An observational study in Pelvic Organ Prolapse, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.
Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Observational
Among 195 studies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with a site in United States — 12 open to participants now, 23 under way, none of them phase 3. Pelvic Organ Prolapse · United States.
Among the 195 studies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with a site in United States, this one is the 30th largest by planned enrollment of the 61 observational ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2026, is one of 62 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 16 of the 22 other live ones, and was the 191st registered.
521 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Organ Prolapse; 80 are open to participants now.
Browse Pelvic Organ Prolapse studies →12 of the 195 studies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Ohio State University · Sites in United States
Ages 18+ · Women only
Cassandra Kisby · Sites in United States
Ages 21+ · Women only
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network · Sites in United States
Ages 18–99 · Women only
University of Alabama at Birmingham · Sites in United States
Ages 18+ · Women only
University of Texas at Austin · Sites in United States
Ages 18+ · Women only · Healthy volunteers
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 53 Pelvic Organ Prolapse studies recruiting now, 31 (58%) set no upper age limit and 10 (19%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
195 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 4 · Phase 2 9 · Phase 3 9 · Phase 4 25
First in 1996; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2026.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's planned enrollment of 106 is below the median of 134 across 171 observational studies indexed under Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Median enrollment 78 across the 133 interventional studies, 103 across the 61 observational. Of the 154 that completed or were terminated, 51 (33%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
28 of 195 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 832 studies on the registry; 120 are open to participants now.
Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (81%) have results posted.
The Cleveland Clinic has 9 studies filed under Pelvic Organ Prolapse — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
8 of the studies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT04179955Mayo ClinicIntraoperative Costs and Patient Perceptions in Sacrocolpopexy for Prolapse | 2026-12 |
| NCT06634459Medstar Health Research InstitutePOMEGRANATE Trial: Comparing Reia Pessary Versus Standard of Care Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment | 2027-01 |
| NCT07008898University of Alabama at BirminghamSequence of Midurethral Sling Placement During Robotic Sacrocolpopexy | 2027-05 |
| NCT07692789Ohio State UniversityImproving Uroflowmetry Interpretability: Evaluating the Impact of Patient Reminder Systems | 2027-06 |
| NCT07218016NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkAccelerometer Measured Early Recovery After Prolapse Surgery | 2027-06-30 |
Add all 8 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 195 studies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
This study is a prospective cohort study which aims to assess patient satisfaction and preparedness for surgery through two methods of preoperative counseling: standard individual phone calls versus virtual group sessions called Shared Medical Appointments (SMAs). The study will focus on patients undergoing urogynecology prolapse surgeries at Cleveland Clinic. Researchers hypothesize that virtual group counseling will improve patient satisfaction and preparedness compared to individual phone calls. Additionally, the study will evaluate healthcare resource utilization as a secondary outcome.
Participants will complete surveys before and after surgery to measure satisfaction and preparedness using validated tools. The study will enroll patients aged 18 and older who can provide informed consent and are scheduled for specific prolapse surgeries. Findings may help improve preoperative counseling practices and enhance patient-centered care.
The study titled "Patient Centered Surgery - Preoperative Counseling and Patient Satisfaction" aims to evaluate patient satisfaction and preparedness for surgery based on the method of preoperative counseling provided by the nursing team. The primary aim is to compare patient satisfaction with preoperative nursing visits conducted through virtual shared medical appointments (SMA) versus individual phone calls. It is hypothesized that virtual group calls will improve patient satisfaction compared to phone calls. Secondary aims include comparing patient preparedness for surgery between the two methods and assessing healthcare resource utilization, such as patient-initiated phone calls, unscheduled office visits, emergency room visits, and inpatient readmissions, following urogynecology surgery. It is hypothesized that virtual group calls will enhance patient preparedness and reduce healthcare resource utilization compared to phone calls.
The study will employ a prospective cohort design to evaluate patient satisfaction and preparedness for surgery based on preoperative teaching methods. Participants will be recruited over a 24-month period, with follow-up lasting up to the postoperative appointment, typically scheduled 7-9 weeks after surgery. The study will be conducted from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2028. The primary outcome will be patient satisfaction as measured by the validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18) following preoperative education appointments. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction measured at the 6-8-week postoperative visit, as well as healthcare resource utilization assessed up to 12 weeks following surgery.
Eligibility criteria include patients scheduled for major urogynecology surgeries for apical prolapse at Cleveland Clinic sites. Eligible surgeries include vaginal colpopexy, vaginal hysteropexy, obliterative procedures, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension, with or without accompanying procedures such as hysterectomy, salpingectomy, anterior/posterior colporrhaphy, and mid-urethral sling placement. Participants must be over 18 years of age, have decision-making capacity, and be able to provide informed consent. For the SMA group, patients must have active MyChart access and be able to speak and read English. Patients unable to consent will be excluded.
Study procedures involve screening and recruitment, which will occur during the patient's initial consultation when surgery is recommended. Eligible participants will receive a recruitment letter via MyChart describing the study and providing instructions for accessing the REDCap survey. If no response is received, a follow-up MyChart message will be sent, and investigators may follow up via telephone using a scripted protocol. Participants who opt into the study will complete surveys electronically via REDCap. Preoperative surveys include the PSQ-18 to assess patient satisfaction and the Patient Preparedness Questionnaire (PPQ) to measure preparedness for surgery. Postoperative surveys will consist of the PSQ-18 only. Participants will receive reminders to complete surveys within 48-72 hours after their visits, with no more than two reminders per survey.
Data collection will be conducted using REDCap, with information abstracted from EPIC electronic health records and linked to survey responses. Identifiable data, including medical record numbers and email addresses, will be used for survey distribution and data collection but will be de-identified for analysis. Data will be securely stored on Cleveland Clinic devices and accessed only by investigators approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Statistical analysis will be performed using JMP Pro version 17.0 software, with support from Cleveland Clinic Quantitative Health Sciences. Patient satisfaction scores from the PSQ-18 will be treated as continuous data and analyzed using t-tests to compare mean scores between groups. Healthcare utilization will be analyzed individually and as a composite, while adverse events will be evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo Grading System for surgical complications. Descriptive statistics will summarize demographic and clinical characteristics.
The study aims to recruit approximately 106 participants, with 53 patients per group to achieve 80% power to detect a 5.5-point difference in PSQ-18 scores between groups. Privacy and confidentiality will be prioritized, with all data managed electronically in REDCap and protected by Cleveland Clinic firewalls. Identifiable information will be removed prior to analysis. Findings will be disseminated through presentations at scientific meetings and publications in gynecologic journals. No data sharing will occur, and the study does not require a Data Monitoring Committee as it involves data collection only. Recruitment efforts will include educating surgeons and advanced practice providers about the study during Urogynecology Section Research Meetings.
- Participants will be prospectively identified by the primary surgeon's team during the patient's initial consultation when the decision is made to proceed with surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Patients undergoing preoperative nursing telehealth appointments
Patients undergoing preoperative shared nursing virtual appointments
Patient Satisfaction
The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18) will assess satisfaction. The PSQ-18 is a validated 18-item questionnaire developed to evaluate satisfaction with medical care in seven domains, namely general satisfaction, technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with provider, and accessibility and convenience. Responses are scored on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score for the questionnaire ranges from 18 (dissatisfaction with medical care) to 90 (highest satisfaction with medical care).
Time frame: From enrollment until the postoperative visit, 6-8 weeks after surgery
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 13 months after the start.
Of 55 non-industry observational studies under Pelvic Organ Prolapse, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 13 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 61 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 63.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.