CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07830004LUSPAMARKUpdated Sep 21, 2026

Plasmatic Biomarkers Associated With Short-term Luspatercept Treatment of Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Luspatercept in Myelodysplasia, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our project aims to identify metabolites and biomarkers associated with luspatercept-related asthenia in a prospective French study of low-risk MDS patients treated per EMA guidelines.

This is a prospective cohort of patients with MDS treated with luspatercept. The main comparisons will consist in exploring differences in biomarkers plasma levels between patients experiencing fatigue after luspatercept initiation, vs those who do not.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myelodysplasia

Keywords

  • fatigue evaluation under LUSPATERCEPT
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Signed Written Informed Consent
  2. Participants must be ≥ 18 years of age
  3. Type of Participant and Target Disease Characteristics:

    Participant had documented diagnosis of MDS according to World Health Organization (WHO 2022) classification

  4. IPSS-R : very low, low, or intermediate-risk disease
  5. Less than 5% blasts (\< 5%) (in bone marrow and \< 1% PB blasts)
  6. Performance status: Eastern (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2
  7. Anemic patients with Hb ≤10g/dL
  8. First line therapy by luspatercept for lower risk MDS RS+ and MDS-RS- patients
  9. Or Second line therapy by luspatercept for MDS-RS+ refractory or intolerant to prior ESA treatment, as defined by any one of the following:

    • Refractory to prior ESA treatment: documentation of nonresponse or response that was no longer maintained to prior ESA-containing regimen, either as a single agent or in combination (eg, with G-CSF).
    • Intolerant to prior ESA treatment: Documentation of discontinuation of prior ESA-containing regimen, either as a single agent or in combination (eg, with G-CSF), at any time after introduction due to intolerance or an AE
  10. Patient or his entourage having a smartphone to load the application for Fidelio ( the chatbot)
  11. Affiliated to SS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion critéria:

  1. Higher risk MDS, del 5q syndrome, MDS-RS-T, MD- CMML
  2. Participant which has known clinically significant anaemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, iron deficiency anaemia or autoimmune haemolytic anaemia
  3. Prior allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant
  4. Use of any of the following within 2-weeks prior to treatment:

    Anticancer cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent or treatment Any investigational agents within 30 days

  5. Pregnancy
  6. Psychiatric contraindications
  7. Protected people according to articles L1121-5 à L1121-8 of CSP
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    LUSPATERCEPT

    Drug: Luspatercept

Interventions

  • DrugLuspatercept

    The main comparisons will consist in exploring differences in biomarkers plasma levels between patients experiencing fatigue after luspatercept initiation, vs those who do not.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. metabolites and biomarkers associated with luspatercept-related asthenia

    Plasma biomarkers, including metabolites (energy metabolism, amino acids, lipid mediators), cortisol, iron-metabolism markers, serotonin, inflammatory cytokines, and selected exosomes derived microRNAs, will be explored, and associated with asthenia evaluated using CTCAE v 6.0. and PROs within the first 6 months of treatment with luspatercept. Fatigue will be graded as follows: * Grade 1: fatigue relieved by rest, * Grade 2: fatigue not relieved by rest, limiting instrumental ADL (activities of daily living) * Grade 3: fatigue not relieved by rest, limiting self-care ADL

    Time frame: 6 months of treatement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evolution of fatigue between luspatercept initiation and up to 6 months

    Fatigue will be assessed over time through different ways: (i) EORTC QLQ C30 , assessed at baseline, Week6, Week12, Week18, Week24 (ii) pro-CTCAE (fatigue) , assessed weekly (iii) FACIT-F , assessed at baseline, Week6, Week12, Week18, Week24 (iv) AI-assisted evaluation of fatigue (Fidelio - chatbot): Fidelio will estimate the CTCAE grading, as well as the main treatment-related adverse events and their impact on daily life, as reported by patients. This will be collected continuously according to patient use of the chatbot, and reports will be produced on a weekly basis to the coordinator (v) CTCAE fatigue grading, assessed at baseline, Week6, Week12, Week18, Week24.

    Time frame: baseline, Week6, Week12, Week18, Week24

  2. Metabolites and plasma biomarkers associated with response to luspatercept

    Metabolites and plasma biomarkers will be the same as already described for the primary objective from V0 to V 4 (Week0, Week6, Week12, Week24 except Month 4.5). The response to luspatercept will be measured using IWG 2018 criteria

    Time frame: V0 to V 4 (Week0, Week6, Week12, Week24 except Month 4.5)

  3. CTCAE fatigue grading

    CTCAE fatigue grading will be made by the investigator at baseline, Week6, Week12, Week18, Week24 and estimated by the chatbot Fidelio on a continuous basis (with weekly reports until 24 weeks). Investigators will be blinded to chatbot reports in order to limit bias in the estimation of agreement.

    Time frame: baseline, Week6, Week12, Week18, Week24 and weekly by chatbot up to 24 weeks

  4. Satisfaction questionnaire about the chatbot

    Adherence to the chatbot will be evaluated each week as (i) presence/absence of a discussion during the week, and (ii) time spent discussing with the chatbot. (iii) A satisfaction questionnaire of the chatbot will be proposed at the end of the trial on a scale from 0 to 10 (and several qualitative questions yes/no).

    Time frame: Weekly and at the end of the trial up to 24 weeks

  5. AE and grading according to CTCAE

    Patient reported AE and grading according to CTCAE will be collected at each 6 weeks visits

    Time frame: baseline, Week6, Week12, Week18, Week24

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Mathieu M, Friedrich C, Ducrot N, Zannoni J, Sylvie T, Jerraya N, Rousseaux S, Chuffart F, Kosmider O, Karim Z, Park S. Luspatercept (RAP-536) modulates oxidative stress without affecting mutation burden in myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol. 2022 Dec;101(12):2633-2643. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-04993-7. Epub 2022 Oct 5. PubMed 36195681 ↗
  • Meunier M, Guttin A, Ancelet S, Laurin D, Zannoni J, Lefebvre C, Tondeur S, Persoons V, Pezet M, Pernet-Gallay K, Chuffart F, Rousseaux S, Testard Q, Thevenon J, Jouzier C, Deleuze JF, Laulagnier K, Sadoul R, Chatellard C, Hainaut P, Polack B, Cahn JY, Issartel JP, Park S. Extracellular vesicles from myelodysplastic mesenchymal stromal cells induce DNA damage and mutagenesis of hematopoietic stem cells through miRNA transfer. Leukemia. 2020 Aug;34(8):2249-2253. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0738-8. Epub 2020 Feb 12. No abstract available. PubMed 32051530 ↗
  • Jouzier C, Cherait A, Cony-Makhoul P, Hamel JF, Veloso M, Thepot S, Cluzeau T, Stamatoullas A, Garnier A, Guerci-Bresler A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Pica GM, Cheze S, Santana C, Chermat F, Fenaux P, Park S. Red blood cell transfusion burden in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with ring Sideroblasts (RS): A retrospective multicenter study by the Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies (GFM). Transfusion. 2022 May;62(5):961-973. doi: 10.1111/trf.16884. Epub 2022 Apr 22. PubMed 35452143 ↗
  • Raskovalova T, Jacob MC, Park S. Myelodysplastic Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 24;383(26):2590. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2032391. No abstract available. PubMed 33369362 ↗
  • Kaphan E, Laurin D, Lafeuillade B, Drillat P, Park S. Impact of transfusion on survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Current knowledge, new insights and transfusion clinical practice. Blood Rev. 2020 May;41:100649. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.100649. Epub 2019 Dec 18. PubMed 31918886 ↗
  • Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Mufti GJ, Garcia-Manero G, Buckstein R, Santini V, Diez-Campelo M, Finelli C, Cazzola M, Ilhan O, Sekeres MA, Falantes JF, Arrizabalaga B, Salvi F, Giai V, Vyas P, Bowen D, Selleslag D, DeZern AE, Jurcic JG, Germing U, Gotze KS, Quesnel B, Beyne-Rauzy O, Cluzeau T, Voso MT, Mazure D, Vellenga E, Greenberg PL, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Zeidan AM, Ades L, Verma A, Savona MR, Laadem A, Benzohra A, Zhang J, Rampersad A, Dunshee DR, Linde PG, Sherman ML, Komrokji RS, List AF. Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 9;382(2):140-151. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908892. PubMed 31914241 ↗
  • Park S, Kosmider O, Maloisel F, Drenou B, Chapuis N, Lefebvre T, Karim Z, Puy H, Alary AS, Ducamp S, Verdier F, Bouilloux C, Rousseau A, Jacob MC, Debliquis A, Charpentier A, Gyan E, Anglaret B, Leyronnas C, Corm S, Slama B, Cheze S, Laribi K, Ame S, Rose C, Lachenal F, Toma A, Pica GM, Carre M, Garban F, Mariette C, Cahn JY, Meunier M, Herault O, Fenaux P, Wagner-Ballon O, Bardet V, Dreyfus F, Fontenay M. Dyserythropoiesis evaluated by the RED score and hepcidin:ferritin ratio predicts response to erythropoietin in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. 2019 Mar;104(3):497-504. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.203158. Epub 2018 Oct 4. PubMed 30287621 ↗
  • Della Porta MG, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Zeidan AM, Komrokji RS, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong IS, Lin CC, Li J, Zhang J, Pilot R, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman KL, Rose S, Prebet T, Lai Y, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Fenaux P, Platzbecker U. Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Sep;11(9):e646-e658. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00203-5. Epub 2024 Jul 19. PubMed 39038479 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07830004
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Sophie Park, Pr
Contact
Spark@chu-grenoble.fr
0033476765697

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion