ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07930806Updated Nov 12, 2026

Stryker Photon Blade 3 Outcomes

An observational study in Lumpectomy, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-12.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Observational

Updated Nov 12, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The PhotonBlade 3 Smoke Evacuation device is a monopolar RF device coupled with illumination that is FDA approved and indicated for cutting and coagulation of soft tissue during surgical procedures and for removing smoke generated by electrosurgery when used in conjunction with an effective smoke evacuation system. The device includes a coated electrode at the distal end of a rotatable and extendable shaft (telescope) which delivers monopolar radiofrequency energy for cutting and coagulation of tissue. These devices enable the operator to remotely conduct an electrosurgical current from the output connector of an electrosurgical unit (ESU) to the operative site for the desired surgical effect. The integrated LED-based illumination allows the user to turn on or off the illumination. The integrated smoke evacuation tubing enables the user to evacuate smoke generated by electrosurgery when used in conjunction with an effective smoke evacuation system.

The Photon Blade 3 integrates localized surgical field illumination, simultaneous electrosurgical dissection, and active smoke evacuation. By improving visualization at the point of dissection and reducing smoke plume accumulation, surgeons perform more precise tissue dissection and hemostasis. The Photon Blade 3 device is FDA approved and being used in standard clinical care at Cleveland Clinic per its intended use. Utilization of the Photon Blade 3 expands feasibility of hidden scar lumpectomy approaches without compromising tissue handling. Cosmetic outcome after lumpectomy significantly influences patient satisfaction, body image, and quality of life. Reduced tissue trauma, optimized hemostasis, and improved control of the resection cavity translate into preservation of native breast contour, potentially leading to lower incidence of fat necrosis with less thermal injury, and more discrete scar placement.

The overall goal of this study is to assess the clinical performance and safety of the Photon Blade 3 illuminated electrosurgical device with integrated smoke evacuation, including patient reported outcomes, incorporation of oncoplastic techniques, and surgical field optimization. This study allows for the collection of data from cases where the device is already being used in standard clinical care in accordance with its FDA approved indication.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumpectomy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 832 studies on the registry; 120 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

lumpectomy for benign or atypical disease

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • any adult patient (18 years of age or older) undergoing lumpectomy for benign or atypical disease with PI as surgeon at Avon or Fairview Hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Degree of clinical performance assess at the time of surgery by the operative success rate and occurrence of intraoperative complications.

    Operative success determined by whether target lesion was excised.

    Time frame: time of surgery

  2. Postoperative complication rate assessed by the occurrence of pre-specified AE's at 3 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, 45 days post-op and 90 days post-op.

    The pre-specified AE's are seromas, hematomas, wound dehiscence and surgical site infections requiring antibiotics.

    Time frame: up to 90 days post-op

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 11 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 21, 2026
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 2027
Last update
Nov 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 12, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 12, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07930806
Collaborators
Stryker Instruments
Responsible party
Chaise Brewer (Research Coordinator, The Cleveland Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 12, 2026

Study contacts

Research Coordinator
Contact
brewerc3@ccf.org
216-672-2131

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion