ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07462052TP2Updated Oct 5, 2026

Talk Parenting Education Program II

An interventional study of The Talk Parenting Program in Parenting Practices, Self Efficacy and Stress, sponsored by Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc. (part of Influents Innovations) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 5, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
184
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether Talk Parenting, a voice-based program delivered through an Amazon Echo Dot (Alexa), can help parents and caregivers of children ages 3-5 years improve challenging bedtime and morning routines. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does using Talk Parenting improve families' bedtime and morning experiences and children's sleep/wake habits?

Does using Talk Parenting improve parents' routine-related parenting practices and confidence, strengthen the parent-child relationship, and reduce children's behavior problems and parents' stress?

Researchers will compare families who receive Talk Parenting right away to families who wait 6 weeks to receive the program (a waitlist control group receiving usual services during the wait).

Participants will:

Complete online questionnaires at the start of the study and again about 6 weeks later (and a follow-up questionnaire later in the study).

Receive a pre-configured Amazon Echo Dot (to keep) and instructions to use Talk Parenting routines at home, including a bedtime routine, a brief calming routine, and a morning routine (enabled after the first 2 weeks).

Read the detailed description

I. Study overview and rationale.

This study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy, acceptability, and usability of Talk Parenting, a voice-delivered (Alexa-enabled) parenting support program intended to improve families' bedtime and morning routines for children ages 3-5 years. The trial will evaluate whether access to Talk Parenting leads to improvements in routine functioning (bedtime and morning experience), children's sleep/wake habits, parents' engagement in targeted parenting practices, parents' self-efficacy for handling routines and challenging child behavior, and the parent-child relationship, as well as reductions in children's behavior problems and parents' stress.

II. Design.

A total of 184 families (primary parent/caregiver and one child age 3-5 years who presents the most bedtime/morning challenges) will be enrolled and randomized after completing the baseline assessment (T1) to either:

Immediate Talk Parenting (Tx): receive Talk Parenting immediately, or

Waitlist Control (WC): wait 6 weeks to receive Talk Parenting while continuing to receive "care as usual" services through their parenting support agency.

All participating families will be re-assessed (T2) 6 weeks after their baseline T1 assessment. At 6 weeks after T2, the WC group will complete their T3 assessment, and at 3 months after T2, the Tx condition will complete their T3 assessment.

This design supports (1) a between-group efficacy test at 6 weeks post-baseline (Tx vs WC at T2), (2) a test of maintenance of gains in the Tx group from T2 to T3 (approximately 3 months after T2), and (3) an initial replication check of within-subject effects in the WC group after they receive the intervention (T2 to T3).

III. Setting, recruitment, and population.

Families will be recruited through community and early childhood service organizations in Oregon, including Head Start sites, Early Childhood Hubs, Parenting Now, WIC and Healthy Start in Lane County, and other similar parenting agencies. Participating families are expected to have risk factors that qualify them for services at these agencies (e.g., low income, family stress), and children may be at elevated risk for psychosocial/behavioral problems and/or poor school readiness. The study will over-enroll to account for anticipated attrition (planned \~30% attrition at T2 and \~40% at T3; target N at T2 is 128, 64 per group).

IV. Intervention delivery and implementation.

Families randomized to Tx will be provided a pre-configured Amazon Echo Dot and associated hardware, along with instructions to set up and initiate Talk Parenting. Talk Parenting will be enabled in a staged manner to support implementation:

At initiation: Bedtime Routine and Calming Down Mini-Routine enabled

After 2 weeks: Morning Routine enabled

Tx families will have access to Bedtime/Calming routines for 6 weeks and Morning routine for 4 weeks prior to the 6-week assessment (T2). After WC families complete their 6-week assessment (T2), they will receive Talk Parenting using the same staged enablement process. Families keep the Echo Dot after participation.

V. Study procedures and assessment schedule.

Parents will complete questionnaires via the Qualtrics online platform at:

T1 (baseline): prior to randomization

T2 (6 weeks after T1): both Tx and WC

T3 (follow-up):

Tx: \~3 months after T2

WC: \~6 weeks after T2 (after receiving Talk Parenting)

VI. Data sources and measurement domains (high level).

Key domains assessed across T1/T2/T3 include:

Parenting practices targeted to bedtime and morning routines

Parenting self-efficacy related to routines and challenging child behaviors

Parent stress

Child sleep problems/behaviors

Child behavioral and emotional adjustment

Parent-child relationship quality

For intervention engagement, Talk Parenting usage will be captured using objective usage metrics from the Alexa back-end database. Satisfaction, acceptability, usability, and problems/difficulties will be assessed at the post-intervention timepoint for each condition (T2 for Tx; T3 for WC). Demographics are collected at baseline (T1).

VII. Feasibility and adoption (implementation-oriented outcomes).

Commercial/implementation feasibility will be assessed via an advisory board and recruitment partners using a practitioner-focused satisfaction/acceptability measure to characterize acceptability for target families, feasibility for parenting education agencies, and interest in adopting Talk Parenting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parenting Practices
  • Self Efficacy
  • Stress
  • Child Behavior
  • Emotional Adjustment
  • Sleep Problem
  • Parent-Child Relations

Keywords

  • Feasibility
  • Satisfaction
  • Usability
  • Efficacy
03

In context

Child Behavior

224 studies on the registry are indexed under Child Behavior; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 184 is above the median of 140 across 197 interventional studies indexed under Child Behavior.

Browse Child Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Referred by a participating agency
  • Child 3-5 years old who lives with the parent at least half time
  • The primary parent in the home (typically the mother but not always)
  • Speaks English
  • Has access to a computer, tablet, or mobile phone at home
  • Access to high-speed internet at home is desired but not required.

The project will cover internet costs for a small number of participants if needed. The participating agencies all serve families who are low-income and/or experiencing economic hardship, stressful family relationships, children's behavior problems, or household instability; thus referred families will be experiencing one or more of these risk factors for an at-risk family environment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Families of target-age children with a developmental disability severe enough that the child cannot speak or follow simple directions will be excluded
  • Families of target-age children whose needs are beyond the scope of Talk Parenting will be excluded
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
184 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Talk Parenting Program

    In a 6-week session, families will use at home the Talk Parenting program, a smart speaker app designed to provide parents with in situ experiential support for building positive family bedtime and morning routines. The Bedtime Routine, Morning Routine, and Calming Down Mini-Routine modules of Talk Parenting will guide families in creating healthy bedtime and morning routines to foster healthy sleep/wake habits, provide experiential practice in self-regulation skills, and promote a positive parent-child relationship.

    Behavioral: The Talk Parenting Program

  • Other
    Waitlist Control

    Families will receive access to the intervention after the T2 assessment (6 weeks after the baseline T1 assessment).

    Behavioral: The Talk Parenting Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralThe Talk Parenting Program

    In a 6-week session, families will use at home the Talk Parenting program, a smart speaker app designed to provide parents with in-situ experiential support for building positive family bedtime and morning routines. The Bedtime Routine, Morning Routine, and Calming Down Mini-Routine modules of Talk Parenting will guide families in creating healthy bedtime and morning routines to foster healthy sleep/wake habits, provide experiential practice in self-regulation skills, and promote a positive parent-child relationship.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Short-Form Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (SF-CSHQ)

    Children's bedtime/sleep problems will be measured with the Short-Form Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (SF-CSHQ), a 23-item version of the widely used CSHQ. Respondents answer on a 5-point scale (1=never; 5=always-7x/week); a mean score will be computed and can range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

  2. Child Adjustment & Parent Self-Efficacy Scale (CAPES) : Behavioral Problems Subscale

    The Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale (CAPES) measures children's behaviors and emotional adjustment. The Behavior Problems subscale consists of 16 problematic and 8 reverse-coded positive behaviors. Respondents answer on a 4-point scale (0=Not at all; 3=Very much); the summed scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

  3. Child Adjustment & Parent Self-Efficacy Scale (CAPES) : Emotional Maladjustment Subscale

    The Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale (CAPES) measures children's behaviors and emotional adjustment. The Emotional Maladjustment subscale has 3 items. Respondents answer on a 4-point scale (0=Not at all; 3=Very much); the summed scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

  4. Child Adjustment & Parent Self-Efficacy Scale (CAPES) : Parent Self-Efficacy Subscale

    The Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale (CAPES) measures children's behaviors and emotional adjustment. The CAPES is also used to measure parents' self-efficacy; parents rate their confidence that they can successfully deal with each of the 19 negative behaviors/emotions on the CAPES. Respondents answer on a 10-point scale (1=Certain I can't do it; 10=Certain I can do it); the summed scores range from 19-190, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

  5. Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index - Toddler Scale (SEPTI-TS): Discipline Subscale

    The Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index - Toddler Scale - Short Form (SEPTI-TS-SF) is used to measure parents' self-efficacy for discipline- and routines-related parenting tasks. The Discipline subscale is measured with 6 items. Respondents answer on a 6-point scale (1=Disagree strongly; 6=Agree strongly); average scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

  6. Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index - Toddler Scale (SEPTI-TS): Routines Subscale

    The Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index - Toddler Scale - Short Form (SEPTI-TS-SF) is used to measure parents' self-efficacy for a discipline- and routines-related parenting tasks. The Routines subscales are measured with 6 items each. Respondents answer on a 6-point scale (1=Disagree strongly; 6=Agree strongly); average scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

  7. Engagement in Program-Targeted Parenting Practices (PTPP) - Parent's Self Efficacy Scale

    Parents' self-efficacy for engaging in the parenting practices targeted by the intervention is measured via the Engagement in Target Activities with Child measure, Parents' Self-Efficacy subscale. Created for this study, these number of items will be determined and will items ask parents to rate how confident they are that they know how to do a series of parenting practices targeted by the program, on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = Not at all confident; 10 = Highly confident). Average scores range from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater parental self-efficacy (better outcome).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

  8. Engagement in Program-Targeted Parenting Practices (PTPP) - Frequency Subscale

    The frequency of parents' engagement in the parenting practices targeted by the intervention is measured via the Engagement in Target Activities with Child measure, Frequency subscale. Created for this study, the number of items will be determined and will ask parents to report the frequency with which they have engaged in target parenting practices in the past 4 weeks. Parents report their frequency on a 6-point scale (0 = "Never in the past month" to 5 = "Every day in past month:). Averaged scores range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more frequent parental engagement in the target activities (better outcome).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parental Stress Scale

    The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) is comprised of 18 items that ask about positive (emotional benefits, personal development) and negative (demands on resources, restrictions) themes of parenthood. Respondents answer on a 5-point Likert "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree" scale in terms of their typical relationship with their child. An overall sum score is derived and can range from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

  2. Child-Parent Relationship Scale - Short Form: Conflicts Subscale

    The Child-Parent Relationship Scale - Short Form (CPRS-SF) is comprised of 14 parent-report items that ask the parent for their assessment of the child-parent relationship, the child's emotional stance toward the parent, and the parent's feelings toward the child.Two subscales are derived: Conflicts and Positive Aspects/Closeness. The Conflicts subscale is measured by 7 items on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely does not apply; 5=Definitely applies); average scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

  3. Child-Parent Relationship Scale - Short Form: Positive Aspects/Closeness Subscale

    The Child-Parent Relationship Scale - Short Form (CPRS-SF) is comprised of 14 parent-report items that ask the parent for their assessment of the child-parent relationship, the child's emotional stance toward the parent, and the parent's feelings toward the child.Two subscales are derived: Conflicts and Positive Aspects/Closeness. The Closeness subscale is measured with 7 items on a 5-point scale (1 = Defintely does not apply; 5 = Defintely apply); average scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline), T2 (6 weeks after T1), T3 (3 months after T2 for Experimental, 6 weeks after T2 for Waitlist)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Mar 2028, 16 months later.

Of 141 interventional studies with no phase under Child Behavior, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Jul 2026 → Nov 2026, on Oct 5, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 3, 2026
First posted
Mar 10, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026was Jul 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 1, 2028
Last update
Oct 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Jul 1, 2026→Nov 1, 2026
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Start date Jul 1, 2026→Nov 1, 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07462052
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 10, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

David R Smith, PhD
Contact
david.smith@influentsin.com
541-484-2123
David R Smith, PhD
principal investigator · Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion