CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07396298EXCITE-PACUpdated Sep 8, 2026

The Existential Cognitive Intervention to Enhance Positive Aspect of Caregiving (EXCITE-PAC) in a Dementia Context

An interventional study of Existential-cognitive intervention to enhance PAC and Usual care in Dementia Caregiver, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
304
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Research evidence is emerging on the co-existence of a positive caregiving experience in the physically and psychosocially taxing dementia care context, but little attention has been paid to promoting the positive aspects of caregiving (PAC) among family carers.

We adopt the paradigm of existential positive psychology, integrating cognitive behavioural theory, construal level theory, and Antonovsky's theory of salutogenesis to develop an existential-cognitive intervention to enhance positive aspects of caregiving (EXCITE-PAC), and thereby improve the health outcomes of family carers of people living with dementia (PLwD).

A pilot mixed-method study comprising a randomised controlled trial and a post-trial qualitative interview is proposed to evaluate the effects of EXCITE-PAC on carers' health and to examine whether any such effects are mediated through changes in PAC. Post-trial interviews with carers will further elucidate their experiences of the intervention and their perceptions of its impact.

Overall aim \& objectives

This sequential mixed-method study aims to:

i) evaluate the effects of the 12-week EXCITE-PAC programme on PAC (primary outcome), Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depression, caregiving self-efficacy and meaning-making among the family carers of PLwD; ii) explore whether the health benefits of EXCITE-PAC, if any, are mediated through improved PAC at the 36-week (i.e., about 6 months) follow-up endpoints; and iii) explore carers' perceptions of the benefits, limitations and acceptability of the EXCITE-PAC programme.

Read the detailed description

Research evidence is emerging on the co-existence of a positive caregiving experience in the physically and psychosocially taxing dementia care context, but little attention has been paid to promoting the positive aspects of caregiving (PAC) among family carers.

We adopt the paradigm of existential positive psychology, integrating cognitive behavioural theory, construal level theory, and Antonovsky's theory of salutogenesis to develop an existential-cognitive intervention to enhance positive aspects of caregiving (EXCITE-PAC), and thereby improve the health outcomes of family carers of people living with dementia (PLwD).

Objectives:

i) To evaluate the effects of the existential-cognitive intervention to enhance the positive aspects of caregiving (EXCITE-PAC) on PAC and the health outcomes of family carers of persons living with dementia (PLwD).

ii) To evaluate whether the positive health effects of EXCITE-PAC, if any, are mediated through a change in PAC.

iii) To explore the experience of family carers in engaging with EXCITE-PAC, as well as the perceived intervention effects.

Hypotheses: Family carers who receive the 12-week EXCITE-PAC programme will report more positive changes in i) PAC, ii) HRQoL, iii) depression, iv) self-efficacy in caregiving, and v) meaning-making upon programme completion (12 weeks), and at 24 weeks and 36 weeks, than those who receive a 12-week education programme on dementia caregiving.

The changes in HRQoL and depression among family carers from baseline to the three post-test endpoints will be mediated by an improvement in PAC.

Research method

This sequential mixed-method study will include a double-blind randomised controlled trial and a post-trial qualitative study.

The inclusion criteria are: i) family carers of Chinese PLwD diagnosed at least six months previously; ii) caregiving for ≥ 4 hours/day; iii) Chinese-speaking; iv) having a mobile device to access virtual meetings via GoToMeeting or Zoom; and v) providing consent to participate. Power analysis guides the sample size estimation. Permuted block randomisation (block size: 8, 12, 16) with computer-generated random codes will be performed to allocate participants in a 1:1 ratio to the EXCITE-PAC or education programme.

For the qualitative interviews, a purposive subsample of 30 family carers who have completed the EXCITE-PAC programme will be recruited.

The 12-week EXCITE-PAC programme is underpinned by existential positive psychology, and meaning-making with respect to the purpose and significance of dementia caregiving. A strength-based approach that includes narrative and empowerment strategies will be integrated.

The 12-week EXCITE-PAC programme adopts a hybrid mode, including a face-to-face home visit, group-based virtual meetings, and telephone follow-ups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dementia Caregiver

Keywords

  • Positive aspect of caregiving
  • dementia caregiver
  • existential-cognitive intervention
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,262 studies on the registry; 340 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • family carers of Chinese PLwDs diagnosed at least six months previously
  • caregiving for ≥ 4 hours/day
  • Chinese-speaking
  • have a mobile device to access virtual meeting via Go-To-Meeting or Zoom
  • consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • NA
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
304 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental : EXCITE-PAC program

    The EXCITE-PAC program is an overall 12-week training and comprises of three phases as follows: Face-to-face home visit to establish narrative-based caregiver biographies. Group-based virtual meetings with video-guided self-distancing cognitive reappraisal to enhance emotional regulation and meaning-making. The goal-oriented empowerment approach will be used to facilitate carers' use of reframing and refocusing techniques in the day-to-day caregiving proces. Telephone follow-ups will be made to continue supporting goal attainment.

    Behavioral: Existential-cognitive intervention to enhance PAC

  • Placebo comparator
    Usual care

    Usual care will be provided to the control group which mainly covers the social activities offered by the affiliated center. The participants are requested not to join any activities relating to cognitive training or auditory training before the post-test data collection.

    Other: Usual care

Interventions

  • BehavioralExistential-cognitive intervention to enhance PAC

    The EXCITE-PAC program is an overall 12-week training and comprises of three phases as follows: Face-to-face home visit to establish narrative-based caregiver biographies. Group-based virtual meetings with video-guided self-distancing cognitive reappraisal to enhance emotional regulation and meaning-making. The goal-oriented empowerment approach will be used to facilitate carers' use of reframing and refocusing techniques in the day-to-day caregiving proces. Telephone follow-ups will be made to continue supporting goal attainment.

  • OtherUsual care

    Usual care will be provided to the control group which mainly covers the social activities offered by the affiliated center. The participants are requested not to join any activities relating to cognitive training or auditory training before the post-test data collection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Positive Aspect of Caregiving Instrument

    To evaluate self-affirmation and outlook on life. It is a 5-point Likert scale, with higher total scores (ranging from 11-55) indicating a more positive perception of the caregiving role.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  2. The Caregiving Self-Efficacy Scale

    To evaluate self-efficacy of carers in managing disturbing behaviour, controlling upsetting thoughts and obtaining a respite in caring for of the PLwD, with higher scores representing greater self-confidence. It is a 15-item tool used to assess caregivers' confidence in managing caregiving situations, rated on a 0-100 scale. Higher score indicate stronger self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  3. The Meaning-Focused Coping Scale

    To evaluate meaning-focused coping, including changes in situational and global beliefs, goals, meaning making, long-term prevention strategies, rational resource use, acceptance and heuristic thinking. It is a 26-items tool using a 7-point Likert scale, higher scores indicating a higher level of meaning-focused coping.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  4. The 10-item Centre of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale

    To evaluate affective symptoms reflecting depression on an ascending 4-point scale of increasing severity.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey

    To evaluate the quality of life with 8 dimensional scores and two component scores to capture physical and mental health. Higher scores indicate less disability

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  2. Positive Affect Index

    To evaluate the participants' positive affect toward the dementia patient. The higher score indicate higher positive affect of respondant.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  3. The Intrinsic Motivations to Care

    To evaluate the intrinsic motivations of family caregivers to provide care to the PWD. The scale generally uses a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1, "not at all true" to 7, "very true") to gauge the intensity of motivation.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Hong Kong
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    • Sau Fung YU, PhD · Contact · dyu1@hku.hk · +852-39176319
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Younas A, Pedersen M, Durante A. Characteristics of joint displays illustrating data integration in mixed-methods nursing studies. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Feb;76(2):676-686. doi: 10.1111/jan.14264. Epub 2019 Nov 25. PubMed 31713252 ↗
  • Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. PubMed 18352969 ↗
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. PubMed 18697684 ↗
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999, 6(1): 1-55.
  • Rosseel Y; lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 2012;48(2):1 - 36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
  • Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modelling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • Lyonette, C., & Yardley, L. The influence on carer wellbeing of motivations to care for older people and the relationship with the care recipient. Ageing and Society, 2003, 23(4), 487-506.
  • Quinn C, Clare L, Woods RT. What predicts whether caregivers of people with dementia find meaning in their role? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;27(11):1195-202. doi: 10.1002/gps.3773. Epub 2012 Feb 15. PubMed 22334416 ↗
  • Bengston, V, Schrader, S. Parent-child relations. In Mangen DJ, Peterson WA (eds.), Research Instruments in Social Gerontology (pp. 115-185). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press, 1982.
  • Leung VP, Lam LC, Chiu HF, Cummings JL, Chen QL. Validation study of the Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory (CNPI). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;16(8):789-93. doi: 10.1002/gps.427. PubMed 11536346 ↗
  • Lam CL, Tse EY, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res. 2005 Mar;14(2):539-47. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0704-3. PubMed 15892443 ↗
  • Amirkhan, J., & Greaves, H. Sense of Coherence and Stress: The Mechanics of a Healthy Disposition. Psychology & Health, 2003, 18(1): 31-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044021000044233
  • Cheng ST, Chan AC. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in older Chinese: thresholds for long and short forms. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 May;20(5):465-70. doi: 10.1002/gps.1314. PubMed 15852439 ↗
  • Gan Y, Guo M, Tong J. Scale development of meaning-focused coping. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 2013; 18: 10-26.
  • Au A, Lai MK, Lau KM, Pan PC, Lam L, Thompson L, Gallagher-Thompson D. Social support and well-being in dementia family caregivers: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Aging Ment Health. 2009 Sep;13(5):761-8. doi: 10.1080/13607860902918223. PubMed 19882415 ↗
  • Lou VW, Lau BH, Cheung KS. Positive aspects of caregiving (PAC): scale validation among Chinese dementia caregivers (CG). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Mar-Apr;60(2):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.10.019. Epub 2014 Nov 7. PubMed 25488014 ↗
  • Yu DSF, Cheng ST, Wang J. Unravelling positive aspects of caregiving in dementia: An integrative review of research literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 16. PubMed 29128685 ↗
  • Yu DSF, Cheng ST, Chow EO, Kwok T, McCormack B, Wu W. The effects of a salutogenic strength-based intervention on sense of coherence and health outcomes of dementia family carers: A randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2023 Sep 1;52(9):afad160. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad160. PubMed 37659094 ↗
  • Loehlin, John C. Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Equation Analysis (4th ed.). Psychology Press, 2004.
  • Park CL. The Meaning Making Model: A framework for understanding meaning, spirituality, and stress-related growth in health psychology. The Eur Health Psychologist, 2013; 15: 40-47.
  • Hedeker, D., Gibbons, R., & Waternaux, C. Sample Size Estimation for Longitudinal Designs with Attrition: Comparing Time-Related Contrasts between Two Groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioural Statistics, 1999, 24(1): 70-93.
  • Cheng ST, Li KK, Losada A, Zhang F, Au A, Thompson LW, Gallagher-Thompson D. The effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for informal dementia caregivers: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2020 Feb;35(1):55-77. doi: 10.1037/pag0000401. PubMed 31985249 ↗
  • Mittelmark MB, Bauer GF. Salutogenesis as a Theory, as an Orientation and as the Sense of Coherence. 2022 Jan 1. In: Mittelmark MB, Bauer GF, Vaandrager L, Pelikan JM, Sagy S, Eriksson M, Lindstrom B, Meier Magistretti C, editors. The Handbook of Salutogenesis [Internet]. 2nd edition. Cham (CH): Springer; 2022. Chapter 3. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK584092/ PubMed 36122001 ↗
  • Trope Y, Liberman N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):440-63. doi: 10.1037/a0018963. PubMed 20438233 ↗
  • González-Prendes, A., & Resko, S. M. (2012). Cognitive-behavioral theory. Trauma: Contemporary directions in theory, practice, and research, 14-41.
  • Wong PT P. Existential positive psychology. In S. Lopez (Ed.), Encyclopedia of positive psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell
  • Yu DSF, Cheng ST, Chen K, Predicting positive aspect of caregiving in a dementia caregiving context: a longitudinal model testing. International Journal of Nursing Studies. Under review.
  • Yu DSF, Cheng ST, Kwok T. Developing and testing of an integrative theoretical model to predict positive aspects of caregiving among family caregivers of persons with dementia: A study protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jan;77(1):401-410. doi: 10.1111/jan.14561. Epub 2020 Oct 17. PubMed 33068058 ↗
  • Mausbach BT, Coon DW, Depp C, Rabinowitz YG, Wilson-Arias E, Kraemer HC, Thompson LW, Lane G, Gallagher-Thompson D. Ethnicity and time to institutionalization of dementia patients: a comparison of Latina and Caucasian female family caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jul;52(7):1077-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52306.x. PubMed 15209644 ↗
  • Hirschfeld M. Home care versus institutionalization: family caregiving and senile brain disease. International Journal of Nursing Studies (1983), 20, 23-32. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Jul;40(5):463-9; discussion 471-2. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00063-4. No abstract available. PubMed 12828966 ↗
  • Cohen CA, Gold DP, Shulman KI, Zucchero CA. Positive aspects in caregiving: An overlooked variable in research. Canadian Journal of Aging 1994; 13:378-391.
  • Rapp SR, Chao D. Appraisals of strain and of gain: Effects on psychological wellbeing of caregivers of dementia patients. Aging and Mental Health 2000; 4:142-147.
  • Williams IC. Emotional health of black and white dementia caregivers: a contextual examination. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Nov;60(6):P287-P295. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.6.p287. PubMed 16260702 ↗
  • Narayan S, Lewis M, Tornatore J, Hepburn K, Corcoran-Perry S. Subjective responses to caregiving for a spouse with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs. 2001 Mar;27(3):19-28. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20010301-05. PubMed 11915254 ↗
  • Andren S, Elmstahl S. Family caregivers' subjective experiences of satisfaction in dementia care: aspects of burden, subjective health and sense of coherence. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005 Jun;19(2):157-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00328.x. PubMed 15877641 ↗
  • Valimaki TH, Martikainen JA, Hongisto K, Vaatainen S, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM. Impact of Alzheimer's disease on the family caregiver's long-term quality of life: results from an ALSOVA follow-up study. Qual Life Res. 2016 Mar;25(3):687-97. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1100-x. Epub 2015 Sep 9. PubMed 26350541 ↗
  • Shin JH, Kim JH. Family Caregivers of People with Dementia Associate with Poor Health-Related Quality of Life: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316252. PubMed 36498333 ↗
  • Papastavrou E, Kalokerinou A, Papacostas SS, Tsangari H, Sourtzi P. Caring for a relative with dementia: family caregiver burden. J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jun;58(5):446-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04250.x. Epub 2007 Apr 17. PubMed 17442030 ↗
  • Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017-2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  • Alzhimer disease international. Dementia statistics. Access from https://www.alzint.org/about/dementia-facts-figures/dementia-statistics/ on 27th Sept 2023

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is not a plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07396298
Lead sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
Responsible party
Prof. Yu, Doris Sau Fung (Proferssor, The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 9, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Sau Fung YU, PhD
Contact
dyu1@hku.hk
+852-39176319
YU YU, PhD
principal investigator · The University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion