A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Dual-site repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the supplementary motor area and cerebellum and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham in Essential Tremor, sponsored by São Paulo State University. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-21.
Sponsored by São Paulo State University · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
Essential tremor is a common movement disorder that causes involuntary shaking, mainly during voluntary actions such as writing or holding objects. Recent research suggests that essential tremor is not caused by a single brain area, but by abnormal activity within a network that includes the cerebellum and motor areas of the brain. However, most non-invasive brain stimulation studies to date have targeted only one brain region and have shown inconsistent clinical benefits.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effects of a dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol targeting the supplementary motor area (SMA) and the cerebellum in patients with essential tremor that does not respond adequately to standard medications. The study is based on previous pilot data showing meaningful tremor reduction using combined stimulation of these two brain regions.
Participants will receive five sessions of rTMS, consisting of low-frequency stimulation over the SMA followed by high-frequency stimulation over the cerebellum. The main hypothesis is that this combined approach will lead to an immediate and sustained improvement in action tremor of the dominant upper limb, measured up to four weeks after treatment. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, safety, side effects, and changes in brain excitability associated with tremor improvement.
This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase II clinical trial designed to investigate the effects of dual-site repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with medication-refractory essential tremor. The trial is conducted at the University of São Paulo.
Participants are randomized to receive either active or sham stimulation over five consecutive daily sessions. The active intervention consists of sequential stimulation of two interconnected nodes of the tremor network. Low-frequency rTMS (1 Hz, 110% of resting motor threshold) is first applied over the supplementary motor area in 24 trains with 3-second inter-train intervals, followed by high-frequency stimulation of the cerebellar cortex (10 Hz, 90% of resting motor threshold) delivered in 12 trains with 3-second inter-train intervals. The protocol is designed to modulate cortical motor drive and cerebellar output within the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit.
The stimulation parameters and dual-site approach were selected based on neurophysiological and neuroimaging evidence supporting a network-based model of essential tremor, as well as on pilot data demonstrating clinically meaningful tremor reduction following combined stimulation of the supplementary motor area and cerebellum.
Participants are evaluated at baseline, immediately after completion of the stimulation protocol, and during follow-up to assess clinical effects, safety, and neurophysiological changes associated with the intervention. This study aims to further characterize the therapeutic potential of network-targeted rTMS in essential tremor and to inform future neuromodulation strategies in this population.
272 studies on the registry are indexed under Essential Tremor; 75 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 36 is above the median of 25 across 189 interventional studies indexed under Essential Tremor.
Browse Essential Tremor studies →São Paulo State University is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Relapsed and refractory
Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Line of therapy
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Sham stimulation over SMA and cerebellum using inactive coil with sound simulation for 5 days.
Device: Dual-site repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the supplementary motor area and cerebellum
The sham intervention replicates the anatomical targeting, sequence, session duration, and acoustic characteristics of the active dual-site rTMS protocol without delivering an effective magnetic field. An inactive coil is positioned over the same supplementary motor area and cerebellar targets, while sound simulation is used to mimic active stimulation, ensuring maintenance of blinding and comparability with the active intervention.
Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham
This intervention consists of a sequential dual-site repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol targeting two interconnected nodes of the tremor network. Low-frequency stimulation (1 Hz) is first applied over the supplementary motor area at 110% of the resting motor threshold to modulate cortical motor drive, followed by high-frequency stimulation (10 Hz) over the cerebellar cortex at 90% of the resting motor threshold to modulate abnormal cerebellar output. Stimulation is delivered over five consecutive daily sessions using standardized anatomical localization and identical session duration across participants. Sham Intervention The sham intervention replicates the anatomical targeting, sequence, session duration, and acoustic characteristics of the active dual-site rTMS protocol without delivering an effective magnetic field. An inactive coil is positioned over the same supplementary motor area and cerebellar cortex
The sham intervention replicates the anatomical targeting, sequence, session duration, and acoustic characteristics of the active dual-site rTMS protocol without delivering an effective magnetic field. An inactive coil is positioned over the same supplementary motor area and cerebellar targets, while sound simulation is used to mimic active stimulation, ensuring maintenance of blinding and comparability with the active intervention.
Also known as: Sham
Change in Action Tremor Severity of the Dominant Upper Limb
Assessed using items 5 and 6 of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale, evaluated by a blinded examiner.
Time frame: baseline (pre-stimulation), at the end of the stimulation protocol, 4 weeks after the last session
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, following publication. Data sharing will be subject to approval by the institutional ethics committee and execution of a data use agreement, in accordance with applicable data protection regulations.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code
Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 2 years after the publication of results
Access criteria: Requests for access to de-identified individual participant data will be considered for scientifically sound research purposes that are consistent with the objectives of the original study. Proposed analyses must not conflict with participant consent or institutional ethical approvals. Requests should include a brief research proposal outlining the study objectives, planned analyses, and statistical methods. All requests will be reviewed by the study investigators and, when required, by the institutional ethics committee. Data sharing will be contingent upon approval of the proposed analyses and execution of a data use agreement in accordance with institutional policies and applicable data protection regulations. Approved data will be shared in a de-identified format through secure data transfer methods.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 9 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
São Paulo State University