ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07430345Updated Jun 29, 2026

Buprenorphine for Analgesia in Older Adults With Acute Fractures in the Emergency Department

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Buprenorphine 0.15 MG and Hydromorphone 0.25 mg IV in Fracture, sponsored by The Cooper Health System. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-29.

Sponsored by The Cooper Health System · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if buprenorphine can treat pain in older adults who have broken bones. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is buprenorphine as effective as opioids to treat pain? Are there less side effects with buprenorphine? Researchers will compare buprenorphine and hydromorphone to see if there are differences in pain control and side effects.

Participants will be given one of the two study drugs after breaking a bone and asked about their pain scores and side effects for the next 48 hours.

Read the detailed description

Older adults are prone to fractures but are less likely to receive adequate analgesia in the Emergency Department (ED)due to concerns for side effects including respiratory depression, sedation, delirium, and constipation, however untreated pain can induce delirium, decrease satisfaction, and impede functional recovery. Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist with analgesic properties, does not require dosing changes in renal or hepatic insufficiency, and may have a ceiling on respiratory depression. Prior studies have demonstrated similar or improved efficacy compared to full agonist opioids in treating acutely painful conditions, however older adults are underrepresented or excluded as a population in this research and have unique considerations due to polypharmacy, comorbidities, and aging physiology, leaving a gap in knowledge for this population.

This proposal will test the hypothesis that buprenorphine is a feasible intervention that is as effective as full-agonist opioids for the treatment of acute pain in older adults but with reduced adverse drug events, with the long-term goal to improve pain control in older adults in acute settings. Demonstrating safety of buprenorphine to manage older adults experiencing acute pain could improve emergency care, reduce adverse events associated with full agonist opioids, and improve patient satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fracture

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • buprenorphine
  • geriatric
  • analgesia
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

723 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 48 is below the median of 80 across 458 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cooper Health System is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 65 years or older
  • Emergency Department patient
  • Diagnosis of suspected or confirmed acute fracture
  • Numerical Rating Scale 4 or greater at time of presentation
  • Must be able to give or have a surrogate decisionmaker to provide informed consent
  • Subjects who may require a surgical procedure are eligible for enrollment, as given the low dose of buprenorphine, this is not anticipated to affect future anesthesia. If additional pain control is needed for surgical procedure, full agonist opioid can be used without .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of opioid use disorder
  • Participants taking chronic opioid therapy (defined as opioids taken during the past month)
  • Allergy to study medications
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring immediate resuscitation
  • Inability to consent and absence of surrogate decisionmaker
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Hydromorphone

    0.25mg hydromorphone IV given every 15 minutes as needed for numerical pain score 4 or greater for a maximum of three doses

    Drug: Hydromorphone 0.25 mg IV

  • Experimental
    Buprenorphine

    0.15mg buprenorphine IV given every 15 minutes as needed for numerical pain score 4 or greater for a maximum of three doses

    Drug: Buprenorphine 0.15 MG

Interventions

  • given every 15 minutes as needed for numerical pain score 4 or greater for a maximum of three doses

  • given every 15 minutes as needed for numerical pain score 4 or greater for a maximum of three doses

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in pain scores

    Difference in pain scores measured on the numerical rating scale (scale of 0-10, with 10 being maximum pain and 0 being no pain), collected on arrival and measured at one hour and four hours after medication administration

    Time frame: 4 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with adverse events

    Gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea, including by inferring from antiemetic administration; respiratory depression; and delirium. Delirium will be assessed at least 8 hours after enrollment and first dose of medication and within 48 hours. Presence of delirium is determined by a positive Brief Confusional Assessment Method (bCAM) screen. Patients will also be interviewed about other adverse effects at the time of delirium assessment.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  2. Number of patients requiring naloxone

    Need for naloxone administration

    Time frame: 4 hours

  3. Number of patients who receive rescue medications

    Administration of rescue medications (yes/no)

    Time frame: 4 hours

  4. Total oral morphine equivalents

    Administered in the ED

    Time frame: 8 hours

  5. Mortality

    Mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Selman K, Perelman S, Blatcher C, Fett D, Adams A, Roberts B. Buprenorphine for acute pain in older adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2024 Dec 1;25(12):691-702. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae064. PubMed 39024042 ↗
  • Albaqami MS, Alqarni AA, Alabeesy MS, Alotaibi AN, Alharbi HA, Alshammari MM, Aldhfery AH. Buprenorphine for acute post-surgical pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi J Anaesth. 2023 Jan-Mar;17(1):65-71. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_822_22. Epub 2023 Jan 2. PubMed 37032687 ↗
  • White LD, Hodge A, Vlok R, Hurtado G, Eastern K, Melhuish TM. Efficacy and adverse effects of buprenorphine in acute pain management: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):668-678. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.086. Epub 2017 Dec 2. PubMed 29576108 ↗
  • Jalili M, Fathi M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Zehtabchi S. Sublingual buprenorphine in acute pain management: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;59(4):276-80. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.10.021. Epub 2011 Nov 23. PubMed 22115823 ↗
  • Saini M, Samanta J, Kumar A, Choudhury A, Dhar J, Jafra A, Chauhan R, Muktesh G, Gupta P, Gupta V, Yadav TD, Kochhar R, Capurso G, De-Madaria E, Facciorusso A. Buprenorphine Versus Diclofenac for Pain Relief in Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar;22(3):532-541.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Nov 3. PubMed 37924855 ↗
  • Dahan A, Yassen A, Romberg R, Sarton E, Teppema L, Olofsen E, Danhof M. Buprenorphine induces ceiling in respiratory depression but not in analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006 May;96(5):627-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael051. Epub 2006 Mar 17. PubMed 16547090 ↗
  • Boger RH. Renal impairment: a challenge for opioid treatment? The role of buprenorphine. Palliat Med. 2006;20 Suppl 1:s17-23. PubMed 16764217 ↗
  • Hale M, Garofoli M, Raffa RB. Benefit-Risk Analysis of Buprenorphine for Pain Management. J Pain Res. 2021 May 24;14:1359-1369. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S305146. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34079354 ↗
  • Coe MA, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL. Buprenorphine Pharmacology Review: Update on Transmucosal and Long-acting Formulations. J Addict Med. 2019 Mar/Apr;13(2):93-103. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000457. PubMed 30531584 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — There is not a plan to make individual participant data collected in this study available at this time given the small sample size. The authors may be contacted at any time to discuss further.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 7 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 18, 2026
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
StartActual
May 7, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 2027
Last update
Jun 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07430345
Lead sponsor
The Cooper Health System
Responsible party
Katherine Selman (Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, The Cooper Health System) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
Start date
May 7, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 29, 2026

Study contacts

Katherine E Selman, MD
Contact
selman-katherine@cooperhealth.edu
856-342-2627

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Buprenorphine

Start the discussion