ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07463235SPARAGMOSUpdated Mar 13, 2026

Safety and Potency of a High Cabergoline Dosage in Microprolactinomas

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cabergoline and Cabergoline in Prolactinoma and Prolactin Excess, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Recruiting at 16 sites in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-13.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This will be a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial with women harboring microprolactinomas and treatment naïve. The sample will be added consecutively and randomized into 2 unblinded groups: the high dosage group will receive a high cabergoline (CAB) dose for a period of \~6 months vs the standard dosage group, which will use the lowest needed dose of CAB to achieve normoprolactinemia for 2 years. The primary outcome will be remission rate.

Read the detailed description

Prolactinoma is the most common subtype of pituitary adenoma, and dopamine agonists are the gold standard for treatment, primarily CAB. The SPARAGMOS trial will be an interventional, randomized, open-label, multicenter study utilizing a high dose of CAB for \~6 months to suppress prolactin levels, with the hypothetical goal of achieving greater tumor apoptosis and remission rates. The control group will receive CAB for two years at the lowest dose necessary to achieve normoprolactinemia, as per current guidelines. Of note, for both groups, the final cumulative dose will be similar. The findings from this trial have the potential to inform and redefine future therapeutic strategies for microprolactinoma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prolactinoma
  • Prolactin Excess

Keywords

  • cabergoline
  • prolactinoma
  • remission
03

In context

Prolactinoma

28 studies on the registry are indexed under Prolactinoma; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 55 across 14 interventional studies indexed under Prolactinoma.

Browse Prolactinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 611 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1. Willing and able to provide written prior to any study-related procedures
  • 2. Adults >18 years old
  • 3. Pre-menopausal women
  • 4. Presence of signs and symptoms matching prolactinoma
  • 5. Hyperprolactinemia, defined as a prolactin (PRL) level ≥2 times the local laboratory maximum level of normality, present at the time of enrolment
  • 6. Presence of an identifiable pituitary mass on MRI with a maximum diameter of less than 1cm, independently of Knosp/invasiveness of the cavernous sinus
  • 7. Treatment naïve
  • 8. Females who engage in heterosexual intercourse must agree to use either a highly effective or a clinically acceptable method of from the beginning of screening to the last study visit, which will include:
  • Hysterectomy or bilateral salpingectomy
  • Bilateral tubal occlusion or ligation
  • Vasectomized partner
  • Intrauterine device (copper or hormonal)
  • Progestogen-only contraception (oral, injectable or implantable)
  • Male or female condom with or without spermicide
  • Sexual abstinence (only when it is the usual and preferred lifestyle of the subject)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. History of primary hyperparathyroidism
  • 2. Use of combined hormonal within the past 4 weeks
  • 3. Pregnancy or current pregnancy desire
  • 4. Prolactinoma associated with a known genetic syndrome
  • 5. Familial history of pituitary adenoma
  • 6. Renal failure (estimated \<30 mL/min /1.73m2)
  • 7. IGF-1 level above the age-adjusted normal range of the local laboratory (IGF 1 >1x ULNR)
  • 8. Idiopathic hyperprolactinemia (normal MRI) or presence of macroprolactinemia
  • 9. Concomitant mental condition rendering her unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study, and/or decompensated psychiatric disease (i.e. gambling or severe obsessive-compulsive disorder), as judged by the Investigator
  • 10. Chronic use of drugs related to hyperprolactinemia (such as metoclopramide, methyldopa, ranitidine, and opioid-related analgesics)
  • 11. Resistant prolactinoma, defined as non-normalization of PRL levels with 2mg/w of CAB
  • 12. Patients in the high dosage group who did not use 3.5mg/w of CAB for an entire 6 months (due to intolerance or non-compliance) or failed to achieve the target dose for any other reason
  • 13. Active malignant disease within the last 5 years, except basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin with complete local excision
  • 14. Any decompensated chronic condition (i.e. heart failure 3-4, diabetes with >8.5%, hypothyroidism with TSH >10 mIU/L) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would impede compliance, hinder completion of the study, compromise the well-being of the patient, or interfere with the study outcomes
  • 15. Male sex
  • 16. Cushing stigmas (moon face, muscle weakness, red striation) or suspicious
  • 17. Prior radiotherapy of the pituitary gland area for any reason
  • 18. Additional pituitary tumor-directed therapy, including temozolomide, everolimus, lapatinib, or cytotoxic chemotherapy
  • 19. Hepatopathy with /TGO or ALT/TGP >3x the upper limit of normality
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HIGH CAB dose

    Drug: Cabergoline

  • Active comparator
    Conventional therapy

    Drug: Cabergoline

Interventions

  • Patients eligible for the study and randomized to the HIGH CAB arm will start oral CAB, 1 pill of 0.5mg, once a week. The dose will be increased by 0.5mg every week until the target dose of 3.5 mg/w. This initial low-dose-escalating regimen of 7 weeks will be used to prevent symptoms of intolerance. When 3.5 mg/w (1 pill every day) is reached, the patient must maintain this dose for 6 months. After this period, a 1-month de-escalation regime is implemented, reducing the dose by 1 mg/w (2 pills per week) until discontinuation.

  • The standard dosage group will receive conventional treatment as recommended by current guidelines: a low dose of CAB enough to achieve normoPRL for 2 years. All patients will start CAB with 1 pill (0.5mg) once a week. The CAB dose can be adjusted during visits if hyperPRL is not resolved (maximum dose 2mg/w to prevent inclusion of resistant cases). The expected dose used for this arm during follow-up is between 0.5 and 1 mg/w. After completion of 2 years of treatment, all patients will have CAB withdrawn, irrespective of tumor reduction, PRL levels or last CAB dose used.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Remission

    Compare laboratory and clinical recurrence of hyperPRL at 3, 6 and 12 months after CAB treatment in the high dosage group vs the standard dosage group (conventional treatment). Laboratory recurrence will be characterized after withdrawal from CAB treatment by the presence of PRL levels above 2x the normal upper limit of reference, after a previous period where PRL levels were within the normal range. At least two separate serum samples are needed to confirm recurrence. The time between samples will be more than a week to ensure sustained elevation. Clinical recurrence will be defined as the recrudescence of symptomatic hyperPRL.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment

07

Study locations

15 of 16 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 17 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 4, 2026
First posted
Mar 11, 2026
StartActual
Mar 4, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 20, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 20, 2029
Last update
Mar 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07463235
Responsible party
Andrea Glezer (MD, PhD, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2026
Start date
Mar 4, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 20, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 13, 2026

Study contacts

Andrea Glezer, MD, PhD
Contact
andrea.glezer@hc.fm.usp.br
55 11 995791108

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cabergoline

Start the discussion