ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07420374ARTIFICEUpdated Mar 31, 2026

Ambulatory Stroke Unit Treatment for Elderly Patients

An interventional study of Ambulatory Stroke Unit Care and Conventional Stroke Unit Care in Ischemic Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Retinal Ischemia, sponsored by University Hospital Heidelberg. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by University Hospital Heidelberg · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ARTIFICE is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, exploratory non-inferiority trial evaluating whether an ambulatory stroke unit model (aSU) is non-inferior to conventional inpatient stroke unit care (SU) in patients aged 60 years or older with acute ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or retinal ischemia and non-disabling neurological deficits.

Eligible patients are randomized 1:1 to same-day comprehensive ambulatory multiprofessional stroke evaluation (aSU) or guideline-based inpatient stroke unit treatment (SU). The primary endpoint is favorable functional outcome at 90 days, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 or return to pre-stroke mRS. Endpoint assessment at 90 days is performed by blinded assessors (PROBE design).

Secondary outcomes include early neurological deterioration, recurrent stroke, delirium, mortality, health-related quality of life, healthcare utilization, and cost-effectiveness. A mixed-methods process evaluation examines feasibility, acceptability, and implementation aspects of the ambulatory care model.

Read the detailed description

Stroke unit treatment in Germany is currently organized as multi-day inpatient care regardless of stroke severity. However, a substantial proportion of patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack present with non-disabling or fully regressed neurological deficits and may not require prolonged inpatient monitoring. At the same time, demographic changes and increasing stroke incidence in older populations challenge inpatient stroke unit capacity and resource allocation.

International experience with structured outpatient TIA and minor stroke clinics suggests that ambulatory management models may provide comparable clinical safety while reducing hospital utilization. However, randomized evidence for such models within the German healthcare system is lacking.

The ARTIFICE trial evaluates a structured ambulatory stroke unit care model designed to provide comprehensive same-day multiprofessional assessment and initiation of secondary prevention while maintaining patient safety. The study investigates whether this ambulatory care approach can represent a medically safe and resource-efficient alternative to conventional inpatient stroke unit treatment in selected older patients.

In addition to clinical effectiveness, the study examines patient-reported outcomes, healthcare utilization, cost-effectiveness, and implementation aspects to inform future health services planning.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ischemic Stroke
  • Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
  • Retinal Ischemia

Keywords

  • Ambulatory Stroke Unit
  • Stroke Unit Care
  • Minor Stroke
  • Transient Ischemic Attack
  • Geriatric Stroke
  • Non-Inferiority Trial
  • Health Services Research
  • Care Delivery Model
  • Integrated Stroke Care
  • Post-Stroke Outcome
  • Modified Rankin Scale
  • Quality of Life
  • Cost-Effectiveness
  • Stroke Recurrence
  • Delirium
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 120 across 1,776 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Heidelberg is the lead sponsor of 177 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke (ICD-10 I63.), (G45.), or retinal ischemia (H34.*)
  • Symptom onset ≤ 7 days before enrollment
  • No or non-disabling newly occurring neurological deficit allowing safe ambulatory management
  • Written provided by the participant or, if lacking decision-making capacity, by a legally authorized representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requirement for urgent surgical or interventional secondary prevention (e.g., carotid revascularization)
  • Fluctuating stroke symptoms within the previous 48 hours
  • Acute febrile infection or isolation-requiring infectious disease
  • dysphagia with high aspiration risk
  • Critical medical or nursing findings requiring mandatory multi-day inpatient treatment
  • Palliative care situation with limitation of acute diagnostic or therapeutic measures
  • Previous participation in the ambulatory stroke unit care model
  • No statutory health insurance coverage in Germany
  • Insufficient German language proficiency to understand study procedures and assessments
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ambulatory Stroke Unit Care (aSU)

    Participants receive structured ambulatory stroke unit care consisting of comprehensive same-day multiprofessional assessment, diagnostic evaluation, and initiation of secondary prevention. After evaluation, clinically stable participants are discharged home with structured follow-up.

    Other: Ambulatory Stroke Unit Care

  • Active comparator
    Inpatient Stroke Unit Care (SU)

    Participants receive guideline-based inpatient stroke unit treatment according to standard clinical practice, including monitoring and diagnostic evaluation during hospital admission.

    Other: Conventional Stroke Unit Care

Interventions

  • OtherAmbulatory Stroke Unit Care

    Structured ambulatory stroke care model providing same-day neurological assessment, diagnostic work-up, therapeutic evaluation, and multidisciplinary case review, followed by discharge home if medically appropriate.

  • OtherConventional Stroke Unit Care

    Standard inpatient stroke unit treatment according to national clinical guidelines, including hospital-based monitoring, diagnostic evaluation, and initiation of secondary prevention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Favorable Functional Outcome at 90 Days

    Favorable functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 or return to pre-stroke mRS level, assessed by blinded outcome assessors.

    Time frame: 90 days (±14 days) after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Early Neurological Deterioration

    Increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥4 points compared to baseline.

    Time frame: Within 7 days after randomization

  2. Recurrent Stroke

    Occurrence of recurrent ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or transient ischemic attack during follow-up.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after randomization (primary safety observation period)

  3. Delirium Occurrence

    Occurrence of delirium assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).

    Time frame: Within 7 days after randomization

  4. All-Cause Mortality

    Death from any cause.

    Time frame: 90 days and 12 months after randomization

  5. Functional Status

    Change in Barthel Index score from baseline to 90 days.

    Time frame: Baseline and 90 days

  6. Stroke Impact

    Change in SIS-16 score from baseline to 90 days.

    Time frame: Baseline and 90 days

  7. Mobility

    Change in Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) time from baseline to 90 days.

    Time frame: Baseline and 90 days

  8. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Change in EQ-5D-5L index value and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from baseline to 90 days.

    Time frame: Baseline and 90 days

  9. Healthcare Utilization

    Use of outpatient, inpatient, and nursing care services assessed by questionnaire.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after randomization

  10. Serious Adverse Events

    Occurrence of serious adverse events including unplanned hospitalization or death.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after randomization

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be made publicly available. De-identified data may be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the sponsor and in accordance with applicable data protection regulations (including GDPR), institutional policies, and a data use agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07420374
Collaborators
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, inav - Institute for Applied Health Services Research GmbH, Berlin, Germany
Responsible party
Dr. Jan Christoph Purrucker (Prof. Dr. Jan Purrucker, University Hospital Heidelberg) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 19, 2026
Start date
Mar 25, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Study contacts

Jan C Purrucker, Prof. Dr.
Contact
artifice.studie@med.uni-heidelberg.de
+49 6221 56 6999

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion