ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07363161BASKET BALLUpdated Jul 20, 2026

BASel Kosten-Effektivitäts-Trial: Drug-coated BALLoon (DCB) vs. Drug-eluting Stent (DES) Strategy in High-risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

An interventional study of PCI and PCI in Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), sponsored by B. Braun Melsungen AG. Recruiting at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-20.

Sponsored by B. Braun Melsungen AG · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,184
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this randomized, multicenter, international, open-label clinical trial is to demonstrate that, in the context of percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary artery disease, a SeQuent® SCB interventional strategy is non-inferior to a new-generation

DES strategy in terms of a 12- and 36-month composite of Target Vessel Failure (TVF), that includes:

  • cardiovascular death (CV death),
  • target vessel related MI (TV-MI),
  • clinically indicated target vessel revascularization (ci-TVR),
  • bleeding according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Types 3-5.

Eligible subjects will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive treatment of all lesions with either the SeQuent® SCB-based strategy or a DES-based strategy. The randomization will be performed prior to the index procedure once signed informed consent has been obtained and all eligibility criteria have been confirmed.

All Subjects will be followed for clinical outcomes at 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years. A subset of 138 randomized patients will undergo control angiography after one-year clinical follow-up (+1 month). An independent core laboratory will analyze all baseline angiograms.

If, at 36 months, the non-inferiority of the SeQuent® SCB strategy compared to the DES strategy is achieved, superiority in terms of TVF and BARC Type 3-5 bleeding will be tested.

An optional extension of follow-up to 6 years may be implemented based on interim results and the joint decision of the Steering Committee and the Sponsor. Details regarding this optional extension are provided in the Clinical Investigation Plan.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

Keywords

  • CAD
  • SCB
  • SeQuent® SCB
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

4,857 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 890 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,184 is above the median of 124 across 3,006 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

B. Braun Melsungen AG is the lead sponsor of 47 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject must be 18 years of age or older
  • Subject can understand risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives of receiving DCB treatment or DES and provide written before any study-related procedure
  • Subject should have a documented angina pectoris or silent ischemia as assessed by non-invasive testing, or functional invasive assessment, or equivalent (dyspnea, arrhythmia, ≥75% diameter stenosis without stress test at staged procedure), or unstable angina, hemodynamically stable NSTEMI and STEMI more than 48 hours after primary PCI and without residual thrombotic material
  • Subject must be affiliated with a social security system, where applicable

Subject must have at least one of the high clinical or anatomical risk features:

High clinical risk, defined as:

  • DM on treatment (insulin or oral antidiabetic agents), or
  • At least 75 years of age, or
  • CKD ( \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2), or
  • Treated for ACS (unstable angina, hemodynamically stable NSTEMI, hemodynamically stable STEMI more than 48 hours after uneventful primary PCI and without residual thrombotic material), or
  • High bleeding risk (defined by Academic Research Consortium criteria - ARC HBR)

OR

High anatomical risk lesions requiring treatment as follows:

  • Multivessel treatment (two or three vessels)
  • True bifurcation with side branch involvement
  • Long lesions (≥36 mm)
  • Lesion likely requiring calcium modification

In the case of multivessel (MV) disease, multiple vessels can be treated provided that all lesions are amenable to treatment with either DCB or DES and vessel size at the site of the lesion is >2.0 mm by visual assessment.

The trial does not restrict the number of target lesions. However, the operator should determine that all target lesions intended to be treated must be suitable for treatment with either DES or DCB. For patients randomized to the DCB arm, the likelihood of requiring provisional stenting must be assessed as less than 30% for each lesion requiring treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary PCI (acute STEMI patients)
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Subject enrolled in an active interventional trial
  • Subject not able or unlikely to comply with the planned follow-ups
  • Subject who is pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant during the study
  • Subject not able to give
  • Subject under judicial protection, guardianship or curatorship or patient deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision (where applicable)
  • Subject with a \<12 months
  • Subjects with known allergies to antiplatelet agents (e.g., acetylsalicylic acid, P2Y12 inhibitors), anticoagulants (e.g., heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors), iodinated contrast media, or mTOR inhibitors (e.g., sirolimus and related compounds)
  • Angiographic exclusion criteria:

    1. aorto-ostial lesions,
    2. coronary bypass grafts requiring intervention,
    3. chronic total occlusion requiring intervention
    4. Previous PCI at any time of a vessel intended to be treated (Instent-restenosis lesions excluded)
    5. Previous PCI within 30 days, except for recent STEMI, >48 hours after uneventful primary PCI and without residual thrombotic material on coronary angiography
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,184 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    SeQuent® SCB-based strategy

    all target lesions should be treated with the SeQuent® SCB after adequate lesion preparation. If the angiographic result is unacceptable following lesion preparation or after DCB treatment (e.g., flow-limiting dissection or residual stenosis \>30%), additional therapeutic steps should be considered. For non-left main bifurcation lesions, if the side branch requires treatment, it should also be treated with the SeQuent® SCB after adequate lesion preparation. If an unacceptable angiographic result, defined as \>70% residual stenosis or major recoil at the side branch ostium, is obtained, or if there is an imminent risk of vessel compromise, further therapeutic steps are required. Those steps may include optimized lesion preparation to avoid DES implantation; however, DES may be implanted if all other attempts fail.

    Device: PCI

  • Active comparator
    DES-based strategy

    all target lesions should be treated with DES. The use of DCB in the DES arm is strongly discouraged. If DES delivery is not feasible due to anatomical or other reasons, the operator may consider alternative treatments, such as more deliverable DES or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), while keeping the patients in the DES group. In case of bifurcation treatment, both DES and POBA are allowed. Any use of DCB in the DES arm shall be justified.

    Device: PCI

Interventions

  • DevicePCI

    PCI with SeQuent® SCB

  • DevicePCI

    PCI with DES

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of Target Vessel Failure (TVF) and bleeding according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Types 3-5

    Time frame: at 12 months (after intervention)

  2. Composite of TVF and bleeding BARC 3-5

    Time frame: at 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite of TVF and bleeding BARC 3-5

    Time frame: at 3 months

  2. Composite of TVF and bleeding BARC 3-5

    Time frame: at 24 months

  3. Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DOCE)

    a composite of cardiovascular death (CV death), device failure-related myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (ci-TLR)

    Time frame: at 3 months

  4. DOCE

    Time frame: at 12 months

  5. DOCE

    Time frame: at 24 months

  6. DOCE

    Time frame: at 36 months

  7. TVF

    Time frame: at 3 months

  8. TVF

    Time frame: at 12 months

  9. TVF

    Time frame: at 24 months

  10. TVF

    Time frame: at 36 months

  11. Patient-oriented Composite endpoint (POCE)

    a composite of any death, any MI, any stroke, and any revascularization

    Time frame: at 3 months

  12. POCE

    Time frame: at 12 months

  13. POCE

    Time frame: at 24 months

  14. POCE

    Time frame: at 36 months

  15. Any death

    Time frame: at 3 months

  16. Any death

    Time frame: at 12 months

  17. Any death

    Time frame: at 24 months

  18. Any death

    Time frame: at 36 months

  19. CV death

    Time frame: at 3 months

  20. CV death

    Time frame: at 12 months

  21. CV death

    Time frame: at 24 months

  22. CV death

    Time frame: at 36 months

  23. Cardiac death

    Time frame: at 3 months

  24. Cardiac death

    Time frame: at 12 months

  25. Cardiac death

    Time frame: at 24 months

  26. Cardiac death

    Time frame: at 36 months

  27. Any MI

    Time frame: at 3 months

  28. Any MI

    Time frame: at 12 months

  29. Any MI

    Time frame: at 24 months

  30. Any MI

    Time frame: at 36 months

  31. Target Vessel-Related MI

    Time frame: at 3 months

  32. Target Vessel-Related MI

    Time frame: at 12 months

  33. Target Vessel-Related MI

    Time frame: at 24 months

  34. Target Vessel-Related MI

    Time frame: at 36 months

  35. Peri-procedural MI

    as defined by Drug Coated Balloon Academic Research Consortium (DCB ARC)

    Time frame: at 3 months

  36. Peri-procedural MI

    Time frame: at 12 months

  37. Peri-procedural MI

    Time frame: at 24 months

  38. Peri-procedural MI

    Time frame: at 36 months

  39. Spontaneous MI

    according to 4th Universal Definition of MI

    Time frame: at 3 months

  40. Spontaneous MI

    Time frame: at 12 months

  41. Spontaneous MI

    Time frame: 24 months

  42. Spontaneous MI

    Time frame: at 36 months

  43. BARC type ≥2 bleeding

    Time frame: at 3 months

  44. BARC type ≥2 bleeding

    Time frame: at 12 months

  45. BARC type ≥2 bleeding

    Time frame: at 24 months

  46. BARC type ≥2 bleeding

    Time frame: at 36 months

  47. BARC 3-5 bleeding

    Time frame: at 3 months

  48. BARC 3-5 bleeding

    Time frame: at 12 months

  49. BARC 3-5 bleeding

    Time frame: at 24 months

  50. BARC 3-5 bleeding

    Time frame: at 36 months

  51. Definite stent/lesion thrombosis

    Time frame: at 3 months

  52. Definite stent/lesion thrombosis

    Time frame: at 12 months

  53. Definite stent/lesion thrombosis

    Time frame: at 24 months

  54. Definite stent/lesion thrombosis

    Time frame: at 36 months

  55. Stroke

    ischemic and hemorrhagic

    Time frame: at 3 months

  56. Stroke

    Time frame: at 12 months

  57. Stroke

    Time frame: at 24 months

  58. Stroke

    Time frame: at 36 months

  59. Any TLR

    Time frame: at 3 months

  60. Any TLR

    Time frame: at 12 months

  61. Any TLR

    Time frame: at 24 months

  62. Any TLR

    Time frame: at 36 months

  63. ci-TLR

    Time frame: at 3 months

  64. ci-TLR

    Time frame: at 12 months

  65. ci-TLR

    Time frame: at 24 months

  66. ci-TLR

    Time frame: at 36 months

  67. Any TVR

    Time frame: at 3 months

  68. Any TVR

    Time frame: at 12 months

  69. Any TVR

    Time frame: at 24 months

  70. Any TVR

    Time frame: at 36 months

  71. ci-TVR

    Time frame: at 3 months

  72. ci-TVR

    Time frame: at 12 months

  73. ci-TVR

    Time frame: at 24 months

  74. ci-TVR

    Time frame: at 36 months

  75. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) burden

    total duration of DAPT and/or Single Antiplatelet Therapy (SAPT)

    Time frame: at 3 months

  76. DAPT burden

    Time frame: at 12 months

  77. DAPT burden

    Time frame: at 24 months

  78. DAPT burden

    Time frame: at 36 months

  79. Hospitalization related to study endpoints

    Time frame: at 3 months

  80. Hospitalization related to study endpoints

    Time frame: at 12 months

  81. Hospitalization related to study endpoints

    Time frame: at 24 months

  82. Hospitalization related to study endpoints

    Time frame: at 36 months

  83. Procedure success

    defined as Device success and freedom from in-hospital cardiovascular death, TLR, peri-procedural MI, any stroke, and BARC 3 or 5 bleeding

    Time frame: at 3 months

  84. Procedure success

    Time frame: at 12 months

  85. Procedure success

    Time frame: at 24 months

  86. Procedure success

    Time frame: at 36 months

  87. Device success (DCB)

    defined as successful delivery in time and inflation within 30-60 s of the allocated DCB device at the intended target lesion during an attempt with a DCB not previously used (first use); successful withdrawal of the device system; attainment of a final in-segment or in-lesion residual stenosis of \<30% (except in the side branch ostium in nonleft main bifurcation lesions \<70%) by visual estimate

    Time frame: at 3 months

  88. Device success (DCB)

    Time frame: at 12 months

  89. Device success (DCB)

    Time frame: at 24 months

  90. Device success (DCB)

    Time frame: at 36 months

  91. Device success (DES)

    defined as successful delivery, balloon expansion, and deployment of the first assigned DES at the intended target lesion; successful withdrawal of the device delivery system; attainment of a final in-stent residual stenosis of \<20% by visual estimate

    Time frame: at 3 months

  92. Device success (DES)

    Time frame: at 12 months

  93. Device success (DES)

    Time frame: at 24 months

  94. Device success (DES)

    Time frame: at 36 months

  95. Metal burden

    by assessing the total stent length

    Time frame: at 3 months

  96. Metal burden

    Time frame: at 12 months

  97. Metal burden

    Time frame: at 24 months

  98. Metal burden

    Time frame: at 36 months

  99. In-segment net gain

    Main angiographic endpoint after completion of the 12-month follow-up

    Time frame: assessed between 12 and 13 months

  100. Cost-effectiveness of DCB-based vs. DES-based strategy

    Time frame: at 12 months

  101. Cost-effectiveness of DCB-based vs. DES-based strategy

    Time frame: at 24 months

  102. Cost-effectiveness of DCB-based vs. DES-based strategy

    Time frame: at 36 months

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Universität des Saarlandes - Klinik für Innere Medizin III
    Homburg, 66421, Germany
    Not yet recruiting
    • Bruno Scheller-Clever, Univ. Prof. Dr. med. · ContactBruno.Scheller@uks.eu · +49 6841 1615927
    • Bruno Scheller-Clever, Univ. Prof. Dr. med. · Principal investigator
  • University Hospital Basel
    Basel, 4031, Switzerland
    Not yet recruiting
    • Gregor Leibundgut, Prof. Dr. med. · ContactGregor.Leibundgut@usb.ch · +41 61 2654444
    • Gregor Leibundgut, Prof. Dr. med. · Principal investigator
  • Stadtspital Zürich - Klinik für Kardiologie
    Zurich, 8063, Switzerland
    Recruiting
    • Raban Jeger, Prof. Dr. med. · ContactRaban.Jeger@stadtspital.ch · +41 44 4163350
    • Raban Jeger, Prof. Dr. med. · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07363161
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2026
Start date
Jun 17, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 20, 2026

Study contacts

Jiani Wang, Dr.
Contact
Jiani.Wang@bbraun.com
+49 151 46206456
Franziska Greifzu, Dr.
Contact
Franziska.Greifzu@bbraun.com
+49 30 568207371
Raban Jeger, Prof. Dr. med.
principal investigator · Stadtspital Zürich - Klinik für Kardiologie
Bruno Scheller-Clever, Univ. Prof. Dr. med.
principal investigator · Universität des Saarlandes - Klinik für Innere Medizin III

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion