An interventional study of Active taVNS and Sham taVNS in Stroke, sponsored by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-04.
Sponsored by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of this clinical trial is to determine if trans-auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is effective in improving upper extremity function in stroke survivors. The primary objectives include: Investigating whether taVNS improves motor function in stroke survivors. The secondary objectives include: Assessing any potential side effects associated with the method. Investigating taVNS effects on daily routine functions and spasticity Researchers will conduct a comparative analysis between taVNS and a sham procedure (which mimics the stimulation without any actual effect) to assess its effectiveness. Participants in the trial will: Undergo taVNS combined with physical therapy or a sham procedure with physical therapy daily over a two-week period.
8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.
Browse Stroke studies →Universidade Federal de Pernambuco is the lead sponsor of 166 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Patients aged between 18 and 75 years, with motor impairment in the upper extremity caused by unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with stroke onset within the last five years.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Device: Active taVNS
Device: Sham taVNS
Protocol uses a 25 Hz frequency with 500 μs pulse width in biphasic configuration, operating at a 1:1 duty cycle with current intensity set to the maximum tolerable level without inducing pain. The total stimulation duration is 60 minutes. The stimulation is combined with physical therapy focused on upper extremity function.
Physical therapy focused on upper extremity function with masking for transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation
Upper extremity Motor Function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) will be used to evaluate motor impairment and recovery of the paretic upper extremity. It consists of items from sections III and IV, assessing motor function, coordination, and speed, with a maximum score of 66 points. Higher scores indicate lower motor impairment. A minimal clinically important difference (mCID) is defined as a change (Δ) of 5 or more points between baseline and post-intervention scores.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (day 5) and post-intervention (day 10)
Manual Dexterity (Box and Block Test)
The Box and Block Test (BBT) will assess manual dexterity of the paretic upper extremity. It counts the number of wooden blocks (2.5 x 2.5 x 2.5 cm) transferred from one compartment to another over a central divider within one minute. The minimal detectable change (MDC) is defined as a difference of 5 blocks per minute.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (day 5) and post-intervention (day 10)
Independence (Functional Independence Measure)
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) assesses the level of independence through motor and cognitive subscales. Each item is scored from 1 to 7. Total score classifications: complete dependence (18-45), moderate independence (46-99), and complete independence (100-126). The MDC is defined as 17 points for the motor section, 3 points for the cognitive section, and 22 points for the total score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (day 5) and post-intervention (day 10)
Spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale)
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) will assess spasticity in finger, wrist, elbow, and shoulder flexors of the paretic upper extremity. It uses a 6-point scale (0 to 5) to quantify muscle tone. The minimal clinically important difference (mCID) is defined as a reduction of at least one point in spasticity score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (day 5) and post-intervention (day 10)
Health-Related Quality of Life (Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale)
The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) assesses stroke-related quality of life across 12 domains, using 49 items. Scores range from 49 to 245, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. The MDC is 4.7 points for the total score, 2.1 for the physical subscore, and 2.8 for the psychosocial subscore.
Time frame: Baseline (day 0), mid-intervention (day 5), post-intervention (day 10)
Multidimensional Stroke Impact (Stroke Impact Scale)
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a self-reported questionnaire assessing multiple consequences of stroke including strength, hand function, mobility, ADLs/IADLs, memory and thinking, communication, emotion, and social participation. It is designed to capture the broader impact of stroke on health and quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (Day 5), post-intervention (Day 10)
Global Perception of Change (Patient Global Impression of Change)
The Global Perception of Change Scale (also referred to as Patient Global Impression of Change - PGIC) assesses the participant's perceived improvement at post-intervention. It includes 7 options, ranging from "no change or condition worsened" to "a great deal better, considerable improvement that made all the difference". A higher value indicates a higher perceived improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (Day 5), post-intervention (Day 10)
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 13 months after the start.
Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 13 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco →