ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07353762CMI-RiskCADUpdated Jan 20, 2026

Coronary Imaging and Metabolic Indicators-Based Risk Prediction Model for Coronary Artery Disease(CMI-RiskCAD)

An observational study in Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (E.G., Angina, Myocardial Infarction, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (ASHD)), sponsored by Beijing Anzhen Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-20.

Sponsored by Beijing Anzhen Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
10,960
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary design of this study is an ambispective cohort study. We plan to integrate coronary imaging features (including parameters derived from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography(CCTA) and coronary angiography(CAG)), coronary functional indices (e.g., FFR, QFR), and metabolic biomarkers (e.g., LDL-C, Lp(a), hs-CRP). First, we will develop a multimodal risk prediction model for coronary artery disease using a retrospective cohort; subsequently, we will validate the model in a prospective cohort to assess its performance in discriminating high- versus low-risk individuals and to explore its potential clinical utility for risk stratification and decision-making.

Read the detailed description

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA), currently the preferred non-invasive imaging modality for clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), not only enables intuitive assessment of coronary stenosis severity but also allows quantitative and qualitative analysis of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and phenotype. Quantitative CCTA integrated with artificial intelligence, particularly convolutional neural network algorithms, has achieved rapid and accurate quantitative diagnosis of atherosclerotic plaques. A large body of research has demonstrated that high-risk plaque features identified by CCTA (such as low-attenuation plaques, positive remodeling, spotty calcification, and the napkin-ring sign) are closely associated with the occurrence of acute coronary syndrome and can be used to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). With advancements in image post-processing techniques, CCTA can also compute CT Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR) via dedicated software, enabling non-invasive assessment of whether a lesion causes hemodynamic abnormalities and myocardial ischemia, thereby partially overcoming the limitations of purely anatomical evaluation. Notably, CCTA not only focuses on intravascular and vascular wall changes but also allows quantitative characterization of phenotypic changes in Perivascular Adipose Tissue (PVAT). By calculating the Perivascular Fat Attenuation Index (pFAI), it can reflect alterations in PVAT density and composition, indirectly indicating the inflammatory activity status of the local coronary artery wall, thus providing a novel imaging perspective for understanding CAD from the "inflammation and metabolism" viewpoint. Furthermore, CCTA can characterize the lesion patterns of coronary atherosclerosis based on physiological and geometric distribution characteristics of the vasculature. For instance, the Pullback Pressure Gradient (PPG) derived from CCTA allows comprehensive quantitative assessment of the longitudinal distribution of CAD vasculature, enabling the classification of CAD phenotypes as predominantly focal or diffuse. The CT-FFR gradient, defined as the peak instantaneous CT-FFR gradient per unit length of the vessel, has also been recently confirmed to possess incremental predictive ability for future coronary events, thereby more comprehensively describing coronary atherosclerosis in terms of both "lesion distribution pattern" and "local functional severity".

Coronary Angiography (CAG), the gold standard for diagnosing CAD, has traditionally relied on stenosis severity and SYNTAX score to assess the anatomical complexity of lesions and the difficulty of interventional treatment. However, anatomical information alone remains limited for predicting plaque stability and event risk. In recent years, emerging parameters such as Radial Wall Strain (RWS) extracted from single or multiple angiographic views have provided new tools for identifying high-risk plaques from a vascular mechanics perspective. Studies have shown that RWS can reflect the radial deformation characteristics of the arterial wall during the cardiac cycle and exhibits good correlation with vulnerable plaques and the risk of plaque rupture, holding promise as a supplementary indicator for risk stratification beyond traditional angiographic parameters.

Meanwhile, intravascular imaging techniques such as Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) can visualize plaque composition, burden, and fibrous cap morphology with high resolution, more closely approximating the pathological "vulnerable plaque" phenotype. Coronary functional assessments, such as FFR, Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR), Murray Law-Based QFR (μFR), and Coronary Angiography-derived FFR (caFFR), evaluate from a hemodynamic perspective whether a stenosis causes functional myocardial ischemia. The continuous development of these technologies has addressed the limitation of traditional CAG, which only assesses anatomical stenosis and cannot accurately distinguish between "ischemia-causing" and "non-ischemia-causing" lesions, thereby reducing the risks of overtreatment and missed lesions. Beyond epicardial large vessel disease, Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMVD) is also a significant mechanism underlying clinically common myocardial ischemia. For assessing microcirculatory function, various non-invasive or minimally invasive functional indices have emerged in recent years, such as the Coronary Angiography-derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (caIMR), which comprehensively reflects myocardial ischemic burden from the perspectives of microcirculatory resistance and perfusion efficiency. This provides a novel solution to the clinical conundrum of "presence of ischemia and symptoms without significant angiographic stenosis".

In addition to imaging and functional information, routine clinical metabolic and inflammatory markers also play a crucial role in the development, progression, and prognostic evaluation of CAD. Examples include low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride-glucose index, lipoprotein(a), glycated hemoglobin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, homocysteine, fasting blood glucose, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. These indices reflect the body's overall metabolic status and cardiovascular risk from different dimensions, including lipid metabolism, glycolipid metabolic disorders, chronic inflammation, endothelial function, myocardial stress, and cardiac function. Studies have suggested that the combined application of metabolic and inflammatory markers with coronary imaging features facilitates more refined individualized risk stratification and prognostic prediction.

In summary, the current assessment of CAD is gradually shifting from a single focus on "anatomical stenosis" to a multidimensional comprehensive characterization encompassing "anatomical structure + functional evaluation + plaque phenotype + perivascular environment + systemic metabolic status". However, there remains a lack of systematic research on how to integrate the aforementioned multi-source information (such as CCTA plaque and functional parameters, CAG and intravascular imaging information, microcirculatory function parameters, and clinical metabolic indicators) into a unified risk prediction model, construct the model through retrospective analysis, and subsequently validate its predictive value and clinical feasibility in a prospective cohort. Therefore, this project aims to integrate coronary imaging features (including CCTA and CAG-related parameters), functional indices, and metabolic markers to construct a multimodal CAD risk prediction model. The model will be developed using a retrospective cohort and its performance validated using a prospective cohort, exploring its application value in clinical risk stratification and decision-making.

This study is led by the National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases and invited to be carried out by several Chinese centers including Beijing Anzhen Hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (E.G., Angina, Myocardial Infarction, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (ASHD))

Keywords

  • Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
  • Perivascular Fat Attenuation Index
  • Coronary Angiography-derived FFR
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

4,857 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 890 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10,960 is above the median of 320 across 1,687 observational studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Anzhen Hospital is the lead sponsor of 192 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Suspected CAD patients underwent CCTA

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

(1)Completion of CCTA examination. (2)Age ≥ 18 years. (3)Signed written , and willing and able to comply with baseline assessment and long-term follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) occurring within 72 hours; history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); severe valvular heart disease; dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; congenital heart disease; or heart failure ( functional class III-IV).
  2. Severe hepatic insufficiency ( class C) or renal failure (estimated [eGFR] \< 30 mL/min/1.73m²).
  3. Pregnancy or lactation.
  4. of less than 1 year, or any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, renders the patient unsuitable for participation in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
10,960 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
60 Months
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • retrospective cohort

    patients with suspected CAD who underwent CCTA between 2020 and 2025

  • prospective cohort

    patients with suspected CAD who underwent CCTA between 2026 and 2030

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)

    including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure.

    Time frame: At 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after discharge

  2. Frequency of occurrence of high-risk plaques

    Frequency (%) of occurrence of high-risk plaque morphologic features (ow-attenuation plaques, positive remodeling, spotty calcification, and the napkin-ring sign, minimal lumen area\[MLA\]\<4mm2)

    Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention

  3. CT Fractional Flow Reserve gradient

    The CT-FFR gradient is defined as the peak instantaneous CT-FFR gradient per unit vessel length, serving as an indicator of local lesion severity. The calculation of the CT-FFR gradient was performed only for lesions with diameter stenosis \> 30%.

    Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention

  4. Perivascular Fat Attenuation Index

    The Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) was defined as the mean attenuation of perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT). The density range of adipose tissue included in the analysis was restricted to -190 HU to -30 HU, and the FAI surrounding the target vessel was automatically calculated by the software.

    Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention

  5. PPG derived by follow up CCTA

    pullback pressure gradient (PPG) derived by follow up CCTA, the values derived from CT-FFR were calculated using the formula

    Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention

  6. SYNTAX score

    In patients undergoing coronary angiography, each lesion (diameter stenosis ≥ 50%) within the coronary artery tree was quantified based on the angiographic findings

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention

  7. Coronary Angiography-derived FFR and Coronary Angiography-derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance

    In patients undergoing coronary angiography, clear angiographic images of the left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and right coronary arteries (RCA) were acquired from at least two different projections, ensuring no overlap or foreshortening. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and hemodynamic calculations were performed using dedicated software (AccuIMR version 1.0).

    Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention

  8. Radial Wall Strain

    For patients undergoing coronary angiography, image frames corresponding to four key cardiac phases-late systole, early systole, late systole, and mid-diastole-were selected for a specific vessel. After segmentation and registration of the lumen contours

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention

  9. IVUS-related parameters

    Minimal Lumen Area, Minimal Lumen Diameter

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention

  10. OCT-related parameters

    Minimal Lumen Area, Lipid Core Burden Index, Fibrous Cap Thickness

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nurmohamed NS, Min JK, Anthopolos R, Reynolds HR, Earls JP, Crabtree T, Mancini GBJ, Leipsic J, Budoff MJ, Hague CJ, O'Brien SM, Stone GW, Berger JS, Donnino R, Sidhu MS, Newman JD, Boden WE, Chaitman BR, Stone PH, Bangalore S, Spertus JA, Mark DB, Shaw LJ, Hochman JS, Maron DJ. Atherosclerosis quantification and cardiovascular risk: the ISCHEMIA trial. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3735-3747. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae471. PubMed 39101625 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Due to patient privacy and ethical restrictions.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07353762
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 20, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2035 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 20, 2026

Study contacts

Chenchen Tu
Contact
tcc2033@mail.ccmu.edu.cn
+8615201648899

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion