ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07360574PAOLO3Updated Jan 22, 2026

Piezo2-related Arthrogryposis & physiopathOLOgy 3

An observational study in Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita and Piezo2 Mutation Gain of Function, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 10 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-22.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12
Ages
10 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study type: Observational, non-interventional, single-center, descriptive study.

Goal of the study:

The goal of this observational study is to characterize the intensity, variability, and qualitative features of pain in patients with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) caused by a gain-of-function mutation in PIEZO2. This population is rare and identified through the French national PARART registry (Pediatric and Adult Registry for patients with ARThrogryposis).

Population:

Participants are ≥10 years old, have a genetically confirmed gain-of-function PIEZO2 variant, and are registered in PARART. All procedures are conducted remotely; no onsite visit is required.

Main questions the study aims to answer:

  • What is the intensity and day-to-day variability of pain over 14 consecutive days, measured with a Numerical Rating Scale (0-100)?
  • What are the sensory qualities and anatomical distribution of pain in this population?
  • How does this pain affect quality of life?
  • What treatments (pharmacological or non-pharmacological) have been used, and how effective are they?

Study design:

There is no comparison group. The study is descriptive and aims to characterize the pain phenotype linked to PIEZO2 gain-of-function mutations.

What participants will do:

Participants will complete the following tasks remotely:

At Day 1:

Questionnaires:

  • Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA)
  • SF-12
  • EQ-5D-5L
  • Pain monitoring: treatments used

For 14 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 14), on a paper logbook:

  • Daily self-reported Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-100) for pain
  • Daily body chart to document pain distribution

All data are collected through REDCap and a paper logbook. No clinical exam, biological sampling, or hospital visit is required.

The study duration for each participant is 14 days.

Read the detailed description

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC; Orpha code 1037) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders defined by congenital joint contractures affecting at least two distinct body regions (Dahan-Oliel et al. 2019).

Its estimated prevalence ranges from 1 in 3,000 to 1 in 12,000 live births, based on population-based epidemiological studies (Darin et al. 2002; Lowry et al. 2010; Hoff et al. 2012). The pathophysiology of AMC is closely linked to impaired fetal movement, with the severity of musculoskeletal manifestations depending on the timing and degree of fetal akinesia during development (Pollard, McGonnell, and Pitsillides 2014; Nowlan 2015; Felsenthal and Zelzer 2017).

Advances in molecular genetics have identified gain-of-function variants in the mechanosensitive ion channel PIEZO2 as a key etiology in a distinct subgroup of distal arthrogryposis (Coste et al. 2013). PIEZO2 plays a central role in mechanotransduction, converting mechanical stimuli into ionic currents in peripheral sensory neurons, thereby mediating proprioception and mechanical nociception (Wu, Lewis, and Grandl 2017; Szczot et al. 2021; Ma et al. 2023; Sánchez-Carranza et al. 2024).

Structural studies have shown that PIEZO2 forms a large trimeric propeller-shaped mechanosensitive channel whose architecture enables rapid transduction of membrane tension into cation influx, particularly Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ (Wang et al. 2019). Experimental data indicate that PIEZO2 gain-of-function mutations lead to delayed channel inactivation, neuronal hyperexcitability, and aberrant mechanotransduction, which likely underlie the distinctive pain phenotype observed in affected patients (Coste et al. 2013).

Clinically, individuals with PIEZO2-related AMC frequently report chronic diffuse pain with episodic exacerbations that are often poorly responsive to conventional analgesic strategies. Despite this recognizable pattern, genotype-phenotype correlations and the mechanisms driving pain severity and distribution remain insufficiently characterized.

This single-center, non-interventional observational study aims to describe the pain phenotype of individuals with AMC caused by gain-of-function variants in PIEZO2 identified through the national PARART registry (NCT05673265).

The study consists of prospective remote collection of self-reported outcomes using validated questionnaires. On Day 1, participants complete assessments of pain quality (QDSA) and quality of life (SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L), along with documentation of prior analgesic strategies. From Day 1 to Day 14, participants record daily pain intensity using a Numerical Rating Scale (0-100) and pain localization on a body chart, enabling evaluation of pain intensity, temporal variability, and anatomical distribution.

The study relies exclusively on descriptive statistical analyses, without hypothesis testing or comparison groups. Data are collected and managed using REDCap, in accordance with predefined procedures for pseudonymization, data integrity, and regulatory compliance (Harris et al. 2009; Harris et al. 2019). By systematically characterizing pain features and their impact on quality of life, this study seeks to improve understanding of the clinical pain profile associated with PIEZO2 gain-of-function mutations and to provide a foundation for future mechanism-based therapeutic strategies in this rare condition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita
  • Piezo2 Mutation Gain of Function

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Arthrogyposis
  • Piezo2
03

In context

Arthrogryposis

16 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthrogryposis; 5 are open to participants now.

Browse Arthrogryposis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 837 studies on the registry; 207 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients affected by Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita with mutation gain of function of Piezo2 gene, followed by the University Hospital of Grenoble.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • PIEZO2 mutation gain of function
  • Age ≥ 10 years
  • Registered member of the PARART database (Pediatric and Adult Registry for Patients With ARThrogryposis)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Age \< 10 years

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
14 Days
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Scale

    Quantitative Pain Evaluation : scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever).

    Time frame: From the start to the end of the follow-up at 14 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Body Pain Map

    Location of the pain on the body.

    Time frame: From the start to the end of the follow-up at 14 days

  2. EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels

    Self-questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life. 5D : Five Dimensions (Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression). 5L : Five Levels (No problems, Slight, Moderate, Severe, Extreme problems)

    Time frame: At the start of the follow-up (Day 1).

  3. 12-Item Short Form Health Survey

    The SF-12 is a self-reported questionnaire that produces two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS).

    Time frame: At the start of the follow-up (Day 1).

  4. Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire

    Qualitative description of pain with a variety of words refering to the different pain types, in distinct groups.

    Time frame: At the start of the follow-up (Day 1).

  5. Pain Monitoring / Treatments

    Listing of pain treatments (medicinal or non-medicinal) used by the patient.

    Time frame: At the start of the follow-up (Day 1).

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Coste B, Houge G, Murray MF, Stitziel N, Bandell M, Giovanni MA, Philippakis A, Hoischen A, Riemer G, Steen U, Steen VM, Mathur J, Cox J, Lebo M, Rehm H, Weiss ST, Wood JN, Maas RL, Sunyaev SR, Patapoutian A. Gain-of-function mutations in the mechanically activated ion channel PIEZO2 cause a subtype of Distal Arthrogryposis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 19;110(12):4667-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221400110. Epub 2013 Mar 4. PubMed 23487782 ↗
  • Felsenthal N, Zelzer E. Mechanical regulation of musculoskeletal system development. Development. 2017 Dec 1;144(23):4271-4283. doi: 10.1242/dev.151266. PubMed 29183940 ↗
  • Nowlan NC. Biomechanics of foetal movement. Eur Cell Mater. 2015 Jan 2;29:1-21; discussion 21. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v029a01. PubMed 25552425 ↗
  • Pollard AS, McGonnell IM, Pitsillides AA. Mechanoadaptation of developing limbs: shaking a leg. J Anat. 2014 Jun;224(6):615-23. doi: 10.1111/joa.12171. Epub 2014 Mar 18. PubMed 24635640 ↗
  • Hoff JM, Loane M, Gilhus NE, Rasmussen S, Daltveit AK. Arthrogryposis multiplexa congenita: an epidemiologic study of nearly 9 million births in 24 EUROCAT registers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Dec;159(2):347-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.09.027. Epub 2011 Oct 17. PubMed 22005589 ↗
  • Lowry RB, Sibbald B, Bedard T, Hall JG. Prevalence of multiple congenital contractures including arthrogryposis multiplex congenita in Alberta, Canada, and a strategy for classification and coding. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Dec;88(12):1057-61. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20738. Epub 2010 Nov 15. PubMed 21157886 ↗
  • Darin N, Kimber E, Kroksmark AK, Tulinius M. Multiple congenital contractures: birth prevalence, etiology, and outcome. J Pediatr. 2002 Jan;140(1):61-7. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.121148. PubMed 11815765 ↗
  • Dahan-Oliel N, Cachecho S, Barnes D, Bedard T, Davison AM, Dieterich K, Donohoe M, Fafara A, Hamdy R, Hjartarson HT, S Hoffman N, Kimber E, Komolkin I, Lester R, Ponten E, van Bosse HJP, Hall JG. International multidisciplinary collaboration toward an annotated definition of arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Sep;181(3):288-299. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31721. Epub 2019 Jul 7. PubMed 31282072 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical and regulatory constraints, and because no data-sharing plan is defined in the study protocol.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Feb 2026; primary completion for Jul 2026, 5 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 15, 2025
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
StartEst.
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 2026
Last update
Jan 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07360574
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 22, 2026
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion