ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07434791GOLD-STANDARDUpdated Sep 4, 2026

Goal-Directed Therapy to Reduce Kidney and Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetic Kidney Disease (GOLD-STANDARD)

An interventional study of Early goal-directed Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) care and Standard care (Comparison arm) in Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Chronic Kidney Disease, sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.

Sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 34 studies in Diabetic Nephropathies with a site in Canada — 5 open to participants now, 5 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Diabetic Nephropathies · Canada.

Planned enrollment
24th of 31
100 · median 226
Started
2026
with 1 other
No phase
3 of 34
2 open now
Registered
34th of 34
by date

Among the 34 studies in Diabetic Nephropathies with a site in Canada, this one is the 24th largest by planned enrollment of the 31 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2026, is one of 3 with no phase, and was the 34th registered.

Diabetic Nephropathies

543 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Nephropathies; 110 are open to participants now.

Browse Diabetic Nephropathies studies →

Open to participants now

5 of the 34 studies in Diabetic Nephropathies with a site in Canada are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 5 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Canada have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Canada →

Who these studies take

Of the 50 Diabetic Nephropathies studies recruiting now, 23 (46%) set no upper age limit and 16 (32%) stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; 8 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 34 studies in Diabetic Nephropathies with a site in Canada, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

GOLD-STANDARD is a pragmatic, open-label pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating the feasibility, safety, and implementation of an early goal-directed Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) care strategy compared with usual care in adults with type 2 diabetes and diabetic kidney disease who are at increased cardiovascular risk. Participants will be followed for 12 months to assess treatment uptake, adherence, retention, and safety outcomes, and to inform the design of a future definitive trial.

Read the detailed description

The GOLD-STANDARD study will evaluate the feasibility of an early, goal-directed Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) care strategy that integrates kidney, cardiovascular, and metabolic risk management within routine nephrology practice. Using a pragmatic randomized design, the study will assess whether a structured approach to CKM care can be implemented safely and effectively within Ontario's healthcare system.

The primary objective of this pilot study is to evaluate feasibility, including recruitment, retention, treatment implementation, and adherence. Safety and treatment uptake measures will also be assessed over 12 months of follow-up. Findings from this study will inform the design and conduct of a future large-scale trial evaluating the impact of early CKM care on clinical kidney and cardiovascular outcomes.

03

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD)
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
  • Chronic Kidney Disease

Keywords

  • diabetes
  • diabetic kidney disease
  • cardiovascular risk
  • Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) care
  • CKM Care
  • Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. T2DM
  3. CKD ( ≥ 25-60 mL/min/1.73 m² OR UACR ≥ 30 mg/g) - on screening labs
  4. High Cardiovascular (CV) Risk: Defined as a history of prior myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or peripheral artery disease (PAD), or the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, (specifically age 40 years or older and at least one of the following: cholesterol above target (LDL≥1.8 mmol/L OR on cholesterol lowering medication - within past 24 months), hypertension (≥130/80 mmHg or on BPLMs), or atrial fibrillation.)
  5. Open to start new medications

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Type 1 diabetes
  2. ≥10% within past 12 months
  3. Serum potassium ≥ 5.2 mmol/L on screening labs
  4. Baseline Blood Pressure (BP) \< 100/60 mmHg at screening
  5. Treated with new or intensified therapy for new (or relapse/flare of pre-existing) kidney disease within the last 60 days
  6. Kidney Transplant
  7. In the opinion of the investigator, currently treated with maximum tolerated dose of ≥3 medication classes:: RASi, SGLT2i, nsMRA or GLP1RA
  8. Currently prescribed all 4 medication classes : RASi, SGLT2i, nsMRA or GLP1RA
  9. Intolerance or allergy to any of RASi, SGLT2i, nsMRA or GLP1RA
  10. Known Heart Failure with Reduced (HFrEF)
  11. Current pregnancy, lactation or women of , unless using highly effective
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early Goal-Directed Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Care

    Participants receive a nephrologist-led, goal-directed Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) care strategy that includes risk assessment, shared decision-making, guideline-directed therapies, and ongoing safety monitoring.

    Other: Early goal-directed Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) care

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Participants receive standard nephrology care according to routine clinical practice and the judgment of the treating clinician.

    Other: Standard care (Comparison arm)

Interventions

  • OtherEarly goal-directed Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) care

    Participants will be referred to a nephrologist and receive a structured Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) care strategy that includes iterative assessment of kidney and cardiovascular risk, early shared decision-making regarding guideline-directed medical therapies (RASi, SGLT2i, nsMRA, and GLP-1 RA), and close monitoring of treatment implementation, tolerability, and adverse effects throughout the study follow-up period.

  • OtherStandard care (Comparison arm)

    Participants will receive standard nephrology care according to routine clinical practice. Medication initiation and adjustment will be based on clinician judgment and relevant clinical parameters, with treatments introduced incrementally as part of usual care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of the pivotal Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

    Percentage of consenting participants who are eligible and randomized. Feasibility is defined as ≥40% of consented and screened participants meeting criteria and being randomized.

    Time frame: From consent through completion of screening procedures to randomization (maximum 60 days).

  2. Prescription and Adherence to Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)

    Determined based on the percentage of people prescribed and adherent to GDMT at 12 months when assessed on an ordinal scale from 1 to 4 medications.

    Time frame: 12 months after randomization (±45-day window).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Declined/ Unable to Receive Treatment - RASi

    Percentage of participants in the intervention group who were recommended a RASi prescription and did not receive treatment for any reason. Participants meeting any of the following criteria are counted toward this single percentage: * Declined due to patient preference * Unable to obtain due to access barriers * Not initiated or titrated to avoid anticipated side effects Unit of Measure: Percent (%)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

  2. Declined or Unable to Receive Treatment- SGLT2i

    Percentage of participants in the intervention group who were recommended a SGLT2i prescription and did not receive treatment for any reason. Participants meeting any of the following criteria are counted toward this single percentage: * Declined due to patient preference * Unable to obtain due to access barriers * Not initiated or titrated to avoid anticipated side effects Unit of Measure: Percent (%)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

  3. Declined or Unable to Receive Treatment - nsMRA

    Percentage of participants in the intervention group who were recommended an nsMRA prescription and did not receive treatment for any reason. Participants meeting any of the following criteria are counted toward this single percentage: * Declined due to patient preference * Unable to obtain due to access barriers * Not initiated or titrated to avoid anticipated side effects Unit of Measure: Percent (%)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

  4. Declined or Unable to Receive Treatment - GLP1RA

    Percentage of participants in the intervention group who were recommended an GLP1RA prescription and did not receive treatment for any reason. Participants meeting any of the following criteria are counted toward this single percentage: * Declined due to patient preference * Unable to obtain due to access barriers * Not initiated or titrated to avoid anticipated side effects Unit of Measure: Percent (%)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

  5. Loss to follow-up

    Percentage of participants who are lost to follow-up from baseline through 12 months post-randomization. The target for loss to follow-up is \<10% over the duration of the study. Unit of Measure: Percent (%)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

  6. BMI

    Change in body mass index (BMI) from baseline to 12 months. Calculated as 12-month value minus baseline value. Unit of Measure: kg/m²

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  7. Waist circumference

    Change in waist circumference from baseline to 12 months. Calculated as 12-month value minus baseline value. Unit of Measure: cm

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  8. Hip circumference

    Change in hip circumference from baseline to 12 months. Calculated as 12-month value minus baseline value. Unit of Measure: cm

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  9. Waist-to-hip ratio

    Change in waist-to-hip ratio from baseline to 12 months. Calculated as 12-month value minus baseline value. Unit of Measure: Ratio (unitless)

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  10. Blood pressure

    Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months. Calculated as 12-month value minus baseline value. Unit of Measure: mmHg

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  11. Change in Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (UACR)

    Change in UACR from baseline to 12 months. Change will be calculated as 12-month value minus baseline value. Unit of Measure: mg/g

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  12. Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

    Change in eGFR from baseline to 12 months. Change will be calculated as the 12-month value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: 12 months post-randomization (visit window ±45 days).

  13. All-cause mortality

    Death from any cause occurring from baseline to 12 months post-randomization. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  14. Hospitalization for myocardial infarction

    Any hospitalization for myocardial infarction occurring from baseline to 12 months post-randomization. Both incident and recurrent events will be captured. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  15. Hospitalization for stroke

    Any hospitalization for stroke occurring from baseline to 12 months post-randomization. Both incident and recurrent events will be captured. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  16. Hospitalization for heart failure

    Any hospitalization for heart failure occurring from baseline to 12 months post-randomization. Both incident and recurrent events will be captured. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window)

  17. All-cause hospitalization

    Any hospitalization for any cause occurring from randomization to 12 months post-randomization. Ascertainment via Connecting Ontario administrative health data. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: From randomization through 12 months post-randomization (visit windows ±45 days)

  18. Hospitalization for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)

    Any hospitalization for DKA occurring from randomization to 12 months post-randomization. Ascertainment via Connecting Ontario administrative health data. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: From randomization through 12 months post-randomization (visit windows ±45 days)

  19. Hyperkalemia requiring medication discontinuation or dose reduction

    Occurrence of hyperkalemia leading to discontinuation or dose reduction of study medications (RASi, SGLT2i, nsMRA, GLP1RA) from randomization to 12 months post-randomization. Ascertainment via review of clinic notes and medication records. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: From randomization through 12 months post-randomization (visit windows ±45 days)

  20. eGFR dip requiring medication discontinuation or dose reduction

    Occurrence of an eGFR decline requiring discontinuation or dose reduction of study medications from randomization to 12 months post-randomization. Ascertainment via review of clinic notes and medication records. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: From randomization through 12 months post-randomization (visit windows ±45 days)

  21. Symptomatic hypotension requiring medication discontinuation or dose reduction

    Occurrence of symptomatic hypotension (SBP \<90 mmHg) leading to discontinuation or dose reduction of study medications from randomization to 12 months post-randomization. Ascertainment via review of clinic notes and medication records. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: From randomization through 12 months post-randomization (visit windows ±45 days)

  22. All-cause medication discontinuation

    Discontinuation of any study medication for any reason from randomization to 12 months post-randomization. Ascertainment via review of clinic notes and medication records. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: From randomization through 12 months post-randomization (visit windows ±45 days)

  23. Medication Prescription

    a) % of participants prescribed maximum indicated dose of RASi

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

  24. Medication Prescription

    b) % of participants prescribed maximum indicated dose of SGLT2i

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

  25. Medication Prescription

    c) % of participants prescribed maximum indicated dose of nsMRA

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

  26. Medication Prescription

    d) % of participants prescribed maximum indicated dose of GLP1RA (oral)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

  27. Medication Prescription

    e) % of participants prescribed maximum indicated dose of GLP1RA (subcutaneous)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization (±45-day visit window).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shin JI, Xu Y, Chang AR, Carrero JJ, Flaherty CM, Mukhopadhyay A, Inker LA, Blecker SB, Horwitz LI, Grams ME. Prescription Patterns for Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in U.S. Health Systems. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Aug 20;84(8):683-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.057. PubMed 39142721 ↗
  • Mata-Cases M, Franch-Nadal J, Gratacos M, Mauricio D. Therapeutic Inertia: Still a Long Way to Go That Cannot Be Postponed. Diabetes Spectr. 2020 Feb;33(1):50-57. doi: 10.2337/ds19-0018. PubMed 32116454 ↗
  • Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, Cohen-Solal A, Diaz R, Filippatos G, Metra M, Ponikowski P, Sliwa K, Voors AA, Edwards C, Novosadova M, Takagi K, Damasceno A, Saidu H, Gayat E, Pang PS, Celutkiene J, Cotter G. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet. 2022 Dec 3;400(10367):1938-1952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02076-1. Epub 2022 Nov 7. PubMed 36356631 ↗
  • Savovic J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Juni P, Pildal J, Als-Nielsen B, Balk EM, Gluud C, Gluud LL, Ioannidis JP, Schulz KF, Beynon R, Welton NJ, Wood L, Moher D, Deeks JJ, Sterne JA. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 18;157(6):429-38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537. PubMed 22945832 ↗
  • Campbell MJ, Julious SA, Altman DG. Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons. BMJ. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1145-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1145. PubMed 7580713 ↗
  • Ong SW, Kitchlu A, Cherney DZI, Leung K, Chan CTM. Virtual Pharmacy: An Integrated Collaborative Redesign Targeting Medication-Related Problems in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Am J Nephrol. 2024;55(2):206-213. doi: 10.1159/000535094. Epub 2023 Nov 8. PubMed 37939689 ↗
  • Lee JF, Berzan E, Sridhar VS, Odutayo A, Cherney DZI. Cardiorenal Protection in Diabetic Kidney Disease. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021 Apr;36(2):256-269. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2021.987. Epub 2021 Apr 19. PubMed 33873265 ↗
  • Sridhar VS, Dubrofsky L, Boulet J, Cherney DZ. Making a case for the combined use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists for cardiorenal protection. J Bras Nefrol. 2020 Oct-Dec;42(4):467-477. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2020-0100. PubMed 32926067 ↗
  • Albakr RB, Sridhar VS, Cherney DZI. Novel Therapies in Diabetic Kidney Disease and Risk of Hyperkalemia: A Review of the Evidence From Clinical Trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Dec;82(6):737-742. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.04.015. Epub 2023 Jul 29. PubMed 37517546 ↗
  • Yau K, Odutayo A, Dash S, Cherney DZI. Biology and Clinical Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Vascular Protection. Can J Cardiol. 2023 Dec;39(12):1816-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.07.007. Epub 2023 Jul 8. PubMed 37429523 ↗
  • Yau K, Dharia A, Alrowiyti I, Cherney DZI. Prescribing SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With CKD: Expanding Indications and Practical Considerations. Kidney Int Rep. 2022 May 5;7(7):1463-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.094. eCollection 2022 Jul. PubMed 35812300 ↗
  • Green JB, Mottl AK, Bakris G, Heerspink HJL, Mann JFE, McGill JB, Nangaku M, Rossing P, Scott C, Gay A, Agarwal R. Design of the COmbinatioN effect of FInerenone anD EmpaglifloziN in participants with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes using a UACR Endpoint study (CONFIDENCE). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Mar 31;38(4):894-903. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac198. PubMed 35700142 ↗
  • Brahmbhatt DH, Ross HJ, O'Sullivan M, Artanian V, Mueller B, Runeckles K, Steve Fan CP, Rac VE, Seto E; Medly Titrate Study Team. The Effect of Using a Remote Patient Management Platform in Optimizing Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;12(4):678-690. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.02.008. PubMed 38569821 ↗
  • Bakris GL, Agarwal R, Anker SD, Pitt B, Ruilope LM, Rossing P, Kolkhof P, Nowack C, Schloemer P, Joseph A, Filippatos G; FIDELIO-DKD Investigators. Effect of Finerenone on Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 3;383(23):2219-2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2025845. Epub 2020 Oct 23. PubMed 33264825 ↗
  • Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, Bompoint S, Heerspink HJL, Charytan DM, Edwards R, Agarwal R, Bakris G, Bull S, Cannon CP, Capuano G, Chu PL, de Zeeuw D, Greene T, Levin A, Pollock C, Wheeler DC, Yavin Y, Zhang H, Zinman B, Meininger G, Brenner BM, Mahaffey KW; CREDENCE Trial Investigators. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2295-2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744. Epub 2019 Apr 14. PubMed 30990260 ↗
  • American Diabetes Association. Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S1-S2. doi: 10.2337/dc22-Sint. No abstract available. PubMed 34964812 ↗
  • Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group. KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2022 Nov;102(5S):S1-S127. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.008. No abstract available. PubMed 36272764 ↗
  • Agarwal R, Rossing P, Mann JFE. Finerenone with Empagliflozin in Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2025 Oct 30;393(17):1755. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2513088. No abstract available. PubMed 41160832 ↗
  • Apperloo EM, Neuen BL, Fletcher RA, Jongs N, Anker SD, Bhatt DL, Butler J, Cherney DZI, Herrington WG, Inzucchi SE, Jardine MJ, Liu CC, Mahaffey KW, McGuire DK, McMurray JJV, Neal B, Packer M, Perkovic V, Sabatine MS, Solomon SD, Staplin N, Szarek M, Vaduganathan M, Wanner C, Wheeler DC, Wiviott SD, Zannad F, Heerspink HJL. Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors with and without glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: a SMART-C collaborative meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Aug;12(8):545-557. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00155-4. Epub 2024 Jul 8. PubMed 38991584 ↗
  • Neuen BL, Fletcher RA, Heath L, Perkovic A, Vaduganathan M, Badve SV, Tuttle KR, Pratley R, Gerstein HC, Perkovic V, Heerspink HJL. Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Safety Outcomes With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Alone and in Combination With SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circulation. 2024 Nov 26;150(22):1781-1790. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071689. Epub 2024 Aug 30. PubMed 39210781 ↗
  • Afkarian M, Sachs MC, Kestenbaum B, Hirsch IB, Tuttle KR, Himmelfarb J, de Boer IH. Kidney disease and increased mortality risk in type 2 diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Feb;24(2):302-8. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012070718. Epub 2013 Jan 29. PubMed 23362314 ↗
  • Lemley KV, Abdullah I, Myers BD, Meyer TW, Blouch K, Smith WE, Bennett PH, Nelson RG. Evolution of incipient nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int. 2000 Sep;58(3):1228-37. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00223.x. PubMed 10972685 ↗
  • Mathiesen ER, Ronn B, Storm B, Foght H, Deckert T. The natural course of microalbuminuria in insulin-dependent diabetes: a 10-year prospective study. Diabet Med. 1995 Jun;12(6):482-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00528.x. PubMed 7648820 ↗
  • Chu L, Fuller M, Jervis K, Ciaccia A, Abitbol A. Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: The Canadian REgistry of Chronic Kidney Disease in Diabetes Outcomes (CREDO) Study. Clin Ther. 2021 Sep;43(9):1558-1573. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Aug 21. PubMed 34426012 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Yes - after publication of planned analyses by study leadership, de-identified individual participant data may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to review and approval by the study investigators and any applicable data-sharing agreements.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Sep 2028, 25 months later.

Of 49 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetic Nephropathies, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 25 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 50 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 18, 2025
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 26, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 2029
Last update
Sep 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07434791
Collaborators
The Kidney Foundation of Canada, Novo Nordisk A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
Start date
Aug 26, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2026

Study contacts

Ayodele Odutayo, Doctor
Contact
ayodele.odutayo@sunnybrook.ca
416-480-6100
GOLD STANDARD Coordinating Centre
Contact
GOLD-STANDARD@sunnybrook.ca
416-480-6100

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion