CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07407400Updated Feb 12, 2026

Lemborexant for Sleep and Delirium Prevention in Elderly ICU Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lemborexant and Placebo in Sleep Disturbance, Delirium and Critical Illness, sponsored by Mahidol University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-12.

Sponsored by Mahidol University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sleep disturbance is very common among critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), particularly in older adults after surgery. Poor sleep in the ICU is associated with important complications, including delirium, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, prolonged hospital stay, and increased mortality. Current non-drug approaches to improve sleep, such as reducing noise and light and clustering nursing care, may provide limited benefit and are often difficult to implement consistently. Safe and effective drug treatments for sleep in critically ill older patients remain limited.

Lemborexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist that promotes sleep by blocking wake-promoting pathways in the brain. Unlike many traditional sleep medications, lemborexant has minimal effects on breathing and has been shown to be well tolerated in older adults with insomnia. However, its effects on sleep and delirium have not been studied in critically ill patients.

This study is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility and pilot trial conducted in the surgical intensive care unit of Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The study will enroll 100 critically ill postoperative patients aged 65 years or older who are expected to remain in the ICU for at least 48 hours. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either low-dose lemborexant (2.5 mg) or a matching placebo once nightly for three consecutive nights. All participants will also receive standard non-pharmacologic sleep-promoting care used in the ICU.

The main goals of this pilot study are to evaluate the feasibility and safety of administering lemborexant in elderly ICU patients and to explore its potential effects on sleep and delirium. Sleep will be assessed using both subjective questionnaires completed each morning and objective wrist-worn actigraphy to measure sleep duration and sleep stages. Delirium will be assessed twice daily using a standardized delirium screening tool for up to seven days or until ICU discharge. Additional outcomes include medication adherence, adverse events, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU and hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality.

The results of this study will provide important preliminary data on the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of lemborexant in critically ill older adults and will help inform the design of future larger clinical trials aimed at improving sleep and reducing delirium in the ICU.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Disturbance
  • Delirium
  • Critical Illness

Keywords

  • Lemborexant
  • Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist
  • Sleep Disturbance
  • Delirium
  • Intensive Care Unit
  • Critically Ill Elderly
03

In context

Parasomnias

756 studies on the registry are indexed under Parasomnias; 189 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 66 across 569 interventional studies indexed under Parasomnias.

Browse Parasomnias studies →

Lead sponsor

Mahidol University is the lead sponsor of 730 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 65 years or older.
  • Admission to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU).
  • Anticipated ICU stay of at least 48 hours, as assessed by the ICU consultant and responsible surgeon.
  • Able to receive enteral medication via oral or nasogastric route.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requirement for frequent neurological checks or scheduled awakening (e.g., acute stroke or neurosurgery).
  • Deep sedation defined as Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) ≤ -3.
  • Positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) within 12 hours prior to randomization.
  • Severe hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring neuromuscular blockers or high-dose vasopressors (e.g., norepinephrine ≥ 0.1 µg/kg/min and titrating upward).
  • High risk of aspiration, including ongoing vomiting, gastric residual volume >250 mL, or intolerance to oral or enteral medications.
  • Concomitant use of strong CYP3A inhibitors or inducers (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin, ritonavir, rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, or St. John's wort).
  • Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C).
  • End-stage kidney disease or chronic kidney disease stage 5.
  • Concomitant use of sedative-hypnotic medications, including benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, trazodone, tricyclic antidepressants, melatonin, or other sleep-inducing agents.
  • Known hypersensitivity to lemborexant or other dual orexin receptor antagonists.
  • History of cataplexy-like symptoms or severe depression with suicidal ideation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lemborexant

    Participants receive lemborexant 2.5 mg (half of a 5-mg tablet) administered orally or via nasogastric tube once nightly at 20:00 ± 30 minutes for three consecutive nights. All participants also receive standard non-pharmacologic sleep-promoting care in the ICU.

    Drug: Lemborexant

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants receive a matching placebo administered orally or via nasogastric tube once nightly at 20:00 ± 30 minutes for three consecutive nights. All participants also receive standard non-pharmacologic sleep-promoting care in the ICU.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLemborexant

    Lemborexant is administered at a dose of 2.5 mg (half of a 5-mg tablet) once nightly at 20:00 ± 30 minutes for three consecutive nights. The medication is given orally or via nasogastric tube. For nasogastric administration, the tablet is crushed, mixed with sterile water, and flushed through the tube. Lemborexant is over-encapsulated to maintain blinding. All participants also receive standard non-pharmacologic sleep-promoting care in the ICU, including light reduction, noise and alarm adjustment, and clustering of care.

  • DrugPlacebo

    A matching inert placebo tablet/capsule identical in appearance to lemborexant is administered orally or via nasogastric tube once nightly at 20:00 ± 30 minutes for three consecutive nights. The placebo is over-encapsulated to maintain blinding. All participants receive standard non-pharmacologic sleep-promoting care in the ICU, including light reduction, noise and alarm adjustment, and clustering of care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Sleep Time Assessed by Actigraphy

    Total sleep time (TST) measured using wrist-worn actigraphy (Fitbit Charge 5), defined as the total number of minutes scored as sleep during the nighttime period.

    Time frame: Nights 1-3 of the intervention period (20:00 to 08:00 each night)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective Sleep Quality Assessed by Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire

    Subjective Sleep Quality Assessed by the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). Subjective sleep quality will be assessed using the validated Thai version of the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. The RCSQ consists of five items (sleep depth, sleep latency, number of awakenings, efficiency of returning to sleep, and overall sleep quality), each rated on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 50 mm, where 0 represents the poorest sleep and 50 represents the best sleep. The total RCSQ score is calculated as the mean of the five item scores, yielding a composite score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating better subjective sleep quality.

    Time frame: Each morning after Nights 1-3 of the intervention period (approximately 08:00)

  2. Delirium Incidence Assessed by CAM-ICU

    Delirium incidence will be assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU), a validated diagnostic instrument for delirium in critically ill patients. The CAM-ICU is not a continuous or ordinal scale but a binary diagnostic assessment, yielding either a positive (delirium present) or negative (delirium absent) result based on four core features (acute change or fluctuating course, inattention, altered level of consciousness, and disorganized thinking). Delirium incidence is defined as the occurrence of at least one positive CAM-ICU assessment during the observation period. As this outcome is dichotomous, minimum and maximum scale values are not applicable, and higher or lower scores do not represent better or worse outcomes.

    Time frame: From randomization until ICU Day 7 or ICU discharge, whichever occurs first

  3. Delirium Duration

    Delirium duration defined as the total number of days with a positive CAM-ICU assessment during the observation period.

    Time frame: From randomization until ICU Day 7 or ICU discharge, whichever occurs first

  4. Objective Sleep Stage Proportions Assessed by Actigraphy

    Objective sleep architecture will be assessed using wrist-worn actigraphy (Fitbit Charge 5). Sleep stage proportions, including deep sleep, light sleep, and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, will be derived from actigraphy algorithms and expressed as the percentage (%) of total sleep time for each night. Each sleep stage proportion ranges from 0% to 100%, where higher values indicate a greater proportion of time spent in that specific sleep stage. No composite or total score is calculated for this outcome.

    Time frame: Nights 1-3 of the intervention period (20:00 to 08:00 each night)

  5. Composite Sleep Score Assessed by Actigraphy

    Overall objective sleep quality will be assessed using the composite sleep score generated by wrist-worn actigraphy (Fitbit Charge 5). The composite sleep score is a proprietary summary metric derived from multiple actigraphy-based parameters, including sleep duration, continuity, and sleep stage distribution. The composite sleep score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better overall objective sleep quality.

    Time frame: Nights 1-3 of the intervention period (20:00 to 08:00 each night).

  6. Safety and Adverse Events

    Safety will be assessed by the frequency and nature of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) potentially related to the study medication. Prespecified events of interest include oversedation, respiratory compromise, aspiration, and excessive somnolence. Adverse events will be identified through daily clinical assessment and review of medical records and recorded according to standard ICU reporting practices. This outcome is descriptive and categorical. It is not based on a numerical scale, and minimum or maximum values are not applicable.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study medication until ICU discharge, assessed for up to 7 days after randomization, whichever occurs first.

  7. Recruitment Rate

    Recruitment rate will be assessed as the proportion of eligible patients who are successfully enrolled and randomized into the study during the recruitment period. The recruitment rate is calculated as the number of randomized participants divided by the total number of eligible patients screened. The recruitment rate ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater feasibility of patient enrollment.

    Time frame: During the recruitment period, from first patient screened to last patient randomized.

  8. Medication Adherence to Study Drug

    Medication adherence will be assessed as the proportion of prescribed study drug doses that are successfully administered during the intervention period. Adherence will be determined from medication administration records. Medication adherence is expressed as a percentage (%) of planned doses received, ranging from 0% to 100%, where higher values indicate better adherence.

    Time frame: Nights 1-3 of the intervention period

  9. Completion Rate of Subjective Sleep Assessments

    Completion of subjective sleep assessments will be assessed as the proportion of expected Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) assessments that are completed by participants. The completion rate ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating better feasibility of questionnaire-based sleep assessment.

    Time frame: Each morning after Nights 1-3 of the intervention period (approximately 08:00).

  10. Adequacy of Actigraphy Wear Time

    Adequacy of actigraphy wear time will be assessed using wrist-worn actigraphy (Fitbit Charge 5) and defined as the proportion of nights with valid actigraphy data, according to prespecified criteria for minimum wear duration during the sleep period. Adequacy is expressed as a percentage (%) of monitored nights with valid data, ranging from 0% to 100%, where higher values indicate better feasibility of actigraphy-based sleep monitoring.

    Time frame: Nights 1-3 of the intervention period (20:00 to 08:00 each night).

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kitisin N, Somnuke P, Thikom N, Raykateeraroj N, Poontong N, Thanakiattiwibun C, Wongtangman K. Psychometric properties of a Thai version of the Richards-Campbell sleep questionnaire. Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Nov;27(6):885-892. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12705. Epub 2021 Aug 23. PubMed 34425024 ↗
  • Tilouche N, Hassen MF, Ali HBS, Jaoued O, Gharbi R, El Atrous SS. Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Outcome. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;22(3):144-149. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_244_17. PubMed 29657370 ↗
  • Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, Speroff T, Gordon SM, Harrell FE Jr, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Dittus RS. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1753-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753. PubMed 15082703 ↗
  • Drouot X, Cabello B, d'Ortho MP, Brochard L. Sleep in the intensive care unit. Sleep Med Rev. 2008 Oct;12(5):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.11.004. Epub 2008 May 23. PubMed 18502155 ↗
  • Parthasarathy S, Tobin MJ. Sleep in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Feb;30(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2030-6. Epub 2003 Oct 16. PubMed 14564378 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07407400
Lead sponsor
Mahidol University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 12, 2026

Study contacts

Nuanprae Kitisin, MD
Contact
nuanprae.kit@mahidol.ac.th
+66896767706
Nattaya Raykateeraroj, MD
Contact
nuanprae.kit@mahidol.ac.th
+66993519963
Nuanprae Kitisin
principal investigator · Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion