day 30).
Balance
The Biodex Balance System (BBS) will be used, which is a mobile platform with levels of instability. In the present study, the postural stability test will be used, starting from level 12 towards level 8. That is, from greater to lesser stability. At the end of the test, the BBS provides three data points: anterior-posterior displacement index (API), medial-lateral displacement index (MLI), and overall stability index (OSI).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (Day 5), post-intervention (Day 10), 1 month post-intervention (Day 30)
Motor function
Motor function will be assessed using the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) and sections II and III of the Movement Disorder Society Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). In the FTSST, volunteers are asked to stand up and sit down five times as quickly as possible, but safely. Shorter times on this test indicate greater functional mobility. For analysis purposes, the average of three repetitions of this test will be used.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (Day 5), post-intervention (Day 10), 1 month post-intervention (Day 30)
Motor function
The MDS-UPDRS is the most widely used clinical assessment tool for characterizing the motor symptoms of PD and for monitoring the progression of these symptoms and the physical disability caused by the disease. The MDS-UPDRS consists of 50 items scored from 0 to 4 each, from best (0) to worst motor performance (4), and is widely accepted for determining the effectiveness of intervention in clinical studies.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (Day 5), post-intervention (Day 10), 1 month post-intervention (Day 30)
Freezing of gait
Freezing of gait is assessed using the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q), which consists of a scale that measures the volunteer's subjective perception of the severity and impact of freezing during gait. The FOG-Q has six items, each scored from 0 to 4, for a total of 24 points. A higher score indicates that gait performance is more affected by freezing.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (Day 5), post-intervention (Day 10), 1 month post-intervention (Day 30)
Speed of gait
Walking speed will be assessed using the 10-meter walk test (10MWT), in which the volunteer is instructed to walk down a 10-meter corridor. The test begins with the volunteer standing, and after instruction, they must walk the 10-meter course and stop at the end of it. Two repetitions of the test will be performed, the first with the volunteer walking at their comfortable speed and the second at their fastest speed, but safely.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (Day 5), post-intervention (Day 10), 1 month post-intervention (Day 30)
Patient global impression of change
The perception of improvement will be verified through the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). This aims to quantify the volunteer's perception of improvement for the proposed treatment in relation to activities of daily living, disease symptoms, emotions, and quality of life. Volunteers are given seven response options, ranging from "no change or condition worsened" to "much better, with a considerable improvement that made all the difference." This questionnaire will only be administered at the end of the ten sessions.
Time frame: Post-intervention (Day 10)
Adverse events
Adverse events will be assessed based on the volunteer's report. The most common adverse effects are headache, tingling in the electrode region, burning sensation, and drowsiness. For each sensation, the volunteer will rate its intensity on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (strong).
Time frame: All days of intervention (up to 10 days)
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Feb 2026; primary completion for Mar 2027, 13 months later.
Of 105 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Parkinson Disease, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 13 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 201 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 44.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco →