ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07399002LONG NAGOMIUpdated Sep 11, 2026

LONG NAGOMI™ PMCF STUDY

An observational study in Coronary Artery Disease and Ischemic Heart Disease, sponsored by Fundación EPIC. Recruiting at 10 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Fundación EPIC · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,039
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 33 studies in Coronary Artery Disease by Fundación EPIC — 13 open to participants now, 20 under way, none of them phase 3. Coronary Artery Disease · Fundación EPIC.

Planned enrollment
3rd of 20
1,039 · median 375
Started
2026
the only one that year
Observational
20 of 33
5 open now
Primary completion
2028-01
later than 15 of 19 live
Registered
32nd of 33
by date

Among the 33 studies in Coronary Artery Disease by Fundación EPIC, this one is the 3rd largest by planned enrollment of the 20 observational ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 20 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 15 of the 19 other live ones, and was the 32nd registered.

Coronary Artery Disease

4,857 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 890 are open to participants now.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Open to participants now

13 of the 33 studies in Coronary Artery Disease by Fundación EPIC are open now, in 7 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

7 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 13 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 588 Coronary Artery Disease studies recruiting now, 402 (68%) set no upper age limit and 68 (12%) stop at 75 or younger; 38 take children under 18; 47 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 33 studies in Coronary Artery Disease by Fundación EPIC, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The study is designed as a prospective, multi-center, observational PMCF (post-market clinical follow-up) study of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ _stent (lengths of 38, 44 and 50 mm) in the treatment of coronary artery disease according to the indications approved in the CE marking.

Read the detailed description

The study serves to fulfill post marketing surveillance requirements for the Ultimaster Nagomi™ stent. This is a PMCF study of real-world use of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ DES aimed to reaffirm the device claims of effectiveness and safety, no comparator is required to meet these specified objectives and endpoints.

03

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Ischemic Heart Disease

Keywords

  • MDR (Medical Device Regulations)
  • PMCF (Post-Market Clinical Follow-up)
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing PCI with implantation of a Long Nagomi stent

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who meet ALL inclusion criteria will be included:
  • Patients aged ≥ 18 years AND;
  • Patients who according to standard practice of the hospital are amenable to PCI as indicated and considered adequate according to the European clinical practice guidelines on coronary revascularization AND;
  • Patients with at least one lesion fulfilling the "long lesion criteria" suitable for a single stent approach AND;
  • Patients who have been informed of the characteristics of the study and have provided written AND;
  • Intention to treat all lesions with the Ultimaster Nagomi™ stent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must not meet any of the following exclusion criteria:
  • Patients who expressly decline to participate in the study.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) under conditions of cardiogenic shock (Killip class 4).
  • Patients with or to sirolimus.
  • Patients with a of less than 2 years.
  • Patients in whom any surgery requiring general anesthesia is planned, comorbidity or indication likely necessitating the discontinuation of dual anti- therapy before the recommended duration of dual anti-platelet therapy per the ESC or national guidelines.
  • Patients included in other clinical trials that did not reach the primary objective.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,039 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

    Device: LONG NAGOMI

Interventions

  • DeviceLONG NAGOMI

    Patients in whom treatment with long nagomi has been attempted

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

    Target Lesion Failure defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1-year post-procedure.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Device success

    Device success defined as delivery success (achievement of successful delivery of study stent to the target lesion, expansion of the study stent and withdrawal of the delivery catheter) with a final residual diameter stenosis of the target lesion of \< 20% by visual assessment and/or \< 30% by QCA, using the assigned device only.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  2. Safety of the stent: Freedom from Accidental dislodgement of the stent

    Safety of the stent defined as an absence of Accidental stent dislodgement

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  3. Safety of the stent: Freedom from Balloon rupture

    Safety of the stent defined as an absence of Balloon rupture o Hypotube rupture.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  4. Safety of the stent: Freedom from Hypotube rupture o Hypotube rupture

    Safety of the stent defined as an absence of o Hypotube rupture o Hypotube rupture.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  5. Safety of the procedure: Freedom from Challenging withdrawal

    Safety of the procedure defined as an absence of Challenging withdrawal

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  6. Safety of the procedure: Freedom from coronary perforation

    Safety of the procedure defined as an absence of coronary perforation

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  7. Safety of the procedure: Freedom from dissection >C

    Safety of the procedure defined as an absence of dissection \>C

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  8. Safety of the procedure: Freedom from no-reflow

    Safety of the procedure defined as an absence of no-reflow

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  9. Safety of the procedure: Freedom from stent thrombosis

    Safety of the procedure defined as an absence stent thrombosis

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  10. Procedure success

    To assess the procedure success rate defined as the achievement of \< 20% residual stenosis by visual assessment in all target lesions using any percutaneous method without the occurrence of death, Q wave or WHO defined non-Q wave myocardial Infarction, or need for new revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  11. Performance of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ stent in Severe calcified lesions

    To assess Performance of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ stent in Severe calcified lesions

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  12. Performance of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ stent in Severe tortuous vessels

    To assess Performance of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ stent in Severe tortuous vessels

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  13. Performance of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ stent in Distal vessels

    To assess Performance of the Ultimaster Nagomi™ stent in Distal vessels

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  14. Angina status assessment Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)

    Angina status assessment Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)

    Time frame: Baseline

  15. Angina status assessment Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)

    Angina status assessment Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)

    Time frame: 12 monts

  16. Quality of Life assessed as per EuroQl five-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire

    Quality of Life assessed as per EuroQl five-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire

    Time frame: After PCI

  17. Quality of Life assessed as per EuroQl five-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire

    Quality of Life assessed as per EuroQl five-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 Months

  18. Cardiovascular death

    Percentage of cardiovascular death

    Time frame: 12 months

  19. Target-vessel related myocardial infarction

    Percentage of target-vessel related myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 12 Months

  20. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization

    Percentage of clinically driven target lesion revascularization

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

10 of 10 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Khan, M. (2024). Prevalence of in-stent restenosis in patients having drug eluting stents with lengths exceeding 40mm: a single-center study. JHRR, 4(2), 837-841. doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.960
  • Khanal S, Agarwal A, Kumar B. One-Year Outcomes of Long Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents (>/=40 MM) in Patients With Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease: Findings From a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India. Cureus. 2024 May 3;16(5):e59611. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59611. eCollection 2024 May. PubMed 38832189 ↗
  • Park KE, Wu CJ, Chehab B, Maksoud A, Bertolet B, Ying SW, Simoes T, Pingle SC, Chang CJ. One-year Outcomes of XIENCE Skypoint 48-mm Drug-Eluting Stents in Long Coronary Lesions: The SPIRIT 48 Trial. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 May 18;2(4):101001. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101001. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug. PubMed 39131646 ↗
  • Patra S, Chakraborty RN, Pande A, Banerjee S, Jena M, Mandal PC, De SK, Khan A, Das SS, Ghosh D, Nag R. Zotarolimus-eluting Resolute Integrity versus everolimus-eluting Xience Xpedition stents in the management of very long (>30mm) de novo coronary artery stenosis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Apr-May;18(3):160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 15. PubMed 28017259 ↗
  • Gautier A, Hovasse T, Arroyo D, Unterseeh T, Garot P, Champagne S, Neylon A, Sanguineti F, Benamer H, Chevalier B, Lefevre T. Safety and efficacy of 48 mm Xience Xpedition everolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of long coronary lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug;100(2):179-187. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30249. Epub 2022 May 27. PubMed 35621281 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2028, 22 months after the start.

Of 634 non-industry observational studies under Coronary Artery Disease, half reached primary completion within 48 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 122. This study's planned 22 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 759 studies reached it within 40 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 87.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 24, 2025
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
StartActual
Feb 27, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2029
Last update
Sep 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07399002
Lead sponsor
Fundación EPIC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
Start date
Feb 27, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

TAMARA GARCIA CAMARERO, MD, PhD
Contact
tgcamarero@gmail.com
0034615420460
FUNDACION EPIC
Contact
iepic@fundacionepic.org
00987876135

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion