ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07023770EXOLATUpdated Sep 1, 2026

Rehabilitation Program Dedicated to Post-stroke Lateropulsion Including Exoskeleton Assisted Exercises

An interventional study of specific lateropulsion rehabilitation program (exoskeleton + specific physiotherapy orientation rehabilitation) and Conventional physiotherapy without without exercises dedicated to lateropulsion or verticality representation alleviation in Stroke, Ischemic, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 84 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 84 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 164 studies in Ischemic Stroke with a site in France — 56 open to participants now, 61 under way, 10 of them phase 3. Ischemic Stroke · France.

Planned enrollment
107th of 109
3 · median 186
Started
2025
with 14 others
No phase
58 of 164
23 open now
Primary completion
2026-09
later than 16 of 60 live
Registered
149th of 164
by date

Among the 164 studies in Ischemic Stroke with a site in France, this one is the 107th largest by planned enrollment of the 109 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 15 that started in 2025, is one of 58 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 16 of the 60 other live ones, and was the 149th registered.

Ischemic Stroke

2,619 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 976 are open to participants now.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Open to participants now

56 of the 164 studies in Ischemic Stroke with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

50 more — sign in →

All 56 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 661 Ischemic Stroke studies recruiting now, 396 (60%) set no upper age limit and 62 (9%) stop at 75 or younger; 26 take children under 18; 42 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 84 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 164 studies in Ischemic Stroke with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Lateropulsion is a deficit in the body orientation with respect to the vertical in the coronal plane, defined by the presence of one of the three signs: lateral body tilt, active pushing from the sound limbs, and resistance to passive corrections. The lateral body tilt is the cardinal sign, the frequency of the 2 other signs increasing with lateropulsion severity (most dramatic forms called pusher syndrome in the past). Lateropulsion is frequent after stroke, and represents the main factor underpinning balance and gait disorders at the subacute phase. After hemisphere stroke lateropulsion is caused by a bias in the internal model of the verticality in the frontal plane, individuals unconsciously aligning their body posture on a tilted verticality representation. Pilot studies suggested the possibility to recalibrate the internal model of verticality, biased by stroke, and to improve individuals' uprightness. The investigators expect that a specific rehabilitation program combining technics devoted to lateropulsion, and comprising exoskeleton (Atalante) assisted balance exercises could help recalibrate the internal model of verticality and alleviate lateropulsion. The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that a 3-week specific lateropulsion rehabilitation program (15 sessions of 30 minutes including exoskeleton and a rehabilitation focused on the vertical body orientation in the frontal plane) improves the visual vertical (VV), the most used test to assess verticality perception.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND To our knowledge, no study has ever assessed the effects of a rehabilitation program specifically devoted to lateropulsion. The investigators expect that such a specific program combining different technics selected on the basis of theoretical rationale, experimental evidence in healthy subjects, or phase I-II randomized clinical studies, and supposed to improve verticality representation or alleviate lateropulsion could improve verticality representation and alleviate lateropulsion. The investigators hypothesize that individuals with moderate to severe lateropulsion after hemisphere stroke could benefit from such a specific lateropulsion rehabilitation program.

OBJECTIVES The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that, in individuals with a first ischemic right hemisphere stroke showing a moderate to severe lateropulsion due to a biased internal model of verticality, a 3-week intensive specific and intensive lateropulsion rehabilitation program (15 physiotherapy sessions of 30 minutes including exoskeleton-assisted lateral balance exercises) improves the visual perception of the verticality as assessed by the Visual Vertical (VV) orientation. This outcome has been selected because it may be repeatedly assessed, which is necessary in a Small-N design Study.

The secondary objectives are to:

  • Test the hypothesis that the specific and intensive lateropulsion rehabilitation program also modulates the postural perception of the vertical (PV). This transmodal modulation of verticality perception involving both VV and PV would mean that the internal model of verticality has been recalibrated. This would have a clinical and scientific significance going far beyond a simple change in verticality perception
  • Test the hypothesis that the specific and intensive lateropulsion rehabilitation program alleviates lateropulsion;
  • Test the hypothesis that the specific and intensive lateropulsion rehabilitation program improves balance and gait abilities without any effect on the motricity of the paretic upper limb;
  • Evaluate the participants' perception at the end of this specific rehabilitation program.

HYPOTHESES Considering the main objective, the investigators hypothesize that the specific and intensive lateropulsion rehabilitation program will improve VV orientation of at least 2°, constituting a real change in VV perception.

STUDY DESIGN The study is a monocentric Small-n design study. The experimental plan is a multiple baseline design. This design applies for intervention with slow/delayed changes and no expected washout. Three participants will be included after about the same time post stroke (subacute phase). The VV will be measured daily (except on weekends) for each participant (i.e. 5 VV per week ), and the generalization and control measures measured once each week. All participants will follow a conventional rehabilitation program until they start the intervention.

The first participant will start the intervention period 2 weeks after enrolment. The second will start at 3 weeks after enrolment and the last one will start at 4 weeks after enrolment. All participants will be assessed repetitively on the target variables. The sequential introduction of the intervention in 3 participants will allow the visualization of lack of retest effect and of progress unrelated to intervention in the individuals not having the intervention yet.

INTERVENTION

During the baseline and after the 3-week intervention, individuals will follow the conventional rehabilitation program including :

  • 2 sessions per day of 30-minutes of "conventional" physiotherapy 5 days a week without exercises specifically devoted to the control of body orientation in frontal plane, or verticality representation
  • 1 session of 30-min of occupational therapy 5 days a week
  • speech therapy and neuropsychology if necessary.

During the 3-week intervention, individuals will have:

  • 1 session per day of 30-min of physiotherapy specifically focused on the body orientation with respect to gravity in the frontal plane, including exoskeleton-assisted balance and gait exercises 3 times a week, 5 days a week,
  • 1 session per day of 30-min conventional physiotherapy 5 days a week
  • 1 session of 30-min of occupational therapy 5 days a week
  • speech therapy and neuropsychology if necessary. So, the intervention phase lasts 3 weeks, and consists in 15 physiotherapy sessions, focused on the active vertical body orientation in the frontal plane and comprising exoskeleton-assisted balance and gait exercises. Participants have the same dose of rehabilitation in each phase (baseline, during intervention and after intervention), which only differ in the nature of the rehabilitation.

During the specific rehabilitation program, the frame of exercises with the Atalante® exoskeleton comprises verticalization: work in standing position, stepping, walking in different directions including backward, with the help of a mirror or without visual information (eyes closed). Some exercises in the exoskeleton will also be performed when the participant is laterally tilted (in a static position, during active functional tasks, eyes open and closed).

The specific physiotherapy rehabilitation targeting lateropulsion will include: verticality awareness, exercises in front of a mirror to facilitate the awareness of body tilt (or with a video record), posturography with biofeedback, trunk inclination, reaching tasks in sitting and standing position, walking with body-weight support, orientation tasks during sensorial ponderation (eyes open/closed, foam or firm surface, cervical extension...) The investigators chose not to include brain stimulation in this program.

PARTICIPANTS Three patients will be included. The study will be explained to eligible individuals who will be free to participate or not. An informed consent form will then be signed by each participant.

To meet the scientific standards of SCEDs, one required design criteria is to include at least three attempts to demonstrate an intervention effect (i.e. 3 participants in our case). The sequential introduction of the intervention in 3 participants will allow the visualization of effect of the intervention on the VV.

RELEVANCE Regaining independent balance and mobility is a major goal in post-stroke rehabilitation. While lateropulsion due to a biased internal model of verticality is one of the most important detrimental factors affecting balance and gait at the post-stroke subacute phase, no specific lateropulsion rehabilitation program has ever been scientifically validated with a high level of evidence. This study will focus on individuals with moderate to severe lateropulsion caused by a biased internal model of verticality due to a right hemisphere stroke which are known to have lesser recovery and longer hospital length of stay. A specific and intensive lateropulsion rehabilitation program dedicated to the active vertical body orientation in the frontal plan could speed up the mobility recovery and shorten the hospitalization period.

03

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Ischemic

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • lateropulsion
  • exoskeleton
  • rehabilitation program
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 84 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Right hemispheric first and unique ischemic stroke between 2 weeks and 6 months old (subacute phase) ;
  • Presence of lateropulsion, assessed by the Scale for Contraversive Pushing (2 ≤ SCP \< 5)
  • Presence of contralesional VV bias (VV > 4°)
  • Right handedness defined by a Edinburgh score ≥0,39
  • Being hospitalized in a Physical Medicine and Neurological Rehabilitation (PMR) facility.
  • Have given a written and

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical instability making evaluation impossible,
  • Comprehension or cognitive or behavioral disorders, or depressive symptoms that compromise participation in the program
  • Postural disorders or body geometry disorders that interfere with balance for a reason that is independant of the stroke
  • Morphological to the use of the Atalante® robot (segment length or joint ranges; height \<155cm; weight >100kg),
  • Severe spasticity (>3 on the modified Ashworth scale) in the adductors, quadriceps, hamstrings and triceps surae
  • Presence of a pressure sore at the areas of contact with the Atalante® robot,
  • History of osteoporotic fractures.
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    program week 2-3-4

    For the participant included in this arm, the intervention will take place during weeks 2-3-4 (5 times per week 30-min sessions with specific physiotherapy targeting lateropulsion including exercices in exoskeleton + 5 times per week conventional physiotherapy). During weeks 1, 5, 6, 7 \& 8, 30-min sessions of conventional physiotherapy will take place 10 times per week. The rest of the rehabilitation (speech therapy, neuropsychology, occupational therapy) will be provided as usual.

    Behavioral: specific lateropulsion rehabilitation program (exoskeleton + specific physiotherapy orientation rehabilitation) · Behavioral: Conventional physiotherapy without without exercises dedicated to lateropulsion or verticality representation alleviation

  • Experimental
    program week 3-4-5

    For the participant included in this arm, the intervention will take place during weeks 3-4-5 (5 times per week 30-min sessions with specific physiotherapy targeting lateropulsion including exercices in exoskeleton + 5 times per week conventional physiotherapy). During weeks 1, 2, 6, 7 \& 8, 30-min sessions of conventional physiotherapy will take place 10 times per week. The rest of the rehabilitation (speech therapy, neuropsychology, occupational therapy) will be provided as usual.

    Behavioral: specific lateropulsion rehabilitation program (exoskeleton + specific physiotherapy orientation rehabilitation) · Behavioral: Conventional physiotherapy without without exercises dedicated to lateropulsion or verticality representation alleviation

  • Experimental
    program week 4-5-6

    For the participant included in this arm, the intervention will take place during weeks 4-5-6 (5 times per week 30-min sessions with specific physiotherapy targeting lateropulsion including exercices in exoskeleton + 5 times per week conventional physiotherapy). During weeks 1, 2, 3, 7 \& 8, 30-min sessions of conventional physiotherapy will take place 10 times per week. The rest of the rehabilitation (speech therapy, neuropsychology, occupational therapy) will be provided as usual.

    Behavioral: specific lateropulsion rehabilitation program (exoskeleton + specific physiotherapy orientation rehabilitation) · Behavioral: Conventional physiotherapy without without exercises dedicated to lateropulsion or verticality representation alleviation

Interventions

  • Behavioralspecific lateropulsion rehabilitation program (exoskeleton + specific physiotherapy orientation rehabilitation)

    5 times a week during 30 minutes sessions = 15 Physiotherapy sessions, focused on the active vertical body orientation in the frontal plane and comprising exoskeleton-assisted balance and gait exercises. \+ 5 times a week during 30 minutes sessions = 15 conventional physiotherapy without exercises dedicated to lateropulsion or verticality representation alleviation The intervention description is more extensive in the study description section

  • BehavioralConventional physiotherapy without without exercises dedicated to lateropulsion or verticality representation alleviation

    10 times a week, during 30-minutes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Vertical (VV) Orientation

    VV consists in testing the direction of a visual line, perceived as vertical by participants, in complete darkness. VV will be tested by a well-validated apparatus and paradigm (Pérennou et al Brain 2008 ; Piscicelli \& Pérennou 2017). VV orientation will be the average orientation (in degree) of the 10 trials performed. Higher score means a worse outcome, indicating the magnitude of the bias in verticality perception.

    Time frame: Daily, from enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postural Vertical (PV) orientation and uncertainty

    PV consists in testing the whole body orientation in sitting, perceived as vertical by participants, in complete darkness. PV will be tested by a well-validated apparatus and paradigm (Pérennou et al Brain 2008). PV orientation will be the average orientation (in degree) of the 10 trials performed ; PV uncertainty is the standard deviation of the 10 trials performed in degrees. Higher scores mean worse outcomes, indicating the magnitude of the bias in verticality perception

    Time frame: Once a week from enrollment to the end of program at 8 weeks

  2. Lateropulsion severity assessed by SCALA

    The SCAle for LAteropulsion (SCALA) scores range from 0 (no lateropulsion) to 50 (severe lateropulsion with pushing); higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: once a week from enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  3. Lateropulsion severity assessed by SCP

    The SCP (= clinical Scale for Contraversive Pusching, Karnath et al. (2000)) scores range from 0 (no lateropulsion) to 6 (severe lateropulsion with pushing); higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: once a week from enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  4. Visual Vertical Uncertainty

    VV consists of testing the direction of a visual line, perceived as vertical by particpants, in complete darkness. VV will be tested by a well-validated apparatus and paradigm (Pérennou et al Brain 2008 ; Piscicelli \& Pérennou 2017). VV uncertainty will be the standard deviation of the 10 trials performed in degrees. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Daily, from enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  5. specific post-effect of one exoskeleton session on visual vertical

    orientation of VV in degrees, a higher score indicate a higher verticality perception biais. 15 minutes max after exoskeleton session.

    Time frame: once a week during the 3 lateropulsion program weeks

  6. Lower limb motricity assessed by "Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke"

    Motor score of lower extremity ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) 34 points (normal motor performance). A higher score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: once a week from enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  7. Balance assessed by the modified Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (mPASS) total score

    The modified Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patient (m-PASS) scores range from 0 (poorer balance ability) to 50 (excellent balance ability). Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: once a week from enrollment to the end of the study at week 8

  8. Gait assessed by Modified Fugl-Meyer Gait Assessment total score

    Modified Fugl-Meyer Gait Assessment score ranges from 0 (not able to walk) to 6 (walks at a normal speed for his age). Higher score means better outcome (Lindmark 1988).

    Time frame: once a week from enrollment to the end of the study (week 8)

  9. Functionnal mobility

    Time in seconds at the Time up and go test (TUG). Higher time means worse outcome.

    Time frame: once a week fron enrollment to the end of the study (week 8)

  10. Upper limb motricity assessed by "Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke"

    Motor score of upper extremity ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 66 points (normal motor performance). A higher score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: once a week from enrollment to the end of the treatment (week 8)

  11. Positions (on both anterior and lateral axes) of the center of pression in the exoskeleton while lateraly inclined

    Measured in the exoskeleton in millimeters. Higher score indicates an asymmetric weight beiring.

    Time frame: During lateropulsion program, Day 1 and Day 5 of the first week, Day 5 of the second week and Day 5 of the third week.

  12. Patient reported discomfort experienced during exoskeleton sessions

    Recorded on a visual analog scale (0-10; lower values better) and a semi-structured interview

    Time frame: Once, on day 5 of the third week of the specific and intensive lateropulsion rehabilitation program including exercices in the exoskeleton

  13. Patient reported satisfaction of exoskeleton sessions

    Recorded on a visual analog scale (0-10; higher values better) and a semi-structured interview

    Time frame: Once, on day 5 of the third week of the specific and intensive lateropulsion rehabilitation program including exercices in the exoskeleton

  14. feasibility and satisfaction of the lateropulsion program perceived by physiotherapist

    physiotherapist point of view, recorded with a semi structured interview and visual analog scales for feasibility and satisfaction ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better outcomes

    Time frame: Once, on day 5 of the third week of the specific and intensive lateropulsion rehabilitation program including exercices in the exoskeleton

  15. specific effect of exoskeleton practice on positions (on both anterior and lateral axes) of the center of pression in the exoskeleton while lateraly inclined

    Measured in the exoskeleton in millimeters. Higher score indicates an asymmetric weight beiring.

    Time frame: During lateropulsion program, before and after a training session, on Day 1 and Day 5 of the first week, Day 5 of the second week and Day 5 of the third week.

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yun N, Joo MC, Kim SC, Kim MS. Robot-assisted gait training effectively improved lateropulsion in subacute stroke patients: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Dec;54(6):827-836. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05077-3. Epub 2018 Dec 3. PubMed 30507899 ↗
  • Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4. PubMed 27145936 ↗
  • Piscicelli C, Perennou D. Visual verticality perception after stroke: A systematic review of methodological approaches and suggestions for standardization. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;60(3):208-216. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Apr 11. PubMed 27079584 ↗
  • Perennou DA, Mazibrada G, Chauvineau V, Greenwood R, Rothwell J, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM. Lateropulsion, pushing and verticality perception in hemisphere stroke: a causal relationship? Brain. 2008 Sep;131(Pt 9):2401-13. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn170. Epub 2008 Aug 4. PubMed 18678565 ↗
  • Perennou DA, Amblard B, Leblond C, Pelissier J. Biased postural vertical in humans with hemispheric cerebral lesions. Neurosci Lett. 1998 Aug 14;252(2):75-8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00501-1. PubMed 9756325 ↗
  • Paci M, Macchioni G, Ferrarello F. Treatment approaches for pusher behaviour: a scoping review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 Mar;30(2):119-136. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2021.2016098. Epub 2022 Feb 14. PubMed 35156566 ↗
  • Odin A, Faletto-Passy D, Assaban F, Perennou D. Modulating the internal model of verticality by virtual reality and body-weight support walking: A pilot study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Sep;61(5):292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 19. PubMed 30031891 ↗
  • Nolan J, Jacques A, Godecke E, Abe H, Babyar S, Bergmann J, Birnbaum M, Dai S, Danells C, Edwards TG, Gandolfi M, Jahn K, Koter R, Mansfield A, Nakamura J, Pardo V, Perennou D, Piscicelli C, Punt D, Romick-Sheldon D, Saeys W, Smania N, Vaes N, Whitt AL, Singer B. Clinical practice recommendations for management of lateropulsion after stroke determined by a Delphi expert panel. Clin Rehabil. 2023 Nov;37(11):1559-1574. doi: 10.1177/02692155231172012. Epub 2023 Apr 26. PubMed 37122265 ↗
  • Louie DR, Mortenson WB, Durocher M, Schneeberg A, Teasell R, Yao J, Eng JJ. Efficacy of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program for non-ambulatory patients during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Oct 10;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00942-z. PubMed 34629104 ↗
  • Lewis J, Heinemann T, Jacques A, Chan K, Harper KJ, Nolan J. Lateropulsion is a predictor of falls during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Mar;67(2):101814. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101814. Epub 2024 Mar 20. No abstract available. PubMed 38513306 ↗
  • Krewer C, Riess K, Bergmann J, Muller F, Jahn K, Koenig E. Immediate effectiveness of single-session therapeutic interventions in pusher behaviour. Gait Posture. 2013 Feb;37(2):246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Aug 11. PubMed 22889929 ↗
  • Hsu TH, Tsai CL, Chi JY, Hsu CY, Lin YN. Effect of wearable exoskeleton on post-stroke gait: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb;66(1):101674. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101674. Epub 2022 Nov 30. PubMed 35525427 ↗
  • Fukata K, Amimoto K, Inoue M, Shida K, Kurosawa S, Inoue M, Fujino Y, Makita S, Takahashi H. Effects of performing a lateral-reaching exercise while seated on a tilted surface for severe post-stroke pusher behavior: A case series. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Dec;28(8):606-613. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1861718. Epub 2020 Dec 20. PubMed 33345722 ↗
  • Dieterich M, Brandt T. Wallenberg's syndrome: lateropulsion, cyclorotation, and subjective visual vertical in thirty-six patients. Ann Neurol. 1992 Apr;31(4):399-408. doi: 10.1002/ana.410310409. PubMed 1586141 ↗
  • Danells CJ, Black SE, Gladstone DJ, McIlroy WE. Poststroke "pushing": natural history and relationship to motor and functional recovery. Stroke. 2004 Dec;35(12):2873-8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000147724.83468.18. Epub 2004 Nov 4. PubMed 15528459 ↗
  • Dai S, Piscicelli C, Clarac E, Baciu M, Hommel M, Perennou D. Balance, Lateropulsion, and Gait Disorders in Subacute Stroke. Neurology. 2021 Apr 27;96(17):e2147-e2159. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011152. Epub 2020 Nov 11. PubMed 33177223 ↗
  • Dai S, Lemaire C, Piscicelli C, Perennou D. Lateropulsion Prevalence After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Neurology. 2022 Apr 12;98(15):e1574-e1584. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200010. Epub 2022 Feb 21. PubMed 35190465 ↗
  • Calabro RS, Sorrentino G, Cassio A, Mazzoli D, Andrenelli E, Bizzarini E, Campanini I, Carmignano SM, Cerulli S, Chisari C, Colombo V, Dalise S, Fundaro C, Gazzotti V, Mazzoleni D, Mazzucchelli M, Melegari C, Merlo A, Stampacchia G, Boldrini P, Mazzoleni S, Posteraro F, Benanti P, Castelli E, Draicchio F, Falabella V, Galeri S, Gimigliano F, Grigioni M, Mazzon S, Molteni F, Morone G, Petrarca M, Picelli A, Senatore M, Turchetti G, Bonaiuti D; Italian Consensus Conference on Robotics in Neurorehabilitation (CICERONE). Robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation following stroke: a systematic review of current guidelines and practical clinical recommendations. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Jun;57(3):460-471. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06887-8. Epub 2021 May 5. PubMed 33947828 ↗
  • Brandt T, Dieterich M, Danek A. Vestibular cortex lesions affect the perception of verticality. Ann Neurol. 1994 Apr;35(4):403-12. doi: 10.1002/ana.410350406. PubMed 8154866 ↗
  • Bergmann J, Krewer C, Jahn K, Muller F. Robot-assisted gait training to reduce pusher behavior: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2018 Oct 2;91(14):e1319-e1327. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006276. Epub 2018 Aug 31. PubMed 30171076 ↗
  • Barra J, Marquer A, Joassin R, Reymond C, Metge L, Chauvineau V, Perennou D. Humans use internal models to construct and update a sense of verticality. Brain. 2010 Dec;133(Pt 12):3552-63. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq311. Epub 2010 Nov 19. PubMed 21097492 ↗
  • Baier B, Suchan J, Karnath HO, Dieterich M. Neural correlates of disturbed perception of verticality. Neurology. 2012 Mar 6;78(10):728-35. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318248e544. Epub 2012 Feb 22. PubMed 22357719 ↗
  • Baggio JA, Mazin SS, Alessio-Alves FF, Barros CG, Carneiro AA, Leite JP, Pontes-Neto OM, Santos-Pontelli TE. Verticality Perceptions Associate with Postural Control and Functionality in Stroke Patients. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 8;11(3):e0150754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150754. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26954679 ↗
  • Babyar SR, Peterson MG, Reding M. Time to recovery from lateropulsion dependent on key stroke deficits: a retrospective analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(3):207-13. doi: 10.1177/1545968314541330. Epub 2014 Jul 8. PubMed 25009223 ↗
  • An CM, Ko MH, Kim DH, Kim GW. Effect of postural training using a whole-body tilt apparatus in subacute stroke patients with lateropulsion: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Mar;64(2):101393. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 Oct 14. PubMed 32450273 ↗
  • Abe H, Kondo T, Oouchida Y, Suzukamo Y, Fujiwara S, Izumi S. Prevalence and length of recovery of pusher syndrome based on cerebral hemispheric lesion side in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 2012 Jun;43(6):1654-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.638379. Epub 2012 Mar 1. PubMed 22382159 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized data that support the findings of this study will be available from the principal investigator (Pr Dominic Pérennou), upon reasonable request, only for authorized research. Their use is subjected to an agreement with the promotor (CHU Grenoble) and the principal investigator of the EXOLAT study

Supporting information: Clinical study report

Time frame: After seminal publication of the results

Access criteria: Anonymized data that support the findings of this study will be available from the principal investigator (Pr Dominic Pérennou), upon reasonable request, only for authorized research. Their use is subjected to an agreement with the promotor (CHU Grenoble) and the principal investigator of the EXOLAT study

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 10 months after the start.

Of 572 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ischemic Stroke, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 653 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 22, 2025
First posted
Jun 17, 2025
StartActual
Nov 18, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2026
Last update
Sep 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07023770
Collaborators
Fondation pour la recherche sur les AVC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 17, 2025
Start date
Nov 18, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Study contacts

Dominic Pérennou, MD, PhD, Pr
Contact
dperennou@chu-grenoble.fr
+334 76 76 60 83
Eugénie Lhommée, MPsych
Contact
elhommee@chu-grenoble.fr
+334 76 76 60 60
Dominic Pérennou, MD, PhD, Pr
principal investigator · University Hospital, Grenoble

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion