ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07471464Updated Aug 3, 2026

Centered Surgery - Preoperative Counseling and Patient Satisfaction

An observational study in Pelvic Organ Prolapse, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
106
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 195 studies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with a site in United States — 12 open to participants now, 23 under way, none of them phase 3. Pelvic Organ Prolapse · United States.

Planned enrollment
30th of 61
106 · median 103
Started
2026
with 4 others
Observational
62 of 195
4 open now
Primary completion
2027-07
later than 16 of 22 live
Registered
191st of 195
by date
Lead sponsor
8 of 195
The Cleveland Clinic

Among the 195 studies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with a site in United States, this one is the 30th largest by planned enrollment of the 61 observational ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2026, is one of 62 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 16 of the 22 other live ones, and was the 191st registered.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

521 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Organ Prolapse; 80 are open to participants now.

Browse Pelvic Organ Prolapse studies →

Open to participants now

12 of the 195 studies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

6 more — sign in →

All 12 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 53 Pelvic Organ Prolapse studies recruiting now, 31 (58%) set no upper age limit and 10 (19%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 195 studies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study is a prospective cohort study which aims to assess patient satisfaction and preparedness for surgery through two methods of preoperative counseling: standard individual phone calls versus virtual group sessions called Shared Medical Appointments (SMAs). The study will focus on patients undergoing urogynecology prolapse surgeries at Cleveland Clinic. Researchers hypothesize that virtual group counseling will improve patient satisfaction and preparedness compared to individual phone calls. Additionally, the study will evaluate healthcare resource utilization as a secondary outcome.

Participants will complete surveys before and after surgery to measure satisfaction and preparedness using validated tools. The study will enroll patients aged 18 and older who can provide informed consent and are scheduled for specific prolapse surgeries. Findings may help improve preoperative counseling practices and enhance patient-centered care.

Read the detailed description

The study titled "Patient Centered Surgery - Preoperative Counseling and Patient Satisfaction" aims to evaluate patient satisfaction and preparedness for surgery based on the method of preoperative counseling provided by the nursing team. The primary aim is to compare patient satisfaction with preoperative nursing visits conducted through virtual shared medical appointments (SMA) versus individual phone calls. It is hypothesized that virtual group calls will improve patient satisfaction compared to phone calls. Secondary aims include comparing patient preparedness for surgery between the two methods and assessing healthcare resource utilization, such as patient-initiated phone calls, unscheduled office visits, emergency room visits, and inpatient readmissions, following urogynecology surgery. It is hypothesized that virtual group calls will enhance patient preparedness and reduce healthcare resource utilization compared to phone calls.

The study will employ a prospective cohort design to evaluate patient satisfaction and preparedness for surgery based on preoperative teaching methods. Participants will be recruited over a 24-month period, with follow-up lasting up to the postoperative appointment, typically scheduled 7-9 weeks after surgery. The study will be conducted from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2028. The primary outcome will be patient satisfaction as measured by the validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18) following preoperative education appointments. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction measured at the 6-8-week postoperative visit, as well as healthcare resource utilization assessed up to 12 weeks following surgery.

Eligibility criteria include patients scheduled for major urogynecology surgeries for apical prolapse at Cleveland Clinic sites. Eligible surgeries include vaginal colpopexy, vaginal hysteropexy, obliterative procedures, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension, with or without accompanying procedures such as hysterectomy, salpingectomy, anterior/posterior colporrhaphy, and mid-urethral sling placement. Participants must be over 18 years of age, have decision-making capacity, and be able to provide informed consent. For the SMA group, patients must have active MyChart access and be able to speak and read English. Patients unable to consent will be excluded.

Study procedures involve screening and recruitment, which will occur during the patient's initial consultation when surgery is recommended. Eligible participants will receive a recruitment letter via MyChart describing the study and providing instructions for accessing the REDCap survey. If no response is received, a follow-up MyChart message will be sent, and investigators may follow up via telephone using a scripted protocol. Participants who opt into the study will complete surveys electronically via REDCap. Preoperative surveys include the PSQ-18 to assess patient satisfaction and the Patient Preparedness Questionnaire (PPQ) to measure preparedness for surgery. Postoperative surveys will consist of the PSQ-18 only. Participants will receive reminders to complete surveys within 48-72 hours after their visits, with no more than two reminders per survey.

Data collection will be conducted using REDCap, with information abstracted from EPIC electronic health records and linked to survey responses. Identifiable data, including medical record numbers and email addresses, will be used for survey distribution and data collection but will be de-identified for analysis. Data will be securely stored on Cleveland Clinic devices and accessed only by investigators approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Statistical analysis will be performed using JMP Pro version 17.0 software, with support from Cleveland Clinic Quantitative Health Sciences. Patient satisfaction scores from the PSQ-18 will be treated as continuous data and analyzed using t-tests to compare mean scores between groups. Healthcare utilization will be analyzed individually and as a composite, while adverse events will be evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo Grading System for surgical complications. Descriptive statistics will summarize demographic and clinical characteristics.

The study aims to recruit approximately 106 participants, with 53 patients per group to achieve 80% power to detect a 5.5-point difference in PSQ-18 scores between groups. Privacy and confidentiality will be prioritized, with all data managed electronically in REDCap and protected by Cleveland Clinic firewalls. Identifiable information will be removed prior to analysis. Findings will be disseminated through presentations at scientific meetings and publications in gynecologic journals. No data sharing will occur, and the study does not require a Data Monitoring Committee as it involves data collection only. Recruitment efforts will include educating surgeons and advanced practice providers about the study during Urogynecology Section Research Meetings.

03

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • surgical counseling
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

- Participants will be prospectively identified by the primary surgeon's team during the patient's initial consultation when the decision is made to proceed with surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18y
  • Has decision-making capacity and able to provide for research participation
  • For patients undergoing SMA: Has active MyChart
  • Able to speak and read English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
106 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Telehealth Appointment

    Patients undergoing preoperative nursing telehealth appointments

  • virtual appointment

    Patients undergoing preoperative shared nursing virtual appointments

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18) will assess satisfaction. The PSQ-18 is a validated 18-item questionnaire developed to evaluate satisfaction with medical care in seven domains, namely general satisfaction, technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with provider, and accessibility and convenience. Responses are scored on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score for the questionnaire ranges from 18 (dissatisfaction with medical care) to 90 (highest satisfaction with medical care).

    Time frame: From enrollment until the postoperative visit, 6-8 weeks after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 13 months after the start.

Of 55 non-industry observational studies under Pelvic Organ Prolapse, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 61 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 63.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 10, 2026
First posted
Mar 13, 2026
StartActual
Jun 11, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Aug 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07471464
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2026
Start date
Jun 11, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Study contacts

Petrina LaFaire, MD, MS
Contact
lafairp@ccf.org
216-445-8090
Shannon Wallace, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion